Take a look at this subject masking:
Original subject:
=?iso-8859-1?B?T3Zlcm5pZ2h0IERlbGl2ZXJ5IC0gWW91IGdldCBtb3JlIGZvciBsZXNzIQ==?
=
Un-masked subject: Overnight delivery - you get more for less!
Any suggestions for regex?
---
D r e n i k N e t w o r k s / S e r b i a / B e l g r a d
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Luka Z. Gerzic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Original subject:
=?iso-8859-1?B?T3Zlcm5pZ2h0IERlbGl2ZXJ5IC0gWW91IGdldCBtb3JlIGZvciBsZXNzIQ==?
=
Un-masked subject: Overnight delivery - you get more for less!
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-talkm=107409131129110w=2
I am having some trouble with Subject header rules to my local.cf file -
they don't seem to be getting read by spamassassin.
Example:
header SUBJECT_VICODIN Subject =~ /\bvicodin\b/
describe SUBJECT_VICODIN Mentions vicodin
score SUBJECT_VICODIN 4.0
(I took this example from Chris' site
Are you sure you want that rule to be case sensitive, lower-case only?
try
header SUBJECT_VICODIN Subject =~ /\bvicodin\b/i
(note the added i at the end)
At 11:48 AM 1/20/04 +, David Logan wrote:
header SUBJECT_VICODIN Subject =~ /\bvicodin\b/
describe SUBJECT_VICODIN Mentions vicodin
Thanks guys..
Made the change and also I run spamassassin with mimedefang and I reread
the mimedefang file - now seems to work !!
Cheers.
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 January 2004 14:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 14:41, David Logan wrote:
Thanks guys..
Made the change and also I run spamassassin with mimedefang and I reread
the mimedefang file - now seems to work !!
Cheers.
Example:
header SUBJECT_VICODIN Subject =~ /\bvicodin\b/
describe SUBJECT_VICODIN Mentions vicodin
Hi group,
Got SA working, and I want to test it out on only a few users. I have
SA set up to run when called from Amavisd, which is called by postfix,
which is set up as a relay. Currently it is set up to put a ***SPAM***
tag on every email that is suspicios to every email that passes through
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Christopher Tarricone wrote:
The permissions on my bayes_journal and bayes_toks files keep changing. Has
anyone else encoutered this problem?
[snip..]
I look in /usr/share/spamassassin/db/ and behold! The permissions are:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] db]# ll
total 23012
Hello,
I'm running qmail 1.03 on a redhat 9 linux box. I've installed qmail-scanner-1.20 and SA 2.61.
mail flow: internet -- qmail/SA relay box in DMZ -- exchange server inside of network.
local.cf file says:
--
required_hits 4.0
rewrite_subject 1
jacksonSent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 11:22 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [SAtalk] rewriting
subject lines.
Hello,
I'm running qmail 1.03 on a redhat 9 linux box. I've installed
qmail-scanner-1.20 and SA 2.61.
mail flow: internet -- qmail/SA relay box in DMZ -- exchange
server
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of marc
jackson
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 1:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] rewriting subject lines.
Hello,
I'm running qmail 1.03 on a redhat 9 linux box
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] rewriting subject lines.
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:59:56 -0800
By default spamassassin doesn't add to the subject line.It just adds it's
information to the mail headers.You have to tell it to rewrite the subject
line in your local.cf file
-Orig
PJust for kicks, I toggled it b/n 0 amp; 1.nbsp; Neither worked./P
PAny more thoughts?/P
You may have to restart spamd to get this to work.
PRegards,/P
PMarcBRBR/P/DIV
DIV/DIVgt;From: David Groce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DIV/DIVgt;To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DIV/DIVgt;Subject: RE: [SAtalk] rewriting
.
-Original Message-
From: marc jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 3:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] rewriting subject lines.
Thanks for responding. In my local.cf file, I have:
rewrite_subject 0 that *should* tell SA to rewrite
: [SAtalk] rewriting subject lines.
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 12:26:58 -0800
I think you need the subject_tag that Matt was referring to. I think for
the rewrite_subject tag, 0 is off and 1 is on. Try adding the subject_tag
SPAM or something to that effect.
-Original Message-
From
The permissions on my bayes_journal and bayes_toks files keep changing. Has
anyone else encoutered this problem?
I get the following error in my /var/log/messages file:
Jan 14 16:50:56 zion spamd[638]: cannot write to
/usr/share/spamassassin/db/bayes_journal, Bayes db update ignored
Jan 14
Here is another one for BigEvil that I am getting a lot of:
www.allsafetyproducts.biz
Andrew Hoying
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced
Can Anybody tell me how to configure spamassassin on redhat 8.0/ sendmail
With Regards,
Sarvesh Singhal
Abhikalak Consultants
(Systems and Security Division)
B-326, Sarita Vihar,
New Delhi - 110 044
Ph: +91 11 2695 2234-35
web:www.abhikalak.com
--On Monday, January 05, 2004 8:55 AM -0500 Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps a good first step would be to not use an open relay for your mail
And second to put a subject line on your messages. :)
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 09:33:23PM -0500, Mark London wrote:
Hi - I see the rule USERNAME_IN_SUBJECT, but I've never seen that
triggered at my site, and a test message sent to myself did not trigger
it. We are using spamassassin with sendmail, mimedefang, cyrus, and
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 07:54:34AM -0500, Mark London wrote:
Actually, no. The rule is matching the username to the To: address, not
From:. The purpose of spammers doing this is to think it's a personal
message, so it has to be the username of the person receiving the spam.
Doh! You're
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ceforge.net .net
Subject
Re: [SAtalk] Re
--On Friday, January 02, 2004 11:50 AM -0500 Theo Van Dinter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's the only version that didn't cause a ton of false positives.
For instance, assume someone uses their first name as their username:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] They'll get legitimate mails like please update this
Hi - I see the rule USERNAME_IN_SUBJECT, but I've never seen that
triggered at my site, and a test message sent to myself did not trigger
it. We are using spamassassin with sendmail, mimedefang, cyrus, and
redhat linux. Any idea why it's not working? Thanks. - Mark
Received: from
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 09:33:23PM -0500, Mark London wrote:
Hi - I see the rule USERNAME_IN_SUBJECT, but I've never seen that
triggered at my site, and a test message sent to myself did not trigger
it. We are using spamassassin with sendmail, mimedefang, cyrus, and
redhat linux. Any idea
Yes, this is what I do and I describe all the details in this
section of my Reverse Spam Fitlering: Winning Without Fighting
page:
http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/spam/#SA
Start reading at the image of the key where it says
One of the keys to my deflexion strategy is to have the spam
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, David B Funk wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've got SA 2.60 running on a Solaris 8 box with SunONE Messaging
Server. It is doing spam scanning for all our users (~7000). In
order to keep the system as speedy as possible, I've configured the
Yes, this is what I do and I describe all the details in this
section of my Reverse Spam Fitlering: Winning Without Fighting
page:
http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/spam/#SA
Start reading at the image of the key where it says
This looks great. Thank you
We've got SA 2.60 running on a Solaris 8 box with SunONE Messaging
Server. It is doing spam scanning for all our users (~7000). In
order to keep the system as speedy as possible, I've configured the
bayes journal to sit on /tmp which is a memory file system.
I'd like to back up the journal
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 01:11:06PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to back up the journal periodicly to disk. Right now I have
There's really no point to that. Just sync the journal to the DB.
searching through the archives and docs, I've not found anything
regarding this issue.
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 01:11:06PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to back up the journal periodicly to disk. Right now I have
There's really no point to that. Just sync the journal to the DB.
Ok, then I guess I have a faulty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 01:11:06PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to back up the journal periodicly to disk. Right now I have
There's really no point to that. Just sync the journal to the DB.
searching
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 01:58:47PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So rather than backing up all three files, I just need to back up the
bayes_toks file periodicly. And I could use a file lock for this
purpose, as you confirmed below.
Arguably you should backup seen as well, it has the
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've got SA 2.60 running on a Solaris 8 box with SunONE Messaging
Server. It is doing spam scanning for all our users (~7000). In
order to keep the system as speedy as possible, I've configured the
bayes journal to sit on /tmp which is a memory
I just got this virus message that appears to have come from sourceforge.
Did anyone else get this or did my antivirus FP on me?
FP.. that exact message passed through my copy of clamscan just fine..
clamav is updated hourly here.
We had it hit as a virus also...
James
filename does not match content
Subject: [SAtalk] 312.649.0007
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk,
mailto:[EMAIL
At 04:41 PM 12/3/2003, Bill wrote:
I just got this virus message that appears to have come from sourceforge.
Did anyone else get this or did my antivirus FP on me?
FP.. that exact message passed through my copy of clamscan just fine..
clamav is updated hourly here.
Terry Milnes said:
Frederick M Avolio wrote:
At 06:13 AM 11/25/2003 +0100, Mark wrote:
Is SA hard to install? Not harder than any other program based on
Perl. Perl
is the underlying engine, which, in and by itself, has nothing to
do with
SA. It is good to keep that in mind;
Perhaps
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, mairhtin o'feannag wrote:
I have one client who wants to receive any emails they get, irrespective
of SPAM (they suspect that there are legitimate emails being eliminated as
spam). What they want is that anything that is addressed to them
(yadayada.com) be sent through
Hello,
I have one client who wants to receive any emails they get, irrespective of SPAM (they
suspect that there are legitimate
emails being eliminated as spam). What they want is that anything that is addressed
to them (yadayada.com) be sent
through the spam checker and marked as spam, but
Hello,
Below are the first few lines of my local.cf file for the entire site. I do not have
a local.cf for any of my users.
However, when I get mail, it says : autolearn=no version=2.60
Why does it think that autolearn is off, when I clearly set it on?
Thanks
Mairhtin
# SpamAssassin
Good evening, Mairhtin,
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003, Mairhtin O'Feannag wrote:
Below are the first few lines of my local.cf file for the entire site.
I do not have a local.cf for any of my users.
However, when I get mail, it says : autolearn=no version=2.60
Why does it think that autolearn is
the autolearn header is only set to yes when a message is found
outside of the boundaries, which is (below) 0.1 for ham/non-spam and
(above) 12.0 for spam. It uses scoresets with bayes disabled when
comparing an email's score against the thresholds (unless of course
you've modified the bayes_*
leave
No, You leave...
Is this spam of some new form?
Reo wrote:
leave
--
Michael H. Collins Admiral, Penguinista Navy
It's us against them. Ride like you stole it!
http://linuxlink.com
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback
: [SAtalk] (no subject)
No, You leave...
Is this spam of some new form?
Reo wrote:
leave
--
Michael H. Collins Admiral, Penguinista Navy
It's us against them. Ride like you stole it!
http://linuxlink.com
---
This SF.net email is sponsored
--Chris
-Original Message-
From: Michael H. Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 1:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)
No, You leave...
Is this spam of some new form?
Reo wrote:
leave
--
Michael H. Collins
that would be openrbl.org
I opted for a Hot Chocolate after lunch. I should have went with the coffee
:)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 3:07 PM
To: 'Michael H. Collins'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk
://www.emtinc.net/spamhammers.htm
Now, ian douglas improved a set I was using:
-Original Message-
From: ian douglas
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 2:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] font color=#FF
describe MY_RBDY_INVSTXTMY: Invisible text color
rawbody
At 03:25 PM 11/19/2003, Robert Oslin wrote:
My first post to this list. Hope I'm doing this right...
I received a message with invisible fonts, yet the generic
HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE rule wasn't hit.
Was it because the body tag didn't specify a background font, therefore the
text font color had
First off...Spamassassin rules. One little issue though...
Has anyone run into an problem
where spamassassin is catching the spam and trying to prepend the
*SPAM* but it fails when there is no subject line? We are using SA2.60/sendmail 8.12.10/spamass-milter
on redhat 9 as a
This is really off subject but concerns spam filtering. I hope you guys
don't get too annoyed.
We use qmail, vpopmail, and qmail-scanner(also spamassassin but it's not
relevant to this question). We're finding that emails forwarded through
qmail to Hotmail accounts are getting picked up by
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Off Subject - Spam FIltering Advice
This is really off subject but concerns spam filtering. I
hope you guys don't get too annoyed.
We use qmail, vpopmail, and qmail-scanner(also spamassassin
Jeff Koch wrote:
We use qmail, vpopmail, and qmail-scanner(also spamassassin but it's not
relevant to this question). We're finding that emails forwarded through
qmail to Hotmail accounts are getting picked up by Hotmail's enhanced
spam filter. These are simple text emails and Hotmail does not
anyone see a problem with this rule
header funky subject =~ /[A-Za-z][0-9][A-Za-z]
for catching subjects like g00d dTbt c0ns0lidati0n pr0graAm
so far its caught only spam but I noticed one spam had an ID number that
could possibly be an issue if a company uses
mixed alphanumerics in its quotes or
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 08:47:50AM -0600, Eric wrote:
anyone see a problem with this rule
header funky subject =~ /[A-Za-z][0-9][A-Za-z]
for catching subjects like g00d dTbt c0ns0lidati0n pr0graAm
so far its caught only spam but I noticed one spam had an ID number that
could possibly be an
-Original Message-
From: Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 10:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] funky subject
anyone see a problem with this rule
header funky subject =~ /[A-Za-z][0-9][A-Za-z]
for catching subjects like g00d dTbt
By itself it is dangerous. But I would try to get a little
more specific
with it. How about multiple instances in a word? like:
header funky subject =~
/[EMAIL PROTECTED],2}[A-Za-z]{1,[EMAIL PROTECTED],2}[A-Za-z]/
*EDIT* Sorry, drop the \b in the begining.
/[EMAIL
g00d dTbt c0ns0lidati0n pr0graAm
what would catch the subject line as shown above
Eric
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US
headerLOCAL_FUNNY_SUBJSubject =~ /g00d.{1,30}pr0/i
describe LOCAL_FUNNY_SUBJ Looks like a funny subject I seen once!
score LOCAL_FUNNY_SUBJ 1.0# score whatever you want.
Add something like the rule above to your local.cf or user_prefs file.
A good article on Regular
Hi all,
**Exuse me for this newbie quetsion , but I did not find anywhere the
answer to
my question**
1-Could anyone explain me why, in Razor installation , when running
razor-admin
create it is useful to change user name from root.
What does it imply if user is still root?
2-Which
Don't forget to vote with your wallet.
* Move your domains from Network Solutions to any
other registrar.
* Don't renew your SSL certs and find another
CA (if possible). Don't use Thawte - Verisign
owns them.
* Sell your VRSN stock and get out of any funds
that invest
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Nougen Canada Inc.
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary=Boundary_(ID_QM90VpaqliA7JXtz7mI5dw)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5b)
Gecko/20030901
I see a lot of spams coming through hiding the subject masked using
ISO-8859, like this
Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?b?SGFsZiBQcmljZWQgU2lsZGVuYWZpbCBDaXRyYXRl?=
which translates back to a subject of:
Half Priced Sildenafil Citrate
obviously I can look for Half Priced Sildenafil Citrate in the
At 03:04 PM 9/9/2003 -0400, Mike Kuentz (2) wrote:
Does SA translate that before hand and that's why it's not hitting?
Yes, QP and base64 are decoded. They are decoded so that they can't avoid
SA's normal subject rules so easily.
body rules also get html tags stripped and end-of-lines removed
Mike Kuentz (2) writes:
I see a lot of spams coming through hiding the subject masked using
ISO-8859, like this
Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?b?SGFsZiBQcmljZWQgU2lsZGVuYWZpbCBDaXRyYXRl?
which translates back to a subject of:
Half Priced Sildenafil Citrate
obviously I can look for Half Priced
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kuentz (2) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] [RD] Subject rule question
I see a lot of spams coming through hiding the subject masked using
ISO-8859, like this
Subject
To: Mike Kuentz (2)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] [RD] Subject rule question
Mike Kuentz (2) writes:
I see a lot of spams coming through hiding the subject masked using
ISO-8859, like this
Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?b?SGFsZiBQcmljZWQgU2lsZGVuYWZpbCBDaXRyYXRl?
which translates back
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mike Kuentz (2) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] [RD] Subject rule question
X-Original-Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:04:25 -0400
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:04:25 -0400
Status: R
Hi Mike,
RE: [SAtalk] [RD] Subject rule question
I chased
Hi,
The tech support team who look ofter my dedicated machine have just
installed SpamAssassin and Clam AV, which seems to be working extremely
well. There's just one thing that has me a bit stumped...
According to the SpamAssassin docs any mail tagged as spam should have
the subject
--On Wednesday, August 20, 2003 12:11 PM -0700 Evan Platt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:04 PM -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does anyone know spam sender [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Yeah, my buddy Jim! What's he doing sending out spam??
Care to expand some more on this?
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 08:04:00PM +0300, Jchen22 wrote:
does anyone know spam sender [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
There's little point in looking at the From: header to figure out
who's sending the spam. Most of the addresses are almost as random
as the addresses in the To: (well, or envelope
does anyone know spam sender [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by Dice.com.
Did you know that Dice has over 25,000 tech jobs available today? From
careers in IT to Engineering to Tech Sales, Dice has tech jobs from the
best
--On Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:04 PM -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does anyone know spam sender [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Yeah, my buddy Jim! What's he doing sending out spam??
Care to expand some more on this? Anonymizer is a well known software app
that allows you to browse without other
It appears that if a subject contains a period, it will fail
the test for all caps.
Example:
Subject: URGENTASSISTANCENEEDED.
Frederic TaraseviciusInternet Information Services,
Inc.
Hi,
how can I make a rule against:
No subject
thanx for help
Jim
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Jim,
Friday, August 1, 2003, 3:52:09 PM, you wrote:
JK Hi,
JK how can I make a rule against:
JK No subject
What do you mean by No subject? Do you mean exactly that text in the
subject header? Do you mean an email that has no subject header?
- Original Message -
From: Robert Menschel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jim Knuth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: SA List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 4:06 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] No subject?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Jim,
Friday, August 1, 2003
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 03:30, Jim Knuth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Robert Menschel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jim Knuth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: SA List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 4:06 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] No subject?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
sir,
i ahve downloaded ur spamassasin . i need to insatll to my server which runs
on linux. I like to have the method of
1.INSTALLATION AND
2.INTEGRATING THIS WITH MY MTA QMAIL USING spamd . That is via C AND NOT PERL.
so how could i go about installing.
ur INSTALL does not provide detais
At 12:05 PM 7/31/03 +0530, jagan wrote:
sir,
i ahve downloaded ur spamassasin . i need to insatll to my server which runs
on linux. I like to have the method of
1.INSTALLATION AND
2.INTEGRATING THIS WITH MY MTA QMAIL USING spamd . That is via C AND NOT
PERL.
so how could i go about installing.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here:
when I try to install digest-sha1 I am getting errors.
What is the best way to install digest::sha1
from cpan it hangs on ftp
from source it wont pass the tests 1/16 failed
Eric
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With
At 01:47 PM 7/17/2003 -0600, Eric wrote:
when I try to install digest-sha1 I am getting errors.
What is the best way to install digest::sha1
from cpan it hangs on ftp
If CPAN's ftp is hanging, you probably need passive mode to get through a
firewall..
one site with a bit of reference on how to
How do I rewrite the body or subject of a message when spamd determines
probably-spam and/or almost-certainly-spam?
Steve
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay
Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 11:57:45AM -0400, Steve wrote:
How do I rewrite the body or subject of a message when spamd determines
probably-spam and/or almost-certainly-spam?
SpamAssassin only knows ham vs spam. So you could do something like
set the spam required_hits (aka definately spam for
- Original Message -
From: Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:57 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] Rewrite subject of probably-spam
How do I rewrite the body or subject of a message when spamd determines
probably-spam and/or almost-certainly-spam
I seem to have everything configured properly but I
think I'm missing a small step somewhere in
starting/running spamassassin.
The process seems to be running but sendmail either
doesn't like it or doesn't see it. However, when I run
the sample.pl against sendmail.cf it test fine. Below
are the
S=unix:[EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't really make much sense for a socket name. You probably want S=localhost:12000
Gerald Raynor wrote:
I seem to have everything configured properly but I
think I'm missing a small step somewhere in
starting/running spamassassin.
The process seems to be running but
Per the sendmail doc it's [EMAIL PROTECTED], although for
kicks I tried what you suggested and got the error:
51 4.0.0 /etc/mail/sendmail.cf: line 1257:
Xspamassassin: unknown socket type localhost: Protocol
not supported
--- Patrick Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
S=unix:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to mexico! :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:10 PM
To: 'Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)'
Subject: Enough with the conspiracy theories! (was Re: [SAtalk] (no
subject))
Peter P. Benac said:
Ya'll need to realize
Alan Leghart said:
--On Wednesday, June 4, 2003 1:10 PM -0700 Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Listen folks -- you are all too conspiracy-minded here.
snip
The last few people who've mailed here, have fit this profile. I know,
because I've followed up on it.
Anyway, I've
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 01:51:43AM -0700, Alan Leghart wrote:
YMMV. Hopefully your changes will relieve some of the I'm the president
posts.
As we seem to have established the OP as a spammer/troll, should we report
them to Razor et al as well as our Bayes DB's?
Regards: Jim Ford
It would help if the spam report that's generated clearly identified
the host that added it. If that header included something like:
Scanned for spam by host mail.small-web-host.com (172.17.2.3)
I also *LOVE* that idea, but for another reason. I like to know which
machines in the farm scanned
AM
To: Jack Gostl; Matt Beland
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)
how many times should i say unsubscribe me from this list
- Original Message -
From: Jack Gostl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Matt Beland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday
-
From: Marge Golomb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 9:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] (no subject)
I do not want spamassassin - I called my ISP and they do not subscribe to
you. I emailed them and they know nothing about you. I found you on my
computer
- Original Message -
From: Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:49 AM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)
UNtil you figure out how to send it to the correct address. No human
handles
the list. Welcome
- Original Message -
From: Matt Beland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:07 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 08:40 pm, Ryan Bingham wrote:
Didn't this (and all the subsequent flames) just happen? Like several
Troll is too good a word for these people, we need some new jargon to refer to a trolling spammer, suggestions?
lawyer?
;)
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
thread debugger on the planet. Designed
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
