[Sprinklerforum] Re: NFPA 13R - Multifamily with attic access

2024-08-12 Thread Steve Leyton
sprinklers Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Re: NFPA 13R - Multifamily with attic access So, to update... The architect has deemed this attic to be no storage. Therefore, not requiring sprinklers per NFPA 13R. However, architect has shown a pull-down hatch into the attic inside the 3'rd floor unit,

[Sprinklerforum] Re: NFPA 13R - Multifamily with attic access

2024-08-12 Thread Dapr Jones
re running into an area outside the dwelling unit and get > kicked back to 13 for Design. > > > > My observation on limited data. > > > > R/ > > Matt > > > > > > > > *Matthew J. Willis, CWBSP, C.E.T.* > > *Ferguson Fire Design, LLC* &

[Sprinklerforum] Re: NFPA 13R - Multifamily with attic access

2024-07-29 Thread Steve Leyton
automatic fire sprinklers Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Re: NFPA 13R - Multifamily with attic access Thanks. Yes I see now that sprinklers would definitely be required if the tenant has access to the attic. Follow up- You can't just install a wet pipe system up there if you add heaters to the

[Sprinklerforum] Re: NFPA 13R - Multifamily with attic access

2024-07-29 Thread matthew.willis1
to:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>> Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Re: NFPA 13R - Multifamily with attic access Caution: This email originated from outside of the organization. DO NOT click links or open attachments unless you recognize and trust the sender.

[Sprinklerforum] Re: NFPA 13R - Multifamily with attic access

2024-07-29 Thread Tony Silva
om:* Dapr Jones > *Sent:* Sunday, July 28, 2024 8:52 PM > *To:* Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers < > sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> > *Subject:* [Sprinklerforum] Re: NFPA 13R - Multifamily with attic

[Sprinklerforum] Re: NFPA 13R - Multifamily with attic access

2024-07-29 Thread Dapr Jones
t; > matthew.will...@ferguson.com > > > > *From:* Dapr Jones > *Sent:* Sunday, July 28, 2024 8:52 PM > *To:* Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers < > sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> > *Subject:* [Sprinklerforum] Re: NFPA 13R - M

[Sprinklerforum] Re: NFPA 13R - Multifamily with attic access

2024-07-29 Thread matthew.willis1
ferguson.com<mailto:matthew.will...@ferguson.com> From: Dapr Jones Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2024 8:52 PM To: Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Re: NFPA 13R - Multifamily with attic access Caution: This email originated from outside of the org

[Sprinklerforum] Re: NFPA 13R - Multifamily with attic access

2024-07-28 Thread Dapr Jones
Thanks Todd, much appreciated. Yes, it would still be 13R I agree. When you say " it would need to be appropriately protected" do you mean the attic would need to be sprinklered? It would become accessible to the tenant and they would likely use it for storage. Does 13R allow omission of sprinkle

[Sprinklerforum] Re: NFPA 13R - Multifamily with attic access

2024-07-28 Thread Fpdcdesign
As far as access, attic access could be allowed unless prohibited by Building Code or other restriction (ie zoning approval). However, since it is accessible for living space or storage, it would need to be appropriately protected. Even then, it could be considered 4 stories inst