On 12/26/2013 3:38 AM, Jilal Oussama wrote:
Solr was hosted on an Amazon ec2 m1.large (2 vCPU with 4 ECU, 7.5 GB memory
840 GB storage) and contained several cores for different usage.
When I manually executed a query through Solr Admin (a query containing
10~15 terms, with some of them
I'm using the following query to do a fuzzy search on Solr 4.5.1 and am
getting empty result.
qt=standardq=+(field1|en_CA|:Swimming~2 field1|en|:Swimming~2)
+(field1|en_CA|:Goggle~1 field1|en|:Goggle~1) +(+startDate:[* TO
2013-12-04T00:23:00Z] -endDate:[* TO
Chances are you're not getting those fuzzy terms analyzed as you'd like. See
debug (debug=true) output to be sure. Most likely the fuzzy terms are not
being lowercased. See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultitermQueryAnalysis for
more details (this applies to fuzzy, not just wildcard) terms
Debug shows that all terms are lowercased properly.
Thanks
On Dec 4, 2013 3:18 AM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote:
Chances are you're not getting those fuzzy terms analyzed as you'd like.
See debug (debug=true) output to be sure. Most likely the fuzzy terms
are not being
: Mhd Wrk
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 2:08 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Shouldn't fuzzy version of a solr query always return a super
set of its not-fuzzy equivalent
Debug shows that all terms are lowercased properly.
Thanks
On Dec 4, 2013 3:18 AM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Shouldn't fuzzy version of a solr query always return a super
set of its not-fuzzy equivalent
Debug shows that all terms are lowercased properly.
Thanks
On Dec 4, 2013 3:18 AM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote:
Chances are you're not getting those fuzzy terms
Im using the default qparser that come with solr 4.4 , Is there anything
better?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-query-syntax-tp4103784p4104344.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-query-syntax-tp4103784p4104344.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 3:17 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr query syntax.
Im using the default qparser that come with solr 4.4 , Is there anything
better?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-query-syntax-tp4103784p4104344.html
I would like to perform searches in Solr using queries I extracted from Fast
ESP . The queries are written in FQL (fast query language) format and I
want to convert them to Solr query syntax . Is there any way to preform a
search like this in Solr? Maybe a tool available? Could not find anything
Is solr ignoring parts of the query that dont consider fields.
something like
and(blabla , name: george)
It wont throw an exeption, so what is he considering blablabla to?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-query-syntax-tp4103784.html
Sent from the Solr
that dont consider fields.
something like
and(blabla , name: george)
It wont throw an exeption, so what is he considering blablabla to?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-query-syntax-tp4103784.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive
The oob request handler is
requestHandler name=/select class=solr.SearchHandler
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:41 PM, RadhaJayalakshmi
rlakshminaraya...@inautix.co.in wrote:
Hi,
I am preparing a solr query. in that i am only giving fq parameter .. I
dont
give any q parameter..
If i
Hi,
I am preparing a solr query. in that i am only giving fq parameter .. I dont
give any q parameter..
If i exeucte such query, where only it is having fq, it is not returning any
docs. in the sense it is returning 0 docs.
So, is it always mandatory to have q parameter in solr query?
if so
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.comwrote:
But how to get the values for docs that match some arbitrary query?
You can specify eff in fl param. it's implied by
http://docs.lucidworks.com/display/solr/Function+Queries
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
In 4.3, frange query using an external file works for both q and fq. The
Solr wiki and SIA both state that ExternalFileField does not support
searching. Was the search/filter capability added recently, or is it not
supported?
Thanks,
Peter
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Upayavira
a couple of things and hear someone say, that's
right.
1. In a solr query you can have multiple fq's, but only a single q.
And yes, I can simply AND the multiple qs together. Just want to avoid
that if I'm wrong.
2. A subtler issue is that when a full query is executied, Solr must
I just want to state a couple of things and hear someone say, that's right.
1. In a solr query you can have multiple fq's, but only a single q. And
yes, I can simply AND the multiple qs together. Just want to avoid that if
I'm wrong.
2. A subtler issue is that when a full query
That's right.
Otis
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Sep 23, 2013 12:55 PM, Scott Smith ssm...@mainstreamdata.com wrote:
I just want to state a couple of things and hear someone say, that's
right.
1. In a solr query you can have multiple fq's, but only a single q
.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Query-taking-so-much-time-to-retrieve-data-tp4087832.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
] it gives data in few seconds.
But if we use with UniqueID:[*+TO+123], it consumes so much time to
retrieve data from solr?
What may be the issue?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Query-taking-so-much-time-to-retrieve-data-tp4087832.html
Sent from the Solr
/ClientAbortException-java-io-IOException-in-solr-query-tp4082321.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
please help me out of this..
thanks in advance,
Aniljayanti
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/ClientAbortException-java-io-IOException-in-solr-query-tp4082321.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Siva,
I think I mention this several days ago... DYM ReSearcher will do that:
http://sematext.com/products/dym-researcher/index.html
Otis
On Tuesday, July 30, 2013, sivaprasad wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way to auto correct the Solr query and get the results? For
example, user tries
this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-Correction-of-Solr-Query-tp4081220p4081243.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
name=tfloat class=solr.TrieFloatField precisionStep=8
omitNorms=true positionIncrementGap=0/
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-query-range-upper-exclusive-tp4080978.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: solr query range upper exclusive
q=price_1_1:[197 TO 249] and q=*:*fq=price_1_1:[197 TO 249] returns 2
records
but I have two records with the price_1_1 = 249, it seams that the upper
range is exclusive and I can't figure out why, can you help me
what query parser should I use? http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax
Differences From Lucene Query Parser
Differences in the Solr Query Parser include
Range queries [a TO z], prefix queries a*, and wildcard queries a*b are
constant-scoring (all matching documents get an equal score
We should consider adding another parameter RealTime in the log. That
would really help all of us trying to figure out how much time a query is
taking.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com
wrote:
Right. The main takeway is that QTime is not exactly what
http://docs.lucidworks.com/display/solr/Working+with+External+Files+and+Processes
says
this about external file fields:
They can be used only for function queries or display.
I understand how to use them in function queries, but how do I retrieve the
values for display?
If I want to fetch only
The only way is using a frange (function range) query:
q={!frange l=0 u=10}my_external_field
Will pull out documents that have your external field with a value
between zero and 10.
Upayavira
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013, at 09:02 PM, Arun Rangarajan wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Arun Rangarajan
arunrangara...@gmail.com wrote:
http://docs.lucidworks.com/display/solr/Working+with+External+Files+and+Processes
says
this about external file fields:
They can be used only for function queries or display.
I understand how to use them in
Yonik,
Thanks, your answer works!
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidworks.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Arun Rangarajan
arunrangara...@gmail.com wrote:
http://docs.lucidworks.com/display/solr/Working+with+External+Files+and+Processes
says
this about
Hi,
It's with regards to generating a query string for Solr.
I am looking for a solution where I can create the query string like
'q=name:ipod AND cat=music AND features=coolfacet=onfacet.field=cat'
Is there any library through which we can create this query string.
I came across Solrj but
On 25 June 2013 00:07, Ashwin Tandel ashwintan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
It's with regards to generating a query string for Solr.
I am looking for a solution where I can create the query string like
'q=name:ipod AND cat=music AND features=coolfacet=onfacet.field=cat'
Is there any library
, but the query
restricts results to the single category music.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ashwin Tandel
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 2:37 PM
To: solr-user
Subject: Creating solr query.
Hi,
It's with regards to generating a query string for Solr.
I am looking for a solution
On 6/4/2013 8:45 AM, O'Regan, Mike wrote:
Can't a GC also kick in before the timer starts, resulting a short QTime but
a long time from the point of view of the client? Believe I have seen that
phenomenon in action.
You are correct. I don't know why I didn't think of that.
Thanks,
Shawn
On Jun 4, 2013, at 8:28 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 6/4/2013 8:45 AM, O'Regan, Mike wrote:
Can't a GC also kick in before the timer starts, resulting a short QTime but
a long time from the point of view of the client? Believe I have seen that
phenomenon in action.
You are correct. I
Right. The main takeway is that QTime is not exactly what user sees.
What users sees is always QTime. To see what end users experience
one needs RUM (and I don't mean the tasty kind, but
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_user_monitoring .
Otis
--
Solr ElasticSearch Support
You can use this tool to analyze the logs..
https://github.com/dfdeshom/solr-loganalyzer
We use solrmeter to test the performance / Stress testing.
https://code.google.com/p/solrmeter/
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-query-performance-tool
Subject: Re: Solr query performance tool
You can use this tool to analyze the logs..
https://github.com/dfdeshom/solr-loganalyzer
We use solrmeter to test the performance / Stress testing.
https://code.google.com/p/solrmeter/
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com
On 6/3/2013 3:33 PM, Greg Harris wrote:
You have to be careful looking at the QTime's. They do not include garbage
collection. I've run into issues where QTime is short (cause it was), it just
happened that the query came in during a long garbage collection where
everything was paused. So
Hi,
Lately we are seeing increased latency times on solr and we would like to
know which queries / facet searches are the most time consuming and heavy
for our system.
Is there any tool equivalent to the mysql low log? Does solr keep the times
each query takes in some log?
Thank you for your
Hi,
The regular Solr log logs Qtime for each query.
Otis
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On May 29, 2013 5:59 PM, Spyros Lambrinidis spy...@peopleperhour.com
wrote:
Hi,
Lately we are seeing increased latency times on solr and we would like to
know which queries / facet
The qtimes are in the solr log, you'll see lines like:
params={q=*:*} hits=32 status=0 QTime=5
QTime is the time spent serving the query but does NOT include
assembling the response.
Best
Erick
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Spyros Lambrinidis
spy...@peopleperhour.com wrote:
Hi,
Lately we
Hi Upayavira,
Thank you for your analysis. I thought 'AND' groupings are supported as
per documentation:
http://docs.lucidworks.com/display/solr/The+Extended+DisMax+Query+Parser
http://lucene.apache.org/core/old_versioned_docs/versions/3_5_0/queryparsersyntax.html#Grouping
But yes,
should go away.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Shankar Sundararaju
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 7:23 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can anyone explain this Solr query behavior?
Hi Erick,
Here's the output after turning on the debug flag:
*q=text
remediation it was performing..
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shankar Sundararaju
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 1:01 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can anyone explain this Solr query behavior?
Hi Jack Krupansky,
Thank you for your reply. I would like to know how
Please post the results of adding debug=query to the URL.
That'll tell us what the query parser spits out which is much
easier to analyze.
Best
Erick
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Shankar Sundararaju
shan...@ebrary.com wrote:
This query returns 0 documents: *q=(+Title:() +Classification:()
Hi Erick,
Here's the output after turning on the debug flag:
*q=text:()debug=query*
yields
response
lst name=responseHeader
int name=status0/int
int name=QTime17/int
lst name=params
str name=indenttrue/str
str name=qtext:()/str
str name=debugquery/str
/lst
/lst
result name=response
(+(doc-id:3000 DisjunctionMaxQuery((Publisher:and^2.0 | text:and |
Classification:and^2.0 | Contributors:and^2.0 |
Title:and^3.0/no_coord
You're using edismax, not lucene. So AND is being considered as a search
term, not an operator, and the word 'and' probably exists in 631580
documents.
: Can anyone explain this Solr query behavior?
Hi Erick,
Here's the output after turning on the debug flag:
*q=text:()debug=query*
yields
response
lst name=responseHeader
int name=status0/int
int name=QTime17/int
lst name=params
str name=indenttrue/str
str name=qtext:()/str
str name=debugquery
This query returns 0 documents: *q=(+Title:() +Classification:()
+Contributors:() +text:())*
This returns 1 document: *q=doc-id:3000*
And this returns 631580 documents when I was expecting 0: *q=doc-id:3000
AND (+Title:() +Classification:() +Contributors:() +text:())*
Am I missing something
would like to create a JIRA ticket soon
Thanks
Roman
On 6 May 2013 09:21, Jan Høydahl jan@cominvent.com wrote:
Hi,
I just added a Wiki page to try to gather a list of all known Solr
query
parsers in one place, both those which are part of Solr and those in
JIRA
or 3rd
this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Need-solr-query-help-tp4061800p4062603.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
can edit the file to play with it and repost the
shops:-
http://localhost:8983/solr/update?stream.body=deletequeryname:shop/query/deletecommit=true
smsolr
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Need-solr-query-help-tp4061800p4062591.html
Sent from the Solr - User
/Need-solr-query-help-tp4061800p4062603.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
We are doing spatial search. with following logic.
a) There are shops in a city . Each provides the facility of home delivery
b) each shop has different max_delivery_distance .
Now my query is suppose some one is searching from point P1 with radius R.
User wants the result of shops those can
Dear All
I am using Apache SOLR 3.6.2 version for my search engine in a job site.
I am observing for a solr query taking around 15 seconds to complete. I am
sure there is something wrong in my approach or I am doing indexing
wrongly. I need assistance/pointer to resolve this issue. I am providing
Yes, that's what the 'start' and 'rows' parameters do in the query
string. I would check the queries Solr sees when you do that long
request. There is usually a delay in retrieving items further down the
sorted list, but 15 seconds does feel excessive.
Thanks a lot Alex.
I will go and try to make use of start filter and update.
Meantime, if I need to know, how many total search records are there.
Example: Lets say I am searching key word java.
There might be 1000 documents having java keyword. I need to show only 100
records at a time.
When
On 5/7/2013 8:45 AM, Kamal Palei wrote:
When user clicks, 4, I will set start filter as 300, rows filter as 100
and do the query. As query result, I am expecting row count as 1000, and
100 records data (row number 301 to 400).
This is what using the start and rows parameter with Solr will do.
Hi,
I just added a Wiki page to try to gather a list of all known Solr query
parsers in one place, both those which are part of Solr and those in JIRA or
3rd party.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/QueryParser
If you known about other cool parsers out there, please add to the list.
--
Jan
Jan,
I have a full 80-page chapter on query parsers in the new book on Lucene and
Solr. Send me an email if you would like to be a reviewer. It integrates the
descriptions of Solr query parser, dismax, and edismax so that it's not as
difficult to figure out which is which and how they compare
to gather a list of all known Solr query
parsers in one place, both those which are part of Solr and those in JIRA
or 3rd party.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/QueryParser
If you known about other cool parsers out there, please add to the list.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent
like to create a JIRA ticket soon
Thanks
Roman
On 6 May 2013 09:21, Jan Høydahl jan@cominvent.com wrote:
Hi,
I just added a Wiki page to try to gather a list of all known Solr query
parsers in one place, both those which are part of Solr and those in JIRA
or 3rd party.
http
a list of all known Solr query
parsers in one place, both those which are part of Solr and those in
JIRA
or 3rd party.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/QueryParser
If you known about other cool parsers out there, please add to the list.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
)
I would like to create a JIRA ticket soon
Thanks
Roman
On 6 May 2013 09:21, Jan Høydahl jan@cominvent.com wrote:
Hi,
I just added a Wiki page to try to gather a list of all known Solr query
parsers in one place, both those which are part of Solr and those in
JIRA
or 3rd party
to on.
Best
Erick
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 8:26 AM, dafnashkedy dafnashk...@yahoo.com wrote:
I would like to execute a solr query and get only the uniquKey I've defined.
The documents are very big so defining fl='my_key' is not fast enough - all
the matching documents are still scanned
I would like to execute a solr query and get only the uniquKey I've defined.
The documents are very big so defining fl='my_key' is not fast enough - all
the matching documents are still scanned and the query can take hours (even
though the search itself was fast - numFound takes few seconds
I am trying to understand how to plug data into the solr query option from
the UI.
The query below works on our old solr version (1.3) but does not return
results on 4.2. I pulled it from the catalina log file. I am trying to
plug in the values one by one into the query UI to see which one
On 4 April 2013 22:11, scallawa dami...@altrec.com wrote:
I am trying to understand how to plug data into the solr query option from
the UI.
The query below works on our old solr version (1.3) but does not return
results on 4.2. I pulled it from the catalina log file. I am trying to
plug
=*:*facet=truefacet.limit=-1facet.mincount=1facet.field=cat-pathfacet.field=genderfacet.field=brandfacet.field=discountfacet.field=star-ratingfacet.field=sizefacet.field=colorfacet.field=pricestart=0
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Query-UI-tp4053860p4053912
/core/4_0_0/queryparser/org/apache/lucene/queryparser/classic/package-summary.html#Escaping%20Special%20Characters
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Query-UI-tp4053860p4053987.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
in my
SOLR query.
http://hostname:8080/SOLR/browse?q=documentID:D12133 OR documentID:D14423 OR
documentID:D912
I want results in same order...
D12133
D14423
D912
Regards,
Atul
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Retriving-results-based-on-SOLR-query-data
issue here.. sort feature works fine.
I have indexed few documents in SOLR.. which have a unique document ID.
Now when I retrieve result's from SOLR results comes automatically sorted.
However I would like to fetch results based on the sequence I mention in my
SOLR query.
http://hostname:8080
to create
hundreds of needless copy fields.
- A full query string example is:
q=*%3A*group=truegroup.facet=truegroup.func=if(exists(groupField),groupField,uuidField)rows=10wt=xml
- I am using Solr 4.0.0
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Using-String-Values-in-Solr
Thanks very much, it worked perfectly !!
Best regards, Lisheng
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:j...@basetechnology.com]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 1:04 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr query parser, needs to call
setAutoGeneratePhraseQueries(true
Hi,
In our application we need to call method
setAutoGeneratePhraseQueries(true)
on lucene QueryParser, this is the way used to work in earlier versions
and it seems to me that is the much natural way?
But in current solr 3.6.1, the only way to do so is to set
Simply add the autoGeneratePhraseQueries attribute with a value of true
to all of your text field types in your schema.xml.
See the text_
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Zhang, Lisheng
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 3:20 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr
...
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 3:51 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr query parser, needs to call
setAutoGeneratePhraseQueries(true)
Simply add the autoGeneratePhraseQueries attribute with a value of true
Thanks very much for your valuable help, it worked perfectly !!!
Lisheng
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:j...@basetechnology.com]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 12:54 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr query parser, needs to call
, 2013 3:20 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr query parser, needs to call setAutoGeneratePhraseQueries(true)
Hi,
In our application we need to call method
setAutoGeneratePhraseQueries(true)
on lucene QueryParser, this is the way used to work in earlier versions
and it seems to me
?
-- Sabeer
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Getting-Lucense-Query-from-Solr-query-Or-converting-Solr-Query-to-Lucense-s-query-tp4031187p4038753.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
SolrQueryRequest object or anything like that to get the instance of
QParserPlugin. Is it possible to create SolrQueryRequest from
HttpServletRequest? I would like to use SolrJ to create Lucense Query from
Solr query (but I do not know whether it is possible or not)
Regards
Sabeer
--
View
to use SolrJ to create Lucense Query from
Solr query (but I do not know whether it is possible or not)
Regards
Sabeer
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Getting-Lucense-Query-from-Solr-query-Or-converting-Solr-Query-to-Lucense-s-query-tp4031187p4038300
You could use wt=xmltr=.xsl and use an xsl stylesheet to transform
the XML into the order you want. (on 3.6 and below, use
wt=xslttr=.xsl)
However, I'm not that sure why you would want to - presumably some app
is going to consume this XML, and can't that put them into the right
order?
On 23 January 2013 23:04, hassancrowdc hassancrowdc...@gmail.com wrote:
Date and time is not being displayed properly, It gives me the following
error and also it goes to he next line after year and month, see following:
createdDate:ERROR:SCHEMA-INDEX-MISMATCH,stringValue=2012-12-
21T21:34:51
look for problem? I have seen logs it does not show anything
happen.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-query-tp4035325.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 1/22/2013 7:32 AM, hassancrowdc wrote:
Hi,
I have indexed data from mysql database to solr. Indexing is successful
everything is woring ok but when i query through the fields of my table i
can only query from one field none of the rest are giving me any
resultset(numFound comes out to be 0)
/lst
lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.StatsComponent
double name=time0.0/double
/lst
lst name=org.apache.solr.handler.component.DebugComponent
double name=time0.0/double
/lst
/lst
/lst
/lst
/response
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-query
On 1/22/2013 8:16 AM, hassancrowdc wrote:
response
lst name=responseHeader
int name=status0/int
int name=QTime1/int
lst name=params
str name=echoParamsall/str
str name=debugQuerytrue/str
str name=indenttrue/str
str name=qkobo/str
str name=qfmodel/str
str name=defTypedismax/str
Based on what I
reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
below:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-query-tp4035325p4035345.html
To unsubscribe from solr query, click
herehttp://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=4035325code
On 1/22/2013 8:33 AM, hassancrowdc wrote:
I thought that is the problem in the beginning but I have tried Kobo, but
it does not give me result(numFound=0) If you want i can send you xml of
resultset. and can you explain ho i can make it flexible so that it takes
care of upper/lowercase or any
On 1/22/2013 8:53 AM, hassancrowdc wrote:
ok. Coming to my original question: problem is only manufacturer field is
working. with the same code and everything, if i use manufacturer field in
query it gives me results but not with model or displayName etc. what
should i do?
When you search by
(spaces or anything else) other than the following?
str name=modelKobo/str
Thanks,
Shawn
--
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
below:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-query-tp4035325p4035371.html
To unsubscribe from
On 1/22/2013 9:54 AM, hassancrowdc wrote:
so this will be fixed by changing type f the fields and adding analyzers?
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 11:54 AM, hassan altaf hassancrowdc...@gmail.comwrote:
ok, i think it is phrase query problem.
Probably. I can't say for sure, but everything I've
thnx. One quick question, can I control the way resultset of the query is
shown: I mean if i want displayName to be shown first and then the id and
then manufacturer and model? is there any way i can do that?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-query
to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
below:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-query-tp4035325p4035390.html
To unsubscribe from solr query, click here
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=4035325code
On 23 January 2013 01:26, hassancrowdc hassancrowdc...@gmail.com wrote:
sorry if it is a stupid question but where can i find result.xml and where
do i write this program? any hints?
[...]
The result XML referred to is the XML returned by
Solr as a response to a query (if you prefer, you
can
401 - 500 of 780 matches
Mail list logo
