Here are the suggestions that come to mind:
- You should either get rid of, or (preferably) expand/replace the
current top-level table of contents. As it is currently, there is
only one useful link in there (API reference) and the table of
contents block waste way too much space for just one
Thanks, that works.
But now, with the attribute_mapped_collection, every language is
queried and assigned to the dict (quite an overhead in my use-case).
how could i achieve to load only a selected language which is
dynamically assigned on the query?
i thought of something like a
On Dec 3, 7:39 pm, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 3, 2008, at 1:26 PM, Guillaume wrote:
Hello,
is there a way with the ORM layer to have abstract base class like in
django ?
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/db/models/#abstract-base-
classes
sure, just
Hello
I am running an application with cherrypy, sqlalchemy and mysql. All is
working fine but sometimes after inserting many data i get the following
messages.
I am using an scoped_session and remove the session if i don't need it. I
only see 3 databases processe in the mysql database.
br
On Dec 4, 2008, at 4:21 AM, Gaetan de Menten wrote:
Here are the suggestions that come to mind:
- You should either get rid of, or (preferably) expand/replace the
current top-level table of contents. As it is currently, there is
only one useful link in there (API reference) and the table
On Dec 4, 2008, at 7:44 AM, Guillaume wrote:
The problem is not directly in the inheritance scenario, but rather
creating an association to an abstract class.
Let's say I have the following classes: CorporateCustomer and
PrivateCustomer inheriting from the abstract class Customer. On the
On Dec 4, 2008, at 4:29 AM, Jürgen Hauptmann wrote:
Hello
I am running an application with cherrypy, sqlalchemy and mysql. All
is
working fine but sometimes after inserting many data i get the
following
messages.
I am using an scoped_session and remove the session if i don't need
I've made all of these changes up on the site. The li issue was a
pixel-based padding already so I just reduced that.
On Dec 4, 2008, at 9:25 AM, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Dec 4, 2008, at 4:21 AM, Gaetan de Menten wrote:
Here are the suggestions that come to mind:
- You should either
sure this is called concrete table inheritance. Though when you
make a relation to Order, you need to declare these separately for
CorporateCustomer and PrivateCustomer since the connection from a
relational perspective is different. When concrete inheritance uses
an abc, it
On Dec 4, 2008, at 11:18 AM, Guillaume wrote:
sure this is called concrete table inheritance. Though when you
make a relation to Order, you need to declare these separately for
CorporateCustomer and PrivateCustomer since the connection from a
relational perspective is different. When
Right now, I'm writing this query as a string. I want to know if it
can be expressed with SQLAlchemy's expressions instead.
Here's the query:
select sh.employee_id, sum(st.stop_time - st.start_time) as hours
from shift sh, shift_time st
where sh.employee_id in (28630, 28648)
and
hi matt -
here's that query generated using lexical tables, which are just like
Table objects but require less boilerplace for SQL prototyping purposes:
from sqlalchemy import *
from sqlalchemy.sql import table, column
import datetime
shift = table('shift', column('employee_id', Integer),
Thanks! This is really helpful.
On Dec 4, 11:43 am, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi matt -
here's that query generated using lexical tables, which are just like
Table objects but require less boilerplace for SQL prototyping purposes:
from sqlalchemy import *
from
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out how to have an object return its primary key
without knowing what it is called. The docs in
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/05/sqlalchemy_orm_mapper.html look
relevant, for example the function identity_key_from_instance (see entry
from docs below), but I'm not
14 matches
Mail list logo
