I use eMbedded Visual C++ 4.0 with de 3.0.8 Wrapper created
by Rob Groves that you will find in
http://www.codeproject.com/database/CppSQLite.asp and with
de WinCE port http://sqlite-wince.sourceforge.net/ created by
Nuno Lucas.
You will find a manual steb-by-step of install this WinCE port in
my
Miquel Matas wrote:
Please, what kind of application developent do you use me to develop
in pocketpc and sqlite 3.0??
Are you asking about the IDE or the application itself?
IDE: Embedded Visual Studio 4 and Visual Studio 2003 (it runs on pdas
and on desktops).
application: it's actually a platf
Markus Oliver Junginger wrote:
D. Richard Hipp wrote:
Not true. V2.8 stores the first 240 or so bytes of data for each
row on a single disk page and the rest on overflow pages. ...
Thanks for the clarification. So, it seems V3.x is the right choice
for embedded software, too, and we will migrat
D. Richard Hipp wrote:
Not true. V2.8 stores the first 240 or so bytes of data for each
row on a single disk page and the rest on overflow pages. ...
Thanks for the clarification. So, it seems V3.x is the right choice for
embedded software, too, and we will migrate to V3.x in the long term.
Reg
Markus Oliver Junginger wrote:
Thanks for the answers so far; there have been some interesting
suggestions ( for example, I didn't know about the SQLITE_OMIT).
Still, I would like to know more about my main concern - memory
consumption. Somewhere I read V2.8 holds the first 240 bytes or so of
e
Thanks for the answers so far; there have been some interesting
suggestions ( for example, I didn't know about the SQLITE_OMIT).
Still, I would like to know more about my main concern - memory
consumption. Somewhere I read V2.8 holds the first 240 bytes or so of
each row in memory, while V3.0 h
Christian Smith wrote:
For non-text data, SQLite 3.x has more efficient storage, as binary data
is stored in binary format and not text format. I've heard figures such as
25% savings on disk space bandied about, but YMMV. The storage is not
binary compatible with SQLite 2.8.x files, and SQLite 3 ca
There are some changes in CVS that introduced a few SQLITE_OMIT_*
macros that are supposed to exclude some features at compile time.
Since you're on embedded system, I guess you'll find quite a few
features that you can omit, hence reduce memory footprint.
I don't think there's any documentation f
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Markus Oliver Junginger wrote:
>We are developing applications that also run on PocketPC devices; Sqlite
>2.8.x is used here as the database.
>
>For the next release of our software the question is if we should switch
>to SQLite 3. What's the experts' recommendation? The main
9 matches
Mail list logo
