On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 06:57:25AM -0500, Jan Dobes wrote:
> Nevermind, you don't have to fix it. I already corrected your patch and
> pushed it to master.
Thanks. :)
--
Bo Maryniuk
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer
His entire j
> > Hi, Michael.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 04:01:23PM +0100, Michael Mraka wrote:
> > > - SSM/Configuration/Enable: The message 'You may schedule rhncfg*
> > > package...'
> > > should stay above the date picker as it was originally.
> >
> > Done.
> >
> >
> > > - The original text befor
> Hi, Michael.
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 04:01:23PM +0100, Michael Mraka wrote:
> > - SSM/Configuration/Enable: The message 'You may schedule rhncfg*
> > package...'
> > should stay above the date picker as it was originally.
>
> Done.
>
>
> > - The original text before the date picker ('Yo
Hi, Michael.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 04:01:23PM +0100, Michael Mraka wrote:
> - SSM/Configuration/Enable: The message 'You may schedule rhncfg* package...'
> should stay above the date picker as it was originally.
Done.
> - The original text before the date picker ('You may schedule the packa
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Michael Mraka
wrote:
> Bo Maryniuk wrote:
> % On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:12:06PM +0100, Michael Mraka wrote:
> % > % > Could be. But it doesn't answer my questions. I'm asking for timeframe
> % > % > because this is one of the blockers for Spacewalk 2.1 release an
Bo Maryniuk wrote:
% On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:12:06PM +0100, Michael Mraka wrote:
% > % > Could be. But it doesn't answer my questions. I'm asking for timeframe
% > % > because this is one of the blockers for Spacewalk 2.1 release and we
% > % > have to decide whether wait for it or not.
% > %
%
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:12:06PM +0100, Michael Mraka wrote:
> % > Could be. But it doesn't answer my questions. I'm asking for timeframe
> % > because this is one of the blockers for Spacewalk 2.1 release and we
> % > have to decide whether wait for it or not.
> %
> % OK, that sounds reasonable
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:12:06PM +0100, Michael Mraka wrote:
> % > Could be. But it doesn't answer my questions. I'm asking for timeframe
> % > because this is one of the blockers for Spacewalk 2.1 release and we
> % > have to decide whether wait for it or not.
> %
> % OK, that sounds reasonable
% > Could be. But it doesn't answer my questions. I'm asking for timeframe
% > because this is one of the blockers for Spacewalk 2.1 release and we
% > have to decide whether wait for it or not.
%
% OK, that sounds reasonable. Then I will make some more patches that will
% synchronize the rest of
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 09:07:31AM +0100, Michael Mraka wrote:
> As you wrote previously you postponed finishing the changes.
> Are you working on it again or not? If yes go ahead, if not please make
> it compatible with other pages.
Ah, OK. Probably my strange expressions misled you. Yes, we do w
Hello Bo,
% > but until it's done
% > (consistently across all the pages) you should keep the old style.
%
% Then why to make the efforts tripple times? Let's sync it with the rest of the
% pages instead? You already agreed that the current way is not simple and, in
% fact, duplicates the functio
Hi, Michael,
I am back. :)
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 11:43:18AM +0100, Michael Mraka wrote:
> Yes, it's possible to simplify date picker on other pages
Of course. This is what we all want, ultimately: a simplicity and better UI.
> but until it's done
> (consistently across all the pages) you shoul
% > First of them: the original schedule date picker on contains two choices
% > - Schedule action as soon as possible
% > - Schedule action for no sooner than:
% > while new contains only
% > - Schedule action for no sooner than
%
% Because it is the same thing: "as soon as possible" is basica
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:15:13AM +0100, Michael Mraka wrote:
> First of them: the original schedule date picker on contains two choices
> - Schedule action as soon as possible
> - Schedule action for no sooner than:
> while new contains only
> - Schedule action for no sooner than
Because it i
Hello Bo,
recently come across two pages - SSM > Errata (/rhn/systems/ssm/ListPatches.do)
and SSM > Misc > Reboot (/rhn/systems/ssm/misc/RebootSystem.do) - which
you've converted from pxt to java. Both pages works fine but there're
small yet important differences between them and the other action
15 matches
Mail list logo
