On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Edouard Gomez wrote:
> swaped in by the VM. Could you explain your point of view a bit more ?
>
All I meant is that someone in the future could use BUFFER_SIZE in an
expression and get a surprise because it isn't surrounded with "(" ")".
It's things like this that appear to
Tim Woodall ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Edouard Gomez wrote:
> > #ifdef __linux__
> > > if(write_dest(fdout, destination_buf, n +
>(bridging)?-BRIDGING1483_HEADER:HDLC_HEADER_SIZE) > 0)
>
> This is surely wrong? ITYM
> if(write_dest(fdout, destina
Tim Woodall ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> +#define BRIDGING1483_HEADER 12
Don't try my previous patch it is really bad, per example
BRIDGING1483_HEADER is only 10 bytes long but i've confused by the
original patch that was just a quick hack to make the patch as small
as possibl
Your fixes have been commited too.
--
Edouard Gomez
Liste de diffusion modem ALCATEL SpeedTouch USB
Pour se désinscrire : mailto:speedtouch-request@;ml.free.fr?subject=unsubscribe
I commited the bridged mode patch. It's compiled by default on GNU/Linux systems.
I need help to make the patch possible for BSD systems too. What is
the equivalent device for making a virtual network device that does
ethernet ?
I know pppoa3 does not work with BSD systems but if one
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Edouard Gomez wrote:
Hopefully this makes more sense.
>
> Hello,
>
> I merged the experimental patch for pppoe support in pppoa3. At the
> moment the code is for linux only as i don't have *BSD box.
>
> I would like people who needs or can use PPPoE to try this patch.
>
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Edouard Gomez wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
(I've confused myself :-(. These are comments on the patch from
r1.24 to r1.25 of pppoa3.c. I'll reply with my comments on your
suggested patch in another email. (I hadn't read your email
properly and assumed that the latest change in cvs wa
Edouard Gomez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'll try to set up my connection in pppoe mode but i never did that
> before so if someone already used the experimental patch could test
> this one, it would be great.
Ok i tested the code myself and it works just fine, it wil be commited
soon.
