[THIS LIST HAS MOVED! see http://useast.spamassassin.org/lists.html .]
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 13:08:58 +0100 PieterB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can somebody explain me why a spammessage gets learned as ham?
Dunno. Why are you running the message through SpamAssassin twice?
-- Bob
> X-Spam-Stat
[THIS LIST HAS MOVED! see http://useast.spamassassin.org/lists.html .]
Hi,
is it possible to have several _local_ configuration files (not only /etc
spamassassin/local.cf, but also e.g. whitelist.cf, words.cf, etc in /etc
spamassassin)? I didn't find any "include" statement etc. in
Mail::SpamAss
[THIS LIST HAS MOVED! see http://useast.spamassassin.org/lists.html .]Thursday,
January 29, 2004, 8:24:15 PM, I wrote:
RM> Even better, since it will catch use of this address in a TO, CC, and/or
RM> From header, might be:
RM> ...
RM> I don't yet have stats for this meta rule (I haven't even l
I have installed Spamassassin 2.61-2 on Debian Sarge, but I can't get
the daemon to run. Running "/etc/init.d/spamassassin start" does not
complain about any error, but nothing happens.
There is no spamd process running. I can not find any reference to
spamassassin or spamd in /var/log either.
[THIS LIST HAS MOVED! see http://useast.spamassassin.org/lists.html .]On Tuesday 27
January 2004 09:11 am, Dennis Davis wrote:
> >From: Matthew Trent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: [SAtalk] Re: Meta-tripwire idea
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:06:41 -0800
>
> ...
>
> >That
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:55:06AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> any advice on how to force an expire successfully here?
You can't force an expiry, you can only force an expiry attempt.
> I am running 2.60 on solaris 9.
I would first recommend upgrading to 2.63, then try again. You'll still
[THIS LIST HAS MOVED! see http://useast.spamassassin.org/lists.html .]I am using SA
2.63. It's been running fine. During the checkers, I
keep seeing in the headers for SA "autolearn=no."
Now, all of a sudden after some usage, SA now says "autolearn=spam" or
"autolearn=ham." How did this feat
[THIS LIST HAS MOVED! see http://useast.spamassassin.org/lists.html .]On Sat, Jan 24,
2004 at 10:49:37AM +0400, Dr Aldo Medina
carved this out of pure phosphors:
> Is there any way to protecto form this?. I just received this email:
>
> TThe coomputeer mmust haave the 'suspend too RRAAM' feeatt
In every domain I manage, we receive spam directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can't imagine I'm the only one.
Apparently some address harvester somewhere along the way harvested and
then mangled [EMAIL PROTECTED], dropping the leading "we" and
replacing the "ter" with "tgr".
I created this rule toda
[THIS LIST HAS MOVED! see http://useast.spamassassin.org/lists.html .]I have a customer using a Verizon DSL which automatically scores a
number of hits from the dynamic IP RBL's. We all understand the
impossibility of changing Verizon's lax enforcement policies; but I'm
hoping there might be a
On Friday 30 January 2004 05:52 pm, Kelson Vibber wrote:
> At 09:04 AM 1/30/2004, Brian Godette wrote:
> >Maybe they'll start writting in Middle English to target that untapped
> > market of english lit majors/grads.
>
> I can just see it:
>
> "Whan thou wouldst gaine the favour of a lass
> Thy Pr
It's been about 9 days since the last update. Longest ever. This update was
an attempt at having more then one person work on the file. Lets say it was
a learning experience :) Some great tweaking was done and awesome bug
testing by SARE members. Can't thank them enough.
Let me know IMMEDIATELY o
Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
For example whitelisting.
Any examples on whitelisting messages that are marked as spam when
they are not ?
From what I understand from
http://au.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
if you get legit messages as spam, you can configure in
/etc/mail/spamassas
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 11:31:42PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Dan Wilder wrote on Mon, 26 Jan 2004 14:49:36 -0800:
>
> > This is a highly automated RBL based on some big spamtraps,
> >
>
> I'm finding spamtrap RBLs quite problematic because they list the wrong
> culprits. What does the mail se
Peggy
Search for it at http://search.cpan.org
Alan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Peggy
> Sent: 29 January 2004 15:29
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Re: Installation failure
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Does anyone kno
At 01:22 PM 1/30/2004, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
1. spamassassin ! Plain sa installation . What next ? Training ?
1000 Spam and 1000 Ham ??
Bayes training is a good thing. Ideal is to have a spam/ham training ratio
close to what comes into your server in reality. However, considerable
variance
For example whitelisting.
Any examples on whitelisting messages that are marked as spam when they are
not ?
From what I understand from
http://au.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
if you get legit messages as spam, you can configure in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
to treat it a
Hi Scott
>
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:30:13 -0500, Chris Santerre
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I received a report of an FP in bigevil. The domain was
> > playaudiomessage.com. A quick google shows tons of hits in
> > news.admin.net-abuse.sightings. It had been my hope the bigevil
> > would
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:30:13 -0500, Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I received a report of an FP in bigevil. The domain was
> playaudiomessage.com. A quick google shows tons of hits in
> news.admin.net-abuse.sightings. It had been my hope the bigevil
> would be ZERO fp. However I'm no
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 08:31:39PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Michael Parker wrote on Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:43:34 -0600:
>
> > perldoc Mail::SpamAssasisn::Conf and search for use_auto_whitelist.
> > If you find it, then I stand corrected. I'm guessing it's not there.
>
> Ah, well, yes, you are r
At 11:51 AM 1/30/2004, Fred wrote:
A bug in 2.6 caused messages which hit BAYES_99 to be learned as ham, this
has been fixed, you should upgrade.
For reference, there was no bug per se. The fact that the message hit
BAYES_99 did not cause it to be learned as ham.
However, newer versions of SA,
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Luka Z. Gerzic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Original subject:
> =?iso-8859-1?B?T3Zlcm5pZ2h0IERlbGl2ZXJ5IC0gWW91IGdldCBtb3JlIGZvciBsZXNzIQ==?
> =
>
> Un-masked subject: Overnight delivery - you get more for less!
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-talk&m=10740913112
these are all mails that get learned about 30 days after being stored on
the system. Basically people have 30 days to clean up their mail.. if
not a FP, then we learn it as spam. So all learned mail is about 30
days old to the tee..
do i need to change my method of learning?
thanks
adam
On Fri
Dan Wilder wrote on Mon, 26 Jan 2004 14:49:36 -0800:
> This is a highly automated RBL based on some big spamtraps,
>
I'm finding spamtrap RBLs quite problematic because they list the wrong
culprits. What does the mail server sending the junk has to do with the
original sender? Nothing other tha
Brett Dikeman wrote:
> I tried setting bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam to a positive
> value- almost all legitimate email we get on the particular system is
> marked somewhere between 0 and 2- rarely any lower. Ever(save for
> whitelisting).
You've found the right setting, and I'm not aware of
My suggestion is to move your filter threshold to 4.5 and stop worrying
about it.
SCott
At 02:31 PM 1/30/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe the idea is right but your example is wrong. 4.92 rounds to 4.9,
not to 5.0
It may have been any number between 4.95 and 4...., say 4.983
> I
Michael Parker wrote on Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:43:34 -0600:
> perldoc Mail::SpamAssasisn::Conf and search for use_auto_whitelist.
> If you find it, then I stand corrected. I'm guessing it's not there.
Ah, well, yes, you are right. It's not there. I was using
http://www.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_Sp
On Friday 30 January 2004 11:19 am, Brent J. Nordquist wrote:
> Yup; my X-Face triggers one chickenpox. If you only get one I don't think
> that's a biggie.
No, but IMHO it should be as accurate as possible...
--
Matt
Systems Administrator
Local Access Communications
360.330.5535
-
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:44:36 -0500, Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm not saying that the domain should be forgotten, but that iit
> > should at least be in a different list.
> >
> > 'Bigevil.cf' -- never once seen in ham.
> > 'Maybeevil.cf' -- a small number of hits in ham
> >
My bad. I just posted a change to body rule with the set, but it has to
be rawbody. I realized this as soon as I hit send. (oops) Now... I
dont know if rawbody looks at the headers... ?? If that doesn't fix
it, I wouldn't know how to miss that. Maybe someone else will know.
Jennifer
>
> Lo
Hi Matthew,
>
> Looks like Backhair is triggering on my X-Face header. At least that's
the
> only thing I can see that might be it. See the following email (BH ==
> BackHair):
I changed the rule from full to body. Could you dl and test the current
set to see if it misses now? It should, being t
--On Thursday, January 29, 2004 12:44 PM -0600 Bob Apthorpe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/incubator/spamassassin/trunk/tools/?root=A
> pache-SVN
Just tried this out on Fedora Core 1 with SA 2.63 and I had to use "--start
yesterday" to get output. Otherwise I see t
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 01:10:52PM -0500, Bob George wrote:
> While I like to think they're slaving away trying to come up with
> stuff that's almost-but-not-completely-totally-unlike-spam
> manually, I suspect it's automated by now.
It must be; yesterday I got a spam, where every word
*including*
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 01:32:11PM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> hmm that is wierd b/c i learned about 500 a nite or so for the last 3 to
> 4 weeks...
were these mails recently sent or old mails that you're learning on now?
> sigh.. does this mean corruption in the DB ?
It could, but I doubt
hmm that is wierd b/c i learned about 500 a nite or so for the last 3 to
4 weeks...
sigh.. does this mean corruption in the DB ?
adam
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 13:21, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 12:27:53PM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> > debug: bayes: expiry check keep size,
Has anybody tried using SA with OpenMosix? Seems like a good way to push
out some of those processes.. got a bunch of old P90 boxes sitting around I
could put to just such a task..
Just wondering if it has been used, and if there are any concerns or gotchas
I'd need to lookout for!
Thanks!
--
Hello ,
this has been posted also to the xmail list.
I thought I had problems posting here so...
---
Hello lst !!
(in a vibrant loud attittude [and voice :-)] ! )
OK ! Topic of the month and the next ... Spamassassin !!
OK , a co
On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 17:17, Jason White wrote:
> Greetings, all.
> I'm using Spamassassin 2.63, called from procmail. I recently tried
> to add my own rules to catch the mangled spellings of [a particular word
> I can't
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 12:27:53PM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> debug: bayes: expiry check keep size, 75% of max: 75
> debug: bayes: token count: 2203679, final goal reduction size: 1453679
> debug: bayes: First pass? Current: 1075482160, Last: 1075479068, atime:
> 1382400, count: 1019, newd
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 12:31:10PM -0500, Philip Mak wrote:
> Warning: I could not locate your pod2man program. Please make sure,
> your pod2man program is in your PATH before you execute 'make'
I really wish people would read the FAQ before posting questions...
http://wiki.spamassassin.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 08:56:54AM -0800, Evan Platt wrote:
> I think we need a FAQ entry for this - this is covered QUITE often.
You mean such as: http://wiki.spamassassin.org/w/StatusRounding
:)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Software is like sex; it's better when it's free." - Linus Torva
hello,
1. I think perl2pod is a package. What installation of linux do you have ?
Is it slackware ? Gentoo ?
Try finding "perl2pod" as a package on the installation cd's , e.g. :
# mount -t iso9660 /dev/hdb /mnt/cdrom
(hdb being primary-slave, maybe is hdc or hdd)
# cd /mnt/cdrom
# find . -dep
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/mkettler/sa/antidrug.cf
Corrected mis-use of __DRUGS_MALEDYSFUNCTION13 in
LOCAL_DRUGS_MALDYSFUNCTION_OBFU. 13 does match the plain, unmodified
v-word, so it can't be used as a sign of obfuscation.
Corrected some un-escaped litteral ;'s in __DRUGS_MALEDYSFUNCTION13.
Chris Santerre wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 10:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] [RD] spammer reactions to antidrug (humorous)
Today I got an interesting form of obfuscation, apparently to avoid
antidrug.
Brian Godette wrote:
> Maybe they'll start writting in Middle English to target that
> untapped market of english lit majors/grads.
Or Elvish for the larger market of Tokien die-hards!
Are the spammers using some sort of filter to obscure the text
into something consistently decipherable? The mes
I thought it was a greater than number ... if it equals it doesn't count ...
>>> "Chris Barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/30/04 11:42AM >>>
I'm confused. A spam message got through and had this in the header:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.0 required=5.0
tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04,
HTML_MESSA
I've had this problem in the past, I think it was something to do with UTF
char sets.
Try 'echo $LANG' - if it says 'en_US.UTF-8' type 'export LANG=en_US' and
start the build again from scratch, I think this will sort it out.
Peter
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-SpamAssassin-2.63]# perl Makefile.PL
> Wh
Looks like Backhair is triggering on my X-Face header. At least that's the
only thing I can see that might be it. See the following email (BH ==
BackHair):
-- Begin
Return-path:
Envelope-to: xxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:42:49 -0800
Received: from alderaan.localaccess.com (
Hi Regis,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:spamassassin-talk-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Regis Wilson
> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 4:57 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] [RD] Justified text
>
> Got some new variants on the "justified text" ratw
Hi Jens.
I already brought this up a while ago - Theo said something about version 2.70
I filed a bug report in bugzilla, feel free to add followup.
Please keep me in the loop if you find a better way.
Thanks
m/
Jens Benecke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
>
>Hi,
>
>we have quite a lot of people w
Hi all,
I received the following mail from a yahoo web mail user, but the
FAKE_HELO_YAHOO keeps on hitting. Is this a false positive?
Thanks,
Pedro
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by p2sam-pc.rogers.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0UFkSLL016979
for <[EMA
At 09:04 AM 1/30/2004, Brian Godette wrote:
Maybe they'll start writting in Middle English to target that untapped market
of english lit majors/grads.
I can just see it:
"Whan thou wouldst gaine the favour of a lass
Thy Prowess shold be paramount to last
Wende thy way to phisik of our Druggers
And
I think the hits= is a rounded number. So it may have been 4.92 for example.
>>> "Chris Barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/30/04 11:42AM >>>
I'm confused. A spam message got through and had this in the header:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.0 required=5.0
tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04,
HTML_MESSA
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:55:07 -0500, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Today I got an interesting form of obfuscation, apparently to avoid
> antidrug.cf.
>
>
> I'm not sure wether to bother with adding rules for this, or be
> satisfied that the obfuscations are so severe that the message
ok upgraded to 2.63 and here is the new output.
debug: bayes: 4047 tie-ing to DB file R/O /share/spam/bayes_toks
debug: bayes: 4047 tie-ing to DB file R/O /share/spam/bayes_seen
debug: bayes: found bayes db version 2
debug: Score set 2 chosen.
debug: Initialising learner
debug: Initialising learne
At 11:17 AM 1/28/2004, Robb Bryn wrote:
Is there anyway to clear all the HAM for Bayes and retrain it without
loosing all the SPAM?
I think that my HAM portion of the db has been corrupted by the autolearn
feature (which I have now disabled) and I'de really like to retrain it
manually.
One mig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-SpamAssassin-2.63]# perl Makefile.PL
What email address or URL should be used in the suspected-spam report
text for users who want more information on your filter installation?
(In particular, ISPs should change this to a local Postmaster contact)
default text: [the administr
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:42:31 -0600, "Chris Barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm confused. A spam message got through and had this in the header:
>
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.0 required=5.0
> tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04,
> HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_WEB_BUGS,LOCAL_PERLMX_TAG_80,MSGID_FRO
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of David Hooton
> Sent: 25 January 2004 04:01
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] BAYES_99
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've been playing with bayes on my home machine and have been
> very impressed wi
Hallo und guten Abend SA-List,
since I updated 2.61 => 2.63 show me spamassassin -D --lint:
--snip
debug: running in taint mode? no
--snap
I think, this run in taint mode now. Why not by me?
Thank you for help.
--
Viele Grüße, best regards
Jim Knuth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Zufalls-Tex
Maybe they'll start writting in Middle English to target that untapped market
of english lit majors/grads.
On Friday 30 January 2004 08:55 am, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Today I got an interesting form of obfuscation, apparently to avoid
> antidrug.cf.
>
> I'm not sure wether to bother with adding rul
Shouldn't a message that is identified as spam by the bayesian
filter of spamassassin (BAYES_90 or BAYES_99 in my case) never be
used as a message that is learned as ham? (I would expect it
not to be used for learning because it wouldn't improve the
bayesfilter, and training it as ham makes the b
A bug in 2.6 caused messages which hit BAYES_99 to be learned as ham, this
has been fixed, you should upgrade.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
http://www.i-is.com/
PieterB wrote:
> Can somebody explain me why a spammessage gets learned as ham?
>
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, h
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 10:55 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] [RD] spammer reactions to antidrug (humorous)
>
>
> Today I got an interesting form of obfuscation, apparently to avoid
> antidrug.c
--On Friday, January 30, 2004 10:42 AM -0600 Chris Barnes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm confused. A spam message got through and had this in the header:
>
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.0 required=5.0
> tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04,
> HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_WEB_BUGS,LOCAL_PERLMX_TAG_80,MSG
I'm confused. A spam message got through and had this in the header:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.0 required=5.0
tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04,
HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_WEB_BUGS,LOCAL_PERLMX_TAG_80,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER
autolearn=no version=2.61
It met the required hit total (exactly) to be clas
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 05:31:36PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Michael Parker wrote on Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:53:12 -0600:
>
> > 2.6x doesn't support that config option. You still need to use -a on
> > the command line. use_auto_whitelist is only supported in the
> > development version of SA.
> >
Michael Parker wrote on Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:53:12 -0600:
> 2.6x doesn't support that config option. You still need to use -a on
> the command line. use_auto_whitelist is only supported in the
> development version of SA.
>
I can't quite believe that, although I want. It's in the official
docum
Attached, is version 1.4 of expand_regex.pl. Notable changes are:
- improved handling of bracketed regex's in situation like ( ( )? ) where
the previous
version did not deal with nested balanced expressions correctly
- added a -lint option which will run the most helpful warning options.
-
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:32:51 -0600
Bob Apthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you tried CPAN, either with:
>
> perl -MCPAN -e 'install HTML::Parser'
>
> or by manually installing it from
> http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTML-Parser/
>
> BTW, does Solaris 9 ship with a usable version of gcc a
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:18:45AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> Thanks Theo i will try that. Any idea why these tokens wont expire
> though? I learn a lot of spam each day and still nothing and my DB just
> keeps getting bigger and bigger.
Not without that extra debug output. :P
The problem i
Today I got an interesting form of obfuscation, apparently to avoid
antidrug.cf.
I'm not sure wether to bother with adding rules for this, or be satisfied
that the obfuscations are so severe that the messages are now barely legible.
Since spammers rely on responses from the mentally-deficient,
At 02:39 PM 1/28/2004, John Fleming wrote:
Below are example of 2 headers from the SATalk list. One was apparently
filtered by Spamassassin, and one not. What's the difference? Some of my
mail is being filtered, and some not, and I have no idea why! I thought a
reboot fixed it, but NOT! PLEASE
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:28:31 + (UTC) Peggy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know where to download HTML::Parser 3.24 for SunOS 5.9 from as I
> always got the following warning when I run the command "perl Makefile.PL
> PREFIX=${Prefix} SYSCONFDIR=/prod/config" for Mail-SpamAssassin-2
Yeah, my bigevil thoughts post was sent ages ago! almost 2 weeks before it
showed up on the list. I posted a bigevil update and haven't seen it yet!
WTF?
--Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary Funck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 1:08 PM
> To: Spamassassin
Thanks Theo i will try that. Any idea why these tokens wont expire
though? I learn a lot of spam each day and still nothing and my DB just
keeps getting bigger and bigger.
adam
On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 23:33, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:55:06AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Andreas J Koenig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I wonder why spamassassin didn't calculate a higher score for this mail.
>
> Are not "adu1t", "p0rn", and "m0vies" words that trigger some spam
> points?
Try Jennifer's chickenpox ruleset, it is geared to catch these. Y
Hi,
Does anyone know where to download HTML::Parser 3.24 for SunOS 5.9 from as I
always got the following warning when I run the command "perl Makefile.PL
PREFIX=${Prefix} SYSCONFDIR=/prod/config" for Mail-SpamAssassin-2.63:
Warning: prerequisite HTML::Parser 3.24 not found.
And when I
Hi,
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, AltGrendel wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 15:19, Justin Mason wrote:
> >
> > svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/spamassassin/trunk
> >
> > or http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/incubator/spamassassin/trunk/?root=Apache-SVN
>
> I tried those and got a connecti
Can somebody explain me why a spammessage gets learned as ham?
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE
autolearn=ham version=2.60
Pieter
8<--
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 25 00:18:38 2004
Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] by
80 matches
Mail list logo
