Re: [spamdyke-users] Zombie Processes

the parent process of the zombies to see what is keeping it from reaping them. Andras -- Andras Korn korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu http://chardonnay.math.bme.hu/~korn/ QOTD: No pixels were harmed in the creation of this program

Re: [spamdyke-users] Block non US ips

do the DNS part. Sam should be able to do I would certainly be interested in something like this. You mean you'd dump the geoip database, then convert it into a format usable by tinydns? Andras -- Andras Korn korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu http

Re: [spamdyke-users] yet another wishlist... :-)

and drop mails when needed. Absolutely pointless feature to be added to spamdyke. FWIW, I use amavisd-new to integrate qmail with SA and clamav. Works pretty well. Andras -- Andras Korn korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu http://chardonnay.math.bme.hu/~korn/ QOTD

Re: [spamdyke-users] error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: failed to map segment from shared object: Cannot allocate memory

script and see how it invokes (probably) softlimit, then increase the memory limit by a factor of at least 10. Andras -- Andras Korn korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu http://chardonnay.math.bme.hu/~korn/ QOTD: If at first you don't succeed, you must

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke and tcpserver: Does It Use RBLSMTPD Variable?

-- Andras Korn korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu http://chardonnay.math.bme.hu/~korn/ QOTD: Virgins for sale! Sorry, no returns accepted. ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org

Re: [spamdyke-users] OT: Spambot attack

to spamdyke's ip blacklist is also an option, but with 70k addresses, I'm guessing lookups will take spamdyke longer than rbldns, which uses a cdb. Andras -- Andras Korn korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu http://chardonnay.math.bme.hu/~korn/ QOTD

Re: [spamdyke-users] Graylisting - how effective it really is?

graphs, it appears that about 1/3 of all connecting IPs are blocked by even this primitive graylist. Andras -- Andras Korn korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu http://chardonnay.math.bme.hu/~korn/ QOTD: A single fact can spoil a good argument

Re: [spamdyke-users] DNSRBL question

quoting at least the list footer. :) -- Andras Korn korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu http://chardonnay.math.bme.hu/~korn/ QOTD: Michael! Are you sure you want a Turbo Boost? (Y/N) ___ spamdyke-users mailing

Re: [spamdyke-users] Why Maillist (and not a Forum?)

-- Andras Korn korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu http://chardonnay.math.bme.hu/~korn/ QOTD: I couldn't repair your brakes, so I made your horn louder. ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org

Re: [spamdyke-users] DENIED_OTHER

verbosity. Fwiw, I get these messages when the backend qmail-smtpd refuses a message, and spamdyke doesn't know/care why. For example, the recipient may be invalid, or the client may have tried to exceed the databytes limit. Andras -- Andras Korn korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu

Re: [spamdyke-users] Backscatter Spam Question

...? What you could and should additionally do, imo, is to complain to the operator of the server sending the backscatter, and to their provider. If enough people bug them about it, they may eventually do something. Andras -- Andras Korn korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu

Re: [spamdyke-users] qmail continuation?

version of qmail. Personally, I think a complete rewrite (using the current architecture and interfaces) may be more efficient than modifying DJB's code, though. :) Andras -- Andras Korn korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu http://chardonnay.math.bme.hu/~korn/ QOTD

[spamdyke-users] Contributing script: geoip lookups for log analysis

DENIED_RBL_MATCH from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] origin_ip: 91.76.144.183 (RU, Russian Federation) origin_rdns: ppp91-76-144-183.pppoe.mtu-net.ru auth: (unknown) Andras -- Andras Korn korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu http://chardonnay.math.bme.hu/~korn/ QOTD

Re: [spamdyke-users] large ip blacklist file

chain, you can also do this with tcpserver and spamdyke. Andras -- Andras Korn korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu http://chardonnay.math.bme.hu/~korn/ QOTD: I'm not old, I'm chronologically gifted

Re: [spamdyke-users] Greylisting wishes

for any lists or even configuration file. Yes. I'm always worried about scalability though. It would be nice to have these external apps running all the time (like fastcgi or squid's helper processes). spamdyke could communicate with them using unix domain sockets. Andras -- Andras

Re: [spamdyke-users] large ip blacklist file

mail you're blocking.) Andras -- Andras Korn korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu http://chardonnay.math.bme.hu/~korn/ QOTD: Everything is fine with the world - one mile under ground. ___ spamdyke-users mailing list

Re: [spamdyke-users] configuration advice requested

have tried IP whitelist, rdnswhitelist but this has not had any effect. Try increasing the timeout value. For example, idle-timeout-secs=300. Andras -- Andras Korn korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu http://chardonnay.math.bme.hu/~korn/ QOTD: Az ora

Re: [spamdyke-users] Backscatter Spam Question

to see any filters in the configuration that fit what I want. Does anyone have any suggestions? You could patch qmail with a patch that provides badrcptto or similar, and periodically generate a list of valid users from your LDAP directory. Andras -- Andras Korn korn

Re: [spamdyke-users] let qmail decide if it accepts a recipient before doing RHSBL?

On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 09:40:51AM -0500, Sam Clippinger wrote: Andras Korn wrote: On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:55:16PM -0500, Sam Clippinger wrote: Most qmail servers run a stock version of qmail-smtpd, which will only reject recipients for relaying. They shouldn't, as stock qmail

Re: [spamdyke-users] let qmail decide if it accepts a recipient before doing RHSBL?

On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:55:16PM -0500, Sam Clippinger wrote: Andras Korn wrote: I don't agree. These days, there are RBLs that will automatically list and delist IPs in the space of a few hours, well within the lifetime of a single email message. If a server is being added

Re: [spamdyke-users] feature requests :)

On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:40:48PM -0500, Sam Clippinger wrote: Andras Korn wrote: On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 12:38:38AM -0500, Sam Clippinger wrote: blacklist connections at the TCP level. tcpserver (or its replacement) should only set appropriate environment variables based on the tests

Re: [spamdyke-users] let qmail decide if it accepts a recipient before doing RHSBL?

this scheme would result in mail being passed to recipients who would otherwise not receive it. I think all feasible local tests should be carried out before resorting to remote tests, because those can be (and typically are) much slower. Andras -- Andras Korn korn

Re: [spamdyke-users] feature requests :)

the client's IP matches the current IP of any of a set of dynamic hostnames. Andras -- Andras Korn korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu http://chardonnay.math.bme.hu/~korn/ QOTD: I only wish my mouth had a BACKSPACE key