[spamdyke-users] max recipients question

When the max recipients value is reached, does the remote server get told to retry one at a time or some such thing, or does the delivery fail with only email addresses up to the max recipient value getting the email? best -- Greg Cirino Cirelle Enterprises Inc. 603-425-2221 www.cirelle.com Webs

Re: [spamdyke-users] super long "_none" directory nesting on 4.0.1

I've had to resort to deleting the directories every 6 hours using cron to run a script containing the following code to keep glisting under control #!/bin/sh for name in $(ls /location_of_your_graylist_directory) do for pref in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y

Re: [spamdyke-users] super long "_none" directory nesting on 4.0.1

The unknown (_none) is usually from bounces like undeliverable etc... Sam mentioned this several days ago probably you are bouncing mail back to junk addresses and that server is responding to you just a guess Greg Cirino Cirelle Enterprises Inc. 603-425-2221 www.cirelle.com Why email when yo

[spamdyke-users] ip-in-rdns-keyword-blacklist-file question

Hello, just a quick question, I have what I thought were keywords in an |ip-in-rdns-keyword-blacklist-file file, but mail with rdns names matching the keywords still get through example in file: |||static.otenet.gr log entry origin_ip: 83.235.176.178 origin_rdns: alithia1.static.otenet.gr auth:

[spamdyke-users] qmail remote timeoutremote parameter and spamdyke

Hello, I have a silly question, but in an effort to resolve an issue I just have to ask. Every so often one of our clients sends out a mail message via their website, which gets routed to one of our qmail servers for delivery (approx 800 messages). Occasionally when mail is sent during the day,

Re: [spamdyke-users] qmail remote timeoutremote parameter andspamdyke

>> You're close, but not quite there. >> >> Spamdyke (v4) can impose two different timeouts depending on the >> configuration, one for the total session and one for inactivity. However, >> spamdyke is only active on *incoming* smtp sessions, so spamdyke doesn't >> come into play in this scenario

[spamdyke-users] allowed mail never gets delivered and keeps on trying

hello is there anything in spamdyke that would prevent mail tagged as ALLOWED in the maillog file from getting to the qmail queue? I'm watching the maillog and a particular message from a friend of mine gets a log entry which says ALLOWED but it never gets to the queue and delivered I did a quic

Re: [spamdyke-users] allowed mail never gets delivered and keeps on trying

ot; messages)? You could also try enabling full > logging to see exactly what's happening during these deliveries. > > -- Sam Clippinger > > Greg Cirelle Enterprises wrote: > >> hello >> is there anything in spamdyke that would prevent mail >> tagged

Re: [spamdyke-users] Unusual log entries

Sergio Minini (NETKEY) wrote: > Hey there, I was checking spamdyke errors in the maillog and found > these unusual entries that I cannot understand. Anyone has any ideas? > Thanks! > -Sergio > > /*** > Oct 6 10:15:07 virtuality spamdyke[1666]: ERROR: unable to write 30 > bytes to file descripto

Re: [spamdyke-users] High load avg

Paulo Henrique wrote: > Hi, > since the spamdyke upgraded to 4.0.5, I noted that my servers working > with a high load, the average of 0.65 and they were left to 3.5, > someone noticed this problem? What may be happening? > > tks > Noticing 99.9% cpu (in top) for spamdyke overall load average

Re: [spamdyke-users] High load avg

is the number in the logs between the [] the PID? does anybody have insight? greg ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Re: [spamdyke-users] High load avg

Sam Clippinger wrote: > Yes, it is. That's how syslogd logs all of its messages. > > -- Sam Clippinger > > Greg Cirelle Enterprises wrote: > >> is the number in the logs between the [] the PID? >> >> does anybody have insight? >> >> greg &g

Re: [spamdyke-users] High load avg

Greg Cirelle Enterprises wrote: > Sam Clippinger wrote: > >> Yes, it is. That's how syslogd logs all of its messages. >> >> -- Sam Clippinger >> >> Greg Cirelle Enterprises wrote: >> >> >>> is the number in the

Re: [spamdyke-users] Updated Spamdyke Statistics Script

awk is a good tool the scripts are nice, but if you need real detail, you may want to consider cat, grep, and awk not to mention sort and uniq just a thought I say this because when I get the support call from someone that is a bit cranky, this script doesn't help nail it down The calls I get k

Re: [spamdyke-users] Updated Spamdyke Statistics Script

Felix Buenemann wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Am 21.10.2008 19:38 Uhr, Eric Shubert schrieb: > [...] > >> Nice. Here's my present result, for all logs: >> # time cat /var/log/qmail/smtp/*.s | ./spamdyke-stats.pl >> 34229DENIED_RDNS_MISSING >> 26702DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS >> 21848DE

[spamdyke-users] From addy To addy the same spam

We have been seeing a large increase in the type of spam having the same address in the from and to parameters. ex. from: i...@somedomain.com to: i...@somedomain.com ... the filters we already have in place are stopping the usual dns and black list entries, but occasionally some get through not

Re: [spamdyke-users] From addy To addy the same spam

at would prevent users from > emailing themselves (some MUAs include a feature to always put the > sender on the BCC line). > > If spamdyke can't stop these messages based on their origin, it's > probably up to SpamAssassin (or something similar) to stop it by >

[spamdyke-users] question about config-dir

I'm just now trying to utilize the config-dir directive. is the config-dir directive mainly for further restricting mail above what is in spamdyke.conf or is it possible to be less restrictive overall, without whitelisting the recipient? for example: the main config file is fairly restrictive wi

Re: [spamdyke-users] possible qmail-smtpd exited by timeout (receiving mails with attachements from exchange server)

We had something like this happening, but further investigation revealed it was our virus scanner dumping the email (clamd). Not sure why the scanner did that, but haven't noticed anything lately Greg Cirino Sam Clippinger wrote: > That's very strange; spamdyke should insert a CR before every ba

Re: [spamdyke-users] question about config-dir

etc > In your global configuration file, add the config-dir option: > config-dir=/etc/spamdyke.d > > That's it. > > -- Sam Clippinger > > Greg Cirelle Enterprises wrote: > >> I'm just now trying to utilize the config-dir directive. >> >&g

[spamdyke-users] peculiar issue with filter_blacklist

One particular client said she was being blacklisted when sending to another client of the same domain. I looked at the logs and saw this entry FILTER_BLACKLIST_IP ip: 75.180.xxx.xxx file: /home/vpopmail/ipblacklist(22) So I went to the ipblacklist file expecting to see the ip entry, but there w

Re: [spamdyke-users] peculiar issue with filter_blacklist

! Use ixquick.com safe search instead. Greg Cirelle Enterprises wrote: > One particular client said she was being blacklisted when sending > to another client of the same domain. > > I looked at the logs and saw this entry > > FILTER_BLACKLIST_IP ip: 75.180.xxx.xxx file: /home/

[spamdyke-users] graylist bounces to sender

Is there a common reason why the sender of an email would receive a graylist bounce message? spamdyke conf graylist-level=always graylist-min-secs=290 graylist-max-secs=61600 -- Greg Cirino Cirelle Enterprises Inc. 603-425-2221 www.cirelle.com Looking for ways to create additional income? it's

Re: [spamdyke-users] graylist bounces to sender

Eric Shubert wrote: > Greg Cirelle Enterprises wrote: > >> Is there a common reason why the sender of an email would receive a >> graylist bounce message? >> >> spamdyke conf >> >> graylist-level=always >> graylist-min-secs=290 >&g

Re: [spamdyke-users] graylist bounces to sender

Eric Shubert wrote: > Greg Cirelle Enterprises wrote: > >> Eric Shubert wrote: >> >>> Greg Cirelle Enterprises wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Is there a common reason why the sender of an email would receive a >>>> gray

Re: [spamdyke-users] FW: failure notice

le > > Spamdyke closes the connection with an error named > =B3DENIED_GRAYLISTED=B2. > > Normally the sender MTA sends this message after a while again. Then > Spamdyke will accept it. (After the time of graylist-min-secs) > > Spamdyke won=B9t send E-Mails by itself. The

Re: [spamdyke-users] graylist bounces to sender

Further information on this issue. Apparently, the sending server is a MailMax server Does anybody have any information regarding this server and it's inability to handle graylisting? best Greg ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdy

Re: [spamdyke-users] graylist bounces to sender

Greg Cirelle Enterprises wrote: > Further information on this issue. > > Apparently, the sending server is a MailMax server > > Does anybody have any information regarding this > server and it's inability to handle graylisting? > > best > > Greg > > &g

[spamdyke-users] MailMax and Graylisting/greylisting

Hello I believe I have discovered (one opinion) about the failure of MailMax mailers in resending email when graylisted. The problem occurs when a mail server does not retry after a 451 error. From what it looks like there is no fix for less than adequate mailer software accept to whitelist those