be!!) then you can use bin/solr -h my-host-name and that'll be used in
place of the IP.
Upayavira
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015, at 05:45 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Glad you found a solution
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 3:21 AM, Savvas Andreas Moysidis
savvas.andreas.moysi
? (adminUIcloudtreelive_nodes. The
addresses of my nodes are things like 192.168.1.201:8983_solr. I'm
wondering if you're taking your node names from the information ZK
records or assuming it's 127.0.0.1
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Savvas Andreas Moysidis
savvas.andreas.moysi
returned.
Best,
Erick
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Savvas Andreas Moysidis
savvas.andreas.moysi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello There,
I am trying to use the createNodeSet parameter when creating a new
collection but I'm getting an error when doing so.
More specifically, I have four Solr
Hello There,
I am trying to use the createNodeSet parameter when creating a new
collection but I'm getting an error when doing so.
More specifically, I have four Solr instances running locally in separate
JVMs (127.0.0.1:8983, 127.0.0.1:8984, 127.0.0.1:8985, 127.0.0.1:8986) and a
standalone
Hello,
You can add this request parameter in the defaults section of your
request handler named /select in solrconfig.xml like this:
lst name=defaults
str name=hltrue/str
/lst
and as long as you use this request handler you
Hi,
If you are using the dismax/edismax query parser you can maybe give
query slops a try?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#How_can_I_search_for_one_term_near_another_term_.28say.2C_.22batman.22_and_.22movie.22.29
On 16 September 2012 10:23, Omnia Zayed omnia.za...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In your field declaration you can specify a default value of
something your field will be populated with in absence of any value
and later at search time run filter queries against that value.
Bare in mind that if you want to filter your results based on any
value you *have* to index that
So, as you say, you only need to have a hasInternalURL (or something
similar) which will be of type boolean and will be populated at index
time?
Unless I'm missing something I don't see why you would need a custom
analyzer for this.
On 9 September 2012 22:56, simple350 aurel...@yahoo.com wrote:
Could you not apply this logic in your solr client prior to displaying
the results?
On 23 August 2012 20:56, François Schiettecatte
fschietteca...@gmail.com wrote:
I would create two indices, one with your content and one with your ads. This
approach would allow you to precisely control how
Hello,
Make sure your unique id has a type which always yields one token
after tokenisation is applied (e.g. either string or a type which
only defines the KeywordTokenizer in its chain)
Regards,
Savvas
On 5 July 2012 11:02, Sohail Aboobaker sabooba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We have defined a
can you post the schema you are applying pls?
On 5 July 2012 11:28, Sohail Aboobaker sabooba...@gmail.com wrote:
Another observation is that when we query an individual schemaid, it
returns only one row using the search interface. Why would frequency be
more than 1?
Hello,
Driven by the same requirements we also implemented the same polling
mechanism (in java) and found it a bit awkward and error prone having
to search through the returned response for occurrences of the terms
failure or Rollback etc.
It would be *really* handy if the status command returned
Hello,
I'm trying to find out why my Function Query isn't getting picked up by the
Standard Parser.
More specifically I send the following set of http params (I'm using the
_val_ syntax):
.
lst name=params
str name=_val_creationDate^0.01/str
str
://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax#Differences_From_Lucene_Query_Parser
Erik
On Jun 2, 2011, at 07:46 , Savvas-Andreas Moysidis wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to find out why my Function Query isn't getting picked up by
the
Standard Parser.
More specifically I send the following
Hello,
Does anyone know if there is a v 3.1 book coming any time soon?
Regards,
Savvas
great, thanks!
So, I guess the Solr In Action and Solr Cookbook will be based on 3.1..
:)
2011/5/19 Rafał Kuć ra...@alud.com.pl
Hello!
Take a look at the Solr resources page on the wiki
(http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrResources).
--
Regards,
Rafał Kuć
Hello,
We have configured solr for delta processing through DIH and we kick off the
index request from within a batch process.
However, we somehow need to know whether our indexing request succeeded or
not because we want to be able to rollback a db transaction if that step
fails.
By looking at
=on to your query to see what each
field
contributes to the score, that'll help with understanding the scoring,
although it's
a little hard to read...
Best
Erick
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Savvas-Andreas Moysidis
savvas.andreas.moysi...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
Currently
I assume you are using the Standard Handler?
In that case wouldn't something like:
q=common_names:(man's friend)q.op=AND work?
On 29 March 2011 21:57, Brian Lamb brian.l...@journalexperts.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have a field set up like this:
field name=common_names multiValued=true type=text
my bad..just realised your problem.. :D
On 29 March 2011 22:07, Savvas-Andreas Moysidis
savvas.andreas.moysi...@googlemail.com wrote:
I assume you are using the Standard Handler?
In that case wouldn't something like:
q=common_names:(man's friend)q.op=AND work?
On 29 March 2011 21:57, Brian
Hello,
Currently in our index we have multiple fields and a copyfield / catch_all
field. When users select all search options we specify the catch_all field
as the field to search on. This has worked very well for our needs but a
question was recently raised within our team regarding the
Hello,
The Dismax search handler doesn't have the concept of a logical operator in
terms of OR-AND but rather uses a feature called Min-Should-Match (or mm).
This parameter specifies the absolute number or percentage of the entered
terms that you need them to match. To have an OR-like effect you
Hello,
This thread might help:
http://search-lucene.com/m/09PHV1E0ZxQ1/Possibilities+of+near+real+time+search+with+solr/v=threaded
On 21 March 2011 09:33, Prav Buz buz.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering what are the best way to do this for this scenario:
Index will have about 250 -
Hi Sai,
You can find your index files at:
{%TOMCAT_HOME}\solr\data\index
If you want to clear the index just delete the whole index directory.
Regards,
- Savvas
On 2 March 2011 14:09, Thumuluri, Sai sai.thumul...@verizonwireless.comwrote:
Good Morning,
We have deployed Solr 1.4.1 under
Hi Rajini,
We use the following script ran from within {TOMCAT_HOME}\bin directory to
create service instances (assuming you are targeting Windows Server
environments..):
cd C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\{TOMCAT_HOME}\bin
set CATALINA_BASE=C:\Program Files\Apache Software
..--DisplayName doesn't *have* to be {TOMCAT_HOME} of course..just a copy
paste artifact.. :D
On 28 February 2011 12:21, Savvas-Andreas Moysidis
savvas.andreas.moysi...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Rajini,
We use the following script ran from within {TOMCAT_HOME}\bin directory to
create service
Hello,
Regarding HTTP specific characters(like spaces and ) , you'll need to
URL-encode those if you are firing queries directly to Solr but you don't
need to do so if you are using a Solr client such as SolrJ.
Regards,
- Savvas
On 26 February 2011 03:11, cyang2010 ysxsu...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello,
you could try wrapping your fq terms in double quotes as in:
?q=homefq=category:Appartement Sale
On 23 February 2011 13:25, Rosa (Anuncios) rosaemailanunc...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to reduce results from facets. (by category with my schema)
My category field is String
Hi Eric,
could you please let us know where can we find more info about this notation
( fq={!field f=category})? What is it called, how to use it etc? Is there a
wiki page?
Thanks,
- Savvas
On 23 February 2011 14:17, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote:
Try -
fq={!field
Nice! will definitely give it a try! :)
On 23 February 2011 22:55, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
Cool!
On 2/23/11, Tomás Fernández Löbbe tomasflo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All, I'm happy to announce a new release of SolrMeter, an open source
stress test tool for Solr.
You can
Hi Hoss,
Ok, that makes much more sense now. I was under the impression that values
were copied as well which seemed a bit odd..
unless you have to deal with a use case similar to yours. :)
Cheers,
- Savvas
On 9 February 2011 02:25, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: In my
understand Solr commit, they are serialized by design. And
committing too often could lead you to trouble if you have many warm-up
queries (?).
Hope this helps,
Pierre
-Message d'origine-
De : Savvas-Andreas Moysidis [mailto:
savvas.andreas.moysi...@googlemail.com]
Envoyé
creates the index, then warms it, then makes it available for
regular queries.
If you are creating indexes frequently, don't bother warming.
wunder
==
Walter Underwood
Lead Engineer, MarkLogic
On Feb 9, 2011, at 8:03 AM, Savvas-Andreas Moysidis wrote:
Hello,
Thanks very much for your
Thanks very much Em.
- Savvas
On 9 February 2011 16:22, Savvas-Andreas Moysidis
savvas.andreas.moysi...@googlemail.com wrote:
Yes, we'll probably go towards that path as our index files are relatively
small, so auto warming might not be extremely useful in our case..
Yep, we do realise
Hello,
I am going through the wiki page related to cache configuration
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCaching and I have a question regarding the
general cache architecture and implementation:
In my understanding, the Current Index Searcher uses a cache instance and
when a New Index
Hi Tavi,
In my understanding the scoring formula Lucene (and therefore Solr) uses is
based on a mathematical model which is proven to work for general purpose
full text searching.
The real challenge, as you mention, comes when you need to achieve high
quality scoring based on the domain you are
could you post the query you are submitting to Solr?
On 3 February 2011 09:33, Isan Fulia isan.fu...@germinait.com wrote:
Hi all,
Even after making facet.mincount=1 , it is showing the results with count =
0.
Does anyone know why this is happening.
--
Thanks Regards,
Isan Fulia.
:00.000Zfacet.date.gap=%2B1HOURfacet.mincount=1
On 3 February 2011 15:14, Savvas-Andreas Moysidis
savvas.andreas.moysi...@googlemail.com wrote:
could you post the query you are submitting to Solr?
On 3 February 2011 09:33, Isan Fulia isan.fu...@germinait.com
wrote:
Hi all
danbsut...@gmail.com wrote:
facet.mincount is grouped only under field faceting parameters not
date faceting parameters
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Savvas-Andreas Moysidis
savvas.andreas.moysi...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Dan,
I'm probably just not able to spot this, but where does
Hello,
Are you definitely positive your database isn't updated after you index your
data? Are you querying against the same field(s) specifying the same
criteria both in Solr and in the database?
Any chance you might be pointing to a dev/test instance of Solr ?
Regards,
- Savvas
On 3 February
indexing if this is the case. No connection errors in the logs.
-Original Message-
From: Savvas-Andreas Moysidis
[mailto:savvas.andreas.moysi...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 4:26 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Index Not Matching
Hello,
Are you
and compared it to the one in our stage environment.
What is really weird is that I grabbed one of the product ID that are
not showing up in SOLR from the DB, search through the SOLR GUI and it
found it.
-Original Message-
From: Savvas-Andreas Moysidis
[mailto:savvas.andreas.moysi
Hi Mark,
When I indexed *George *it was also finally analyzed and stored as *george*
Theny why is it that I don't get a match as per the analysis report I had
your indexed term is george but you search for George* which does not go
through the same analysis process as it did when it was indexed.
Hi David,
maybe the wiki page on caching could be helpful:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCaching#newSearcher_and_firstSearcher_Event_Listeners
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCaching#newSearcher_and_firstSearcher_Event_Listeners
Regards,
- Savvas
On 14 January 2011 00:08, David Cramer
good point! that's an enhancement we would definitely welcome as well.
currently, we too have to remote desktop to the Sol machine and search
through the logs..
Any thoughts?
Cheers,
-- Savvas
On 11 January 2011 19:59, roz dev rozde...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All
We are using SolrJ client (v
Hi Adam,
we are using DIH to index off an SQL Server database(the freeby SQLExpress
one.. ;) ). We have defined the following in our
%TOMCAT_HOME%\solr\conf\data-config.xml:
dataConfig
dataSource type=JdbcDataSource
name=mssqlDatasource
It might not be practical in your case, but is it possible to get from that
other system, a list of ids the user is *not* allow to see and somehow
invert the logic in the filter?
Regards,
-- Savvas.
On 15 December 2010 14:49, Michael Owen michaelowe...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm
Hello,
shouldn't that query syntax be *:* ?
Regards,
-- Savvas.
On 6 December 2010 16:10, Solr User solr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
First off thanks to the group for guiding me to move from default search
handler to dismax.
I have a question related to getting all the search results. In the
ahhh, right..in dismax, you pre-define the fields that will be searched upon
is that right? is it also true that the query is parsed and all special
characters escaped?
On 6 December 2010 16:25, Peter Karich peat...@yahoo.de wrote:
for dismax just pass an empty query all q= or none at all
Hello,
would something similar along those lines:
(field1:term AND field2:term AND field3:term)^2 OR (field1:term AND
field2:term)^0.8 OR (field2:term AND field3:term)^0.5
work? You'll probably need to experiment with the boost values to get the
desired result.
Another option could be
Hi,
If you are able to do a full re-index then you could index the full names
and not the codes. When you later facet on the Country field you'll get the
actual name rather than the code.
If you are not able to re-index then probably this conversion could be added
at your application layer prior
hi,
I might not understand your case right but can you not add an extra
publishedDate field and then specify a secondary (after relevance) sort by
that?
On 30 November 2010 08:05, jan.kure...@nokia.com wrote:
You could also put a short representation of the data (I suggest days since
it it to do a dual-sort.
I like the idea of using one of the dismax parameters (bf) to in-effect
increase the boost on a newer document.
Thanks for all replies, most useful.
-Original Message-
From: Savvas-Andreas Moysidis [mailto:
savvas.andreas.moysi...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tue 30
Hello,
We think we've come across a bug in solrj?
The following is a toString() dump of a QueryResponse object we are getting:
{responseHeader={status=0,QTime=0,params={sort=creationDate
asc,start=30,q=songTitle:(mad dog) AND creationDate:[123750720 TO
Sounds like a good plan. I'd probably also set multiple cores for each
website. This could give you more accurate results scoring.
Good question about the required configuration option.. any input?
Although on the other hand, this is a rule which seems to better fit in your
application's
Hi,
Could you elaborate a bit more on how you access Solr? are you making direct
Solr calls or is the communication directed through an application layer?
On 22 November 2010 11:05, Jos Janssen j...@websdesign.nl wrote:
Hi,
We are currently investigating how to setup a correct solr server
maybe this older thread on Modeling Access Control might help:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Modelling-Access-Control-td1756817.html#a1761482
Regards,
-- Savvas
On 22 November 2010 18:53, Jos Janssen j...@websdesign.nl wrote:
Hi,
We plan to make an application layer in PHP which will
yes, a synonyms filter should allow you to achieve what you want.
On 15 November 2010 03:14, sivaprasad sivaprasa...@echidnainc.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a requirement where a user enters acronym of a word, then the search
results should come for the expandable word.Let us say. If the user
have you tried using a TokenFilter which removes accents both at indexing
and searching time? If you index terms without accents and search the same
way you should be able to find all documents as you require.
On 10 November 2010 20:08, Claudio Devecchi cdevec...@gmail.com wrote:
Tomas,
Let
have you tried using a TokenFilter which removes accents both at
indexing and searching time? If you index terms without accents and
search the same
way you should be able to find all documents as you require.
On 10 November 2010 20:25, Tomas Fernandez Lobbe
tomasflo...@yahoo.com.arwrote:
It
One place to start would be the Analysis page http://{your
machine}:{port}/solr/admin/analysis.jsp?highlight=on
There you can see exactly what happens to your query as it being moved down
the Analysis chain.
In my knowledge, no analysis is performed on wildcarded terms so my guess
would be that
strange..my second guess would be that stemming could be the reason but if
your analyser(s) emit the same values you use for searching that's odd..
could you post your schema definition for the surname field?
On 5 November 2010 17:33, C0re blue-...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Hi Savvas,
Thanks for
One way to view how your Tokenizers/Filters chain transforms your input
terms, is to use the analysis page of the Solr admin web application. This
is very handy when troubleshooting issues related to how terms are indexed.
On 31 October 2010 17:13, PeterKerk vettepa...@hotmail.com wrote:
I
...
HTH
Erick
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Savvas-Andreas Moysidis
savvas.andreas.moysi...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
We currently index our data through a SQL-DIH setup but due to our model
(and therefore sql query) becoming complex we need to index our data
programmatically
I think string10 is before string2 in lexicographic order?
On 29 October 2010 09:18, RL rl.subscri...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a quick question about natural sorting of strings.
I've a simple dynamic field in my schema:
fieldType name=string class=solr.StrField sortMissingLast=true
In our case, we just store a database id and do a secondary db query when
displaying the results.
This is handy and leads to a more centralised architecture when you need to
display properties of a domain object which you don't index/search.
On 28 October 2010 05:02, kenf_nc
If I get your question right, you probably want to use the AND binary
operator as in samsung AND andriod AND GPS or +samsung +andriod +GPS
On 26 October 2010 14:07, Varun Gupta varun.vgu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have lot of small documents (each containing 1 to 15 words) indexed in
Solr.
Pushing ACL logic outside Solr sounds like a prudent choice indeed as in, my
opinion, all of the business rules/conceptual logic should reside only
within the code boundaries. This way your domain will be easier to model and
your code to read, understand and maintain.
More information on Filter
strange..are you absolutely sure the two queries are directed to the same
Solr instance? I'm running the same query from the admin page (which
specifies the xml format) and I get the exact same results as solrj.
On 21 October 2010 22:25, Mike Sokolov soko...@ifactory.com wrote:
quick follow-up:
You'll have to supply your dates in a format Solr expects (e.g.
2010-10-19T08:29:43Z
and not 2010-10-19). If you don't need millisecond granularity you can use
the DateMath syntax to specify that.
Please, also check http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax.
On 17 October 2010 10:54, nedaha
ok, maybe don't get this right..
are you trying to match something like check-in date 2010-10-19T00:00:00Z
AND check-out date 2010-10-21T00:00:00Z *or* check-in date =
2010-10-19T00:00:00Z
AND check-out date = 2010-10-21T00:00:00Z?
On 18 October 2010 10:05, nedaha neda...@gmail.com wrote:
ok, I see now..well, the only query that comes to mind is something like:
check-in date:[2010-10-19T00:00:00Z TO *] AND check-out date:[* TO
2010-10-21T00:00:00Z]
would something like that work?
On 18 October 2010 11:04, nedaha neda...@gmail.com wrote:
The exact query that i want is:
looks like you are not tokenizing your field properly. What does your
schema.xml look like?
On 14 October 2010 13:01, Allistair Crossley a...@roxxor.co.uk wrote:
actuall no you don't .. if you want hi in a sentence of hi there this is me
this is just normal tokenizing and should work .. check
verbatim from schema.xml:
!-- The StrField type is not analyzed, but indexed/stored verbatim.
- StrField and TextField support an optional compressThreshold which
limits compression (if enabled in the derived fields) to values which
exceed a certain size (in characters).
I think this should work..It might also be a good idea to investigate how
exactly each filter in the chain modifies your original text..this way you
will be able to better understand why certain queries match certain
documents.
On 14 October 2010 14:18, PeterKerk vettepa...@hotmail.com wrote:
yep, the Solr Admin web-app provides functionality that does exactly
that..it can reached@ http://
{serverName}:{serverPort}/solr/admin/analysis.jsp
On 14 October 2010 14:28, PeterKerk vettepa...@hotmail.com wrote:
It DOES work :)
Oh and on the filtersis there some sort of debug/overview
correct, it show the transformations that happen to your indexed term (or
query term if you use the *Field value (query)* box ) after each
Tokenizer/Filter is executed.
On 14 October 2010 14:40, PeterKerk vettepa...@hotmail.com wrote:
Awesome again!
And for my understanding, I type a single
If I understand your problem right what you probably need is to escape those
characters: http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_9_1/queryparsersyntax.html#Escaping
Special Characters
On 14 October 2010 14:36, Igor Chudov ichu...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's say that I submit a query for a MoreLikeThis
Hi,
yes, Solr does support fuzzy queries by using the Levenstein Distance
algorithm: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damerau%E2%80%93Levenshtein_distance
You can specify a fuzzy query by adding a tilde (~) symbol at the end of
your query as in title: Solr~
You can even specify a proximity threshold
Hello,
What does your schema look like? Have you defined a catch all field and
copy every value from all your other fields in it with a copyField /
directive?
Cheers,
-- Savvas
On 8 October 2010 08:30, Subhash Bhushan subhash.bhus...@stratalabs.inwrote:
Hi,
I have two fields in the bean
Hello,
Try searching for name_de:(das urteil). A search for name_de:das urteil will
search for das in *name_de* and for urteil in the default field (e.g.
catch all field).
Hope that helps,
-- Savvas
On 8 October 2010 09:00, Thomas Kellerer spam_ea...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
I have the following
Hello,
It seems that your analysis process removes punctuation and therefore
indexes terms without it. What you see in the faceted result is the text
that has been indexed.
If you select a Tokenizer/Token Filter which preserves punctuation you
should be able to see what you want.
Cheers,
--
the facet list based on the
unanalyzed counterparts.
-Original message-
From: Savvas-Andreas Moysidis savvas.andreas.moysi...@googlemail.com
Sent: Wed 06-10-2010 00:46
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org;
Subject: Re: Umlaut in facet name attribute
Hello,
It seems that your analysis
83 matches
Mail list logo
