I did optimize the master and the slave started replicating the indices!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Replication-Problem-from-solr-3-6-to-solr-4-0-tp4025028p4148953.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Same with me too, in a multi-core Master/Slave.
11:17:30.476 [snapPuller-8-thread-1] INFO o.a.s.h.SnapPuller - Master's
generation: 87
11:17:30.476 [snapPuller-8-thread-1] INFO o.a.s.h.SnapPuller - Slave's
generation: 3
11:17:30.476 [snapPuller-8-thread-1] INFO o.a.s.h.SnapPuller - Starting
Hi all,
First time posting so the regular sorry if this is a popular question..
Anyhoo - I'm running solr 4.0 on a test rig with multicore and I would like
to upgrade to 4.8.1. I can't find any clear tutorials on this on the web
and I can only see a thread on 4.2 - 4.7 on the mailing list.
Can
- I'm running solr 4.0 on a test rig with multicore and I would like
to upgrade to 4.8.1. I can't find any clear tutorials on this on the web
and I can only see a thread on 4.2 - 4.7 on the mailing list.
Can anyone confirm of I need to change config wildly on an upgrade, using
tomcat and war
..
Anyhoo - I'm running solr 4.0 on a test rig with multicore and I would
like
to upgrade to 4.8.1. I can't find any clear tutorials on this on the web
and I can only see a thread on 4.2 - 4.7 on the mailing list.
Can anyone confirm of I need to change config wildly on an upgrade, using
tomcat
Hi,
i am running into the exact same problem:
27534 [qtp989080272-12] INFO org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore – [collection1]
webapp=/solr path=/replication
params={command=details_=1394164320017wt=json} status=0 QTime=12
28906 [qtp989080272-12] INFO org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore – [collection1]
If anyone is interested, I managed to resolve this a long time ago.
I used a Data Import Handler instead and it worked beautifully.
DIH are very forgiving and it takes what ever XML data is there and injects
it into the Solr Index.
It's a lot faster than crawling too.
You use XPATH to map the
hi All, I'm trying to store a 2 dimensional array in SOLR [version 4.0].
Basically I've the following data:
[[20121108, 1],[20121110, 7],[2012, 2],[20121112, 2]] ...
The inner array being used to keep some count say X for that particular day.
Currently, I'm using the following field to
a field contain or match a scalar value.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: A Geek
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 7:10 AM
To: solr user
Subject: Store 2 dimensional array( of int values) in solr 4.0
hi All, I'm trying to store a 2 dimensional array in SOLR [version 4.0
the internal array is
of two ints, one being date and other being the count.
Please point me in the right direction. Appreciate your time.
Thanks.
From: j...@basetechnology.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Store 2 dimensional array( of int values) in solr 4.0
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 08:44
: Store 2 dimensional array( of int values) in solr 4.0
Hi,Thanks for the quick reply. Sure, please find below the details as per
your query.
Essentially, I want to retrieve the doc through JSON [using JSON format as
SOLR result output]and want JSON to pick the the data from the dataX field
as a two
Hello,
when I put a function in the Field List, when are field values calculated
and on wich docs?
Are values calculated over the whole set of docs? Only over the resulting
set of doc? Or, better, over the docs actually serialized in results.
i.e. I have 1000 docs in the index, 100 docs
Hi,
not actually sure I got the point but
Are values calculated over the whole set of docs? Only over the resulting
set of doc? Or, better, over the docs actually serialized in results.
The third: a function is like a virtual field computed in real-time
associated with each (returned) doc.
Whoa that's cool!
It can simplify mani front-end calculations. - obviously I don't want to
use it to make a simple sum :)
Thanks!
c.
2013/8/30 Andrea Gazzarini andrea.gazzar...@gmail.com
Hi,
not actually sure I got the point but
Are values calculated over the whole set of docs? Only
Hi,
with solr 4.0 the fuzzy query syntax is like keyword~1 (or 2)
Proximity search is like value~20.
How does this differentiate between the two searches. My thought was
promiximity would be on phrases and fuzzy on individual words. Is that
correct?
I wasnted to do a promiximity search for text
triniti.
But you didn't provide the field definition so it's just a guess.
Best
Erick
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Prasi S prasi1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
with solr 4.0 the fuzzy query syntax is like keyword~1 (or 2)
Proximity search is like value~20.
How does this differentiate
provide the field definition so it's just a guess.
Best
Erick
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Prasi S prasi1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
with solr 4.0 the fuzzy query syntax is like keyword~1 (or 2)
Proximity search is like value~20.
How does this differentiate between the two searches. My
:
Hi,
with solr 4.0 the fuzzy query syntax is like keyword~1 (or 2)
Proximity search is like value~20.
How does this differentiate between the two searches. My thought was
promiximity would be on phrases and fuzzy on individual words. Is that
correct?
I wasnted to do a promiximity
and Trinigee may stem
to something like triniti.
But you didn't provide the field definition so it's just a guess.
Best
Erick
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Prasi S prasi1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
with solr 4.0 the fuzzy query syntax is like keyword~1 (or 2)
Proximity search
triniti.
But you didn't provide the field definition so it's just a guess.
Best
Erick
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Prasi S prasi1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
with solr 4.0 the fuzzy query syntax is like keyword~1 (or 2)
Proximity search is like value~20.
How does this differentiate
Hi,
About once a week the admin system comes up with SolrCore Initialization
Failures. There's nothing in the logs and SOLR continues to work in the
application it's supporting and in the 'direct access' mode (i.e.
http://123.465.789.100:8080/solr/collection1/select?q=bingo:*).
The cure is to
Yes :-) see SOLR-118, seems an old issue...
On 4 Jul 2013 06:43, David Quarterman da...@corexe.com wrote:
Hi,
About once a week the admin system comes up with SolrCore Initialization
Failures. There's nothing in the logs and SOLR continues to work in the
application it's supporting and in
Cheers, Roman! It was a default Jetty set up so now added a 'work' directory
and that's in use now.
-Original Message-
From: Roman Chyla [mailto:roman.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 July 2013 15:00
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SOLR 4.0 frequent admin problem
Yes :-) see
I have checked the FSDirectory, it will create MMapDirectory or
NIOFSDirectory for Directory.
This two directory only supply IndexInput extend for read file (MMapIndexInput
extends ByteBufferIndexInput),
why not there is not MMap/NIO IndexOutput extend for file write. It only use
FSIndexOutput
Output is quite a bit simpler than input because all we do is write a
single stream of bytes with no seeking (append only), and it's done
with only one thread, so I don't think there'd be much to gain by
using the newer IO APIs for writing...
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On
On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 06:59 +0200, Jeffery Wang wrote:
Time queryTime(ms), CPU % r/s w/s rMB/s wMB/s IO %
...
7:30:52 16594 26 36 0 0.140 99.3
7:30:53 31 80 368 0 42.43 0 94.3
7:31:23 28575 41
Yes, I used the same query url for each curl-call, it is very simple
http://...q=OS01W:sina*fl=SecId,OS01Wrows=1wt=xmlindent=true;.
-Original Message-
From: Toke Eskildsen [mailto:t...@statsbiblioteket.dk]
Sent: 2013年6月14日 16:20
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Solr 4.0
Do someone known Why the query is very slow before the optimize end of a few
minutes.
When the solr optimize, I have a loop query( curl query url and sleep one
second) every one second to check the query speed. It is normal, the query time
can be accept. But it always very slow before the
Hi,
What you pasted from console didn't come across well. Yes, optimizing
a static index is OK and yes, if your index is very unoptimized then
yes, it will be slower than when it is optimized not sure if that
addresses your concerns...
Otis
--
Solr ElasticSearch Support --
Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis.gospodne...@gmail.com]
Sent: 2013年6月14日 12:20
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr 4.0 Optimize query very slow before the optimize end of a few
minutes
Hi,
What you pasted from console didn't come across well. Yes, optimizing
Hi,
I'd like your advice on this backup plan.
It's my first Solr deployment (4.0).
Production consists of 1 master and n frontend slaves
placed in different datacenters, replicating through HTTP.
Only master is backed up. Frontend slaves can die anytime
or go stale for a while and that's ok.
This sounds pretty complete to me.
Otis
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Jun 11, 2013 4:21 AM, Cosimo Streppone cos...@streppone.it wrote:
Hi,
I'd like your advice on this backup plan.
It's my first Solr deployment (4.0).
Production consists of 1 master and n frontend
Sandeep:
You need to be a little careful here, I second Shawn's comment that
you are mixing versions. You say you are using solr 4.0. But the jar
that ships with that is apache-solr-core-4.0.0.jar. Then you talk
about using solr-core, which is called solr-core-4.1.jar.
Maven is not officially
erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
Sandeep:
You need to be a little careful here, I second Shawn's comment that
you are mixing versions. You say you are using solr 4.0. But the jar
that ships with that is apache-solr-core-4.0.0.jar. Then you talk
about using solr-core, which is called solr-core-4.1.jar
Hi Shawn,
Thanks for your reply.
I'm not mixing versions.
The problem I faced is I want to override Highlighter from solr-core jar
and if I add that as a dependency in my project then there was a clash
between solr-core.jar and the apache-solr-core.jar that comes bundled
within the solr
On 5/21/2013 4:55 AM, Sandeep Mestry wrote:
I'm not mixing versions.
The problem I faced is I want to override Highlighter from solr-core jar
and if I add that as a dependency in my project then there was a clash
between solr-core.jar and the apache-solr-core.jar that comes bundled
within the
Sandeep,
What version of Solr are you using?
Steve
On May 21, 2013, at 6:55 AM, Sandeep Mestry sanmes...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Shawn,
Thanks for your reply.
I'm not mixing versions.
The problem I faced is I want to override Highlighter from solr-core jar
and if I add that as a
Hi Steve,
Solr 4.0 - mentioned in the subject.. :-)
Thanks,
Sandeep
On 21 May 2013 14:58, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
Sandeep,
What version of Solr are you using?
Steve
On May 21, 2013, at 6:55 AM, Sandeep Mestry sanmes...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Shawn,
Thanks for your reply
The 4.0 solr-core jar is available in Maven Central:
http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Corg.apache.solr%7Csolr-core%7C4.0.0%7Cjar
Steve
On May 21, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Sandeep Mestry sanmes...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Steve,
Solr 4.0 - mentioned in the subject.. :-)
Thanks,
Sandeep
,
Solr 4.0 - mentioned in the subject.. :-)
Thanks,
Sandeep
On 21 May 2013 14:58, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
Sandeep,
What version of Solr are you using?
Steve
On May 21, 2013, at 6:55 AM, Sandeep Mestry sanmes...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Shawn,
Thanks
Hi All,
I want to override a component from solr-core and for that I need solr-core
jar.
I am using the solr.war that comes from Apache mirror and if I open the
war, I see the solr-core jar is actually named as apache-solr-core.jar.
This is also true about solrj jar.
If I now provide a
On 5/20/2013 8:01 AM, Sandeep Mestry wrote:
And I do remember the discussion on the forum about dropping the name
*apache* from solr jars. If that's what caused this issue, then can you
tell me if the mirrors need updating with solr-core.jar instead of
apache-solr-core.jar?
If it's named
catenateNumbers=0 catenateAll=0
splitOnCaseChange=1 splitOnNumerics=0 preserveOriginal=0 /
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Sandeep Mestry
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 5:50 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question about Edismax - Solr 4.0
Hi Jack,
Thanks for your
queries
(collection:assets) which appear correctly but they do not appear in case 1
above.
I can't make this as part of the query parameter as that needs to be
searched against multiple fields.
Can someone suggest a fix in this case please. I'm using Solr 4.0.
Many Thanks,
Sandeep
Edismax - Solr 4.0
-- *Edismax and Filter Queries with Commas and spaces* --
Dear Experts,
This appears to be a bug, please suggest if I'm wrong.
If I search with the following filter query,
1) fq=title:(, 10)
- I get no results.
- The debug output does NOT show the section containing
Mestry
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 6:51 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Question about Edismax - Solr 4.0
-- *Edismax and Filter Queries with Commas and spaces* --
Dear Experts,
This appears to be a bug, please suggest if I'm wrong.
If I search with the following filter query
-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question about Edismax - Solr 4.0
Thanks Jack for your reply..
The problem is, I'm finding results for fq=title:(,10) but not for
fq=title:(, 10) - apologies if that was not clear from my first mail.
I have already mentioned the debug analysis in my previous
Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Sandeep Mestry
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 12:42 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question about Edismax - Solr 4.0
Thanks Jack for your reply..
The problem is, I'm finding results for fq=title:(,10) but not for
fq=title:(, 10
splitOnNumerics=0 preserveOriginal=0 /
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Sandeep Mestry
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 5:50 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question about Edismax - Solr 4.0
Hi Jack,
Thanks for your response again and for helping me out to get
Good afternoon,
Does anyone know of a good tutorial on how to perform SQL like aggregation
in solr queries?
Thanks,
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-aggregate-data-in-solr-4-0-tp4063584.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: How to aggregate data in solr 4.0?
Good afternoon,
Does anyone know of a good tutorial on how to perform SQL like aggregation
in solr queries?
Thanks,
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-aggregate-data-in-solr-4-0-tp4063584.html
Is the DIH Scheduler available in SOLR 4.1 or in 4.2? I would like to
know if we can schedule delta-import in SOLR 4.1 or 4.2.
In SOLR 4.1 DIH console, I see a Refresh Status button and
Auto-Refresh Status check box. Is this related to the delta-import
scheduling? I couldn't find any
Jegan
By DIH Scheduler you mean
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#Scheduling ? If so, then it's not
yet in. More details in the Ticket (which is as well linked from the
Wiki-Page): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2305
Regarding your Question on the UI: the Auto-Refresh
I'll fix it - I put up a patch last night.
- Mark
On Mar 18, 2013, at 1:12 AM, mark12345 marks1900-pos...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
This looks similar to the issue I also have:
*
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-1-4-2-SolrException-Error-opening-new-searcher-td4046543.html
This looks similar to the issue I also have:
*
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-1-4-2-SolrException-Error-opening-new-searcher-td4046543.html
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-1-4-2-SolrException-Error-opening-new-searcher-td4046543.html
Hey all,
We're using a Solr 4 core to handle our article data. When someone in our CMS
publishes an article, we have a listener that indexes it straight to solr. We
use the previously instantiated HttpSolrServer, build the solr document, add it
with server.add(doc) .. then do a
Hi Scott,
Not sure why IW would be closed, but:
* consider not (hard) committing after each doc, but just periodically,
every N minutes
* soft committing instead
* using 4.2
Otis
--
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Danzig, Scott
This ended up being a SPM issue. I noticed the same issue w/ 4.2 and decided
to upgrade to monitor version 1.9.0 and it is now showing correct data.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-0-to-Solr-4-1-upgrade-tp4044990p4046631.html
Sent from the Solr -
Otis,
I noticed this in my logs repeatedly during that time period:
Mar 5, 2013 1:28:00 PM org.apache.solr.core.CachingDirectoryFactory close
INFO: Releasing
directory:/usr/local/solr_aggregate/solr_aggregate/data/index
It wasn't in my logs any other time.
I found this:
I upgrade one of my slaves by replacing the solr.war, all other slaves and
master were still 4.0. When I started to monitor it w/ SPM I noticed that
the request rate was way up while the request count was way down. I've
since put back the solr.war for 4.0 and the slave has returned to normal.
Hello Richard,
Did you see anything in the logs?
What did other metrics look like? I'l look at system metrics like disk IO
and network IO, CPU, and also JVM/GC metrics first. Any sudden changes in
those metrics could point you in the right direction.
Otis
--
Solr ElasticSearch Support
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
What I'm questioning is whether the issue you see in 4.1 has been
resolved in Subversion. While I would not expect 4.0 to read a 4.1
index, the SVN branch/4.2 should be able to do so effortlessly.
Upayavira
I see, thanks.
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
Can you use a checkout from SVN? Does that resolve your issues? That is
what will become 4.2 when it is released soon:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x/
Upayavira
Thank you. Which feature of 4.2
What I'm questioning is whether the issue you see in 4.1 has been
resolved in Subversion. While I would not expect 4.0 to read a 4.1
index, the SVN branch/4.2 should be able to do so effortlessly.
Upayavira
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013, at 06:17 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:37 PM,
Solr 4.1 has been giving up much trouble rejecting documents indexed.
While I try to work my way through this, I would like to move our
application back to Solr 4.0. However, now when I try to start Solr
with same index that was created with Solr 4.0 but has been running on
4.1 few a few days I
://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch - ElasticSearch
Solr 4.1 has been giving up much trouble rejecting documents indexed.
While I try to work my way through this, I would like to move our
application back to Solr 4.0. However, now when I try to start Solr
with same index that was created
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Rafał Kuć r@solr.pl wrote:
Hello!
I suppose the only way to make this work will be reindexing the data.
Solr 4.1 uses Lucene 4.1 as you know, which introduced new default
codec with stored fields compression and this is one of the reasons
you can't read
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Rafał Kuć r@solr.pl wrote:
Hello!
I assumed that re-indexing can be painful in your case, if it wouldn't
you probably would re-index by now :) I guess (didn't test it myself),
that you can create another collection inside your cluster, use the
old codec
Hello!
As far as I know you have to re-index using external tool.
--
Regards,
Rafał Kuć
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch - ElasticSearch
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Rafał Kuć r@solr.pl wrote:
Hello!
I assumed that re-indexing can be painful in your case,
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Rafał Kuć r@solr.pl wrote:
Hello!
As far as I know you have to re-index using external tool.
Thank you Rafał. That is what I figured.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://gibberish.co.il
http://what-is-what.com
Can you use a checkout from SVN? Does that resolve your issues? That is
what will become 4.2 when it is released soon:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x/
Upayavira
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013, at 10:51 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Rafał Kuć
What about SolrEntityProcessor in DIH?
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#SolrEntityProcessor
Regards,
Alex.
Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
- Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening
Yes, the SolrEntityProcessor can be used for this.
If you stored the original document bodies in the Solr index!
You can also download the documents in Json or CSV format and re-upload
those to old Solr. I don't know if CSV will work for your docs. If CSV
works, you can directly upload what
to use the backup feature of the
replication handler.
- Mark
On Feb 23, 2013, at 3:54 AM, Prakhar Birla prakharbi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We use Solr 4.0 for our main searcher so it is a very vital part. We have
set up a process called Index reassurance which assures that all
prakharbi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We use Solr 4.0 for our main searcher so it is a very vital part. We have
set up a process called Index reassurance which assures that all documents
are available in Solr by comparing to our database. In short this is
achieved as: The production server (read
Michael is correct, that was what was said at the bootcamp (by me). I
believe this may not be correct though.
Further code review shows that Solr 4.0 was already distributing documents
using the hash range technique used in 4.1. The big change in 4.1 was that
a composite hash key could be used
Arkadi,
That's the answer I received at Solr Bootcamp, yes.
Michael Della Bitta
Appinions
18 East 41st Street, 2nd Floor
New York, NY 10017-6271
www.appinions.com
Where Influence Isn’t a Game
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Arkadi Colson
Hi,
I'm running solr 4.0 final with manifoldcf 1.1 and I verified via fiddler
that Manifold is indeed sending the content field from a RSS feed that
contains xml data
However, when I query the index the content field is there with just the
data; the XML structure is gone.
Does anyone know how
Do I have to recreate the collections/cores?
Do I have to reindex?
thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Do-I-have-to-reindex-when-upgrading-from-solr-4-0-to-4-1-tp4039560.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
No. You can just update Solr in place. But...
If you're using Solr Cloud, your documents won't be hashed in a way
that lets you do shard splitting in 4.2. That seemed to be the
consensus during Solr Boot Camp.
Michael Della Bitta
Appinions
18
Does it mean that when you redo indexing after the upgrade to 4.1 shard
splitting will work in 4.2?
Met vriendelijke groeten
Arkadi Colson
Smartbit bvba • Hoogstraat 13 • 3670 Meeuwen
T +32 11 64 08 80 • F +32 11 64 08 81
On 02/10/2013 05:21 PM, Michael Della Bitta wrote:
No. You can just
=geohash indexed=true stored=true
multiValued=true/
the query looks like this with Solr 3.5: q=*:*fq={!geofilt}sfield=
location_datapt=45.15,-93.85d=50sort=geodist() asc
As SOLR-2155 plugin not compatible with solr 4.0 I try to change the
field definition to next:
fieldType name=location
Roman,
My bet is that number of indexed fields doesn't impacts the search time,
and number of queried fields does linearly increase the search time.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Roman Slavik slaav...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
what is relation between number of indexed fields and
Hi guys,
what is relation between number of indexed fields and searching speed?
For example I have same number of records, same searching SOLR query but 100
indexed fields for each record in case 1 and 1000 fields in case 2. I's
obvious that searching time in case 2 will be greater, but how
() asc
As SOLR-2155 plugin not compatible with solr 4.0 I try to change the
field definition to next:
fieldType name=location class=solr.LatLonType
subFieldSuffix=_coordinate /
field name=location_data type=location indexed=true stored=true
multiValued=true/
dynamicField name=*_coordinate
I am having some difficulty migrating our solr indexing scripts from using 3.5
to solr 4.0. Notably, I am trying to track down why our performance in solr 4.0
is about 5-10 times slower when indexing documents. Querying is still quite
fast.
The code adds documents in groups of 1000, and adds
.solr.schema.GeoHashField length=12
/
field name=location_data type=geohash indexed=true stored=true
multiValued=true/
the query looks like this with Solr 3.5: q=*:*fq={!geofilt}sfield=
location_datapt=45.15,-93.85d=50sort=geodist() asc
As SOLR-2155 plugin not compatible with solr 4.0 I try to change
difficulty migrating our solr indexing scripts from using
3.5 to solr 4.0. Notably, I am trying to track down why our performance in
solr 4.0 is about 5-10 times slower when indexing documents. Querying is
still quite fast.
The code adds documents in groups of 1000, and adds each group to the solr
again. Then let's take it from there.
- Mark
On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:00 AM, Kevin Stone kevin.st...@jax.org wrote:
I am having some difficulty migrating our solr indexing scripts from
using 3.5 to solr 4.0. Notably, I am trying to track down why our
performance in solr 4.0 is about 5-10 times slower
using 3.5 to solr 4.0. Notably, I am trying to track down why our
performance in solr 4.0 is about 5-10 times slower when indexing
documents. Querying is still quite fast.
The code adds documents in groups of 1000, and adds each group to the
solr in a thread. The documents are somewhat large
it's definition out of solrconfig.xml and
try your test again. Then let's take it from there.
- Mark
On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:00 AM, Kevin Stone kevin.st...@jax.org wrote:
I am having some difficulty migrating our solr indexing scripts from
using 3.5 to solr 4.0. Notably, I am trying to track down
Thank you Erick for that great tip on getting a listing of the Cores.
O. O.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Delete-all-Documents-in-the-Example-Solr-4-0-tp4035156p4035454.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
:)
-Michael
-Original Message-
From: Lyuba Romanchuk [mailto:lyuba.romanc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 6:36 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr 4.0 - timeAllowed in distributed search
Hi,
I try to use timeAllowed in query both in distributed search
:)
-Michael
-Original Message-
From: Lyuba Romanchuk [mailto:lyuba.romanc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 6:36 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr 4.0 - timeAllowed in distributed search
Hi,
I try to use timeAllowed in query both in distributed search with one
Hi,
I am
attempting to use the example-DIH that comes with the Solr 4.0 download. In
/example, I start Solr using:
java -Dsolr.solr.home=./example-DIH/solr/ -jar
start.jar
After playing with it for a while, I decided to delete all
documents in the index. The FAQ at
http
On 1/21/2013 11:27 AM, O. Olson wrote:
http://localhost:8983/solr/update
and I got a 404 too. I then looked at
/example-DIH/solr/solr/conf/solrconfig.xml and it seems to have requestHandler
name=/update class=solr.UpdateRequestHandler /.
I am confused why I am getting a 404 if /update has a
I just tested that and /update does not seem to honor the default core
value (same 404 issue). Is that a bug?
Regards,
Alex.
Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
- Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org
A: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc:
Inviato: Lunedì 21 Gennaio 2013 12:35
Oggetto: Re: Delete all Documents in the Example (Solr 4.0)
On 1/21/2013 11:27 AM, O. Olson wrote:
http://localhost:8983/solr/update
and I got a 404
@lucene.apache.org
Cc:
Inviato: Lunedì 21 Gennaio 2013 12:35
Oggetto: Re: Delete all Documents in the Example (Solr 4.0)
On 1/21/2013 11:27 AM, O. Olson wrote:
http://localhost:8983/solr/update
and I got a 404 too. I then looked at
/example-DIH/solr/solr/conf/solrconfig.xml and it seems to have
experience is usually not the part of the query that
is actually slow). Do not depend on timeAllowed doing anything useful :)
-Michael
-Original Message-
From: Lyuba Romanchuk [mailto:lyuba.romanc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 6:36 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr
1 - 100 of 575 matches
Mail list logo
