:06 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cores and and ranking (search quality)
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 14:34 +0100, johnmu...@aol.com wrote:
My question is this: if I put my data in multiple cores and use
distributed search will the ranking be different if I had all my data
Thanks Walter. This explains a lot.
- MJ
-Original Message-
From: Walter Underwood [mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 4:41 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cores and and ranking (search quality)
If the documents are distributed randomly across
On 3/10/2015 11:17 AM, johnmu...@aol.com wrote:
If I have two cores, one core has 10 docs another has 100,000 docs. I then
submit two docs that are 100% identical (with the exception of the unique-ID
fields, which is stored but not indexed) one to each core. The question is,
during
core (the one with 100,000)
docs?
Thanks!
-- MJ
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:47 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cores and and ranking (search quality)
SOLR-1632 will certainly help. But trying
and and ranking (search quality)
On Mar 10, 2015, at 10:17 AM, johnmu...@aol.com wrote:
If I have two cores, one core has 10 docs another has 100,000 docs. I then
submit two docs that are 100% identical (with the exception of the unique-ID
fields, which is stored but not indexed) one to each
. If so,
than maybe this is not a design I can use.
- MJ
-Original Message-
From: Walter Underwood [mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 2:39 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cores and and ranking (search quality)
On Mar 10, 2015, at 10:17
On Mar 10, 2015, at 10:17 AM, johnmu...@aol.com wrote:
If I have two cores, one core has 10 docs another has 100,000 docs. I then
submit two docs that are 100% identical (with the exception of the unique-ID
fields, which is stored but not indexed) one to each core. The question is,
will now be as if I had 1 core?
- MJ
-Original Message-
From: Toke Eskildsen [mailto:t...@statsbiblioteket.dk]
Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2015 9:06 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cores and and ranking (search quality)
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 14:34 +0100, johnmu...@aol.com
-Original Message-
From: Toke Eskildsen [mailto:t...@statsbiblioteket.dk]
Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2015 9:06 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cores and and ranking (search quality)
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 14:34 +0100, johnmu...@aol.com wrote:
My question is this: if I put my data
Hello - facetting will be the same and distributed more like this is also
possible since 5.0, and there is a working patch for 4.10.3. Regular search
will work as well since 5.0 because of distributed IDF, which you need to
enable manually. Behaviour will not be the same if you rely on average
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 14:34 +0100, johnmu...@aol.com wrote:
My question is this: if I put my data in multiple cores and use
distributed search will the ranking be different if I had all my data
in a single core?
Yes, it will be different. The practical impact depends on how
homogeneous your
11 matches
Mail list logo
