Yes, thanks alot.
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:49:05 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] has been unsubscribed. (I eventually wrote an LWP
crawler to download each of the 87 chunks of the address list from
sf.net so I could grep them ;)
--j.
From: Richard Bewley
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2003
9:04 AM
To:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: SpamAssassin with postfix
as a gateway
Hi,
I am currently running postfix a gateway for incoming mail,
which has a transport.map file configured to
I thought I saw a reference to a letter that SA could automatically
generate upon encountering spam. I've got 2.60 installed, could someone
give me a pointer on how to create this letter.
--
Jack Gostl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Justin Mason wrote:
Charles Gregory writes:
I've been playing with the 'locales' settings, and they work quite well
where a message has been properly formatted with 'charset' headers, but
here's a message whose only visible clue is the use of 'windows-1251' in
the SUBJECT
in the foreground of shell I run:
/usr/bin/spamd --username=popuser -D
--virtual-config-dir=/var/qmail/mailnames/%d/%l/configs/ -a
in my syslog files I see this:
Using default config for qmailq:
/var/qmail/mailnames///configs//user_prefs
atleast I know why I can not get per user config
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Robert Menschel wrote:
I use the following rule with some success. You should be able to
substitute your windows-1251.
header RM_sx_iso8859 Subject:raw =~ /iso-8859-1/i
Interesting. They do not list the 'raw' option in the SA documentation
for header checks. This is
What the? I have received several of these today. I'm not sending any mail
that would actually generate a legitimate delivery receipt, so what does
this message mean?
Side note: they are using an old domain that is disused, so definitely a
a spam behind this somewhere.
- Charles
--
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:49:05 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] has been unsubscribed. (I eventually wrote an LWP
crawler to download each of the 87 chunks of the address list from
sf.net so I could grep them ;)
I also wrote a note to 'pool.com' suggesting that
How is this possible?
From: master [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ñ¢èë¯çLçêŶ
ä÷êSÇÃñÇ¢ïÇÇÕëÂï¦Ç¾ñ¿òfÇǮǩÇØívǵÇÐÇ
ÇçÌèúâÇÇ¢ÅB
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on cfcl.com
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=1.0 tests=BAYES_00,
UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY
Well, now I see the - in front of the 2.1. Though if the BAYES test says the
probability is 0 the4 Bayes test is really lame.
From: master [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ñ¢èë¯çLçêŶ
ä÷êSÇÃñÇ¢ïÇÇÕëÂï¦Ç¾ñ¿òfÇǮǩÇØívǵÇÐÇ
ÇçÌèúâÇÇ¢ÅB
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60
Vicki Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, now I see the - in front of the 2.1. Though if the BAYES
test says the probability is 0 the4 Bayes test is really lame.
Looks like some spam must have been autolearned as ham at some
point. You may want to delete your Bayes database.
--
Keith C.
Hello list -
I apologise if this question has been answered before; I briefly
searched the archives and Googled a lot, and didn't find anything that
fully answered my question, but it's quite possible I missed the magic
keyword in my search.
I'll begin by describing what I want to set up, and
Good evening, Rubin,
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003, Rubin Bennett wrote:
I want to set up a central email address for my users to forward spam to
([EMAIL PROTECTED] for example). I would like to have that address be fed to
a script that runs sa-learn on the message, but not as root: I want
sa-learn
Hello,
Below are the first few lines of my local.cf file for the entire site. I do not have
a local.cf for any of my users.
However, when I get mail, it says : autolearn=no version=2.60
Why does it think that autolearn is off, when I clearly set it on?
Thanks
Mairhtin
# SpamAssassin
Hey,
I want to add BNBL (bl.blueshore.net) to my DNSBL checks in SpamAssassin,
can I just add something like this to 20_dnsbl_tests.cf
header RCVD_IN_BNBLeval:check_rbl('bnbl', 'bl.blueshore.net.')
describe RCVD_IN_BNBL Received via a relay in bl.blueshore.net
tflags
Good evening, Mairhtin,
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003, Mairhtin O'Feannag wrote:
Below are the first few lines of my local.cf file for the entire site.
I do not have a local.cf for any of my users.
However, when I get mail, it says : autolearn=no version=2.60
Why does it think that autolearn is
I've got a quick perl question:
I have a 'badrule' which searches for / badtext / and gives lots of
points
I have another 'goodrule' which searches for / badtext goodtext / and
subtracts lots of points (enough to more than counteract the effects of
badrule containing 'xyz')
My problem: if the
the autolearn header is only set to yes when a message is found
outside of the boundaries, which is (below) 0.1 for ham/non-spam and
(above) 12.0 for spam. It uses scoresets with bayes disabled when
comparing an email's score against the thresholds (unless of course
you've modified the bayes_*
I started using the default setting of 5 in user_prefs. This caught
*very* little spam. Most of the Swen virus emails, for example, still
get through with scores of about 2.something But marking as spam at 2.5
is already causing too much collateral damage for mailing lists. I have
to be
Hello,
I am trying to confirm that RBLs are working. I have the following in
my local.cf but with debug output on (output below) nothing about RBLs
are noted. How do i confirm the RBLs i want are working properly?
thanks
adam
from local.cf
-
### RBL Checks
skip_rbl_checks 0
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003, Richard Bewley wrote:
I want to add BNBL (bl.blueshore.net) to my DNSBL checks in SpamAssassin,
can I just add something like this to 20_dnsbl_tests.cf
header RCVD_IN_BNBLeval:check_rbl('bnbl', 'bl.blueshore.net.')
describe RCVD_IN_BNBL Received
Hi folks --
After some dithering about which software to use, we've taken the plunge;
here's the SpamAssassin Wiki:
http://wiki.spamassassin.org/
The main idea of it right now is to replace the FAQ; this provides a
better way to create a publically-editable hypertext, and it's
easier to
- Original Message -
From: Marvin Raab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 1:18 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] perl question
How do I contruct a proper perl expression to search
for / badtext goodtext / where the seaprating character
can be a space or a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Vicki,
Saturday, November 22, 2003, 12:24:59 PM, you wrote:
VB Well, now I see the - in front of the 2.1. Though if the BAYES test
VB says the probability is 0 the4 Bayes test is really lame.
I disagree.
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marvin,
Saturday, November 22, 2003, 4:06:09 PM, you wrote:
MR I have a 'badrule' which ...
MR I have another 'goodrule' which ...
MR My problem: if the spam contains badtext followed by a carriage
MR return instead of a space and then
On Saturday 22 November 2003 02:52 pm, William Stearns wrote:
SpamAssassin 2.55
It's _well_ worth upgrading to 2.60.
Just curious what is so much better about 2.6. If it is just the filters used
I already run a bunch of custom ones that fit my needs really well with 2.55.
I get
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 06:24:38PM -0800, Robert Menschel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello John,
Saturday, November 22, 2003, 4:24:01 PM, you wrote:
JO I started using the default setting of 5 in user_prefs. This caught
JO *very* little spam. Most of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Charles,
Saturday, November 22, 2003, 12:06:02 PM, you wrote:
RM I use the following rule with some success. You should be able to
RM substitute your windows-1251.
CG Interesting. They do not list the 'raw' option in the SA
CG documentation
Have you seen the configuration generator at:
http://www.yrex.com/spam/spamconfig.php
Bryan
John Oliver wrote:
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 06:24:38PM -0800, Robert Menschel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello John,
Saturday, November 22, 2003, 4:24:01 PM, you
29 matches
Mail list logo
