[sqlalchemy] Re: Full connection pool close

2009-02-02 Thread Smoke
On 29 Gen, 21:03, Rick Morrison rickmorri...@gmail.com wrote: I then added a wait option which simply sleeps for brief period after closing the SA connections, and then does the connection count check. With a 1/2 second delay between the closing of the SA connection pool and the check for

[sqlalchemy] Re: Full connection pool close

2009-01-27 Thread Smoke
On 24 Gen, 23:31, Rick Morrison rickmorri...@gmail.com wrote: Oh... i didn't explain myself... I mean that it's already empty at the first cycle of the loop... It would be normal to not enter the loop if you haven't yet opened any connections, as connections are opened on demand. Make

[sqlalchemy] Re: Full connection pool close

2009-01-24 Thread Smoke
On 23 Gen, 23:43, Rick Morrison rickmorri...@gmail.com wrote: From your earlier post: a_session.close() sa_Session.close_all() sa_engine.dispose()       del sa_engine but it does not close the connection! Here's Engine.dispose (line 1152, engine/base.py)     def

[sqlalchemy] Re: Full connection pool close

2009-01-24 Thread Smoke
On 24 Gen, 21:27, Rick Morrison rickmorri...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, seems that you've got the problem. conn = self._pool.get( False ) is the problem It raises an Empty error...: It's supposed to; that's the exit condition for the while True loop.  It does make it at least once

[sqlalchemy] Re: Full connection pool close

2009-01-23 Thread Smoke
On 21 Gen, 16:18, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote: On Jan 21, 2009, at 5:22 AM, Smoke wrote: Hi, I'm not a SQLAchemy expert ( just an average user... ). I have an application that's causing me some problems... It's a monitoring application that connects to a MS Sql Server

[sqlalchemy] Re: Full connection pool close

2009-01-23 Thread Smoke
On 23 Gen, 19:21, Rick Morrison rickmorri...@gmail.com wrote: Good question, I don't know the answer. But even if it were a DSN option, it's likely to be an optional one. In the absence of an explicit setting, shouldn't we default to having the setting off, not on? It sounds as if the

[sqlalchemy] Re: Full connection pool close

2009-01-23 Thread Smoke
On 23 Gen, 20:46, Rick Morrison rickmorri...@gmail.com wrote: his answer here: http://groups.google.com/group/pyodbc/browse_thread/thread/320eab14f6... You say in that thread that you're already turning off the setting by issuing:    import pyodbc    pyodbc.pooling = False before

[sqlalchemy] Re: Full connection pool close

2009-01-23 Thread Smoke
On 23 Gen, 21:24, Rick Morrison rickmorri...@gmail.com wrote: OK, it should use whatever is set on the ODBC DSN then.   im not sure that pyodbc should have an opinion about it. Eh? is there a way to set pyodbc.pooling = None or some equivalent ? It's pyodbc.pooling = False, as

[sqlalchemy] Full connection pool close

2009-01-21 Thread Smoke
Hi, I'm not a SQLAchemy expert ( just an average user... ). I have an application that's causing me some problems... It's a monitoring application that connects to a MS Sql Server, so it's always on. Sometimes happens that casualy I have a DBAPIError with pyodbc. The error is something like

[sqlalchemy] Re: save_or_update and composit Primary Keys... MSSQL / pyodbc issue ?

2007-12-19 Thread Smoke
On 19 Dic, 01:37, Rick Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Same here on pymssql. I tried it with 'start' as the only PK, and with both 'identifier' and 'start' as PK. Both work fine. Are you sure your in-database tabledef matches your declared schema? I've attached a script that works here.

[sqlalchemy] Re: save_or_update and composit Primary Keys... MSSQL / pyodbc issue ?

2007-12-18 Thread Smoke
Sorry because i'm a bit late ( work deadlines are struggling my time! :) ). I've made some different configurations and schema definitions... and i've noticed that it never updates a row if i set the datetime field as PK ( never! even if i set it as the only PK .. ). If i set composite PKs

[sqlalchemy] Re: save_or_update and composit Primary Keys... MSSQL / pyodbc issue ?

2007-12-18 Thread Smoke
Sorry because i'm a bit late ( work deadlines are struggling my time! :) ). I've made some different configurations and schema definitions... and i've noticed that it never updates a row if i set the datetime field as PK ( never! even if i set it as the only PK .. ). If i set composite PKs

[sqlalchemy] Re: save_or_update and composit Primary Keys... MSSQL / pyodbc issue ?

2007-12-12 Thread Smoke
I'm not on my pc right now so I can send you the non working copy only tomorrow I've tried several schemas changes to try and see if the problem always occurs or if there cases that it works, not necessary because i need all those schemas In the former table schema, as i said, i've

[sqlalchemy] Re: save_or_update and composit Primary Keys... MSSQL / pyodbc issue ?

2007-12-10 Thread Smoke
On 10 Dic, 03:11, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I cant reproduce your problem, although i dont have access to MSSQL here and there may be some issue on that end. Attached is your script using an in-memory sqlite database, with the update inside of a while loop, and it updates

[sqlalchemy] save_or_update and composit Primary Keys...

2007-12-09 Thread Smoke
Hi, These days i'm playing with sqlalchemy to know if it can fit my needs... I'm having some troubles with this ( maybe it's a real dumb question.. or maybe a non supported feature.. :) ): I have a database (mssql) with some tables with composite primary keys... something like this: t_jobs =

[sqlalchemy] Re: save_or_update and composit Primary Keys...

2007-12-09 Thread Smoke
On 9 Dic, 21:37, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: theyre entirely supported. try to provide a fully working example illustrating the problem youre having. Here's a small example just to simulate the problem.. The last part of this code is there just to simulate the problem... normally

[sqlalchemy] Re: db autogenerated pks?

2007-09-14 Thread Smoke
implications, I'm sure you can find more if you look: http://www.sql-server-performance.com/articles/per/guid_performance_p... Thans much! :) FP Rick On 9/12/07, Smoke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Still have problems... if i change: t = sa.Table(Machines, metadata, autoload=True

[sqlalchemy] Re: db autogenerated pks?

2007-09-12 Thread Smoke
from sqlalchemy.databases.mssql On Sep 11, 9:01 am, Smoke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I'm new to sqlalchemy and was checking if i can introduce it into some of my projects... I have some database ( sql server ) tables with MSUniqueidenfier columns set as PK and with newid