On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 22:55 -0400, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
> Weaknesses in RC4 have been found where
> the first few numbers coming out of the PRNG leak information about the
> key. If an attacker can guess the first few bytes of plaintext, and
> hence guess the first few numbers from the PRNG,
Ok, I'm definately thinking this is just a problem with my understanding
of the build process in *nix's and the quirks of Cygwin.
I am getting the following warning with the default Makefile that is
generated.
"libtool: link: warning: undefined symbols not allowed in i686-pc-cygwin
shared
Doug Currie wrote:
>> I downloaded the raw source and ran 'configure' and 'make' from a
>> separate folder. The resulting output I copied to /usr/lib/sqlite.
>> In it a see the bunch of .lo, .o and the two .la files
>> (libsqlite3.la, libtclsqlite3.la)
using cygwin ( when i built sqlite3 from
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 10:08:21AM -1000, Glen Nakamura wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 02:50:04PM -0500, Jolan Luff wrote:
> > OpenBSD/amd64 with gcc 3.3.5. I noticed that with 3.2.2 it was possible
> > to run "make test" without having done "make" first and this is no
> > longer the case with
KW> I downloaded the raw source and ran 'configure' and 'make' from a
KW> separate folder. The resulting output I copied to /usr/lib/sqlite. In
KW> it a see the bunch of .lo, .o and the two .la files (libsqlite3.la,
KW> libtclsqlite3.la)
KW> I am use to a Visual Studio build environment, but
Jay Sprenkle wrote:
undefined reference at link time is usually a missing library. I think
you're using
linux?
I'm actually Cgywin is a linux emulation layer.. from their site:
"Cygwin is a Linux-like environment for Windows.
It consists of two parts: A DLL (cygwin1.dll) which acts as a
Hello,
It also looks to my that the interface should be something as as simple as:
db aggregate_function step_func final_func
> But it seemed to me that all it should take is to create a normal TCL
> function to be called for each row selected (say, to compute the sums
> and
On 8/24/05, Kiel Wadner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is almost a general programming question, but any help would be
> appreciated.
>
> Root Problem:
> /home/kiel/development/omms/output/libdbWrapper.a(dbwrapper.o): In
> function `_ZN3srs9DbWrapper4openERKSs':
>
I'm using 3.2.1 and have no index.
Note that i'm not talking about the query itself but the data retrieval.
- Original Message -
From: "D. Richard Hipp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 2:59 PM
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Duration of reading
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 05:56 -0700, Cory Nelson wrote:
> I believe the recent release can use an index for sorting, so you may
> want to try that.
>
To clarify: SQLite has been able to use indices for sorting
for a long time - going back to version 2.5.1 on 2002-June-19.
Recent releases just do
I believe the recent release can use an index for sorting, so you may
want to try that.
On 8/25/05, Edwin Knoppert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> FYI:
>
> Duration of reading records seems longer when sorted as not.
> ~600 rec's in 500ms instead of 2400 (also ~500ms)
> I'm not talking about
FYI:
Duration of reading records seems longer when sorted as not.
~600 rec's in 500ms instead of 2400 (also ~500ms)
I'm not talking about prepare but the data retrieval per record.
Maybe we should explain the term 'wrapper'.
I'm using wrappers around the salite dll in my own code.
But a wrapper might be seen over here as additional library (dll or so)
others can use.
A redistribute part, which i don't like.
(Like the VB 'wrapper' dll)
- Original Message -
From:
13 matches
Mail list logo