5G memory per JVM
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/my-index-has-500-million-docs-how-to-improve-solr-search-performance-tp1902595p2819179.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-search-performance-tp2239298p2239714.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-search-performance-tp2239298p2239378.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Wednesday 12 January 2011 10:56 AM, Grijesh.singh wrote:
Which type of performance issues you have index time or query time?
-
Grijesh
i have query time index issues.Also tell me in which condition
field_type' textspell' is used. Is it effect the performance of solr query.
Which type of performance issues you have index time or query time?
-
Grijesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-search-performance-tp2239298p2239338.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi
Plz tell me changes that made in solr config file to improve the
solr search performance.
Thanks!
;http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501&tag=nl.e036'
EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.
- Original Message
From: Lance Norskog
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wed, November 17, 2010 10:53:47 PM
Subject: Re: my index has 500 million docs ,how to impro
This is pretty standard. I think the problem is basic probabilities:
when there are multiple shards, the query waits until the final shard
responds, then does another query which may wait for more than one
shard. The nature of probabilities is that there will be "stragglers"
(late responses) an
ml content:
id
name
I'm looking forward to your opinion
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/my-index-has-500-million-docs-how-to-improve-solr-search-performance-tp1902595p1916398.html
Sent from the Solr - User maili
-docs-how-to-improve-solr-search-performance-tp1902595p1916289.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
It's not that EC2 instances have slow disks, it's that they have no
quota system to guarantee you X amount of throughput. I've benchmarked
1x to 3x on the same instance type at different times. That is, 300%
variation in disk speeds.
Filter queries are only slow once; after that they create a
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 06:35 +0100, lu.rongbin wrote:
> In addition,my index has only two store fields, id and price, and other
> fields are index. I increase the document and query cache. the ec2
> m2.4xLarge instance is 8 cores, 68G memery. all indexs size is about 100G.
Looking at http://aws.ama
-500-million-docs-how-to-improve-solr-search-performance-tp1902595p1902869.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
llion-docs-how-to-improve-solr-search-performance-tp1902595p1902595.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
> Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> > From: bbarani
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: Wed, June 16, 2010 5:06:55 PM
> > Subject: SOLR search performance - Linux v
gt; Linux box but takes just a second
in windows box. Have anyone encountered
> this kind of issue before?
Thanks,
BB
--
View this message in
> context:
> href="http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-search-performance-Linux-vs-Windows-servers-tp901069p901069.html";
>
issue before?
Thanks,
BB
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-search-performance-Linux-vs-Windows-servers-tp901069p901069.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> can you be more specific about what you mean when you say "And I got the
> time from dispatchfilter..." What *exactly* are you looking at (ie: is
> this a time you are seeing in a log file? ifso which log file? ... is this
> timing code you added to the dispatch filter yourself? what *exactl
: 1) how are you timing this (ie: what exactly are you measuring)
: And I got the time from dispatchfilter received the request to
: responsewriter write the response
: It is much larger than QTime.
can you be more specific about what you mean when you say "And I got the
time from dispatchfilte
2008/4/9, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> : most of time seems to be used for the writer getting and writing the
> docs
> : can those docs prefetched?
>
> as mentiond, the documentCache can help you out in the common case, but
> 1-4 seconds for just the XMLWriting seems pretty high ...
: most of time seems to be used for the writer getting and writing the docs
: can those docs prefetched?
as mentiond, the documentCache can help you out in the common case, but
1-4 seconds for just the XMLWriting seems pretty high ...
1) how are you timing this (ie: what exactly are you measur
I will try what u suggested !
Thanks a lot~
在08-4-9，Leonardo Santagada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 写道：
>
>
> On 09/04/2008, at 00:24, 李银松 wrote:
>
> > most of time seems to be used for the writer getting and writing the
> > docs
> > can those docs prefetched?
> >
>
>
> There is a cache on solr... if you
On 09/04/2008, at 00:24, 李银松 wrote:
most of time seems to be used for the writer getting and writing the
docs
can those docs prefetched?
There is a cache on solr... if you really want it you could make the
cache and the jvm as big as your memory it should probably fit most of
the 10gb i
most of time seems to be used for the writer getting and writing the docs
can those docs prefetched?
2008/4/9, Leonardo Santagada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On 08/04/2008, at 23:13, 李银松 wrote:
>
> > I'm testing solr search performance using LoadRunner
> >
; On 08/04/2008, at 23:13, 李银松 wrote:
>
> > I'm testing solr search performance using LoadRunner
> > the index contains 5M+ docs , about 10.7GB large.
> > CPU:3.2GHz*2 RAM16GB
> > The result si dispirited
> > max:19s min 1.5s avg 11.7s
> > But the QTime is
On 08/04/2008, at 23:13, 李银松 wrote:
I'm testing solr search performance using LoadRunner
the index contains 5M+ docs , about 10.7GB large.
CPU:3.2GHz*2 RAM16GB
The result si dispirited
max:19s min 1.5s avg 11.7s
But the QTime is around 1s
(simple query without facet or mlt,just fetch the t
I'm testing solr search performance using LoadRunner
the index contains 5M+ docs , about 10.7GB large.
CPU:3.2GHz*2 RAM16GB
The result si dispirited
max:19s min 1.5s avg 11.7s
But the QTime is around 1s
(simple query without facet or mlt,just fetch the top 50 IDs)
So it seems that XMLWriter i
27 matches
Mail list logo
