I know steps were taken to reduce it, but just confirming it is still going
on today.
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
9. Insert finishes**UNLOCKED
10. Destroy command object**UNLOCKED
11. Close Connection **UNLOCKED
12. Destroy connection object **UNLOCKED
Your insights are appreciated,
Denis Burke
The SQLite documentation (http://www.sqlite.org/lang_select.html) says the
GROUP BY clause accepts [expr]. And [expr] can be composed of a literal.
What I cannot find is what SQLite does (or should do) with a literal in the
GROUP BY clause.
In the simple case of table T1 with two columns C1,C2
C
I am not sure about sqlite2009, but you edit DBs that are encrypted using
the encryption in system.data.sqlite. I use SQLITE Expert. It allows you
to replace the standard library which does not support encryption to one
from the system.data.sqlite that does. It is the interop dll that you
replace.
> REINDEX does *not* update the stats. You must run ANALYZE separately.
> May I ask why you are running REINDEX?
Sure. We issue new releases of our application about every 3 months. With
some of these, we update the schema of the underlying DB. And with some of
these schema updates, we have c
I am wondering if I run reindex than should I always run analyze
afterward? If the reindex command though also updates the stats in
addition to recreating the actual indexes, then of course i would not need
it.
Thanks,
Denis
___
sqlite-users mailing lis
ect C1 from T1 indexed by IndxT1C3
where C3='2016-01-02'
> no query solution
Why can this index not be used?
Thank you,
Denis Burke
Thank you Simon - that is helpful.
I would still be interested if anyone can provide any further info
regarding locking as seen through System.Data.SQlite.
-Denis
--
On 8 Mar 2016, at 6:50pm, Denis Burke wrote: > Is it
possible to tell if SQLite has a database file locked?
).
Thanks,
Denis Burke
' end;
This gives "is in list". But since null is clearly not in the list of one
member ('a'), I would expect this to generate "not in the list".
Is this expected behavior, or a bug?
Thank you,
Denis Burke
I was analyzing hundreds of queries in our system and a few stood out
(average query time is subsecond, but these few that stood out were 10+
seconds).
Here is the basic query for these problem few:
SELECT T1.A from T1 INNER JOIN T2 on T1.B=T2.B and T1.C=T2.C where
T1.D='2015-12-31' and T2.E=2 GR
ave a
lot of queries that either use partial indexes or could benefit from them.
-Denis
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 1/21/16, Denis Burke wrote:
> > When
> > would you NOT want to add the "where [indexedColumn] IS NOT NULL"? Seems
> >
elpful.
Thanks again for the excellent insight.
-Denis Burke
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 1/21/16, Richard Hipp wrote:
> > On 1/21/16, Denis Burke wrote:
> >>
> >> That query takes 4 minutes to run...
> >
> > Can you please run
I have a DB with a large table (1M records) and several small tables (~100
records).
I am running queries like this:
select F1 from BigTable inner join SmallTable on BigTable.F2=SmallTable.F2
where SmallTable.F3=1 and BigTable.F4=2
That query takes 4 minutes to run and the query plan shows it is
08-1.0.90.0.exe
Both with the same result.
Thanks,
Denis Burke
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
or LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _DllMainCRTStartup
percentile2.dll : fatal error LNK1120: 6 unresolved externals
--END OUTPUT
Any insight would be appreciated.
-Denis Burke
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlit
System.Data.SQLite open C:\Mydb.db.
I have to use v1.0.85 or earlier in order to open \\mypc\db\Mydb.db
Let me know if more data is useful but from my testing, I see 100% failure
rate with UNC paths, so I think recreating the issue should not be
difficult.
Thanks,
Denis Burke
Apps works fine on 1.0.85, but with v1.0.89 I get the error noted at the
bottom. Switching back to 1.0.85 works fine again. Further investigation
finds that v1.0.85 does not have a separate SQLite.Interop.dll. These
functions were apparently separated from the main DLL in a release after
1.0.85.
Sunday:
e.g.
strftime ('%W','2013-06-19')
-> 24
strftime ('%W','2013-06-17')
-> 24
strftime ('%W','2013-06-16')
-> 23
It seems to me these useful functions are inconsistent. Is it possible to
modify %W to treat Sunday as the fi
Moving from v1.0.81.0 to v1.0.83.0 (no code changes on my part), results in
a change in reported state from the SQLiteConnection.State property.
I could not find any documentation/bug fixes which indicates that this is
an expected change.
Background info:
Vb.net app, .NET 3.5SP1, VS 2010, OS=Win
20 matches
Mail list logo