From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of George Church
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 6:38 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Dual floor control assembies
You mean feeding half the floor off east standpipe, half off
forum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of George Church
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 4:17 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Dual floor control assembies
There would have to be or a single flow would set off all WFSs since it would
ac
inkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of George Church
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 4:17 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Dual floor control assembies
There would have to be or a single flow would set off all WFSs since it would
act as a bi
ems, Inc.
> PO Box 407, Middleburg, PA 17842
> 877-324-ROWE 570-837-6335 fax
> g...@rowesprinkler.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:
> sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Garth W. Warren
>
335 fax
g...@rowesprinkler.com
-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Garth W. Warren
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 3:00 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: Dual floor control a
I believe there is a requirement for check valves at each connection.
Garth
- Original Message -
From: "Ronl.Fletcher"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 1:13 PM
Subject: Dual floor control assembies
Is anyone aware of a prohibition against having two floor control
assemblies
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Ed Kramer
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 11:08 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Dual floor control assembies
If my memory serves me correctly, there was a time when NFPA 14 prohibited
it. My 2003 edition doesn't ha
:08 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Dual floor control assembies
If my memory serves me correctly, there was a time when NFPA 14 prohibited
it. My 2003 edition doesn't have it. So if it was prohibited, it was in an
edition older than 2003.
Ed Kramer
Littleto
If my memory serves me correctly, there was a time when NFPA 14 prohibited
it. My 2003 edition doesn't have it. So if it was prohibited, it was in an
edition older than 2003.
Ed Kramer
Littleton, CO
> -Original Message-
> From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerf
...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Eric Tysinger
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 10:46 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Dual floor control assembies
I've seen it done quite a few times. In my opinion, not best practice, service
nightmare down the road. Yes the signs are req
Hello Ronl.Fletcher,
There are a few high rises here setup that way around here... BIG thing is the
alarm company has to put the flow switches on different points so it can be
verified that BOTH work during the test. Inspectors need to know to look for 2
flow alarms from each floor and have a w
-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Morey, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 1:32 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Dual floor control assembies
I'm not aware of a specific prohibition, and NFPA 13 2010 "6.7.4.3.1* Systems
that have more than one control val
I'm not aware of a specific prohibition, and NFPA 13 2010 "6.7.4.3.1* Systems
that have more than one control valve that must be closed to work on a system
or space shall have a sign referring to existence and location of other
valves." would suggest to me it's OK as long as that requirement is
13 matches
Mail list logo
