On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: #SOLR-433 MultiCore and SpellChecker replication [1]. Based on the
: status of this feature request I'd asume that the normal procedure of
: keeping the spellchecker index up2date would be running a cron job on
Hi,
that there's no feedback indicates that our plans/preferences are
fine. Otherwise it's now a good opportunity to feed back :-)
Cheers,
Martin
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Martin Grotzke
martin.grot...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
we're just planning to move from our replicated single
: #SOLR-433 MultiCore and SpellChecker replication [1]. Based on the
: status of this feature request I'd asume that the normal procedure of
: keeping the spellchecker index up2date would be running a cron job on
: each node/slave that updates the spellchecker.
: Is that right?
i'm not 100%
Hi,
we're just planning to move from our replicated single index setup to
a replicated setup with multiple cores.
We're going to start with 2 cores, but the number of cores may
change/increase over time.
Our replication is still based on scripts/rsync, and I'm wondering if
it's worth moving to
