I know steps were taken to reduce it, but just confirming it is still going
on today.
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
9. Insert finishes**UNLOCKED
10. Destroy command object**UNLOCKED
11. Close Connection **UNLOCKED
12. Destroy connection object **UNLOCKED
Your insights are appreciated,
Denis Burke
The SQLite documentation (http://www.sqlite.org/lang_select.html) says the
GROUP BY clause accepts [expr]. And [expr] can be composed of a literal.
What I cannot find is what SQLite does (or should do) with a literal in the
GROUP BY clause.
In the simple case of table T1 with two columns C1,C2
I am not sure about sqlite2009, but you edit DBs that are encrypted using
the encryption in system.data.sqlite. I use SQLITE Expert. It allows you
to replace the standard library which does not support encryption to one
from the system.data.sqlite that does. It is the interop dll that you
> REINDEX does *not* update the stats. You must run ANALYZE separately.
> May I ask why you are running REINDEX?
Sure. We issue new releases of our application about every 3 months. With
some of these, we update the schema of the underlying DB. And with some of
these schema updates, we have
I am wondering if I run reindex than should I always run analyze
afterward? If the reindex command though also updates the stats in
addition to recreating the actual indexes, then of course i would not need
it.
Thanks,
Denis
___
sqlite-users mailing
index not be used?
Thank you,
Denis Burke
Thank you Simon - that is helpful.
I would still be interested if anyone can provide any further info
regarding locking as seen through System.Data.SQlite.
-Denis
--
On 8 Mar 2016, at 6:50pm, Denis Burke wrote: > Is it
possible to tell if SQLite has a database file loc
).
Thanks,
Denis Burke
"is in list". But since null is clearly not in the list of one
member ('a'), I would expect this to generate "not in the list".
Is this expected behavior, or a bug?
Thank you,
Denis Burke
I was analyzing hundreds of queries in our system and a few stood out
(average query time is subsecond, but these few that stood out were 10+
seconds).
Here is the basic query for these problem few:
SELECT T1.A from T1 INNER JOIN T2 on T1.B=T2.B and T1.C=T2.C where
T1.D='2015-12-31' and T2.E=2
lot of queries that either use partial indexes or could benefit from them.
-Denis
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 1/21/16, Denis Burke wrote:
> > When
> > would you NOT want to add the "where [indexedColumn] IS NOT NULL"? Seems
> > l
in for the excellent insight.
-Denis Burke
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 1/21/16, Richard Hipp wrote:
> > On 1/21/16, Denis Burke wrote:
> >>
> >> That query takes 4 minutes to run...
> >
> > Can you please run ".fullsche
I have a DB with a large table (1M records) and several small tables (~100
records).
I am running queries like this:
select F1 from BigTable inner join SmallTable on BigTable.F2=SmallTable.F2
where SmallTable.F3=1 and BigTable.F4=2
That query takes 4 minutes to run and the query plan shows it
08-1.0.90.0.exe
Both with the same result.
Thanks,
Denis Burke
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
or LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _DllMainCRTStartup
percentile2.dll : fatal error LNK1120: 6 unresolved externals
--END OUTPUT
Any insight would be appreciated.
-Denis Burke
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlit
of System.Data.SQLite open C:\Mydb.db.
I have to use v1.0.85 or earlier in order to open \\mypc\db\Mydb.db
Let me know if more data is useful but from my testing, I see 100% failure
rate with UNC paths, so I think recreating the issue should not be
difficult.
Thanks,
Denis Burke
Apps works fine on 1.0.85, but with v1.0.89 I get the error noted at the
bottom. Switching back to 1.0.85 works fine again. Further investigation
finds that v1.0.85 does not have a separate SQLite.Interop.dll. These
functions were apparently separated from the main DLL in a release after
013-06-19')
-> 24
strftime ('%W','2013-06-17')
-> 24
strftime ('%W','2013-06-16')
-> 23
It seems to me these useful functions are inconsistent. Is it possible to
modify %W to treat Sunday as the first day of the week?
Thanks,
Denis Burke
___
Moving from v1.0.81.0 to v1.0.83.0 (no code changes on my part), results in
a change in reported state from the SQLiteConnection.State property.
I could not find any documentation/bug fixes which indicates that this is
an expected change.
Background info:
Vb.net app, .NET 3.5SP1, VS 2010,
20 matches
Mail list logo