Thank you for the clarification.
We really need scoring with solr joins, but as you can see I'm not a
specialist in solr development.
We would like to hire somebody with more experience to write a qparser
plugin for scoring in joins and donate the source code to the community.
Any suggestion
Hello Mikhail,
thx for the clarification. I'm a little bit confused by the answer of
Alvaro, but my own tests didn't result in a proper score, so I think
you're right and it's still not implemented.
What do you mean with the "impedance between Lucene and Solr"?
Why isn't the possibility of
Hello,
referencing to this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4307
Is it still not possible with the solr query time join to use scoring?
Do I still have to write my own plugin or is there a plugin somewhere
I could use?
I never wrote a plugin for solr before, so I would prefe
like this "title^40.0 subtitle^40.0 original_title^10.0
keywords^5.0" and my query like this:
test _query_:"{!join from=doc_id to=id}{!dismax qf='content
content_de content_en content_fr content_it content_es' v='test'}"^5
If I use the mm attribute fo
title^10.0
keywords^5.0" and my query like this:
test _query_:"{!join from=doc_id to=id}{!dismax qf='content content_de
content_en content_fr content_it content_es' v='test'}"^5
If I use the mm attribute for example with sth like this "2<-25%" I
g
But isn't query time join much slower when it comes to a large amount
of documents?
Zitat von Mikhail Khludnev :
Hello,
It sounds like you need to switch to query time join.
15.02.2014 21:57 пользователь написал:
Any suggestions?
Zitat von m...@preselect-media.com:
Yonik Seeley :
O
Any suggestions?
Zitat von m...@preselect-media.com:
Yonik Seeley :
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:25 AM, wrote:
Is there any workaround to perform atomic updates on blocks or do I have to
re-index the parent document and all its children always again if I want to
update a field?
The latter,
Yonik Seeley :
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:25 AM, wrote:
Is there any workaround to perform atomic updates on blocks or do I have to
re-index the parent document and all its children always again if I want to
update a field?
The latter, unfortunately.
Is there any plan to change this behavio
Hello,
I'm using block join to store nested documents with a huge number of children.
I want to update some fields in the parent document using atomic
updates, because I don't want to re-index all the child documents again.
So, as far as I understood atomic updates, solr is reindexing the
w
Hi,
In my schema, I have Tags, AdTags and am giving the search like. ?q=(Tags:
anton* and AdTags: Funn*)
my schema query parser is :
So Is it required to give the 'and' in the query?? Is yes is there any
difference b/w giving 'AND' & 'and' (case sensitive), Please let me know.
When am giving
Hi,
1)
Can i give by default defaultSearchField with multiple field values as
like
text, Tag, Category
Or should i use
Thanks,
Kalidoss.m,
that you only wish
> to read the image details
> --Noble
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Kalidoss MM
> wrote:
> > Even in my case, we cant make it flattern, Bcoz we are managing total
> image
> > gallery information in Solr, So image gallery contains aroung 20
Even in my case, we cant make it flattern, Bcoz we are managing total image
gallery information in Solr, So image gallery contains aroung 20 images also
with image descrption, thumbnail info, width, height, etc also we want to
store/update the stats along with image gallery,
If we flatten the xml,
Hi,
I think i can use http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MergingSolrIndexes - to
index two different solr index directory??
Thanks,
kalidoss.m,
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <
noble.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Kalidoss MM
> w
Hi,
I want to store normalized data into Solr, example am spliting
personal information datas(fname, lname, mname) as one solr record, Address
(personal, office) as another record in Solr. the id is different
123212_name, 123212_add,
Now, some case i require both personal and
Hi,
I have a requirement like, There is a running solr and having around
10K records indexed in it. Now i have to index another set of 30K records?
The 10K data already in live, And i dont have an option to insert
that 30K records in live,
Is there any way to run the solr in
Hi,
We use Solr1.3 and indexed some of our date fields in the format
'1995-12-31T23:59:59Z' and as we know this is a UTC date. But we do want to
index the date in IST which is +05:30hours so that extra conversion from
UTC to IST across all our application is avoided. How to do that?
And we have
Any update on this?? Please let me know?
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Kalidoss MM wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are trying to implement an auto-suggest feature in our application that
> uses Solr as the core engine for search.
>
> The XML is structured as follows:
>
>
Hi,
We are trying to implement an auto-suggest feature in our application that
uses Solr as the core engine for search.
The XML is structured as follows:
QLrKnirLDEo9DThnL2h
Description
Cat1
Cat2
Kalidoss
Kaling
Soundoss
We transform the same in solr understandable fo
, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
> On Jan 5, 2009, at 7:33 AM, Kalidoss MM wrote:
>
>> We have created a Java EmbeddedSolrServer Client Code, I can able to
>> add, delete, update the Solr content - At the same time i cant able to
>> search the updated conente from the Run
Hi,
We have created a Java EmbeddedSolrServer Client Code, I can able to
add, delete, update the Solr content - At the same time i cant able to
search the updated conente from the Running Solr client(jetty) web
interface.
My requirement is, All search need to happen from/by running web
S
21 matches
Mail list logo
