Hi,
Im facing the same problem, did anyone find a solution?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/spellcheck-tp506116p2140923.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Can you show us how you configured spell check?
--
Jan Høydahl - search architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 10. feb. 2010, at 11.48, michaelnazaruk wrote:
>
> Hello,all!
> I have some problem with spellcheck! I download,build and connect
> dictionary(~500 000 words)!It work fine! But
Hi,
Did you add spellcheck.extendedResults=true to your query? This will a.o. tell
you if Solr thinks it has been spelled correctly or not. However, if you have
specified spellcheck.onlyMorePopular=true, you may get suggestions even if it
has been spelled correctly.
Don't let the onlyMorePopu
here simple query:
http://estyledesign:8983/request/select?q=popular&spellcheck=true&qt=keyrequest&spellcheck.extendedResults=true
result:
populars! but popular is correct word! Maybe i must change some properties
in solrconfig! Here my configs for keyrequest:
dismax
true
here simple query:
http://estyledesign:8983/request/select?q=popular&spellcheck=true&qt=keyrequest&spellcheck.extendedResults=true
result:
populars! but popular is correct word! Maybe i must change some properties
in solrconfig! Here my configs for keyrequest:
dismax
true
here simple query:
http://estyledesign:8983/request/select?q=popular&spellcheck=true&qt=keyrequest&spellcheck.extendedResults=true
result:
populars! but popular is correct word! Maybe i must change some properties
in solrconfig! Here my configs for keyrequest:
dismax
true
Hi,
Check my earlier reply. You have explicitely set onlyMorePopular to true thus
you will most likely always get suggestion even if the term was spelled
correctly. You'll only get no suggestions if the term is spelled correctly and
it is the most `popular` term.
You can opt for keeping onlyM
I change config, but i get the same result!
dismax
false
false
true
external
query
spellcheck
mlt
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/spellcheck-tp27527425p27550755.html
Sent from the Solr - U
Hi,
I see you use an `external` dictionary. I've no idea what that is and how it
works but it looks like the dictionary believe `populars!` is a term which
obviously is not equal to `popular`. If this is an external index under your
manual control; how about adding `popular` to the dictionary?
I try to config spellcheck, but I still have this problem:
Config:
solr.FileBasedSpellChecker
file
spellings.txt
UTF-8
./spellcheckerFile
false
false
1
true
file
spellcheck
Maybe I have thi
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Danicela nutch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get search suggestions like Google 'Did you mean ?' with
> indexed data with Solr from Nutch.
>
> I added this to my schema.xml :
>
> positionIncrementGap="100" >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> multiValued="true" />
>
I just tried to start the data from scratch, I deleted Nutch segments and
solr/data/index files, but it changed nothing. Maybe I should delete other
elements ?
- Original Message -
From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
Sent: 09/07/11 12:08 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Danicela nutch wrote:
> I just tried to start the data from scratch, I deleted Nutch segments and
> solr/data/index files, but it changed nothing. Maybe I should delete other
> elements ?
[...]
Hi,
Following up from your message on the Nutch list.
If q=*:* is sh
Hi if you have not figyured it out as yet, this might help::
Issues with *schema.xml*
here the type should actually be textSpell (fieldType that you have defined
earlier)
Also I would suggest that you use a seperate RequestHandler for your
queries. You alreasy have spellCheckCompRH defined
yes, how to fix
that ?
- Original Message -
From: tamanjit.bin...@yahoo.co.in
Sent: 09/08/11 08:43 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spellcheck
Hi if you have not figyured it out as yet, this might help:: Issues with
*schema.xml* here the type should actually be textSpell (
yes, how to fix
that ?
- Original Message -
From: tamanjit.bin...@yahoo.co.in
Sent: 09/08/11 08:43 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spellcheck
Hi if you have not figyured it out as yet, this might help:: Issues with
*schema.xml* here the type should actually be textSpell (
In the RequestHandler spellCheckCompRH you have to make changes as follows:
explicit
textSpell
false
true
5
spellcheck
This hopefully should do it.
Also I would suggest that for the time being (i.e. till you ge
to:g...@mimirtech.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:10 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spellcheck
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Danicela nutch wrote:
> I just tried to start the data from scratch, I deleted Nutch segments and
> solr/data/index files, but it chan
Tanner,
Currently Solr will only make suggestions for words that are not in the
dictionary, unless you specifiy "spellcheck.onlyMorePopular=true". However, if
you do that, then it will try to "improve" every word in your query, even the
ones that are spelled correctly (so while it might change
are there any updates on this? any third party apps that can make this work
as expected?
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Dyer, James wrote:
> Tanner,
>
> Currently Solr will only make suggestions for words that are not in the
> dictionary, unless you specifiy "spellcheck.onlyMorePopular=true".
ling_Dictionary
text
./spellchecker
.01
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Tanner Postert [mailto:tanner.post...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 6:04 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spellcheck Phrases
-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Spellcheck Phrases
Tanner,
I just entered SOLR-2571 to fix the float-parsing-bug that breaks
"thresholdTokenFrequency". Its just a 1-line code fix so I also included a
patch that should cleanly apply to solr 3.1. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-25
What's your "textSpell FieldType look like?
Spelling is definitely something that needs tuning, so you might have
to play with some of the knobs like accuracy, etc.
As for JaroWinkler, and I suppose the default, your field is "spell",
but based on your configuration, I gather you really wan
Grant Ingersoll schrieb:
What's your "textSpell FieldType look like?
Spelling is definitely something that needs tuning, so you might have
to play with some of the knobs like accuracy, etc.
As for JaroWinkler, and I suppose the default, your field is "spell",
but based on your configuration,
Can anybody help me with this? :(
-Original Message-
From: Marc Ghorayeb
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 9:46 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Spellcheck help
Hello,I've been trying to get rid of a bug when using the spellcheck but so
far with no success :(When searching for
Spellchecking can also take a dictionary as its database. Is it
possible to create a dictionary of the terms you want suggested?
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 10:40 AM, wrote:
> Can anybody help me with this? :(
>
> -Original Message- From: Marc Ghorayeb
> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 9:46 AM
Norskog
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 1:42 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spellcheck help
Spellchecking can also take a dictionary as its database. Is it
possible to create a dictionary of the terms you want suggested?
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 10:40 AM, wrote:
Can anybody help me with
terms that present this behavior, but it is important for
> me to get rid of this bug. So can i use the dictionnary AND the list built
> by the spellchecker?
>
> -Original Message- From: Lance Norskog
> Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 1:42 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
&
Book Company
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: dekay...@hotmail.com [mailto:dekay...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2010 12:41 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spellcheck help
Can anybody help me with this? :(
-Original Message-
From: Marc Ghorayeb
S
Thanks for the input, i'll check it out!
Marc
> Subject: RE: Spellcheck help
> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:12:04 -0500
> From: james.d...@ingrambook.com
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> In org.apache.solr.spelling.SpellingQueryConverter, find the line (#84):
>
>
yer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Book Company
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Marc Ghorayeb [mailto:dekay...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 8:07 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Spellcheck help
Thanks for the input, i'll check it out!
Marc
> Subject: R
Did you try the setting 'onlyMorePopular' ?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.onlyMorePopular
André Maldonado wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> I'm configuring spell checking in my index. Everything is working, but I
> want to get the best suggestion based in number of ocurrence
Hi Doug,
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Doug Steigerwald
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When spellchecking 'blackberri wi', the collation returned is 'blackberry
> wii'. When spellchecking 'blackberr wi', the collation returned is
> 'blackberrywii'. 'blackber wi' returns 'blackberrwiiwi'.
It lo
I believe I just fixed this on SOLR-606 (thanks to Stefan's patch).
Give it a try and let us know.
-Grant
On Aug 13, 2008, at 2:25 PM, Doug Steigerwald wrote:
I've noticed a few things with the new spellcheck component that
seem a little strange.
Here's my document:
5
wii blackberry
I'd try, but the build is failing from (guessing) Ryan's last commit:
compile:
[mkdir] Created dir: /Users/dsteiger/Desktop/java/solr/build/core
[javac] Compiling 337 source files to /Users/dsteiger/Desktop/
java/solr/build/core
[javac] /Users/dsteiger/Desktop/java/solr/client/java/s
have you updated recently?
isEnabled() was removed last night...
On Aug 14, 2008, at 2:30 PM, Doug Steigerwald wrote:
I'd try, but the build is failing from (guessing) Ryan's last commit:
compile:
[mkdir] Created dir: /Users/dsteiger/Desktop/java/solr/build/core
[javac] Compiling 337 s
Right before I sent the message. Did a 'svn up src/;and clean;ant
dist' and it failed. Seems to work fine now.
On Aug 14, 2008, at 2:38 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
have you updated recently?
isEnabled() was removed last night...
On Aug 14, 2008, at 2:30 PM, Doug Steigerwald wrote:
I'd try
On Sep 25, 2008, at 2:17 PM, Jason Rennie wrote:
I see that there's an option to automatically rebuild the spelling
index on
a commit. That's a nice feature that we'll consider using, but we run
commits every few thousand document updates, which would yield ~100
spelling
index rebuilds a d
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 12:43 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> On Sep 25, 2008, at 2:17 PM, Jason Rennie wrote:
>
> I see that there's an option to automatically rebuild the spelling index
>> on
>> a commit. That's a nice feature that we'll consider using, but we run
>> commits
: postCommit/postOptimize callbacks happen after commit/optimize but before a
: new searcher is opened. Therefore, it is not possible to re-build spellcheck
: index on those events without opening a IndexReader directly on the solr
FWIW: I believe it has to work that way because postCommit events
That seems reasonable.
Another thing to think about, is maybe it is useful to provide some
event metadata to the events that contain information about what
triggered them. Something like a SolrEvent class such that postCommit
looks like
postCommit(SolrEvent evt)
and
public void newSearch
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Chris Hostetter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> couldn't the Listener's newSearcher() method just do something like
> this...
>
> if (rebuildOnlyAfterOptimize &&
>! (newSearcher.getReader().isOptimized() &&
> ! oldSearcher.getReader().isOptimized()) {
> re
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason, can you please open a jira issue to add this feature?
>
Done.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-795
Jason
I've been using spellcheck.count=10 since that seems to yield a much better
top result than using the default count of 1. However, I'm still seeing
weird cases. Here are a few queries with returned suggestions. Frequency
counts are in parenthesis.
- query is "candyz". Suggestions are: 1. "c
On Oct 6, 2008, at 4:08 PM, Jason Rennie wrote:
I've noticed a few issues with spellcheck as I've been testing it
out for
use on our site...
1. Rebuild breaks requests - I'm using rebuildOnCommit ATM. If a
commit
is going on and files are being rebuilt in the spellcheck data dir,
s
On Oct 6, 2008, at 6:10 PM, Jason Rennie wrote:
I've been using spellcheck.count=10 since that seems to yield a much
better
top result than using the default count of 1. However, I'm still
seeing
weird cases. Here are a few queries with returned suggestions.
Frequency
counts are in par
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Is there anyway you can write up a small test case? This definitely sounds
> like a bug.
I tried adding single word documents according to the top ten suggestions
and frequencies for "chanl". I.e. I created a fresh in
Can you share your spellchecker setup and the code for the test case?
I would like to reproduce it and see what's going on.
On Oct 7, 2008, at 2:18 PM, Jason Rennie wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Grant Ingersoll
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
Is there anyway you can write up a small
Sure. I just sent the relevant files/code directly to you. Let me know if
you don't get them or have any trouble with them.
Jason
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you share your spellchecker setup and the code for the test case? I
> would like t
Hi Grant,
Here are solr config files (attached) and java code (included below) to
recreate the test case.
Jason
List> terms = new ArrayList>();
terms.add(new Pair("chanel", 834));
terms.add(new Pair("chant", 10));
terms.add(new Pair("chang", 8));
terms.add
Hi Jason,
Here's what I did:
1. Took your code and modified it to be that of [1] below
2. Set up your config, schema, etc. as per the EmbeddedSolrServer
paths in the code (a Maven like dir structure w/ src/main/resources/
solr/spell containing your configuration.
3. Ran the code. My output
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Token: chane OMP: false
> Oct 8, 2008 1:19:56 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
> INFO: [spell] webapp=null path=/select
> params={q=description%3Achane&spellcheck=true&spellcheck.onlyMorePopular=false&spellcheck.e
On Oct 8, 2008, at 2:03 PM, Jason Rennie wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Grant Ingersoll
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Token: chane OMP: false
Oct 8, 2008 1:19:56 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
INFO: [spell] webapp=null path=/select
params={q=description
%3Achane
&spellcheck
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> chane is in the dictionary. For better or worse, Lucene skips words that
> are in the dictionary when OMP is false.
Ah, I see. I think we'll use OMP=true, which seems like a reasonable
setting anyway.
> Makes sense
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Jason Rennie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just tried J-W and *yes* it seems to do a much better job! I'd certainly
> vote for that becoming the default :)
>
Ack! I did some more testing and J-W results started to get weird
(including suggesting "courses" for "c
On Oct 8, 2008, at 6:20 PM, Jason Rennie wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Jason Rennie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I just tried J-W and *yes* it seems to do a much better job! I'd
certainly
vote for that becoming the default :)
Ack! I did some more testing and J-W results starte
Ah, now I see. Results are always sorted first by the edit distance, then
by the popularity. What I think would work even better than allowing a
custom compareTo function would be to incorporate the frequency directly
into the distance function. This would allow for greater control over the
trad
ectly spelled) terms from other fields into the
single field upon which the dictionary is built.
-Original Message-
From: Dyer, James [mailto:james.d...@ingrambook.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 11:40 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Spellcheck Phrases
Actually, someone
gt; from those fields along with (correctly spelled) terms from other fields into
> the single field upon which the dictionary is built.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dyer, James [mailto:james.d...@ingrambook.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 11:40 AM
> To: solr-us
??
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Spellcheck-Two-dictionaries-tp2931458p2987915.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
o: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spellcheck: Two dictionaries
??
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Spellcheck-Two-dictionaries-tp2931458p2987915.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
That uber dictionary is not what i want. I get also suggestions form the
where in the what. An example:
what where
chelseaLondon
Soccerclub Bondon London
When i type "soccerclub london" i want the suggestion from the wha
.@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 3:09 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Spellcheck: Two dictionaries
That uber dictionary is not what i want. I get also suggestions form the
where in the what. An example:
what where
chelsea
: I have a little problem with spellcheck! I get suggestions all time even the
: word is correct! I use dictionary from file! Here my configuration:
:false
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.onlyMorePopular
-Hoss
Although the wiki states it correctly (will also return suggestions even
if properly spelled), perhaps we should add that it's a better practice to
only present end users with suggestions if the correctlySpelled flag is
false.
This issue keeps coming back.
Chris Hostetter said:
> : I have a littl
: We use Solr along with Drupal for our content management needs. The
: solrconfig.xml that we have from Drupal mentions that "we do not
: spellcheck by default" and here is our request handler from
: solrconfig.xml.
:
: First question - why is it recommended that we do not spellcheck by
: defau
I'm afraid there currently isn't much support for correcting misplaced
whitespace. Solr is going to look at each word individually and won't even try
to combine ajacent words (or split a word into 2 or more). So there is no good
way to get these kinds of suggestions.
One thing that might work
This will work for mispelled compounds indeed but not when the compound word
is actually queried as two separate correctly spelled words. Most likely both
sail and boat exist in the index as single token.
There is a work around but that's limited to a scenario where users never use
more than 1
ution...
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Markus Jelsma [mailto:markus.jel...@openindex.io]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 10:13 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Dyer, James
Subject: Re: Spellcheck compounded words
This will wor
Using ShingleFilterFactory and PositionFilterFactory I get some results, but
never as a useful collation.
So I tried to see what results with spellcheck.maxCollations=2 would be, but
I never got this to work. not on 3.3 nor 4.0. Even lowering
maxCollationEvaluations had no effect. I never get a re
the query in
"spellcheck.q" to get it to work. But I've never used shingles with spellcheck
before so I'm not sure.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: O. Klein [mailto:kl...@octoweb.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 201
Im using 4.0 for testing this.
Im not sure what to expect, but as soon as I increase maxCollationTries to 1
or more, even with maxCollationEvaluations set to low value like 10 it just
hangs.
With maxCollationTries set to 0 it works just fine.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.47206
to try and figure out if this
is a bug and if so, then try and fix it.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: O. Klein [mailto:kl...@octoweb.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 11:37 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Spellcheck
I will try to duplicate the behavior in 3.3 as I cant get logging to file
working in 4.0 like in other releases
http://globalgateway.wordpress.com/2010/01/06/configuring-solr-1-4-logging-with-log4j-in-tomcat/
Solr logging (maybe you know how to fix this?)
Config is pretty normal I think:
> I will try to duplicate the behavior in 3.3 as I cant get logging to file
> working in 4.0 like in other releases
> http://globalgateway.wordpress.com/2010/01/06/configuring-solr-1-4-logging-
> with-log4j-in-tomcat/ Solr logging (maybe you know how to fix this?)
You're most likely caught by t
Adding log4j-1.2.16.jar and deleting slf4j-jdk14-1.6.1.jar does not fix
logging for 4.0 for me.
Anyways, tried it on 3.3 and Solr just hangs here also. No logging, no
exceptions.
I'll let you know if I manage to find source of problem.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.na
FWIW, here is the process I follow to create a log4j aware version of the
apache solr war file and the corresponding lo4j.properties files.
Have fun :)
François
##
#
# Log4J configuration for SOLR
#
# http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Sol
François Schiettecatte wrote:
>
> #
> # 4) Copy:
> # slf4j-1.6.1/slf4j-log4j12-1.6.1.jar ->
> WEB-INF/lib
> # log4j.properties (this file)->
> WEB-INF/classes/ (needs to be
> created)
> #
>
Don't you mean log4j-1.2.16/slf4j-log
I get slf4j-log4j12-1.6.1.jar from
http://www.slf4j.org/dist/slf4j-1.6.1.tar.gz, it is what interfaces slf4j to
log4j, you will also need to add log4j-1.2.16.jar to WEB-INF/lib.
François
On Jul 26, 2011, at 3:40 PM, O. Klein wrote:
>
> François Schiettecatte wrote:
>>
>> #
>> # 4) Copy:
I see you use this for Solr 3.3.
In 3.3 there is no problem with logging. Have you tried to do the same thing
for 4.0?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Spellcheck-compounded-words-tp3192748p3201597.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.c
All the talk about logging derailed the thread. So can someone test if adding
2
2
to the dedault requesthandler in solrconfig.xml using collations causes
system to hang?
O. Klein wrote:
>
> Anyways. I was testing on 3.3 and found that when I added
> &spellcheck.maxCollations=2&spe
oweb.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 9:15 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spellcheck compounded words
All the talk about logging derailed the thread. So can someone test if adding
2
2
to the dedault requesthandler in solrconfig.xml using collations causes
syste
O. Klein wrote:
>
> Anyways. I was testing on 3.3 and found that when I added
> &spellcheck.maxCollations=2&spellcheck.maxCollationTries=2 as parameters
> to the URL there was no problem at all.
>
> Adding
>
> 2
> 2
>
> to the default requestHandler in solrconfig.xml caused reques
It seem you forget this
true
-Original Message-
From: Ruixiang Zhang
To: solr-user
Sent: Tue, Nov 22, 2011 11:54 am
Subject: spellcheck in dismax
I put the following into dismax requestHandler, but no suggestion field is
returned.
true
false
1
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Varun Gupta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Solr 1.3 for spell checking. I am facing a strange problem of
> spell checking index not been generated. When I have less number of
> documents (less than 1000) indexed then the spell check index builds, but
> when the docum
No, there are no exceptions in the logs.
--
Thanks
Varun Gupta
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Varun Gupta
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am using Solr 1.3 for spell checking. I am facing a strange problem
Hi Kalyan,
Currently the spell checker does not support phrase based
suggestions. See http://lucene.markmail.org/message/wdr7wsenhtuecatb?q=spellcheck+list:org%2Eapache%2Elucene%2Esolr-user
and a variety of other links.
Now, I think there are a couple of things you could do.
1. Try n-gram
Configure language specific fields and spellcheckers just as you would for a
single language index, so multiple content_LANG fields and spell_LANG field.
This will, of course, only work if you know in what language the search
operates.
-Original message-
From: Grijesh.singh
Sent: Tue
I have to search on multiple fields on different language at a time
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Spellcheck-in-multilanguage-search-tp1393357p1393431.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
You can use copyField to get multiple fields in the field you use for spell
checking, don't forget to set it to multiValued.
-Original message-
From: Savannah Beckett
Sent: Mon 27-09-2010 10:08
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org;
Subject: spellcheck on multiple fields?
Is it possible to
you need to clean and recompile
> SEVERE: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
> org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.StandardFilter.(Lorg/apache/lucene/util/Version;Lorg/apache/lucene/analysis/TokenStream;)V
Nice, that's the trick to remember.
On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 12:16:07 pm Robert Muir wrote:
> > SEVERE: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
> > org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.StandardFilter.(Lorg/apache/luc
> > ene/util/Version;Lorg/apache/lucene/analysis/TokenStream;)V
--
Markus Jelsma - CT
If using SolrJ,
use QueryResponse.getSpellCheckResponse().getCollatedResults() . This returns
a List . On each Collation object, getCollationQueryString() will
return the corrected queries.
Note that unless you specify "spellcheck.maxCollationTries", the collations
might not return anythin
I am using solrJ.
Here is what my method looks like.
List suggestedTermsList = new ArrayList();
if(aQueryResponse == null) {
return suggestedTermsList;
}
try {
SpellCheckResponse spellCheckResponse =
aQueryResponse.getSpellCheckResponse();
if(spellCheckResponse ==
set it at
least to whatever value you've got for "maxCollations", possibly a few higher.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Kudzanai [mailto:kudzanai.vudzij...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 9:20
spellcheck.collateExtendedResults = true seems to have sorted my problem.
My other parameters are:
spellcheck = true
spellcheck.count = aNumResults
spellcheck.q = SEARCH TEXT
spellcheck.build= true
spellcheck.collate= true
spellcheck.maxCollations= 4
spellcheck.collateExtendedResults = true
Hello Anurag, I'm facing the same problem. Will u please elaborate on how u
solved the problem? It would be great if u give me a step by step
description as I'm new in Solr.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Spellcheck-in-solr-nutch-integration-tp1953232p2429702
First go thru the schema.xml file . Look at the different components.
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 1:01 PM, 666 [via Lucene] <
ml-node+2429702-1399813783-146...@n3.nabble.com
> wrote:
> Hello Anurag, I'm facing the same problem. Will u please elaborate on how u
> solved the problem? It would be great i
I'm not sure what you mean by "i need the documents" and how
that relates to spell check. Are you saying you need the name
of the document the suggestion came
from?
Please clarify a bit
Best
Erick
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:25 AM, sivaprasad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have configured spell check fo
Siva,
If you specify "spellcheck.collate=true", then the spell checker will return
you a corrected query. Your client has to re-run this query as there is no way
to get Solr to automatically redirect the response to the correction. The new
query will return documents that have the corrected t
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
