On 27/09/2011 18:48, Michael Bayer wrote:
(Note to readers: Chris and I hang out each year at Pycon. He's a great guy,
so forgive the colloquial tone I take with him !)
Likewise, I should point out I have huge amounts of respect for Mike, so
if I'm grumbling, it's usually 'cos he's right
Hi All,
Say I have a class such as:
class MyObj(Base)
__tablename__='mytable'
__table_args__=dict(autoload=True)
...but the Base's metadata isn't bound, and won't be until the app has
started (ie: the model has been imported) as the connection string comes
from the environment.
Is
On Sep 27, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Hi All,
Say I have a class such as:
class MyObj(Base)
__tablename__='mytable'
__table_args__=dict(autoload=True)
...but the Base's metadata isn't bound, and won't be until the app has
started (ie: the model has been
On 27/09/2011 16:58, Michael Bayer wrote:
ah, hm. interesting ! basically, not rea..^H^H^H OK actually this is very
easy, using a technique I used previously to create abstract concrete mappers.
This should probably be how we recommend people use reflection with mappings
since this
On Sep 27, 2011, at 12:49 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
On 27/09/2011 16:58, Michael Bayer wrote:
ah, hm. interesting ! basically, not rea..^H^H^H OK actually this is
very easy, using a technique I used previously to create abstract concrete
mappers. This should probably be how we
On 27/09/2011 18:10, Michael Bayer wrote:
That looks like it should ship with SA itself...
Does it?
on the website, sure :)
Many of these things are better as recipes
Meh, that used to be true of mixins.
I'm very glad that's now in the core.
The trouble with keeping this as a recipe is
On Sep 27, 2011, at 1:21 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
On 27/09/2011 18:10, Michael Bayer wrote:
That looks like it should ship with SA itself...
Does it?
on the website, sure :)
Many of these things are better as recipes
Meh, that used to be true of mixins.
I'm very glad that's now
