vious thread, the URL rewriter protocol of Squid
>>>> 3.4 is different than with previous versions of Squid.
>>>> Despite Amos' belief, I found out yesterday that there is no backward
>>>> compatibility since a typical redirection URL is
>>>>
>>
ef, I found out yesterday that there is no backward
compatibility since a typical redirection URL is
www.example.com/foo.cgi?category=adult&url=http://www.example.com/foo/bar
and Squid 3.4 has a parser that splits tokens at '=' and then complains
that it does not understand the answer of
I found out yesterday that there is no backward
>> compatibility since a typical redirection URL is
>>
>> www.example.com/foo.cgi?category=adult&url=http://www.example.com/foo/bar
>> and Squid 3.4 has a parser that splits tokens at '=' and then complains
&
On 15/12/2013 5:11 p.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> Hey,
>
> OK so now we know that there is a *bug* but I still do not think it
> should affect any new revisions of squid which are out already.
>
> Since the "OK key=value" works as expected on all the basic helpers the
> fix is to use new code bu
Hey,
OK so now we know that there is a *bug* but I still do not think it
should affect any new revisions of squid which are out already.
Since the "OK key=value" works as expected on all the basic helpers the
fix is to use new code but to consider that it will work only with only
specific ca
On 14/12/2013 6:59 a.m., Marcus Kool wrote:
> all,
>
> as discussed in a previous thread, the URL rewriter protocol of Squid
> 3.4 is different than with previous versions of Squid.
> Despite Amos' belief, I found out yesterday that there is no backward
> compatibility sinc
all,
as discussed in a previous thread, the URL rewriter protocol of Squid 3.4 is
different than with previous versions of Squid.
Despite Amos' belief, I found out yesterday that there is no backward
compatibility since a typical redirection URL is
www.example.com/foo.cgi?category=adul
On 15/11/2012 9:53 p.m., Vincent Miszczak wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for your answer.
I understand I cannot redirect SSL web traffic to intercepting Squid using NAT
from another box, as Squid won't be able to figure out the destination address,
right ?
Yes. That is one of the side effects of NAT
On 11/15/2012 10:53 AM, Vincent Miszczak wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for your answer.
I understand I cannot redirect SSL web traffic to intercepting Squid using NAT
from another box, as Squid won't be able to figure out the destination address,
right ?
Vincent
yes, but you can use --set-mark with i
actory.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 14 novembre 2012 19:34
À : Vincent Miszczak
Cc : squid-dev@squid-cache.org
Objet : Re: Squid HEAD : intercept SSLBump server first + out of Squid box NAT
redirection
On 11/14/2012 11:17 AM, Vincent Miszczak wrote:
> I'd like to know how Squid resolves th
On 11/14/2012 11:17 AM, Vincent Miszczak wrote:
> I’d like to know how Squid resolves the remote host when handling an
> intercepted server-first bumped connection, so I’ll be able to setup my
> network accordingly.
Using the destination address of the intercepted TCP connection, Squid
securely c
Hi guys,
I'm testing this feature, working like it should at the moment, great feature :)
For now, I've been testing with an inline Linux server using iptables
redirection. Both Netfilter REDIRECT and DNAT targets make this configuration
work.
My production setup won't hav
P servers available. including the old "reference
implementation" from NetApp, linked from the i-cap.org site. You can
customize them. If you want more support and less work, The
Measurement Factory builds ICAP servers "to suit" and also provides
Traffic Spicer, the bare-bones IC
Easiest: Implement your filter using ICAP, and in your ICAP server agent
buffer the response until you find it's OK. If not OK replace the
response with your blocking page..
Doing this within Squid is a bit hairy..
Regards
Henrik
while finding on ICAP servers i came accross this : there
t restructured in 2.6.STABLE10.
> what would be the easiest way to start the redirection to our server's
> custom page
> which says "page blocked" as in what function is responsible for starting
> the redirection to another page and the data structures also responsib
been doing to
2.6stable9+.
what would be the easiest way to start the redirection to our server's
custom page
which says "page blocked" as in what function is responsible for starting
the redirection to another page and the data structures also responsible
for
holding the curr
2.6 stable 6 and i cudnt find that fucntion in the source
code.. is it a part of the later releases?
also please if any one can tell us...
what would be the easiest way to start the redirection to our server's custom
page
which says "page blocked" as in what function is responsib
ons 2007-03-07 klockan 19:29 +0530 skrev Siddhesh PaiRaikar:
> we need to block a particular site based on the content. we are planning to
> block the page from the function storeAppend() in store.c. wold it be the
> right place for blocking the page or should it be blocked elsewhere.
httpAppendBo
we need to block a particular site based on the content. we are planning to
block the page from the function storeAppend() in store.c. wold it be the
right place for blocking the page or should it be blocked elsewhere.
also ...
what would be the easiest way to start the redirection to our
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Ram Kumar Gandhapuneni wrote:
> I am a novice squid developer. I am trying to make modifications to
> the code in the client_side to do the redirection based on http header of
> the requests.
Please describe a little more in detail what it is you want to do (the
Hi,
I am a novice squid developer. I am trying to make modifications to
the code in the client_side to do the redirection based on http header of
the requests. I saw a thread with suggestions to start at redirectStart.
It would be great if anybody can give me more elaborate description of
ried implementing wccpv2. to my dismay the cisco 3550 does not support wccpv2
> with GRE packet redirection. it must use Layer 2 redirection. so when i run squid
> with the wccpv2 i get the following errors on the cisco 3550 (off course i change
> both configs on cisco and squid wccp2_ro
the router). when i do that i see the
> redirection counter on the cisco incrementing and the access.log on
> squid showing the request and query. However if i do from the same
> client any other web request the redirect counters don't increment, the
> access.log obviously doesn't show
igured with. ( menaing if i type in the web browser the IP address of the
cisco switch. the web managment interface of the router). when i do that i see the
redirection counter on the cisco incrementing and the access.log on squid showing the
request and query.
However if i do from the same clie
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, John El-Rassi wrote:
> So i tried implementing wccpv2. to my dismay the cisco 3550 does not
> support wccpv2 with GRE packet redirection.
No problem in theory. L2 redirection just makes life a whole lot easier as
you don't need any GRE module, just normal i
open case with cisco about this).
So i tried implementing wccpv2. to my dismay the cisco 3550 does not support wccpv2
with GRE packet redirection. it must use Layer 2 redirection. so when i run squid
with the wccpv2 i get the following errors on the cisco 3550 (off course i change both
configs
26 matches
Mail list logo
