On Dec 19, 2007, at 4:19 AM, Lele Gaifax wrote:
Can you point me to a more correct way of testing the expected
behaviour of sane_multi_rowcount? And given new results on
sane_rowcount, is it right turning it to True on Firebird too?
sane_multi_rowcount is specifically for an executemany,
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:21:15 -0500
Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sane_rowcount is set to False on FB probably because someones
version of FB did not support it correctly. it might be worth
tracking it down in svn blame to see why it was changed.
I did that already, having changed
Hi Lele -
On Dec 19, 2007 9:08 PM, Lele Gaifax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:21:15 -0500
Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sane_rowcount is set to False on FB probably because someones
version of FB did not support it correctly. it might be worth
tracking it
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:00:54 -0300
Roger Demetrescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At that time, the test script was also failing with 0.4 (unreleased),
and turning off
`supports_sane_multi_rowcount` fixed it.
Yes, in fact. As said, `supports_sane_multi_rowcount` should stay to
False, while I'm
