Michael Bayer wrote:
i havent looked yet but this is likely a bug in eager loading when it
interacts with polymorphic. are you on trunk ?
Nope. I just installed SQLAlchemy-0.4.2dev_r3952. And it's now working.
SA 0.4.1:
[...]
FROM companies JOIN suppliers ON companies.id = suppliers.id
Hi all,
I was finally able to spend a little time on the Firebird backend, and
I'm glad to say that I'm currently down to this test summary:
Ran 1030 tests in 63.169s
FAILED (failures=7, errors=187)
There are still some real issue, but most of the failures and errors
come from a few common
On 16 Aralık, 22:22, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 15, 11:02 pm, Utku Altinkaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not want to lose invalid values, becouse I want to send them to
the user again, so while using object as intermediate holder I have to
set attributes invalid
On Dec 13, 5:49 pm, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
these are some cleanup messages which occur during the final gc of
objects in the session. ive tried to work around them a bit but they
still persist for some applications ( i havent yet been able to
reproduce them and im
Please people help me
My Simple Model
class Record:
has_field('special_number',Unicode(100))
belongs_to('person',of_kind='Person')
class Person:
has_field('name',Unicode(100))
=
Use this:
Greetings to all http://milearmida.tripod.com/widescreen-wallpapers-naruto.html
widescreen wallpapers naruto
http://milearmida.tripod.com/index.html naruto wallpapers
http://milearmida.tripod.com/naruto-akatsuki-wallpapers.html naruto
akatsuki wallpapers
That works. Thank's a lot.
Marcos.
I will continue asking. Soon...
On Dec 14, 7:20 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
your 'iva' table-column AND 'iva' attribute/relation/property have same
name, Thats what the error says. either rename one of them (e.g. the column
to become iva_id), or use that
On Dec 17, 2007, at 11:32 AM, Justin wrote:
Using the Django ORM you can write:
MyModel.objects.filter(property__in=['list', 'of', 'values'])
...and It will OR those values for you. Does SQLAlchemy have a similar
shortcut?
table.c.somecol.in_([list of values])
On Dec 16, 2007, at 7:29 PM, Ryszard Szopa wrote:
On Dec 13, 5:49 pm, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
these are some cleanup messages which occur during the final gc of
objects in the session. ive tried to work around them a bit but they
still persist for some applications ( i
On Dec 17, 2007, at 8:59 AM, Lele Gaifax wrote:
A. some tests do a textual comparison against an expected
statement; this breaks on FB, because the dialect inserts an
explicit PK field::
AssertionError: Testing for query 'INSERT INTO users (user_name)
VALUES (?)' params
Thanks!
- Justin
On Dec 17, 2007 11:44 AM, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007, at 11:32 AM, Justin wrote:
Using the Django ORM you can write:
MyModel.objects.filter(property__in=['list', 'of', 'values'])
...and It will OR those values for you. Does SQLAlchemy
On Dec 16, 2007, at 3:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and another issue around attribute.get_history...
i have a descriptor that is autosetting some defaultvalue at first
get.
a descriptor on top of the InstrumentedAttribute itself ? id wonder
how you are configuring that.
Michael Bayer wrote:
On Dec 16, 2007, at 3:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and another issue around attribute.get_history...
i have a descriptor that is autosetting some defaultvalue at first
get.
a descriptor on top of the InstrumentedAttribute itself ? id wonder
how you are
yes and no, as i said i'm replacing the __dict__ with something
special; so
its IA riding on top of me (;-) but otherwise its that. no renaming,
i dont
want someone (thats can be me, later) to be able to workaround
either me or SA.
then have your magic __dict__ implement the same
Hi,
I am just wondering about the traversal order of ClauseVistor, does it
have to be in a set order?
I am eagerloading lots (1000s) of relations, and query compilation
take a long time, a profiling revealed that most of the time was spent
in traverse. So, I am just wondering if the performance
On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:38 PM, Esceo wrote:
Hi,
I am just wondering about the traversal order of ClauseVistor, does it
have to be in a set order?
I am eagerloading lots (1000s) of relations, and query compilation
take a long time, a profiling revealed that most of the time was spent
in
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the quick reply.
What I am in fact doing is undefer all fields, eagerload all relations
(and undefer the corresponding fields) for a corresponding model.
(ended up being 9xx options altogether)
And yes, I am on 0.3.11 (and probably is unable to move onto a 0.4 as
I am
Hi,
Seeing so many improvements and benefits, I might as well migrate to
0.4
Just few things I wanted to make sure before I start on that.
Inside the 0.4 branch,
1) are we still generating anonymous labels with a width of 4 char
('anon_0fda') etc?
2) there is a bug inside 0.3's strategies
On Dec 18, 2007, at 12:57 AM, Esceo wrote:
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the quick reply.
What I am in fact doing is undefer all fields, eagerload all relations
(and undefer the corresponding fields) for a corresponding model.
(ended up being 9xx options altogether)
And yes, I am on 0.3.11
no, 0.4 is almost a total rewrite of 0.3's internals.Of course its
possible since its been done, but then youd just be left with...
0.4! Which you can just download. I'm not sure how extensive your
elixir/SA hacks are but the Elixir project has also been improving and
updating,
On Dec 18, 2007, at 1:34 AM, Esceo wrote:
Hi,
Seeing so many improvements and benefits, I might as well migrate to
0.4
Just few things I wanted to make sure before I start on that.
Inside the 0.4 branch,
1) are we still generating anonymous labels with a width of 4 char
('anon_0fda')
21 matches
Mail list logo
