Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-31 Thread adityab
but i see two different version numbers Under commit: 1364655616211 22 and under Master/Slave tags 1364619609805 20 Can this be a case anytime on Master ? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-2-Slave-Index-version-is-higher-than-Master-tp4049827p405

Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-30 Thread Mark Miller
The gen is an incrementing int for each commit, the version is a timestamp of the commit. - Mark On Mar 30, 2013, at 11:06 AM, adityab wrote: > Mark, isn't this response from master some what confusing. The gen and > version number is out of sync. > > http://.../solr/replication?command=det

Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-30 Thread adityab
Mark, isn't this response from master some what confusing. The gen and version number is out of sync. http://.../solr/replication?command=details 0 2 1.52 GB /storage/solrdata/index/ 1364655616211 22 ... true false 1364619609805 20 schema.xml commit startup false 22 This response fo

Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-29 Thread adityab
@Mark attached are the full logs from both master and slave. Hope this might be some help. console_master.log console_slave.log Ignore the mbeans call in

Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-29 Thread Mark Miller
That's pretty weird stuff. As a workaround, you might stop replicating your conf files - that takes a sketchier path at the moment. The key to solving this is to figure out how the heck the slave is increasing it's gen…that should require a commit. In this case, *lots* of them. Commits that don

Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-29 Thread adityab
Something is really wrong with replication. Check the document attached which has the screen shot. I - re-indexed the master after adding new fields to schema file (its part of config file replication) The UI shows master as gen '6' where as in slaves log the Master gen is '7' The attached docu

Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-29 Thread adityab
+1 I have observed this same issue no change on master and slave is bumped up with higher index number. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-2-Slave-Index-version-is-higher-than-Master-tp4049827p4052445.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive

Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-28 Thread Uomesh
;>>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Mark Miller-3 [via Lucene] < > >>>>> [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4050577&i=3>> > > >> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Are you replica

Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-26 Thread Mark Miller
t;>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]< >> http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4050075&i=6> >>>>>>>>>> mible.com <[hidden email]< >> http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4050075&i=7>>> >&g

RE: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-26 Thread John, Phil (CSS)
er/slave replication (not solrcloud) >>>>> with 1 >>>> master and 2 slaves and I noticed the slave having a higher version >>>> number than the master the other day as well. >>>>> >>>>> In our case, knock on wood, it hasn't

Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-26 Thread Uomesh
4050075&i=0>> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> To add to the discussion. > >>>>> > >>>>> We're running classic master/slave replication (not solrcloud) with > 1 > >>>> master

Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-22 Thread Mark Miller
plication (not solrcloud) with 1 >>>> master and 2 slaves and I noticed the slave having a higher version number >>>> than the master the other day as well. >>>>> >>>>> In our case, knock on wood, it hasn't stopped replication. >>>>&g

Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-22 Thread Mark Miller
g a higher version number >>> than the master the other day as well. >>>> >>>> In our case, knock on wood, it hasn't stopped replication. >>>> >>>> If you'd like a copy of our config I can provide off-list. >>>> >>

Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-22 Thread Uomesh
, >> > >> > Phil. >> > >> > ________ >> > >> > From: Mark Miller [mailto:[hidden >> > email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4050075&i=1>] >> >> > Sent: Fri 22/03/2013 06:

Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-22 Thread Uomesh
; > > > > From: Mark Miller [mailto:[hidden > > email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4050075&i=1>] > > > Sent: Fri 22/03/2013 06:32 > > To: [hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=40500

Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-22 Thread Mark Miller
_ > > From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com] > Sent: Fri 22/03/2013 06:32 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master > > > > The other odd thing here is that this should not stop replication at al

Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-22 Thread Bernd Fehling
That issue was already with solr 4.1. http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/replication-problems-with-solr4-1-td4039647.html Nice to know that it is still there in 4.2. With some luck it will make it to 4.2.1 ;-) Regards Bernd Am 21.03.2013 21:08, schrieb Uomesh: > Hi, > > I am seeing an issue af

RE: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-22 Thread John, Phil (CSS)
7;d like a copy of our config I can provide off-list. Regards, Phil. From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com] Sent: Fri 22/03/2013 06:32 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master The other od

Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-21 Thread Mark Miller
>>>>>>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the >>>> discussion >>>>

Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-21 Thread Mark Miller
below: >>>>> >>>>> >>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-2-Slave-Index-version-is-higher-than-Master-tp4049827p4049832.html >>>>> To unsubscribe from Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than >>> Master, click >

Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-21 Thread Mark Miller
, click >>>> here< >>>> . >>>> NAML< >> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-

Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-21 Thread Uomesh
gt; Umesh > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> View this message in context: > >> > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-2-Slave-Index-version-is-higher-than-Master-tp4049827.html > >>> Sent from the Solr - U

Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-21 Thread Mark Miller
>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-2-Slave-Index-version-is-higher-than-Master-tp4049827.html >>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> ---

Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-21 Thread Mark Miller
B >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Umesh >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-2-Slave-Index-version-is-higher-than-Master-tp4049827.html >>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list

Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-21 Thread Uomesh
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-2-Slave-Index-version-is-higher-than-Master-tp4049827p4049832.html > To unsubscribe from Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher

Re: Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-21 Thread Mark Miller
Can you give more details about your configuration and setup? Our best bet is to try and recreate this with a unit test. - Mark On Mar 21, 2013, at 4:08 PM, Uomesh wrote: > Hi, > > I am seeing an issue after upgrading from solr 3.6.2 to Solr 4.2. My Slave > stop replicating after sometime. An

Solr 4.2 - Slave Index version is higher than Master

2013-03-21 Thread Uomesh
Hi, I am seeing an issue after upgrading from solr 3.6.2 to Solr 4.2. My Slave stop replicating after sometime. And it seems issue is because of my Slave Index version is higher than master. How could it be possible to Slave Index version is higher than master? Please help me. IS there anything i