Hi Neil,
Although you haven't mentioned it, just wanted to confirm - do you have
soft commits enabled?
Also what's the version of solr you are using for the solr cloud setup?
4.0.0 had lots of memory and zk related issues. What's the warmup time for
your caches? Have you tried disabling the cache
it-vs-soft-commit-tp4083817.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
--
Shreejay Nair
Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse brevity and typos.
in the next few weeks. .
There are plenty of other such log analysis tools. It all depends on your
particular use case.
--Shreejay
On Sunday, August 11, 2013, adfel70 wrote:
> Hi
> I'm looking at a tool that could help me perform solr logging analysis.
> I use SolrCloud on mult
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: [schema.xml] Duplicate field
definition for 'id'
You might have defined an id field in the schema file. The out of box schema
file already contains an id field .
--
Shreejay
On Thursday, June 20, 2013 at 9:16, Abhishek Bansal wrote:
> Hel
Hi,
Have you tried this?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.onlyMorePopular
Of course this is assuming that your corpus has correct words occurring more
frequently than incorrect ones!
--
Shreejay
On Friday, June 14, 2013 at 2:49, venkatesham.gu...@igate.com
.
--
Shreejay
On Friday, June 14, 2013 at 5:11, Markus.Mirsberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed (after long time testing and finally looking into the
> docu :p) that the ngroups parameter does not show the correct number of
> groups when used in anything else than a single shard
apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceFactors#Optimization_Considerations
--
Shreejay
On Sunday, June 2, 2013 at 7:16, Yoni Amir wrote:
> Hello,
> I am receiving OutOfMemoryError during indexing, and after investigating the
> heap dump, I am still missing some information, and I thou
Didn't notice the original message. Sorry about that.
--
Shreejay
On Friday, May 31, 2013 at 5:55, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> Please do not respond to hijacked message threads, other than to encourage
> the sender to start a new message thread.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
&
Are the fields you are trying to highlight "stored"?
If yes then can you show the exact query you are using? Which version of solr?
And which highlighter? ( you can paste the relevant highlight section from solr
config file)
--
Shreejay
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 at 22
This might help
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LukeRequestHandler
--
Shreejay Nair
Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse brevity and typos.
On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 13:47, gpssolr2020 wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We can use lukeall4.0 for reading Solr3.x index . Like that d
geeky2 wrote
> you mean i would add this switch to my script that kicks of the
> dataimport?
>
> exmaple:
>
>
> OUTPUT=$(curl -v
> http://${SERVER}.intra.searshc.com:${PORT}/solrpartscat/${CORE}/dataimport
> -F command=full-import -F clean=${CLEAN} -F commit=${COMMIT} -F
> optimize=${OPTIMIZE} -
your indexing is
over then you can specify openSearcher=false while doing a commit. That should
speed up your indexing a lot.
--
Shreejay Nair
Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse brevity and typos.
On Monday, May 20, 2013 at 7:16, geeky2 wrote:
> hello,
>
> we are tracking
You can disable polling so that the slave never polls the Master(In Solr
4.3 you can disable it from the Admin interface). . And you can trigger a
replication using the HTTP API
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#HTTP_API or again, use the
Admin interface to trigger a manual replication.
Hello Wiki Admins,
Request you to please add me to the ContributorsGroup.
I have been using Solr for a few years now and I would like to contribute
back by adding more information to the wiki Pages.
Wiki User Name : Shreejay
--Shreejay
We ended up using a Solr 4.0 (now 4.2) without the cloud option. And it seems
to be holding good.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Frequent-OOM-Unknown-source-in-logs-tp4029361p4061945.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
code.
--Shreejay
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Frequent-OOM-Unknown-source-in-logs-tp4029361p4029657.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Otis,
Following is the setup:
6 Solr individual servers (VMs) running on Jetty.
3 Shards. Each shard with a leader and replica.
*Solr Version *: /Solr 4.0 (with a patch from Solr-2592)./
*OS*: /CentOS release 5.8 (Final)/
*Java*:
/java version "1.6.0_32"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (bui
Hello,
I am seeing frequent OOMs for the past 2 days on a SolrCloud Cluster
(Solr4.0 with a patch from Solr-2592) setup (3 shards, each shard with 2
instances. Each instance is running CentOS with 30GB memory, 500GB disk
space), with a separate Zoo Keeper ensemble of 3.
Here is the stacktrace:
t have such extended periods of outage.
We are looking forward to 4.1 and will start using it as soon as its
released.
--Shreejay
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Data-from-deleted-from-Solr-Solr-cloud-tp4028055p4029212.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing l
se a new searcher is
created in the log files. I am not sure why it is being called? Does
solrCloud ignore openSearcher=false?
--Shreejay
shreejay wrote
> Hi Mark,
>
> That was a typo in my post. I am using openSearcher only. But still see
> the same log files.
>
> /updat
Hi Mark,
That was a typo in my post. I am using openSearcher only. But still see the
same log files.
/update/?commit=true&openSearcher=false
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Commit-and-OpenSearcher-not-working-as-expected-tp4027419p4027451.html
Sent from
n of
documents right now, and am not using search at all. Also read in the Wiki,
that keeping openSearcher=false is recommended for solrcloud.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrConfigXml#Update_Handler_Section
Is there some place else where openSearcher has to be set while calling a
commit?
--Shre
\core\src\java\org\apache\lucene\codecs" and compiling it suffice ?
--
Shreejay
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/A-SPI-class-of-type-org-apache-lucene-codecs-Codec-with-name-Lucene41-does-not-exist-tp4026118.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks Marcus. I will apply the patch to the 4x branch I have, and report
back.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-OOM-heap-space-tp4025821p4025858.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks Markus. Is this issue only on 4.x and 5.x branches? I am currently
running a v recent build of 4.x branch with an applied patch.
I just want to make sure that this is not an issue with 4.0. In which case I
can think of applying my patch to 4.0 instead of 4x or 5x.
--Shreejay
start.jar"
If anyone has faced similar issues please let me know.
--Shreejay
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-OOM-heap-space-tp4025821.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
and re-indexing data so
that all documents with same group field are on the same server, has anyone
else tried or used any alternate methods?
I wanted to see if there would be any other options before re-indexing.
Thanks.
--Shreejay
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472
Hi All,
Is the server hosting nightly builds of Solr down?
https://builds.apache.org/job/Solr-Artifacts-4.x/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/solr/package/
If anyone knows an alternate link to download the nightly build please let
me know.
--Shreejay
--
View this message in context:
http
r1 - Memory - 22 GB, JVM - 10 GB
Server2 - Memory - 22 GB, JVM - 8 GB
While typing his post I did a "Reload" from the Core Admin page, and both
servers (Shard1-Server2 and Shard2-Server1)came back up again.
Has anyone else encountered these issues? Any steps to prevent these?
Thanks
Thanks Mark. I meant ConcurrentMergeScheduler and ramBufferSizeMB (not
maxBuffer). These are my settings for Merge.
/
960
40
/
--Shreejay
Mark Miller-3 wrote
> On Nov 9, 2012, at 1:20 PM, shreejay <
> shreejayn@
> > wrote:
>
>> Instead of doing
Merge settings by
keeping a maxBuffer = 960, a merge Factor = 40 and ConcurrentMergePolicy.
I am also going to check the option so I can see how the
indexing is going on.
Thanks for your inputs.
--Shreejay
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr4-0
issue this time due to the memory
changes. I will post more info once I am done.
Thanks once again.
--Shreejay
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr4-0-SolrCloud-queries-tp4016825p4018176.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
be having this issue either.
--Shreejay
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr4-0-SolrCloud-queries-tp4016825.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
the Solr Server. Can I specify these queries
in NewSearcher and FirstSearcher also? Or are the queries supposed to be
simple queries?
Thanks.
--Shreejay
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/NewSearcher-old-cache-tp4013225.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
34 matches
Mail list logo