Take a look at the FILTER_README in the postfix distro.
Basicly you set "content_filter" to send to spamproxy
(smtp:localhost:
and in master.cf add an smtp server at the return port for spamproxy and
overide the content_filter rule:
inet n - y - - smtpd -o
]+\]
| formail -b -f -A "$trash_header ordinary hotmail invalid no-orig-ip"
Is it even possible to do a test like that one from
my .spamassassin.cf file?
Thanks,
Jim
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
I am getting the following from spamproxyd:
Can't locate object method "new" via package "Mail::Audit" at
/usr/bin/spamproxyd line 68.
server started on port 10025
umm help please.
Thanks
-jlh
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
h
--On Wednesday, February 20, 2002 17:34 -0500 Greg Ward
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have heard good things about
> postfix.
I haven't played much with exim but I've used postfix a lot and it's real
easy to setup.
-jlh
___
Spamassassin-talk m
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 01:15:00PM +0100, Mark wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 20:51, Mike Loiterman wrote:
> Yeah, killall would kill Perl, and all instances of it. Not what you want,
> really. How about this?
>
> kill -TERM `ps ax | grep spamd | egrep -v grep | awk '{print $1}'`
ps (whatever)|gr
we could pass a callback
procedure to check(), and have check() simply invoke our procedure
with all of the gory details after determining what's up with the
current mail. Still, I'd have to modify /usr/bin/spamd or just
rewrite it to actually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can I create a local installation of SpamAssassin when I'm not root? I
use services at a site that does not give me root privs, but I want to
filter my spam. The site will not install SpamAssassin.
- --
Jim Holthaus (pronunciation: HOLT
ple think of the idea?
-jim
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
ns to be on the same
> mailing list as me can send me mail. But that's just my experience.
It's a bit different for me; I frequently deal with pretty clueless
e-mails for various reasons, and my experience in the past is that
a number of them are almost indistinguishable from spam. :)
rule. It matches any hyphenated English phrase
> where both are seven or more letters long.
With no spaces and on a line by itself. I can't imagine running into
that too often (and, in fact, it doesn't match _any_ of the 100k
e-mail
o get that info out. Oops. I'm
still probably going to add an option to spamc (and corresponding
functionality to spamd), but yes, that would do the trick.
-jim
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=5.0
> tests=NO_REAL_NAME,IN_REP_TO,MAILTO_TO_REMOVE version=2.11
Were these line breaks there or did you add them when sending the
message?
-jim
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.source
--On Friday, March 15, 2002 7:12 PM +0800 Jason Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I want to use Spamassassin on our Postfix bastion mail host to filter
> all mail before it's relayed to our MAILSweeper (which then forwards to
> Exchange).
Jason,
Take a look at spamproxyd in the spamas
It works that way for me too. I'm not sure why. The hack that I did they
showed up in the body of the message, but it was an ugly hack job.
-jlh
--On Friday, March 15, 2002 9:16 AM -0600 Dennis Reiter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I tried this the other night, but the SPAM: reporting lines alw
--On Saturday, March 30, 2002 1:55 PM -0500 Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'm trying to avoid bringing up how your country still can run a decent
> election... even after 225 years.
Hey, at least we were able to provide the world with so entertainment :)
-jlh
___
--On Saturday, March 30, 2002 3:49 PM -0600 dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think they also
> use that as an informal poll
A poll that has been dead on every year for the 30+ years
-jlh
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https:/
--On Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:21 AM -0400 "Marc G. Fournier"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just curious, but in 2.11, spamproxyd requires '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to
> be set, or it won't run ... with it set, all messages triggered as SPAM go
> to a central address, which, IMHO, is "A Bad Thing" ..
t's nothing.
You said it yourself -- at 3 seconds per hashcode, a single computer
can send 28,800 spams per day. That's a single spammer, with a single
computer. That's still a LOT.
-jim
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTEC
at about legitimate mailing lists? And autoresponders? And..)
-jim
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
Setup my cobalt raq4 with redhat 6.2 and newest release of spamassassin.
Everything works great. Except the startup script. It starts the application
fine. However stopping it does not work. I modified it to just kill the
process dead but that is not ideal. Anyone have any insight?
The original s
where it put everything.
Then decide if you want to use spamassassin.pl or spamd which is how I use
it.
Jim
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email
le it is looking for and move it to one of the locations in your path that
it is looking in below.
locate SpamAssassin.pm
Jim
- Original Message -
From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk]
Could you forward that to me as well. Also any insight on the rc script for
stopping and starting the service?
Jim
- Original Message -
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtal
How does one go about viewing the email addresses in the users whitelist? Is
there a utility to view this?
Jim
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition
nly concerned with the body content?
Just trying to figure out how to do it properly and hopefully be a
contributer. Does submitting these messages make a big difference? What
about spam messages that are not caught by spamassassin? Should those be
reported someplace else?
Thanks
Perhaps there would be a way to detect this message better as spam?
Jim
--- Begin Message ---
Title: notepad.gif
You are receiving this email from Blue Chip Brands. If you would prefer not to
receive messages of this sort in the future, please see the unsubscribe instructions
at the
Definately something wrong with this one.
Jim
--- Begin Message ---
Title: Is your laser printer costing you more than you thought
Is your laser printer, copier, fax, or Inkjet printer
costing you more than you thought? Perhaps we can help !!We can save
you up to 70% on toner
eople to go in and modify
their own filters? I saw the Document regarding the SQL, but want to make sure
that everything works with Postfix before I start getting really involved.
Thanks!
Jim Hale
---
Jim & Kathy's Website Collection
http://h
es to a mailing list and snagging them
before they go out? I know that it will catch the copy of the message sent to
ME, but can it catch the message before it gets shipped off to 100+ people?
Thanks!
Jim Hale
---
Jim & Kathy's Website Coll
I installed the i386.rpm version of Spam Assassin and thanks to the help
from everybody, I got it up and running - question is, where's the rules
file so that I can alter the percentages and such?
Thanks!
Jim Hale
---
Jim & Kathy's Website Collection
http://h
Found it! Thanks! :)
Jim Hale
---
Jim & Kathy's Website Collection
http://hale.dyndns.org
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Ron Carter
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:05 PM
> To: Jim Hale
> Cc
particular messages and SA is grabbing them and throwing them into the
Spam Pile.
Thanks!
Jim Hale
---
Jim & Kathy's Website Collection
http://hale.dyndns.org
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's C
I was hoping SA had the same
functionality, and maybe it does, but I haven't figured out how yet.
Since the spammers are constantly changing their tactics, it seems that
using the latest and greatest rules all the time would be the best way to
keep them at bay
I found the whitelist and have entries in there so that I can receive
mail from certain places regardless of what they send, but where's the
blacklist so that I can explicitly block addresses?
Thanks!
Jim Hale
---
Jim & Kathy's Website Collection
http://h
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 2:46 PM
Subject: Fw: Does Size Really MatterWGXP
In a recent survey conducted by Durex condoms, 67% of
women said thatthey are unhappy with the size of their lovers. Proof that
size doe
wanted to disable one or the
other? Is there a configuration file in SpamAssassin that I can use to turn
on features like this?
Would be nice if something could be specified even a user by user basis so
some users may want to use these extra features and others not?
Thanks
Jim
completly if
needed. I am guessing I could move razor-check or rename it and it would
probably not get invoked then? Just curious to know in case I need to in the
future.
Thanks for you help Theo
Jim
- Original Message -
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[E
?
Jim
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -
http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink
___
Spamass
file
for.
Jim
- Original Message -
From: "Pete Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debbie Doerrlamm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SA with .forward files
At 06/12/2002 06:17, D
o work. It is built into spamassassin to call it if it is installed.
Hope that helps
Jim
>
> ___
>
> Sponsored by:
> ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/
> ___
> Spamass
Signature: 9b974aaf58f9b783c37cd88ca9c2b36dc8ed4866
debug: Server version: 1.11, protocol version 2
debug: Server response: Negative 9b974aaf58f9b783c37cd88ca9c2b36dc8ed4866
debug: Message 1 NOT found in the catalogue.
Jim
___
Don'
PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Fw: [Razor-users] Announce: Vipul's Razor v2
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 12:55:07PM -0700, Jim Scott wrote:
> debug: Razor is available
> debug: Razor Agents 1.20, protocol version 2.
As I just posted (crossed in the ether), SA is using
How come this list does not have the reply to: set to the spamassassin list?
Every time I want to reply to the list I have to type in the email address.
Or as I see others do they use the reply to all feature and then the user
and the list gets a copy.
Is it just me?
Jim
_RELAY but did not get hit
debug: Ran run_rbl_eval_test rule FUDGE_RELAY_OSIRU but did not get hit
Thanks
Jim
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -
http://devc
installed
the older version as well.
Just need some clarification to know what to do.
Thanks
Jim
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -
http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp
$Id: SpamAssassin.pm,v 1.94
2002/06/14 23:17:15 hughescr Exp $)
X-Spam-Prev-Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_102443564316318=_"
Jim Scott
Infoconex Online Services
http://www.inf
Undefined subroutine &main::pod2usage called at /usr/bin/spamassassin line
59.
When running compiling the new version from CPAN and running spamassassin -h
I get the above error.
Jim Scott
Infoconex Online Services
http://www.infoconex
I just installed 2.31 from the website that was just released and the
problem is gone. Must be a but in 2.30
Jim
- Original Message -
From: "David Flanigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1
, bad mail ends up
in a caughtspam file.
What I'd like to do is modify this rule so that it sends good mail to my
inbox, but also forwards it to another internet address, namely that of my
wireless device.
I'd really appreciate adv
ess to the blacklist?
Etc.
Any help at this point would be appreciated.
Best regards,
Jim Rota
President
Worldrecords.com
http://www.worldrecords.com
The Ultimate Surf Machine.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
No, I will no
Is there some sort of Web Based front end that a person can get into to modify
their own personal setting for what they want filtered or not want filtered?
I know that SquirrelMail has something that will do it, but I'm using the Horde
Suite.
Thanks! :)
Jim Hale
---
http://hale.dyndn
FYI,
I was dismayed to find obvious spam in my inbox today.
This came through with such a high score because amazon.com
is white-listed by spamassassin. (full headers to anyone who's interested)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ±¡½ì¥Î«~ ºô¸ôÁʪ«°Ó«°
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 13 Jul 2
aw something before about
redirecting it to null, but I can't remember.
Thanks! :)
Jim Hale
---
http://hale.dyndns.org
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek h
We were succesfully using spamd until 2 days ago. At that time the server on
which it was running was brought down abruptly due to a small fire in the
computer room. That caused a bad block to appear on disk and several files
(including perl modules) to disappear. I have restored or rebuilt ever
Calling SPAMC from /etc/procmailrc;
and running SPAMD on a second host, I cannot get user_prefs in user's home
directories to work.
This looks like a process ownership problem. When I specify -u username in
the spamc line in /etc/procmailrc,
the user's .spamassassin/user_prefs is observed and
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 09:27:18AM -0700, Dan Jones wrote:
> I tried running spamc in procmail and it appears to work. I think I am
> missing something still. When I check the log the the message is scanned
> but is not delivered to a mailbox. Is there something in postfix that
> need to set to get
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 10:23:25AM +1100, Juan Alejandro wrote:
> When using assasin before all of my mail that was spam would come in with
> the subject ***spam*** and eudora would get rid of it for me ...now all of
> a sudden the subject box does not say spam all the mail comes in and i get
>
57 matches
Mail list logo
