This was my initial reading too Paul, but reading the OP post again it
could be either - who knows what is meant by syncing. I also think
this is the main point for the OP - If by syncing he really means
copying the file then Richard's advice, else if he means adding via
normal DB connection
Richard
I read that the db on the standby machine is being updated at a record
by record level, i.e. not copied in its entirety. In this scenario I
can't see the two db files being guaranteed binary compatible. Copying
the journal across in this scenario would imo be a mistake.
Paul
Hi All
We have two systems which are running in active/standby configuration. The
active machine, is actively writing sqlite transactions to a file abcd.db. The
standby is syncing the abcd.db file from the active machine on a
communication channel and writing the delta records to the
I would say no. The journal file stores pages referenced by page no
and when replayed will write those pages back to the main DB at the
appropriate physical offset. Although the content of your DB's at a
logical level may be the same, it is unlikely that they will be exact
copies at a binary level
I don't think it can be done, and if it could be done, it would not be wise.
The journal is owned and specific to a connection. a hot Journal for
connection A on DB 1 cannot ever be used to roll back or affect in any
way connection B on DB 2.
However, when you say the standby is syncing, I
On 2/12/15, Mayank Kumar (mayankum) mayan...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi All
We have two systems which are running in active/standby configuration. The
active machine, is actively writing sqlite transactions to a file abcd.db.
The standby is syncing the abcd.db file from the active machine on a
Hi,
here comes a bug report with fix proposal.
If a CSV file contains a row with missing column, the previous cell will not be
imported.
Tested version: sqlite-shell-win32-x86-3080802.zip,
sqlite-autoconf-3080802.tar.gz
Steps to reproduce:
- A file named data.csv with following content:
Having personally written about a dozen virtual table implementations I can
confirm that those implementations needing a nontrivial xBestIndex function
are all based on building an SQLite interface on substantial proprietary
storage subsystems like an in-memory ISAM table (with configurable
I have recently released this free VS addin, also Works with the free VS 2013
Community edition.
Blog post:
http://erikej.blogspot.dk/2014/08/sqlite-toolbox-40-visual-guide-of.html
Channel 9 video:
http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Visual-Studio-Toolbox/SQL-Server-Compact-and-SQLite-Toolbox
Hello sqlite Users,
I am using sqlite on arm-board and getting a database or disk full error
(SQLITE_FULL) while using the update command.
1. DB file location is set to some /opt/dbspace/*.db. ( 32 Gb space and 4
GB RAM)
2. Not used compile time option SQLITE_TEMP_STORE so, deafult value 1.
jitendar kumar wrote:
where is the temporary files location ??
1. temp_directory, if set
2. SQLITE_TMPDR, if set
3. TMPDIR, if set
4. /var/tmp
5. /usr/tmp
6. /tmp
Regards,
Clemens
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
On 2015/01/10 15:50, Richard Hipp wrote:
Yes, it was a compile-time omission. I have uploaded a new DLL that includes the loadable extension interface.
Thank you - it works perfectly for all entries.
All other tests worked well too, so no new problems to report from this side.
On 9/01/2015 5:00 PM, Dan Kennedy wrote:
On 01/08/2015 07:48 AM, Philip Warner wrote:
How difficult would it be to add LOCALIZED collation support? I'm guessing
that the fact it's not there means it's non-trivial, but I was hoping
otherwise...
The stumbling block is that the Android
On 01/11/2015 01:55 PM, Philip Warner wrote:
On 9/01/2015 5:00 PM, Dan Kennedy wrote:
On 01/08/2015 07:48 AM, Philip Warner wrote:
How difficult would it be to add LOCALIZED collation support? I'm guessing that
the fact it's not there means it's non-trivial, but I was hoping otherwise...
On 1/9/15, RSmith rsm...@rsweb.co.za wrote:
The pre-compiled and supplied DLL (sqlite3.dll) seem to be missing an entry
point for sqlite3_enable_load_extension - I do not see
any mention in the update text about altering or removing this feature so I
am assuming this might be a compile-time
The pre-compiled and supplied DLL (sqlite3.dll) seem to be missing an entry point for sqlite3_enable_load_extension - I do not see
any mention in the update text about altering or removing this feature so I am assuming this might be a compile-time omission?
On 2015/01/09 19:23, Richard Hipp
On 1/9/15, Dominique Devienne ddevie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
We hope to release SQLite version 3.8.8 sometime later this month
(January). A change-log is available at
https://www.sqlite.org/draft/releaselog/current.html
Could
I wish to add a confirmation to this.
SQLite installation for 1.0.94.0 did not add the option for
System.Data.Sqlite Database File to Choose Data Source dialog when adding
ADO.NET Entity Data Model to my application.
Using:
~ Visual Studio 2010
~ VB.NET WinForms Application @ .NET 4.0
~
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
We hope to release SQLite version 3.8.8 sometime later this month
(January). A change-log is available at
https://www.sqlite.org/draft/releaselog/current.html
Could you please provide more info about stmt_scanstatus()?
We hope to release SQLite version 3.8.8 sometime later this month
(January). A change-log is available at
https://www.sqlite.org/draft/releaselog/current.html
Please stress the code in every way you can between now and then and
report any problems to this list, or directly to me.
Source code
On 01/08/2015 07:48 AM, Philip Warner wrote:
I just saw the SQLite Android Bindings page at
http://www.sqlite.org/android/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki
but was a little disappointed to read in the details that UNICODE and
LOCALIZED are not supported. I'd really like the latest SQLite, and
On 1/7/15, The Responsa Project gr.respo...@biu.ac.il wrote:
To Whom it amy concern
I am trying to use SQLITE and the like statement with wildcards and hebrew
when I put in an english string it works correctly, such as
Select * from dbname where colname like '%123%'
I will get all the
To Whom it amy concern
I am trying to use SQLITE and the like statement with wildcards and hebrew
when I put in an english string it works correctly, such as
Select * from dbname where colname like '%123%'
I will get all the entries from that column that contain 123 anywhere in the
column.
I just saw the SQLite Android Bindings page at
http://www.sqlite.org/android/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki
but was a little disappointed to read in the details that UNICODE and LOCALIZED
are not supported. I'd really like the latest SQLite, and LOCALIZED.
How difficult would it be to add
On 2015/01/07 12:13, The Responsa Project wrote:
To Whom it amy concern
I am trying to use SQLITE and the like statement with wildcards and hebrew
when I put in an english string it works correctly, such as
Select * from dbname where colname like '%123%'
I will get all the entries from
How about to use dynamic binding?
For example, is your SQL(SELECT * from dbname where colname like '%אב%'),
use '?' instead of 'אב'.
In my guess, 'אב' can have same ASCII code of wildcard(%).
Full SQL can be as like as follows.
SELECT * from dbname where colname like '%?%'
To do this, you need
I want to know how to setting a loging sqlite passwd?
When I input:
Sqlite mtdb
Command, the console will prompt like this:
Pls input your password:
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
On 4 Jan 2015, at 12:56am, YAN HONG YE yanhong...@mpsa.com wrote:
I want to know how to setting a loging sqlite passwd?
When I input:
Sqlite mtdb
Command, the console will prompt like this:
Pls input your password:
http://www.sqlite.org/src/doc/trunk/ext/userauth/user-auth.txt
It is only
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Simon Slavin slav...@bigfraud.org wrote:
On 4 Jan 2015, at 12:56am, YAN HONG YE yanhong...@mpsa.com wrote:
I want to know how to setting a loging sqlite passwd?
When I input:
Sqlite mtdb
Command, the console will prompt like this:
Pls input your
On 4 Jan 2015, at 1:00am, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
(1) The OP says he used the sqlite command (version 2 of SQLite) not
sqlite3.
(2) SQLite has *never* given a prompt Pls input your password. That
message is coming from third-party software.
I agree that my answer has nothing to
Maybe the question is How do I make SQLite do this when accessing a
database? and the 3 just got dropped inadvertently. If that is the case,
as Dr. Hipp said, SQLite has never done it, and I'll add on that it has
never done it stock.
On the other hand, that link you posted, Dr. Hipp, is rather
I am writing continuously into a db file which has PRAGMA journal_mode=WAL,
PRAGMA journal_size_limit=0. My C++ program has two threads, one
reader(queries at 15 sec intervals) and one writer(inserts at 5 sec
intervals).
Every 3 min I am pausing insertion to run a sqlite3_wal_checkpoint_v2()
from
Readers do not need long-lasting transactions (if any at all), so I'd
rather suspect your writer to be the culprit. Does it use lasting
transactions? If so, make it commit the transaction before checkpointing.
regards
gerd
___
sqlite-users mailing
On 12/19/2014 11:22 AM, Kushagradhi Bhowmik wrote:
I am writing continuously into a db file which has PRAGMA journal_mode=WAL,
PRAGMA journal_size_limit=0. My C++ program has two threads, one
reader(queries at 15 sec intervals) and one writer(inserts at 5 sec
intervals).
Every 3 min I am
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 22:01:15 +0700
Dan Kennedy danielk1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/08/2014 09:55 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
Ideally there would be something like DEFERRED foreign key checking
for uniqueness constraints...
You could hack SQLite to do enforce unique constraints the same way
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 15:48:41 +0200
RSmith rsm...@rsweb.co.za wrote:
UPDATE pages SET position = position + 1 WHERE book_id = 0 AND
position = 1;
NOT a bug... the moment you SET position to position +1 for the
first iteration of the query, it tries to make that entry look like
(0,2) and
-users sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Sent: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 10:38 am
Subject: Re: [sqlite] sqlite bugreport : unique index causes valid updates to
fail
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 22:01:15 +0700
Dan Kennedy danielk1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/08/2014 09:55 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
Ideally there would
Discussion of SQLite Database sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Sent: Mon, Dec 8, 2014 12:07 pm
Subject: Re: [sqlite] sqlite bugreport : unique index causes valid updates to
fail
Le 8 déc. 2014 à 17:21, Simon Slavin slav...@bigfraud.org a écrit :
Why not an opt-in way to ask for deferred constraint checking
Hi,
I'm about to use sqlite-amalgamation(sqlite3.c) on Visual C++.
But although the compiling was successfully finished, even if I set break
point
on the source code, I can't trace the working line in sqlite3.c correctly.
I suspected that the sqlite3.c was optimized, but there is no opiton like
Shinichiro Yoshioka wrote:
I'm about to use sqlite-amalgamation(sqlite3.c) on Visual C++.
But although the compiling was successfully finished, even if I set break
point
on the source code, I can't trace the working line in sqlite3.c correctly.
How exactly are you using SQLite in your
Hi Shinichiro,
which Version of VC++ do you use? As far as I know, older versions do
not support debugging source files with more than 65535 lines.
Also, why do you want to debug into the sqlite.c file?
The file sqlite.c is just another source file for your compiler;
optimizations would
Hi, Clemens and Martin,
Thank you for your prompt responses.
How exactly are you using SQLite in your program? If you are not using
the SQLite C API (sqlite3_* functions) directly,
I'm using sqlite APIs for calling from C source code directly.
which Version of VC++ do you use?
I'm using
Hi Shinichiro,
If opening the database failed with sqlite3_open() != SQLITE_OK, it is
probably best to check the return code and error message using
sqlite3_errmsg(). It will give a strong hint. Debugging into the sqlite3
code itself never worked for me.
Make sure that
- the directory the
Hi,
Unique indexes make some valid update queries fail.
Please find below the SQL queries that lead to the unexpected error:
-- The `books` and `pages` tables implement a book with several pages.
-- Page ordering is implemented via the `position` column in the pages table.
-- A unique index
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Gwendal Roué g...@pierlis.com wrote:
Hi,
Unique indexes make some valid update queries fail.
Please find below the SQL queries that lead to the unexpected error:
-- The `books` and `pages` tables implement a book with several pages.
-- Page ordering is
Subject: Re: [sqlite] sqlite bugreport : unique index causes valid updates to
fail
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Gwendal Roué g...@pierlis.com wrote:
Hi,
Unique indexes make some valid update queries fail.
Please find below the SQL queries that lead to the unexpected error:
-- The `books
Le 8 déc. 2014 à 14:14, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org a écrit :
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Gwendal Roué g...@pierlis.com wrote:
Hi,
Unique indexes make some valid update queries fail.
Please find below the SQL queries that lead to the unexpected error:
-- The `books` and
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Sent: Mon, Dec 8, 2014 8:14 am
Subject: Re: [sqlite] sqlite bugreport : unique index causes valid updates to
fail
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Gwendal Roué g...@pierlis.com wrote:
Hi,
Unique indexes make some valid
On 8 Dec 2014, at 1:31pm, Gwendal Roué g...@pierlis.com wrote:
We share the same conclusion. I even tried to decorate the update query with
ORDER clauses, in a foolish attempt to reverse the ordering of row updates,
and circumvent the issue.
A way to solve this is to use REAL for page
: [sqlite] sqlite bugreport : unique index causes valid updates to
fail
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Gwendal Roué g...@pierlis.com wrote:
Hi,
Unique indexes make some valid update queries fail.
Please find below the SQL queries that lead to the unexpected error:
-- The `books
Le 8 déc. 2014 à 14:39, Simon Slavin slav...@bigfraud.org a écrit :
On 8 Dec 2014, at 1:31pm, Gwendal Roué g...@pierlis.com wrote:
We share the same conclusion. I even tried to decorate the update query with
ORDER clauses, in a foolish attempt to reverse the ordering of row
updates,
Discussion of SQLite Database sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Sent: Mon, Dec 8, 2014 8:40 am
Subject: Re: [sqlite] sqlite bugreport : unique index causes valid updates to
fail
J T,
I did provide a sequence of queries that reliably reproduce the issue (see
below, from the first CREATE to the last UPDATE
On 2014/12/08 11:55, Gwendal Roué wrote:
Hi,
Unique indexes make some valid update queries fail.
Please find below the SQL queries that lead to the unexpected error:
-- The `books` and `pages` tables implement a book with several pages.
-- Page ordering is implemented via the `position`
Le 8 déc. 2014 à 14:48, RSmith rsm...@rsweb.co.za a écrit :
On 2014/12/08 11:55, Gwendal Roué wrote:
Hi,
Unique indexes make some valid update queries fail.
Please find below the SQL queries that lead to the unexpected error:
-- The `books` and `pages` tables implement a book with
On 2014/12/08 15:58, Gwendal Roué wrote:
I'm new to this mailing list, and I won't try to push my opinion, which is : yes this is a bug, and this bug could be fixed
without introducing any regression (since fixing it would cause failing code to suddenly run, and this has never been a
I am like you, Gwendal, in that I don't like that behavior in SQLite; however,
not liking it doesn't make it a bug.
The constraint-checking algorithm was defined to work exactly the way it's
working. When designed, the fact that your type of insert would fail was known
and understood. Hence,
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Marc L. Allen mlal...@outsitenetworks.com
wrote:
I am like you, Gwendal, in that I don't like that behavior in SQLite;
however, not liking it doesn't make it a bug.
On another of my forums, this is called a BAD - Broken, As Designed. As
opposed to the normal
-
From: RSmith rsm...@rsweb.co.za
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Sent: Mon, Dec 8, 2014 9:15 am
Subject: Re: [sqlite] sqlite bugreport : unique index causes valid updates to
fail
On 2014/12/08 15:58, Gwendal Roué wrote:
I'm new to this mailing list, and I won't
: Monday, December 08, 2014 9:18 AM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] sqlite bugreport : unique index causes valid updates to
fail
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Marc L. Allen mlal...@outsitenetworks.com
wrote:
I am like you, Gwendal, in that I don't like that behavior
Cancel that, apparently that only updates the last record...
-Original Message-
From: John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Sent: Mon, Dec 8, 2014 9:18 am
Subject: Re: [sqlite] sqlite bugreport : unique index
Le 8 déc. 2014 à 15:18, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Marc L. Allen mlal...@outsitenetworks.com
wrote:
I am like you, Gwendal, in that I don't like that behavior in SQLite;
however, not liking it doesn't make it a bug.
On another
...@rsweb.co.za; sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] sqlite bugreport : unique index causes valid updates to
fail
Might have another work around.
update page set position=position + 1 where designation=(select designation
from page where book='1' order by position desc)
and then insert your
On 8-12-2014 14:58, Gwendal Roué wrote:
Le 8 déc. 2014 à 14:48, RSmith rsm...@rsweb.co.za a écrit :
On 2014/12/08 11:55, Gwendal Roué wrote:
Hi,
Unique indexes make some valid update queries fail.
Please find below the SQL queries that lead to the unexpected error:
-- The `books` and
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Marc L. Allen mlal...@outsitenetworks.com
wrote:
I'm not sure I'd even consider it broken.
Well, to some on that forum: If it doesn't work the way that _I_ want,
then it is ipso-facto broken. And I forgot the grin/ in my message.
Sorry.
SQLite is
Ideally there would be something like DEFERRED foreign key checking
for uniqueness constraints... You can get something like that by
using non-unique indexes (but there would also go your primary keys)
and then check that there are no duplicates before you COMMIT. (Doing
this reliably would
On 12/08/2014 09:55 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
Ideally there would be something like DEFERRED foreign key checking
for uniqueness constraints...
You could hack SQLite to do enforce unique constraints the same way as
FKs. When adding an entry to a UNIQUE index b-tree, you check for a
duplicate.
Yes, that would be nice.
For example, sqlite already needs explicit opt-in for some of the relational
toolkit. I think about PRAGMA foreign_keys = ON.
Why not an opt-in way to ask for deferred constraint checking. The key here is
only to allow perfectly legit requests to run. With all the due
On 8 Dec 2014, at 3:05pm, Gwendal Roué g...@pierlis.com wrote:
Why not an opt-in way to ask for deferred constraint checking. The key here
is only to allow perfectly legit requests to run. With all the due respect to
sqlite implementors and the wonderful design of sqlite.
SQL-99 includes a
Le 8 déc. 2014 à 17:21, Simon Slavin slav...@bigfraud.org a écrit :
Why not an opt-in way to ask for deferred constraint checking. The key here
is only to allow perfectly legit requests to run. With all the due respect
to sqlite implementors and the wonderful design of sqlite.
SQL-99
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Dan Kennedy danielk1...@gmail.com wrote:
You could hack SQLite to do enforce unique constraints the same way as FKs.
When adding an entry to a UNIQUE index b-tree, you check for a duplicate. If
one exists, increment a counter. Do the opposite when removing
On Dec 8, 2014 2:10 AM, Shinichiro Yoshioka dekochan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm about to use sqlite-amalgamation(sqlite3.c) on Visual C++.
But although the compiling was successfully finished, even if I set break
point
on the source code, I can't trace the working line in sqlite3.c
:~/sqlite/bld$ make sqlite3-all.c
tclsh /home/drh/sqlite/sqlite/tool/split-sqlite3c.tcl
drh@bella:~/sqlite/bld$ wc sqlite3-*.c
32314 165952 1228350 sqlite3-1.c
30892 145495 1098859 sqlite3-2.c
32729 144742 1091870 sqlite3-3.c
32481 150359 1198841 sqlite3-4.c
23259 100070 768733 sqlite3-5
and
it will generate a version of the amalgamation that #includes a handful of
separate files (named sqlite3-N.c for N=1,2,3,), each less than 32K
lines in size.
drh@bella:~/sqlite/bld$ make sqlite3-all.c
tclsh /home/drh/sqlite/sqlite/tool/split-sqlite3c.tcl
drh@bella:~/sqlite/bld$ wc
On 2014-11-26, 7:53 AM, RSmith wrote:
The fact that inside of SQLite an Integer can be stored in different
ways is simply a code/data/space optimisation for SQLite, it is
transparent to the user and transparent to the SQL - it is in no way
intended as a data-feature or extension of the SQL
That's not true. A 64 bit floating point number and an 64 bit integer can
be represented by the exact same 64 bit pattern, and no-one would suggest
they're the same value. You can have those two differently typed although
identical bit values in the same SQLite column. The data identifying the
Hi Darko,
Firstly, kindly keep this to the sqlite-users forum and not on the dev forum (the devs read this too, the difference being simply
that this one exists to help you, the other one is to discuss development stuff, not to help anyone).
Secondly, you are confusing two things. You are
The person I replied to cross posted, not I, and I didn't realise this
before I replied to his cross post and the I couldn't change it then, so
maybe take that up with him.
I'm not confusing anything. You, and the other posters, are confusing the
representation of values and the concrete value
On 2014/11/26 15:58, Darko Volaric wrote:
I'm not looking for confirmation of ideas, on the contrary, people seem to want to push their own ideas about a database should be
used and how I'm not using it correctly, when that is irrlevent to the issue I'm discussing. Maybe more focus on the
You wrote:
From the tone of your last post (if I am reading correctly) I understand
that you have your mind set on finding a way that you have thought about a
lot lying in your bed late at night, you have rolled it around in your head
and you just feel this should be doable and will be so elegant
a type column to go with variant data would probably be best... how many
columns do you have that are actually self-described typedata required?
could just serialize it to a blob; include type, and the value... kinda
hard to select for a value that way... at least if it's a parallel type the
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:53 PM, RSmith rsm...@rsweb.co.za wrote:
By the way, my Oracle friends should intersect here if need be, but I
believe the oracle method of /decimal(n,m)/ is simply a representation
directive and constraint, there is no native datatype that actually stores
or
Hi,
I am new for SQLite. I am trying to create database. But its not creating.
I have attached the screenshot. Please find and do needful.
Thanks Regards
Arvind
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
On 14 Nov 2014, at 3:42am, James K. Lowden jklow...@schemamania.org wrote:
Simon Slavin slav...@bigfraud.org wrote:
I'm not aware of
any usable libraries which actually support 23,10 outside the world
of physics.
http://www.mpfr.org/#free-sw
I'm sure you're aware of such things.
On 14 Nov 2014, at 10:40am, ARVIND KUMAR arv...@sblsoftware.com wrote:
I am new for SQLite. I am trying to create database. But its not creating.
I have attached the screenshot. Please find and do needful.
You cannot post screenshots to this mailing list.
Most problems with creating a new
If you're using SQLite3.exe (or equivalent CLI - Command Line Interface)
then by default the database id written to memory, not to the disk. Doing
something like [ sqlite3.exe test.db3] will create a test.db3 file once you
do an actual transaction like creating a table. I THINK even doing a
Hi,
Does any of SQLite data Type support 23,10 precision format for Number?
If yes, could you pleas help with right data type or approach to achieve
this.
If No, then is there something that can be added to SQLite and how quickly?
Thanks,
Dinesh Navsupe
On 13 Nov 2014, at 12:23pm, Dinesh Navsupe dinesh.navs...@gmail.com wrote:
Does any of SQLite data Type support 23,10 precision format for Number?
If yes, could you pleas help with right data type or approach to achieve
this.
SQL stores REAL numbers in a REAL field which conforms to 64-bit
[mailto:dinesh.navs...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. November 2014 13:23
An: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Betreff: [sqlite] [SQLite] Support for 23,10 Precision number format
Hi,
Does any of SQLite data Type support 23,10 precision format for Number?
If yes, could you pleas help with right data
Hi,
My need is 23 decimal digits of precision. We work on complex payout
calculation engine where in formula outputs are quite large numbers and
clients do not want to round off.
We want to use SQLite for local disk data store and calculations.
Thanks,
Dinesh Navsupe
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at
On 2014/11/13 15:01, Dinesh Navsupe wrote:
Hi,
My need is 23 decimal digits of precision. We work on complex payout
calculation engine where in formula outputs are quite large numbers and
clients do not want to round off.
I do not think that re-stating your need suffices as a good enough
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:33 PM, RSmith rsm...@rsweb.co.za wrote:
On 2014/11/13 15:01, Dinesh Navsupe wrote:
My need is 23 decimal digits of precision. We work on complex payout
calculation engine where in formula outputs are quite large numbers and
clients do not want to round off.
If
On 13 Nov 2014, at 1:01pm, Dinesh Navsupe dinesh.navs...@gmail.com wrote:
My need is 23 decimal digits of precision. We work on complex payout
calculation engine where in formula outputs are quite large numbers and
clients do not want to round off.
If you're working with floating-point
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Simon Slavin slav...@bigfraud.org wrote:
On 13 Nov 2014, at 1:01pm, Dinesh Navsupe dinesh.navs...@gmail.com
wrote:
My need is 23 decimal digits of precision. We work on complex payout
calculation engine where in formula outputs are quite large numbers and
You are right Dominique.
I mean Oracle's NUMBER(23, 10), and given [1], that's more
9,999,999,999,999.99
Thanks.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Dominique Devienne ddevie...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Simon Slavin slav...@bigfraud.org
wrote:
On 13 Nov
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Dinesh Navsupe dinesh.navs...@gmail.com
wrote:
I mean Oracle's NUMBER(23, 10), and given [1], that's more
My need is 23 decimal digits of precision. We work on complex payout
calculation engine where in formula outputs are quite large numbers
and
On 13 Nov 2014, at 3:44pm, Dominique Devienne ddevie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Simon Slavin slav...@bigfraud.org wrote:
100,000,000,000,000,000,000
Assuming he means Oracle's NUMBER(23, 10), and given [1], that's more
9,999,999,999,999.99
i.e. just
On 2014/11/13 19:06, Simon Slavin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Simon Slavin slav...@bigfraud.org wrote:
100,000,000,000,000,000,000
But he's using the field to store an amount of money in. So why ask for
anything with ten places after the decimal point ? No genuine currency
of SQLite Database
Betreff: Re: [sqlite] [SQLite] Support for 23,10 Precision number format
On 13 Nov 2014, at 3:44pm, Dominique Devienne ddevie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Simon Slavin slav...@bigfraud.org wrote:
100,000,000,000,000,000,000
Assuming he means
The following SQL produces an incorrect result with sqlite-3.8.7.1:
CREATE TABLE A(
symbol TEXT,
type TEXT
);
INSERT INTO A VALUES('ABCDEFG','chars');
INSERT INTO A VALUES('1234567890','num');
CREATE TABLE B(
chars TEXT,
num TEXT
);
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS C AS
SELECT A.symbol AS
This is https://www.sqlite.org/src/info/094d39a4c95ee4 which has been fixed
in trunk and will be fixed in 3.8.7.2.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Hinrichsen, John jhinrich...@c10p.com
wrote:
The following SQL produces an incorrect result with sqlite-3.8.7.1:
CREATE TABLE A(
symbol TEXT,
1 - 100 of 6223 matches
Mail list logo
