On 23 February 2010 17:44, newlog newlog2...@yahoo.fr wrote:
OK,
With the following code :
-
sqlite3 *db = NULL;
if( sqlite3_open( D:\Test3.db, db) != SQLITE_OK )
{
// Exit if error while opening.
wxMessageBox(
On 2/24/10 9:36 , Simon Davies simon.james.dav...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 23 February 2010 17:44, newlog newlog2...@yahoo.fr wrote:
OK,
I really don't understand
Rogue semicolon on line
if( sqlite3_close( db ) != SQLITE_OK );
Regards,
Simon
I have been bitten by such
Hi,
I understand from reading http://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/value.html that
there is a distinction between protected and unprotected value objects,
and that some api interfaces, notably sqlite3_value*, require the former
and others, notably sqlite3_column*, provide the latter.
What I would
Hello
I'm only getting started with VB.Net, and I need a way to work with an
SQLite 3 database.
According to the wiki, the following solutions seem to be currently
supported:
=
System.Data.SQLite
http://sqlite.phxsoftware.com/
Devart dotConnect for SQLite
wcl...@gfs-hofheim.de wrote:
What I would really like to be able to do would be to cache objects
returned by sqlite3_column_value(...) and process them later, even after
the statement that generated them is finalised
You can't. The only thing you can reliably do with the result of
I CAN'T BELIEVE I'VE DONE THIS !!!
I must be so stupid that I've spent days wondering why.
Thank you so much Simon for your very advised look on my code.
I deeply apologize for polluting that forum with such a silly mistake.
Regards
Very well done Simon !!
On Feb 24, 9:54 am, Jean-Denis
Consider a query of the form
UPDATE table1 SET field1 = (SELECT field2 FROM table2 WHERE field3 !=
0) WHERE field4 = value;
If both tables are native tables, the function selectAddSubqueryTypeInfo() gets
called exactly once for the subquery.
However, if both tables are virtual tables, the
Begin forwarded message:
From: Anita Asken markani...@yahoo.co.uk
Date: February 24, 2010 6:04:35 AM EST
To: d...@hwaci.com
Subject: Sqlite files in temp folder
Dear Sir,
I have been contacted by a friend who has the above
files appearing in her Temp folder on a daily
You could just import the required DLL functions from sqlite3.dll? Not
very object-oriented, I admit - you'd need to write your own class
wrapper around the functions if you wanted that - but I'd think that
importing the functions was the quickest method, and then you're not
reliant on 3rd party
I'd suggest Anita uses a file monitoring app (like SysInternals'
DiskMon, if she's using Windows) to see what is writing those files.
Then stop the app from doing it.
Nick.
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of D.
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:17:23 -, Nick Shaw
nick.s...@citysync.co.uk wrote:
You could just import the required DLL functions from sqlite3.dll? Not
very object-oriented, I admit - you'd need to write your own class
wrapper around the functions if you wanted that - but I'd think that
importing
Igor Tandetnik wrote on 24/02/2010:
Well, too bad.
Ha! Nothing's that bad!!!
Protected means a mutex is held while the value is outstanding.
If such a hypothetical API existed, it would mean you could instruct
SQLite to hold a mutex for an indefinite period of time, thus
blocking all
Ah ok, in that case a 3rd party interface would probably be quickest for
you. :)
Good luck!
Nick.
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Gilles Ganault
Sent: 24 February 2010 13:20
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:31:52 -, Nick Shaw
nick.s...@citysync.co.uk wrote:
Ah ok, in that case a 3rd party interface would probably be quickest for
you. :)
Thanks. For those interested, using the above open-source wrapper,
here's how to 1) create a new SQLite database file, 2) create a new
wcl...@gfs-hofheim.de wrote:
Igor Tandetnik wrote on 24/02/2010:
Well, too bad.
Ha! Nothing's that bad!!!
Protected means a mutex is held while the value is outstanding.
If such a hypothetical API existed, it would mean you could instruct
SQLite to hold a mutex for an indefinite period
Igor Tandetnik wrote on 24/02/2010:
I must admit I have no idea what you are talking about, you lost me
thoroughly. In any case, mutex or no mutex, the pointer returned by
sqlite3_column_value is only valid until you step away from that row
or reset the statement. You can't hold onto the
Mark,
Can you offer any advice on how to
stop the files being written, and remove the
programme(s) that are writing these files.
Hello, I'm (simply) a member of the sqlite mailing list.
As you probably know, it is not sqlite itself that is creating these files, but
some program on the
Can somebody please clarify the bug reporting process for sqlite? My
understanding is that it's not possible to file bug reports directly, and that
the advise is to write to the user list first. I've done that (below) but have
no response so far and am concerned that this means the bug report
We got the Porter stemmer code directly from Martin Porter.
I'm sorry it does not work like you want it to. Unfortunately, we
cannot change it now without introducing a serious incompatibility
with the millions and millions of applications already in the field
that are using the existing
Additionally, your algorithm reference for step1c is from the Snowball
English (Porter2) algorithm.
The implementation used in SQLite is for the original Porter algorithm
discussed here:
http://tartarus.org/~martin/PorterStemmer/
HTH.
-SHane
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:05 AM, D. Richard Hipp
I use BEGIN TRANSACTION and COMMIT as prepared statements in a C
application. I originally was not resetting these types of
non-binding prepared statements that only return SQLITE_DONE.
http://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/step.html states:
SQLITE_DONE means that the statement has finished executing
If you're sure that there's no other threads or processes accessing
the database then I'd suggest you to look for help somewhere among
Windows gurus because it sounds like an issue with file system which
somehow tries to execute some tasks in background returning to the
caller immediately. Maybe
On 2/24/10, Jean-Denis Muys jdm...@kleegroup.com wrote:
On 2/24/10 9:36 , Simon Davies simon.james.dav...@googlemail.com wrote:
Rogue semicolon on line
if( sqlite3_close( db ) != SQLITE_OK );
Regards,
Simon
I have been bitten by such silly mistakes often enough!
This
On Feb 24, 2010, at 1:12 PM, Mike Shal wrote:
This compiler is llvm. Check it out at http://llvm.org
You can test for this mistake on the demo page at http://llvm.org/
demo
FWIW, there are currently two places in SQLite where we have had to
complicate the code in order to work around
Mike Goins
mike.go...@adtecservices.net wrote:
I use BEGIN TRANSACTION and COMMIT as prepared statements in a C
application. I originally was not resetting these types of
non-binding prepared statements that only return SQLITE_DONE.
http://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/step.html states:
drh,
Thanks for the response: it's nice to know that the report was actually seen.
It would be hubris indeed to claim to fix an implementation bug in Porter's
code. The code in sqlite didn't match any of Porter's code I could find, so I
assumed it came from elsewhere: but maybe I missed
Actually, I think a new version of the tokenizer would have to be a
distinct tokenizer (ie, porter versus porter1 versus porter2,
whatever). fts4 should not interpret the meaning of an explicit
tokenizer differently from fts3, but it could use a different default
tokenizer.
[Don't take this as
Hi,
I've run into some puzzling behavior. I've tried to distill it to a
minimal case. In the final SELECT query below, the last LEFT JOIN clause
seems have the effect of an INNER JOIN in that its condition limits the
rows returned. I can rewrite the query to get the desired result using
a UNION
It's pretty strange how you try to join with some table not even
mentioning any column of that table in the joining condition. I bet
behavior is not defined for such cases in SQL standard and you're
getting some interpretation of such query.
Probably this query will return what you want:
SELECT
It's pretty strange how you try to join with some table not even
mentioning any column of that table in the joining condition. I bet
behavior is not defined for such cases in SQL standard and you're
getting some interpretation of such query.
I'm not aware of any requirement that a JOIN
Mark Brand mabr...@mabrand.nl wrote:
--Gives unexpected results
SELECT c1.cur cur1, c2.cur cur2, COALESCE(self.rate, x.rate) rate
FROM currency c1
CROSS JOIN currency c2
LEFT JOIN exchange x
ON x.cur1=c1.cur
AND x.cur2=c2.cur
LEFT JOIN (SELECT 1 rate) self
ON c1.cur=c2.cur;
/*
Igor Tandetnik itandet...@mvps.org wrote in message
news:hm45gu$s5...@dough.gmane.org...
Mark Brand mabr...@mabrand.nl wrote:
--Gives unexpected results
SELECT c1.cur cur1, c2.cur cur2, COALESCE(self.rate, x.rate) rate
FROM currency c1
CROSS JOIN currency c2
LEFT JOIN exchange x
ON
ve3meo holden_fam...@sympatico.ca wrote in
message news:hm47t5$5l...@dough.gmane.org...
Igor Tandetnik itandet...@mvps.org wrote in
message news:hm45gu$s5...@dough.gmane.org...
Mark Brand mabr...@mabrand.nl wrote:
--Gives unexpected results
SELECT c1.cur cur1, c2.cur cur2,
Does INDEX sqlite_autoindex_currency_1 contain only pointers to the
identical currencies?
First of all AFAIK 'PRIMARY KEY' implies uniqueness of the column. And
second: I bet if you execute 'PRAGMA case_sensitive_like = true' then
plans will be the same.
See
On Feb 24, 2010, at 5:20 PM, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
Does INDEX sqlite_autoindex_currency_1 contain only pointers to the
identical currencies?
First of all AFAIK 'PRIMARY KEY' implies uniqueness of the column. And
second: I bet if you execute 'PRAGMA case_sensitive_like = true' then
plans will
D. Richard Hipp d...@hwaci.com wrote:
This problem has existed in SQLite forever and has never been seen
before. So it is obscure. The simple fix is to put the ON clause on
the CROSS JOIN where it belongs.
Does CROSS JOIN allow an ON clause? That doesn't make much sense. I guess I'm
missing
I posted the following and it didn't appear - I probably hit Reply to Sender
instead of Reply Group:
Does INDEX sqlite_autoindex_currency_1 contain only pointers to the
identical currencies?
Tom
This little change also works:
ON +c1.cur=c2.cur;
or
ON c1.cur=+c2.cur;
Along with LIKE, that
On Feb 24, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
D. Richard Hipp d...@hwaci.com wrote:
This problem has existed in SQLite forever and has never been seen
before. So it is obscure. The simple fix is to put the ON clause on
the CROSS JOIN where it belongs.
Does CROSS JOIN allow an ON
D. Richard Hipp d...@hwaci.com wrote:
On Feb 24, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
D. Richard Hipp d...@hwaci.com wrote:
This problem has existed in SQLite forever and has never been seen
before. So it is obscure. The simple fix is to put the ON clause
on the CROSS JOIN where it
Hello all,
I create the following table:
sqlite create table t1(a);
sqlite insert into t1 values(123456789.123456789);
I ran the following commands:
sqlite select * from t1;
123456789.123457
sqlite select typeof(a) from t1;
real
What I expected to get is:
sqlite select * from t1;
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:22 PM, eternelmangekyosharingan
eternelmangekyosharin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I create the following table:
sqlite create table t1(a);
sqlite insert into t1 values(123456789.123456789);
I ran the following commands:
sqlite select * from t1;
eternelmangekyosharingan
eternelmangekyosharin...@gmail.com
wrote:
I create the following table:
sqlite create table t1(a);
sqlite insert into t1 values(123456789.123456789);
I ran the following commands:
sqlite select * from t1;
123456789.123457
sqlite select typeof(a) from t1;
real
I'm sorry but I don't get your answer.
Can you provide further explanations, please ?
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:40 AM, P Kishor punk.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:22 PM, eternelmangekyosharingan
eternelmangekyosharin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I create the
Igor, thanks for your reply.
I read that too. But it does not make any sense to me as any number will be
truncated according to this definition.
Can you give me an example where an REAL is converted to a TEXT due to a
conversion loss ?
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:54 AM,
44 matches
Mail list logo
