Hello.
I have pylons 0.96 (SVN) and current SQLAlchemy (0.3), and I have bug
that
doesn't exist earlier.
My connection code:
code
import sqlalchemy.mods.threadlocal
from sqlalchemy import DynamicMetaData, objectstore
metadata = DynamicMetaData( case_sensitive = False )
def db_connect( dsn ):
With SA 0.4beta4 if I try to access a mapped object field
(Table.c.fieldname) before any query has been sent to the database the
call fails with a AttributeError(key). Everything works if I do this
after having issued a query.
-- Example: (skip to the __main__ section)
import sqlalchemy as sqa
Dear SQLAlchemy users,
I am pleased to announce the first release of FormAlchemy !
FormAlchemy: Auto-generated, customizable HTML input form fields from
your SQLAlchemy mapped classes.
FormAlchemy is a library written in Python that generates HTML form
fields from your SQLAlchemy's mapped
On 8/28/07, caffecoder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sqlalchemy.exceptions.DBAPIError: (Connection failed)
(OperationalError) FATAL: sorry, too many clients already
I've been getting a similar but not identical error after upgrading to
SQLAlchemy 0.4, and somebody else on the list also mentioned
Hi List:
I am just doing a test of my pylons site under medium load.
(ab2 -c 20 -n 5000 ...)
and got following errors:
2007-08-29 17:32:34,468 INFO [paste.httpserver.ThreadPool]
kill_hung_threads status: 10 threads (10 working, 0 idle, 0 starting)
ave time 2.24sec, max time 7.22sec, killed 0
Hi:
I'm new to SQL.
I have to execute the following SQL line, which updates a sequence
number. The table zseq_document_types_lookup has only one record with
this number.
update zseq_document_types_lookup set id=2;
I thought of retrieving the record with something like this:
class
I am attempting to use SQLAlchemy's table reflection to access a MSSQL
2k database. However the user I can connect with only had
db_datareader access. When SQLAlchemy tries to load the schema, it
attempts a rollback at the end, which the user does not have
permission to execute:
2007-08-29
Jian wrote:
Hi List:
I am just doing a test of my pylons site under medium load.
(ab2 -c 20 -n 5000 ...)
and got following errors:
2007-08-29 17:32:34,468 INFO [paste.httpserver.ThreadPool]
kill_hung_threads status: 10 threads (10 working, 0 idle, 0
starting) ave time 2.24sec, max
Hi Jason,
thanks for the reply.
My pylons basecontroller takes care of the session clean up
like this:
class BaseController(WSGIController):
def __call__(self, environ, start_response):
try:
return WSGIController.__call__(self, environ,
start_response)
finally:
Jian wrote:
Hi Jason,
thanks for the reply.
My pylons basecontroller takes care of the session clean up
like this:
class BaseController(WSGIController):
def __call__(self, environ, start_response):
try:
return WSGIController.__call__(self, environ,
the remove is described in doc as close + extra cleanup
Shouldn't the doc be updated to add that point, which will make the
the life of newbies like me easier =D
Or better: add the explicitly close in remove.
Best
Jian
On Aug 30, 12:10 am, jason kirtland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jian wrote:
Jian wrote:
the remove is described in doc as close + extra cleanup
Shouldn't the doc be updated to add that point, which will make
the the life of newbies like me easier =D
Or better: add the explicitly close in remove.
Yeah, the current remove() implementation in trunk isn't yet in
sync
Is there any way to use reflection with a read only connection?
I use reflection on an Oracle database with read only permission, no
problems (using SA 0.3.8).
I don't recall seeing SA trying to do a ROLLBACK during reflection
though.
Steve
its most likely uncompiled mappers. the c attribute on the class
is deprecated; use Table.attribute instead. Also issue
compile_mappers() after your mappers have been established to force a
compile. The typical usage pattern is that the session.query() is
created first, which also
Ive committed this fix in r3425. remove() calls close() on an
existing session if one is present.
On Aug 29, 2007, at 6:49 PM, jason kirtland wrote:
Jian wrote:
the remove is described in doc as close + extra cleanup
Shouldn't the doc be updated to add that point, which will make
the
On Aug 29, 2007, at 1:55 PM, Jason Koelker wrote:
I am attempting to use SQLAlchemy's table reflection to access a MSSQL
2k database. However the user I can connect with only had
db_datareader access. When SQLAlchemy tries to load the schema, it
attempts a rollback at the end, which the
On Aug 29, 7:27 pm, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 29, 2007, at 1:55 PM, Jason Koelker wrote:
I am attempting to use SQLAlchemy's table reflection to access a MSSQL
2k database. However the user I can connect with only had
db_datareader access. When SQLAlchemy tries to
17 matches
Mail list logo
