Collection Creation across DC

2021-02-10 Thread Revas
Hello, Can we create a collection across data Center ( shard replica is in a different data center) for HA ? Thanks Revas

Re: when to use docvalue

2020-05-20 Thread Revas
Thanks, Erick. Its just when we enable both index=true and docValues=true, it increases the index time by 2x atleast for full re-index. On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:30 PM Erick Erickson wrote: > Revas: > > Facet queries are just queries that are constrained by the total result >

Re: when to use docvalue

2020-05-20 Thread Revas
Erick, Can you also explain how to optimize facet query and range facets as they dont use docValues and contribute to higher response time? On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 5:55 PM Erick Erickson wrote: > They are _absolutely_ able to be used together. Background: > > “In the bad old days”, there was no

Re: facets & docValues

2020-05-05 Thread Revas
re spaced far enough apart that the warming completes before a new > searcher starts warming. > > > Joel Bernstein > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ > > > On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 10:27 AM Revas wrote: > > > Hi Erick, Thanks for the explanation and advise. With face

Re: facets & docValues

2020-05-04 Thread Revas
t get adequate response time even under fairly light query loads > as a general rule. > > Best, > Erick > > > On Apr 16, 2020, at 12:08 PM, Revas wrote: > > > > Hi Erick, You are correct, we have only about 1.8M documents so far and > > turning on the inde

Re: facets & docValues

2020-04-16 Thread Revas
t I think that’s the root issue here. > > Best, > Erick > > > On Apr 14, 2020, at 11:51 PM, Revas wrote: > > > > We have faceting fields that have been defined as indexed=false, > > stored=false and docValues=true > > > > However we use a lot of subfa

facets & docValues

2020-04-14 Thread Revas
We have faceting fields that have been defined as indexed=false, stored=false and docValues=true However we use a lot of subfacets using json facets and facet ranges using facet.queries. We see that after every soft-commit our performance worsens and performs ideal between commits how is that

searcher

2020-03-31 Thread Revas
Hi I am seeing from my logs searcher referenced as main and realtime .Do they correspond to hard vs sofCommit. I do not see the co-relation to that based on our commit settings. Opening [Searcher@538abc62[xx_shard1_replica2] main] Opening [Searcher@2e151991[ xx _shard1_replica1] realtime]

Re: DocValue field & commit

2020-03-31 Thread Revas
r-powered > machine. The hard commit will trigger segment merging, which is CPU and > I/O intensive. If > you’re using a machine that can’t afford the cycles to be taken up by > merging, that could account > for what you see, but new searchers are being opened every 2 seconds >

Re: DocValue field & commit

2020-03-30 Thread Revas
towarming. That should smooth out > the delay your user’s experience when commits happen. > > Best, > Erick > > > On Mar 30, 2020, at 4:06 PM, Revas wrote: > > > > Thanks, Eric. > > > > 1) We are using dynamic string field for faceting where indexing

Re: DocValue field & commit

2020-03-30 Thread Revas
secs. On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 4:06 PM Revas wrote: > Thanks, Eric. > > 1) We are using dynamic string field for faceting where indexing =false > and stored=false . By default docValues are enabled for primitive fields > (solr 6.6.), so not explicitly defined in schema. Do you

Re: DocValue field & commit

2020-03-30 Thread Revas
ouble check <1> first. > > Best, > Erick > > > On Mar 30, 2020, at 12:20 PM, sujatha arun wrote: > > > > A facet heavy query which uses docValue fields for faceting returns > about > > 5k results executes between 10ms to 5 secs and the 5 secs time seems to > > coincide with after a hard commit. > > > > Does that have any relation? Why the fluctuation in execution time? > > > > Thanks, > > Revas > >

Re: Overlapping onDeckSearchers=2

2010-05-04 Thread revas
Thanks for the repsonse .What happens in this scenario? Does the commit happen in this case or does the search server hang or just throws an error without committing Regards Sujatha On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote: : When i run 2 -3 commits

Migration to Solr 1.4

2010-01-08 Thread revas
Hello, I would like to know if by just copying the solr.war file to my existing solr 1.3 installation ,lucene version is also upgraded to current 2.9 ? I believe reindex is not necessary ,is that correct? Is there anything else apart form this that i need to do to upgrade to the latest

Re: Migration to Solr 1.4

2010-01-08 Thread revas
Thanks ,Erik. On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 8, 2010, at 4:14 AM, revas wrote: I would like to know if by just copying the solr.war file to my existing solr 1.3 installation ,lucene version is also upgraded to current 2.9 ? Yes

Help on this parsed query

2009-11-25 Thread revas
*/str * * str name=*querystring**simple:peRsonal*/str * * str name=*parsedquery**MultiPhraseQuery(simple:(person pe) rsonal)*/str * * str name=*parsedquery_toString**simple:(person pe) rsonal*/str what is this multiphrase query ,why is this a phrase query istead of simple query? Regards Revas

field type definition

2009-11-20 Thread revas
and the index analyzer and I am assuming that this will be used by both query and index analyzer .Is this correct? Regards Revas

solr Analyzer help

2009-07-09 Thread revas
the above for German language analysis am i to use the standardard anlyzer with German filter factory and German stemmers ? are there more language specific tokenizers in lucene and if so what are the steps to integrate into solr? Regards Revas

Re: Customizing results

2009-06-10 Thread revas
Hi Michael, What is GNU gettext and how this can be used in a multilanguage scenario? Regards Revas On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Michael Ludwig m...@as-guides.com wrote: Manepalli, Kalyan schrieb: Hi, I am trying to customize the response that I receive from Solr. In the index I have

Re: spellcheck /too many open files

2009-06-09 Thread revas
:15 AM, revasHi revas...@gmail.com wrote: 1)Does the spell check component support all languages? SpellCheckComponent relies on Lucene/Solr analyzers and tokenizers. So if you can find an analyzer/tokenizer for your language, spell checker can work. 2) I have a scnenario where i have

Re: spellcheck /too many open files

2009-06-09 Thread revas
PM, revas revas...@gmail.com wrote: But the spell check componenet uses the n-gram analyzer and henc should work for any language ,is this correct ,also we can refer an extern dictionary for suggestions ,could this be in any language? Yes it does use n-grams but there's an analysis step

Re: query issue /special character and case

2009-06-08 Thread revas
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 9:48 AM, revas revas...@gmail.com wrote: Hi , When i give a query like the following ,why does it become a phrase query as shown below? The field type is the default text

spellcheck /too many open files

2009-06-08 Thread revas
,will the open files be closed automatically or would i have to reindex to close the open files or how do i close the already opened files.This is on linux with solr 1.3 and tomcat 5.5 Regards Revas

query issue /special character and case

2009-05-29 Thread revas
translate php fucntion) ,but again not in windows OS. Any pointers Regards Revas

Solr Cache Usage

2009-05-19 Thread revas
Regards Revas

Compund file format

2009-05-19 Thread revas
What is the draw back in using compunf file format for indexing when we have several webapps in a sinle container Regards Sujatha

Multi-language support

2009-04-09 Thread revas
the above languages .Will search be same across all the above cases? thanks revas

Analyzers and stemmer

2009-04-09 Thread revas
Hi , With respect to language support in solr ,we have analyzers for some languages and stemmers for certain langauges.Do we say that solr supports this particular language only if we have both analyzer and stemmer for the language or also for which we have analyzer but not stemmer Regards

Facets drill down

2009-04-02 Thread revas
Hi, I typically issue a facetdrill down query thus q=somequery and Facetfield:facetval . Is there any issues with the above approach as opposed to fq=facetfield:value in terms of memory consumption and the use of cache. Regards Suajatha

caching

2009-03-24 Thread revas
If i don't explicity set any default query in the solrconfig.xml for caching and make use of the default config file,does solr do the caching automatically based on the query? Thanks

Re: stop word search

2009-03-21 Thread revas
PM, revas revas...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Erik, I have now commented the query time stopword analyzer .I restarted the server.But now when i search for a stop word ,i am getting results. We had earlier indexed the content with the stop word analyzer.I dont think we need to reindex

Re: stop word search

2009-03-20 Thread revas
AM, revas revas...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have a query like this content:the AND iuser_id:5 which means return all docs of user id 5 which have the word the in content .Since 'the' is a stop word ,this query executes as just user_id :5 inspite of the AND clause ,Whereas

stop word search

2009-03-17 Thread revas
Hi, I have a query like this content:the AND iuser_id:5 which means return all docs of user id 5 which have the word the in content .Since 'the' is a stop word ,this query executes as just user_id :5 inspite of the AND clause ,Whereas the expected result here is since there is no result for

Sharding question

2009-03-16 Thread revas
Hi, If i were to add a second server for sharding once ,the first server reaches its limit and then if i need to update any document,how can i figure out on which server the document is located? Regards Sujatha

Re: Solr and Zend Lucene

2009-03-06 Thread revas
The luke request handler returns all the tokens from the index ,is this correct? On 3/5/09, revas revas...@gmail.com wrote: We will be using sqllite for db.This can be used for a cd version where we need to provide search On 3/5/09, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: On Mar 5

Luke request handler

2009-03-06 Thread revas
Hi, I just want to confirm my understanding of luke request handler. It gives us the raw lucene index tokens on a field by field basis. What should be the query to return all tokens for a field . Is there any way to return all the token across all fields Regards Revas

Solr and Zend Lucene

2009-03-05 Thread revas
Zend lucene is not able to open the solr index files ,the error being unsupported format. The final option is to reindex using zend lucene and read the index tokens ,but then facets are not supported by zend-lucene Any body done something similar,please give your thoughts or pointers Regards Revas

change the lucene version

2009-03-05 Thread revas
Hi, If i need to change the lucene version of solr ,then how can we do this? Regards Revas

Re: Number of webapps

2009-03-05 Thread revas
25, 2009 at 11:42 AM, revas revas...@gmail.com wrote: thanks will try that .I also have the war file for each solr instance in the home directory of the instance ,would that be the problem ? if i were to have common war file for n instances ,would there be any issue? regards

Re: Solr and Zend Lucene

2009-03-05 Thread revas
We will be using sqllite for db.This can be used for a cd version where we need to provide search On 3/5/09, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: On Mar 5, 2009, at 3:10 AM, revas wrote: Hi, I have a requirement where i need to search offline.We are thinking of doing

Number of webapps

2009-02-25 Thread revas
Hi I am sure this question has been repeated many times over and there has been several generic answers ,but i am looking for specific answers. I have a single server whose configuration i give below,this being the only server we have at present ,the requirement is everytime we create a new

Re: Number of webapps

2009-02-25 Thread revas
thanks will try that .I also have the war file for each solr instance in the home directory of the instance ,would that be the problem ? if i were to have common war file for n instances ,would there be any issue? regards revas On 2/25/09, Michael Della Bitta mdellabi...@gmail.com wrote: It's