yntax, including updates and deletes. These changes are
commited using the commitWithin configuration every 30 seconds.
Now I want to use AtomicUpdates on MultiValue'd fields, so I post the
"add" commands for these fields only. Sometimes I have to post multiple
Solr commands affecti
nd adjusting my
commitWithin time down to about 1 second. I'm getting pretty good results
this way. Is there another suggestion about how I might get a single field
with a state out of a doc in NRT without adjusting these fields? I forgot
to mention I'm using 4.10.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019, 8:
On 7/18/2019 9:37 AM, Benjamin Mellish wrote:
I have a solrconfig.xml file as follows:
2000
2
false
${solr.ulog.dir:}
But I also submit records with a 'commitWithin' of 10 seconds. It seems
that my documen
I have a solrconfig.xml file as follows:
2000
2
false
${solr.ulog.dir:}
But I also submit records with a 'commitWithin' of 10 seconds. It seems
that my documents are not searchable with the soft commit every second,
Perfect! Thanks Erick.
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Solr executes the deletes and adds in the order they are received.
> Commitwithin isn't relevant to the execution order.
>
> commitWithin just controls when the accumulated changes are flushed
Solr executes the deletes and adds in the order they are received.
Commitwithin isn't relevant to the execution order.
commitWithin just controls when the accumulated changes are flushed to
a new index segment and is global,
not per request.
Let's say Solr gets a request with commit
Hi,
If I send multiple instructions /update with a bunch of deletes and adds,
all having commitWithin specified, how can I make sure that the
instructions are executed in the same order as I send them in?
For example, if both a delete and an add is sent for the same ID, I want to
be able to
re are any hints as to
> whats going on.
>
> Cheers,
> -Brendan
>
>
>
> On 30 December 2014 at 12:57, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>
>> On 12/29/2014 4:11 PM, Brendan Humphreys wrote:
>> > We've noticed that when we send deletes to our SolrCloud cluster via
>>
n.
Cheers,
-Brendan
On 30 December 2014 at 12:57, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 12/29/2014 4:11 PM, Brendan Humphreys wrote:
> > We've noticed that when we send deletes to our SolrCloud cluster via curl
> > with the param commitWithin=1 specified, the deletes are applied and
On 12/29/2014 4:11 PM, Brendan Humphreys wrote:
> We've noticed that when we send deletes to our SolrCloud cluster via curl
> with the param commitWithin=1 specified, the deletes are applied and
> are visible to the leader node, but aren't replicated to other nodes.
>
I've confirmed this is also happens with deletes via SolrJ with
commitWithin - the document is deleted from the leader but the delete is
not replicated to other nodes. Document updates are replicated fine.
Any help in debugging this behaviour would be much appreciated.
Cheers,
-Brendan
Hi,
We've noticed that when we send deletes to our SolrCloud cluster via curl
with the param commitWithin=1 specified, the deletes are applied and
are visible to the leader node, but aren't replicated to other nodes.
The problem can be worked around by issuing an explicit (har
time could well be more than enough for the short-interval autoCommit or
commitWithin to run in the background and in parallel with the request
return to your app and the submission by your app of the subsequent request.
The magic of asynchronous operation in a parallel and distributed
; According to this wiki:
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/solr/NearRealtimeSearch
>
> the commitWithin is a soft-commit by default. Soft-commits are very
> efficient in terms of making the added documents immediately searchable.
> But! They are not on the disk yet. That means the document
Cross-posting my answer from SO:
According to this wiki:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/NearRealtimeSearch
the commitWithin is a soft-commit by default. Soft-commits are very
efficient in terms of making the added documents immediately searchable.
But! They are not on the disk yet. That means the
making a commit- from a
functional perspective.
Seeing that there is no magic in the world, I am trying to understand what is
the price I am actually paying when using the commitWithin feature, on the one
hand it commits almost immediately, on the other hand, it performs wonderfully.
Where is
Yes, committing after each document will greatly degrade performance. I
typically use autoCommit and autoSoftCommit to set the time interval
between commits, but commitWithin should have a similar effect.. I often
see performance of 2000+ docs per second on the load using auto commits.
When
Doing a standard commit after every document is a Solr anti-pattern.
commitWithin is a “near-realtime” commit in recent versions of Solr and not a
standard commit.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Near+Real+Time+Searching
- Mark
http://about.me/markrmiller
On Feb 12, 2014, at
documents
2. Indexing included - commit after each add. ~8 minutes (!) to post and
index 2000 documents
3. Indexing included - commitWithin 1ms ~55 seconds (!) to post and index
2000 documents
The 3rd result does not make any sense, I would expect the behavior to be
similar to the one in point 2
I have this configuration for test servers (the order of the instance
start leads to this conf.) not for production.
Elodie
On 01/23/2014 04:35 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 12/11/2013 2:41 AM, Elodie Sannier wrote:
collection fr_blue:
- shard1 -> server-01 (replica1), server-01 (replica2)
- shar
On 12/11/2013 2:41 AM, Elodie Sannier wrote:
> collection fr_blue:
> - shard1 -> server-01 (replica1), server-01 (replica2)
> - shard2 -> server-02 (replica1), server-02 (replica2)
>
> collection fr_green:
> - shard1 -> server-01 (replica1), server-01 (replica2)
> - shard2 -> server-02 (replica1),
; - shard2 -> server-02 (replica1), server-02 (replica2)
>
> I add documents using solrj CloudSolrServer and using commitWithin feature
> :
> int commitWithinMs = 3;
> SolrServer server = new CloudSolrServer(zkHost);
> server.add(doc, commitWithinMs);
>
> When I query
server-01 (replica2)
- shard2 -> server-02 (replica1), server-02 (replica2)
I add documents using solrj CloudSolrServer and using commitWithin feature :
int commitWithinMs = 3;
SolrServer server = new CloudSolrServer(zkHost);
server.add(doc, commitWithinMs);
When I query an instance, f
Ya, looks like this is a bug in Datastax Enterprise 3.1.2. I'm using
their enterprise cluster search product which is built on SOLR 4.
:(
On 9/5/13 11:24 AM, "Jack Krupansky" wrote:
>I just tried commitWithin with the standard Solr example in Solr 4.4 and
>it w
;Ryan, Brent" wrote:
> Ya, looks like this is a bug in Datastax Enterprise 3.1.2. I'm using
> their enterprise cluster search product which is built on SOLR 4.
>
> :(
>
>
>
> On 9/5/13 11:24 AM, "Jack Krupansky" wrote:
>
>> I just tried c
I just tried commitWithin with the standard Solr example in Solr 4.4 and it
works fine.
Can you reproduce your problem using the standard Solr example in Solr 4.4?
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Ryan, Brent
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 10:39 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: JSON
I'm prototyping a search product for us and I was trying to use the
"commitWithin" parameter for posting updated JSON documents like so:
curl -v
'http://localhost:8983/solr/proposal.solr/update/json?commitWithin=1'
--data-binary @rfp.json -H 'Content-type:a
; replicas). I indexed the example docs, then queried both shards to
> verify the doc existed on both. Then I deleted the doc through the
> non-leader via:
> curl "http://localhost:7574/solr/update?commitWithin=6"; -H
> 'Content-type:application/json' -d &#x
verify the doc existed on both. Then I deleted the doc through the
non-leader via:
curl "http://localhost:7574/solr/update?commitWithin=6"; -H
'Content-type:application/json' -d '{"delete": { "id":"SOLR1000"}}'
This was to test both t
gt;
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Yonik Seeley
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
>>> I am running off of a snapshot taken 5/3/2012 of solr 4.0 and am
>>> noticing some issues around deleteById when a commitWithin parameter
>>>
; noticing some issues around deleteById when a commitWithin parameter
>> is included using SolrJ
>
> Oh wait... I just realized you were talking about SolrJ specifically -
> so the issue may be there.
>
> -Yonik
> http://lucidimagination.com
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> I am running off of a snapshot taken 5/3/2012 of solr 4.0 and am
> noticing some issues around deleteById when a commitWithin parameter
> is included using SolrJ
Oh wait... I just realized you were talking about SolrJ specifically
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> I am running off of a snapshot taken 5/3/2012 of solr 4.0 and am
> noticing some issues around deleteById when a commitWithin parameter
> is included using SolrJ, specifically commit isn't executed. If I
> later just call c
I am running off of a snapshot taken 5/3/2012 of solr 4.0 and am
noticing some issues around deleteById when a commitWithin parameter
is included using SolrJ, specifically commit isn't executed. If I
later just call commit on the solr instance I see the item is deleted
though. Is anyone awa
Solr version? I think that for a while now, deletes where not triggering
commitWithin. I think this was recently fixed - if I remember right it will be
part of 3.6 and then 4.
- Mark Miller
lucidimagination.com
On Apr 4, 2012, at 10:12 AM, Jens Ellenberg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am
Hello,
I am trying to use commitwithin in Java but there seams to be no commit
at all with this option.
1. Example Code:
UpdateRequest request = new UpdateRequest();
request.deleteByQuery("fild:value");
request.setCommitWithin(1);
System.o
Always best to give the version of Solr you are using out of the gate.
How large is your index?
It may be that sometimes background merges are triggered, and sometimes they
are not.
Also, some bugs around the autocommit code (commitWithin shares a lot of code
with autocommit) have recently
nov. 2011, at 04:40, Vijay Sampath wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using CommitWithin for immediate commit. The response times are
> inconsistent. Sometimes it's less than a second. Sometimes more than 25
> seconds. I'm not sending concurrent requests. Any idea?
>
>
.x
You can download Solr 3.3/3.4.0 with RankingAlgorithm 1.3 from here:
http://solr-ra.tgels.org
Regards,
- Nagendra Nagarajayya
http://solr-ra.tgels.org
http://rankingalgorithm.tgels.org
On 11/2/2011 8:40 PM, Vijay Sampath wrote:
Hi,
I'm using CommitWithin for immediate commit.
Hi,
I'm using CommitWithin for immediate commit. The response times are
inconsistent. Sometimes it's less than a second. Sometimes more than 25
seconds. I'm not sending concurrent requests. Any idea?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommitWithin
Snippet:
UpdateRe
Hi,
I'm confused about using StreamingUpdateSolrServer and commitWithin
parameter in conjuction with waitSearcher and waitFlush.
Does it make sense a request like this?
UpdateRequest updateRequest = new UpdateRequest();
updateRequest.setCommitWithin(12);
updateRequest.setWaitSearcher(
Many customers have asked me how to do this, so it's not easy enough.
Therefore I opened SOLR-2742 to add even more convenience :)
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
On 25. aug. 2011, at 01:38, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
: I ended up doing this with request.process(server) on an UpdateRequest
: class.
right ... if you peek under the covers of SolrServer most of it's
methods are are just convinience methods for constructing a Request,
setting some attributes/streams on it, and then processing it via that
Server
I ended up doing this with request.process(server) on an UpdateRequest
class.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Daniel Skiles
wrote:
> What is the cleanest way to use the commitWithin directive with SolrJ?
> AbstractUpdateRequest has a setCommitWithin() method, but I don't see how to
What is the cleanest way to use the commitWithin directive with SolrJ?
AbstractUpdateRequest has a setCommitWithin() method, but I don't see how to
hook that into SolrServer.add(SolrInputDocument doc).
Do I need to use SolrServer.request(), or do I need to use some other
method?
Thanks.
Any chance of getting the ExtractingRequestHandler to use the commitWithin
parameter?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/ExtractingRequestHandler-commitWithin-tp26478144p26478144.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.
>
> The documentation for the commitWithin leaves some room for interpretation.
> Does setting commitWithin=1000 mean that only this update will be committed
> within 1s, or that all pending documents will be committed within 1s?
The update that contains the commitWithin=1000 will be committ
Our application involves lots of live index updates with mixed priority. A
few updates are very important and need to be in the index promptly, while
we also have a great deal of updates which can be dealt with lazily.
The documentation for the commitWithin leaves some room for interpretation
48 matches
Mail list logo
