Here I meant Martin
Horneffer.
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Horneffer
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 11:02 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); spring@ietf.org
Cc: Horneffer, Martin
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution - Policy
Hi Les,
comme
NM, you have not answered my below email/proposal. I had waited for the new
version of the draft but it also does not touch this subject.
So, could you please consider and answer my comment?
In short, in an implementation-independent sentence:
> I'm wondering if we could address the conflict on a
ould you please consider and answer my comment?
In short, in an implementation-independent sentence:
> I'm wondering if we could address the conflict on a per FEC/Prefix basis
> rather than on a per IGP advertisement (range) basis.
> If so, this may avoid the discussion between
t touch this subject.
So, could you please consider and answer my comment?
In short, in an implementation-independent sentence:
> I'm wondering if we could address the conflict on a per FEC/Prefix basis
> rather than on a per IGP advertisement (range) basis.
> If so, this may avo
C/Prefix basis
> rather than on a per IGP advertisement (range) basis.
> If so, this may avoid the discussion between the Quarantine vs ignore policy.
Thanks
Bruno
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
bruno.decra...@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com&g
ge) basis.
> If so, this may avoid the discussion between the Quarantine vs ignore policy.
Thanks
Bruno
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
bruno.decra...@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 1:57 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (
this may avoid the discussion between the Quarantine vs ignore policy.
Thanks
Bruno
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
bruno.decra...@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 1:57 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); spring@ietf
discussion between the Quarantine vs ignore policy.
Thanks
Bruno
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
bruno.decra...@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 1:57 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.or
f
bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 1:57 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution - Policy
Les,
Please see inline [Bruno]
From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2016 12:41 A
ring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
bruno.decra...@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 8:23 AM
To: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
Subject: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution - Policy
Hi authors, all
As an individual contributor, please fin
n Behalf Of Les Ginsberg
(ginsberg)
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2016 3:41 PM
To: bruno.decra...@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>;
spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution - Policy
Bruno -
I am having difficulty parsing t
lict - as
the example I presented below demonstrates.
Are we closer to agreement now?
Les
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg
(ginsberg)
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2016 3:41 PM
To: bruno.decra...@orange.com; spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-sp
pring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *
bruno.decra...@orange.com
*Sent:* Thursday, May 12, 2016 8:23 AM
*To:* spring@ietf.org
*Subject:* [spring] draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution - Policy
Hi authors, all
As an individual contributor, please find below some feedback on
00, 1, 1, 0) !VPN1
The latter choice is suboptimal because it prevents use of the VPN2 entry
unnecessarily.
This point needs to be made explicit in the draft.
Les
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 8:23 AM
To:
Hi authors, all
As an individual contributor, please find below some feedback on the policy.
I'm wondering if we could address the conflict on a per FEC/Prefix basis rather
than on a per IGP advertisement basis.
If so, this may avoid the discussion between the Quarantine vs ignore policy.
The p
15 matches
Mail list logo
