mån 2008-04-07 klockan 07:17 +0200 skrev Kinkie:
rsync://squid-cache.org/source/squid-version
where version is one of 3, 3.0, 2, 2.7, 2.6
I've added documentation for this on the wiki in DeveloperResources.
Thanks
Regards
Henrik
Hi Henrik,
Finally I have found some time to continue my bootstrap with bzr.
At 20:43 31/03/2008, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
Your SQUID_NT_3_0 branch is
/bzr/squid3/branches/SQUID_NT_3_0
But I have to ask Robert how we best continue the merge process on that
branch.. I suspect it would
sön 2008-04-06 klockan 16:48 +0200 skrev Guido Serassio:
My needs are:
- A Windows specific development/stable branch based on the STABLE
branch, so, now there is
Which I question, but we had that discussion already.
SQUID_NT_3_0 based on SQUID_3_0, likely in the future will be
Hi Henrik,
At 17:56 06/04/2008, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
What is the better solution ?
My vote is that you create a new private branch from 3.0 for fixing
Windows specific issues, apply the latest NT patch there and select a
suitable location to publish the tree at. Suggested hosts are
-
sön 2008-04-06 klockan 18:44 +0200 skrev Guido Serassio:
If I'm not wrong, the needed steps are listed in the Merge another
branch into yours section.
The SOURCE_OF_FOO branch must be already locally checked-out, right ?
Not unless you want to.. but if you follow the instructions it will be.
Actually when thinking of it I think we should provide an rsync source
for current Squid sources.. Done.
rsync://squid-cache.org/source/squid-version
where version is one of 3, 3.0, 2, 2.7, 2.6
I've added documentation for this on the wiki in DeveloperResources.
--
/kinkie
Amos Jeffries wrote:
tis 2008-04-01 klockan 09:23 +1100 skrev Robert Collins:
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 20:43 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
But I have to ask Robert how we best continue the merge process on
that
branch.. I suspect it would actually be best to recreate the branch as
a
new bzr
tis 2008-04-01 klockan 15:13 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries:
So whats with the branch SQUID_NT_3_0 already in bzr? as shown here:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bzrview/
It's the import of the SQUID_NT_3_0 branch from CVS. But CVS do not have
the same merge details as bzr so the import doesn't know
sön 2008-03-30 klockan 16:37 -0600 skrev Alex Rousskov:
My understanding is that no CVS branches other than trunk and
squid3-ecap have been ported or moved to bzr. The decision to move is up
to the branch maintainer.
Everything in the main squid3 CVS repository has been migrated to bzr,
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 20:43 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
But I have to ask Robert how we best continue the merge process on
that
branch.. I suspect it would actually be best to recreate the branch as
a
new bzr branch from trunk, if it's kept at all...
We can manually sync it up quite
tis 2008-04-01 klockan 09:23 +1100 skrev Robert Collins:
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 20:43 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
But I have to ask Robert how we best continue the merge process on
that
branch.. I suspect it would actually be best to recreate the branch as
a
new bzr branch from
tis 2008-04-01 klockan 09:23 +1100 skrev Robert Collins:
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 20:43 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
But I have to ask Robert how we best continue the merge process on
that
branch.. I suspect it would actually be best to recreate the branch as
a
new bzr branch from
On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 17:10 +0200, Guido Serassio wrote:
- What are the branches currently available ? I need to work on old
SQUID-3_0 and SQUID_NT_3.0
- I don't know at all the bzr architecture, so what is the bzr
procedure equivalent to CVS checkout/update/commit ?
My understanding is
13 matches
Mail list logo
