Re: [SAtalk] Spam Rejection Message

2002-12-29 Thread Maxime Ritter
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 10:00:07PM -0500, Mike Leone wrote: if ((/^X-Spam-Status:.*Yes/)) { echo Your Email was Rejected by our SPAM filters. Sorry. EXITCODE=100 exit } Maybe I need to rephrase that: It informs the *sender*. What I like

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Rejection Message

2002-12-29 Thread up
Actually, this *appeared* to work in testing, but once in production, it became pretty clear that the exitcode wasn't doing what I had thought/hoped; keeping bounce messages out of the queue. The only other way I know of dealing with this at the MDA level is to route rejected email to /dev/null,

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Rejection Message

2002-12-29 Thread Robert James Kaes
On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, this *appeared* to work in testing, but once in production, it became pretty clear that the exitcode wasn't doing what I had thought/hoped; keeping bounce messages out of the queue. The only other way I know of dealing with this at

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Rejection Message

2002-12-29 Thread Mike Leone
Maxime Ritter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 12/29/02 at 13:27: On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 10:00:07PM -0500, Mike Leone wrote: if ((/^X-Spam-Status:.*Yes/)) { echo Your Email was Rejected by our SPAM filters. Sorry. EXITCODE=100 exit

[SAtalk] Spam Rejection Message

2002-12-13 Thread James D. Stallings
Does anyone know if there is a way that I can have SA send a message that is detected as spam back to the spammer stating you are not welcome and this message is blocked...?? Or is that asking for trouble. Thanks Jim Get your own 800 number

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Rejection Message

2002-12-13 Thread Evan Platt
At 10:55 AM 12/13/2002, you wrote: Does anyone know if there is a way that I can have SA send a message that is detected as spam back to the spammer stating you are not welcome and this message is blocked...?? Or is that asking for trouble. I think it's been brought up before - SA has no

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Rejection Message

2002-12-13 Thread Matt Kettler
Well, that's not really something SA itself can do at all.. SA is just a filter, it can't deliver, delete, or do anything else but change the content of an email. However the MUA/MTA that you are calling SA from could be capable of such things. A good procmail recipe should be able to do it..

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Rejection Message

2002-12-13 Thread Tony L. Svanstrom
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 the voices made James D. Stallings write: Does anyone know if there is a way that I can have SA send a message that is detected as spam back to the spammer stating you are not welcome and this message is blocked...?? 1. SA doesn't send nor delete e-mails, it just tags

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Rejection Message

2002-12-13 Thread Michael Grau
If you want to bounce mail that you are sure is spam, you'll want to integrate SA with a milter like mimedefang. Then you can just do: if ($hits = $req) { return action_bounce(Message looks like SPAM, rejected); } You can also keep a copy of the message in quaranteen for a few days in case

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Rejection Message

2002-12-13 Thread up
This varies depending on the MDA. With maildrop (used with Maildir), you would have something like: if ((/^X-Spam-Status:.*Yes/)) { echo Your Email was Rejected by our SPAM filters. Sorry. EXITCODE=100 exit } to ./Maildir/. On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, James D. Stallings wrote: Does

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Rejection Message

2002-12-13 Thread Mike Leone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 12/13/02 at 18:20: This varies depending on the MDA. With maildrop (used with Maildir), you would have something like: if ((/^X-Spam-Status:.*Yes/)) { echo Your Email was Rejected by our SPAM filters. Sorry. EXITCODE=100

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Rejection Message

2002-12-13 Thread Mike Leone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 12/13/02 at 21:43: Maybe I need to rephrase that: It informs the *sender*. What I like about exit code 100 is that it doesn't queue the message and clog my queue. Anyway, I've tested this. It definitely passes the echo back. Here is