Hi All
I would like some advice / best practice on the following basic problem
please. I'm new to SQL so am groping with some things that used to be
basic. :-(
I've looked around in SA and have only found a few small notes on locking.
There is a for_update but when I try this it appears to be
Hello, all!
I'm following the tutorial here http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/orm/tutorial.html
and I'm running into some problems at one moment, specifically at the
Configuring delete/delete-orphan Cascade section. Here is a paste of
exactly what I'm doing http://bpaste.net/show/9861/ . Am I making
Sorry I was being a bit lazy and trying to avoid setting up the PG
test environment. The problem affects a domain over a custom type.
Here is a test that exhibits the behaviour (without assertions):
class DomainOverCustomTypeReflectionTest(TestBase,
AssertsExecutionResults):
__only_on__ =
great, that test is perfect. I added ticket #1933, I just want to see if I
can get the testtype to be available somehow before falling back to setting
coltype=None solution.
On Sep 30, 2010, at 9:22 AM, Nikolaj wrote:
Sorry I was being a bit lazy and trying to avoid setting up the PG
test
I try to update counter for omr object ang got following:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/vugluskr/tmp/z/sa.py, line 56, in module
main()
File /home/vugluskr/tmp/z/sa.py, line 52, in main
q2.update({data.cnt: data.cnt + 1})
File
On Sep 30, 2010, at 4:43 AM, Warwick Prince wrote:
Hi All
I would like some advice / best practice on the following basic problem
please. I'm new to SQL so am groping with some things that used to be basic.
:-(
I've looked around in SA and have only found a few small notes on
OK, was hard to spot, and I think maybe I should change this, there's a line
where it does this:
users_table = User.__table__
So the original users_table is replaced with the one that User.__table__ is
mapped to.
I'm going to change that remapping to read like this:
mapper(User,
On Sep 30, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Sep 30, 2010, at 4:43 AM, Warwick Prince wrote:
Hi All
I would like some advice / best practice on the following basic problem
please. I'm new to SQL so am groping with some things that used to be
basic. :-(
I've looked
Hi guys.
I keep getting this message:
[paste.httpserver.ThreadPool] kill_hung_threads status: 10 threads (1
working, 9 idle, 0 starting) ave time 0.03sec, max time 0.03sec,
killed 0 workers
Do I have to close a connection every time i'm querying the db?
--
You received this message because
this is a bug , created at http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/ticket/1935 , and a
patch which fixes this issue is there. will try to get this committed soon.
On Sep 30, 2010, at 9:57 AM, bogun.dmit...@gmail.com wrote:
I try to update counter for omr object ang got following:
Traceback
On Sep 30, 2010, at 10:26 AM, dobrysmak wrote:
Hi guys.
I keep getting this message:
[paste.httpserver.ThreadPool] kill_hung_threads status: 10 threads (1
working, 9 idle, 0 starting) ave time 0.03sec, max time 0.03sec,
killed 0 workers
Do I have to close a connection every time i'm
On 9/30/10 16:26 , dobrysmak wrote:
Hi guys.
I keep getting this message:
[paste.httpserver.ThreadPool] kill_hung_threads status: 10 threads (1
working, 9 idle, 0 starting) ave time 0.03sec, max time 0.03sec,
killed 0 workers
that's just the paste httpserver checking if any of your
Hi.
I've got autoloadable table:
---
class ObjectList(object):
pass
t_object_list = sa.Table('object_list', meta.metadata, autoload=True,
autoload_with=engine)
orm.mapper(ObjectList, t_object_list)
Hi,
I've two classes CourseSet and CanonicalCourse (with the same parent)
which need to be connected in a many-to-many relationship. But these
classes are mapped on the same table, thus definition of the
association table seems redondant:
assoc_course_set_canonical_table = Table(
2010/9/30 Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com:
this is a bug , created at http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/ticket/1935 , and a
patch which fixes this issue is there. will try to get this committed
soon.
Thanks, patch fix issue.
I try to update counter for omr object ang got following:
Hey,
I am trying to create a funky relationship where I want to take a
field in a table, take a portion of it and then use that portion to
create a relation. Is this even possible?
My relation is below
reseller = relation(Reseller,
uselist = False,
primaryjoin =
dont send tuples as bind parameters for scalar attributes. one or more
members of your data dictionary are tuples.
On Sep 30, 2010, at 6:12 PM, phasma wrote:
If add to sqlalchemy/orm/mapper.py at 1699 line this code:
if isinstance(value, tuple):
at:
ol.type = data['type'],
print type(data['type'])
returns str
print ol.__dict__
returns:
{u'has_tire_shop': (False,), u'gps_lat': ('2',), '_sa_instance_state':
sqlalchemy.orm.state.InstanceState object at 0x7fcc6002b0d0,
u'name': ('2',), u'has_fitness': (False,), u'has_another': '',
you need to specify primaryjoin and secondary join when you do self ref using
m2m. there's an example at the end of
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/orm/relationships.html#specifying-alternate-join-conditions-to-relationship
, as well as some variants of that syntax which declarative
On Sep 30, 2010, at 4:47 PM, Dan wrote:
Hey,
I am trying to create a funky relationship where I want to take a
field in a table, take a portion of it and then use that portion to
create a relation. Is this even possible?
My relation is below
reseller = relation(Reseller,
uselist
I feel I need to sleep. Thank you :)
On Oct 1, 2:47 am, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
you're doing this:
data = {}
data['type'] = 'some type'
class Foo(object):
pass
ol = Foo()
ol.type = data['type'],
print ol.type
its a tuple, lose the ','
On Sep 30, 2010, at
21 matches
Mail list logo
