On 11/12/2010 3:00 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
I have not tried reloading the core instead of restarting Solr, I
should do that.
Just so everyone's aware: Reloading the core is not enough to get
solr.core.name to be updated in the healthcheck filename. Solr must be
restarted.
On 11/12/2010 2:48 PM, sivaram wrote:
That is good if we can restart the solr. But we don't want to restart the
whole solr after every commit because some of the core usually have to
update for comparatively short times. So, we do a core reload to get all the
synonyms and other stuff getting upda
>> Shawn
That is good if we can restart the solr. But we don't want to restart the
whole solr after every commit because some of the core usually have to
update for comparatively short times. So, we do a core reload to get all the
synonyms and other stuff getting updated with out the solr reload.
On 11/7/2010 9:11 AM, Ephraim Ofir wrote:
Do you mean solr.core.name has the wrong value after the swap? You
swapped doc-temp so now it's doc and solr.core.name is still doc-temp?
This completely contradicts my experience, what version of solr are you
using?
Why use postCommit? You're running the
Do you mean solr.core.name has the wrong value after the swap? You
swapped doc-temp so now it's doc and solr.core.name is still doc-temp?
This completely contradicts my experience, what version of solr are you
using?
Why use postCommit? You're running the risk of performing a swap when
you don't
Do you mean solr.core.name has the wrong value after the swap? You
swapped doc-temp so now it's doc and solr.core.name is still doc-temp?
This completely contradicts my experience, what version of solr are you
using?
Why use postCommit? You're running the risk of performing a swap when
you don't me