On 25/04/11 03:41, jiluspo wrote:
squid running 2 instances(iptables balanced).
peer cache digest both sibling on each other
running cache_mem only
for overloaded server(61k req/min) should we create 2 http ports for
peer and for tproxy?
Yes. This is a MUST DO requirement. TPROXY mangles the
On 25/04/11 02:20, Nick wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using someone's Squid service but I want to find out if the squid
is configured in Reverse mode or transparent mode. I don't have access
to the configuration. Is there any way to find out?
Make a telnet port-80 to another random website.
If it goes
On 23/04/11 17:23, Andreas Braathen wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that squid manipulates the headers/traffic from a source
towards a destination. The squid is acting like a mediator with my
config - how is it possible to forward the exact header retrieved
from a client without squid changing it?
On 22/04/11 19:32, a bv wrote:
Hi,
For a linux which runs squid and will act as a proxy what are the
parameters youll recommend to change and why and how (on both linux
and squid)? (especially with TCP/IP stack, TIME_WAIT, maximum
connect.ion limits vs)
Regards
It would be helpful if you
On 22/04/11 07:42, Pablo Hrbacek wrote:
Hello! I want to compile a squid 3.1.12 in Debian Lenny but I don't know what
packages I need. Please help me.
The Debian source package for 3.1.12 in the Unstable or Testing source
repositories requires these:
On 22/04/11 02:08, jeffrey j donovan wrote:
Greetings,
I have a a transparent squid in a private net with a 1-1 NAT, Im
trying to get a good understanding of what my clients look like to
the outside. What is the Default setting for forwarded_for if my
system is running intercept?
On 22/04/11 04:57, Sheridan Dan Small wrote:
First I will explain what I am trying to do.
I have a number of tests (executables and scripts) which run on
resources downloaded via HTTP, FTP etc. Some of these tests are third
party compiled executables which would be problematic to change. The
On 21/04/11 13:04, Jenny Lee wrote:
I have 3.2.0.1 and unfortunately this does not work either. I
will check on 3.2.0.7 (would that make a difference?).
May do. I don't recall changing anything there directly but the
passing around of request details has been fixed in a few places
earlier
On 23/04/11 19:11, Edward Ting wrote:
Hi Amos,
You mentioned in the post below that this is One of the design flaws
we have not yet removed from Squid.. Is there a bug ID already?
This could be from many places for many reasons. Care to track down
where the problem is and see if its
Hello:
went i navigate to: ftp://novapublishers.com/...
squid3 sent me a: Zero Sized Reply
my acl is:
ftp proto ftp
http_access allow ftp
my squd3 version is: 3.1.6
please help me..
thanks, Javier
--
View this message in context:
Hi
I have got a reverse proxy that is working just fine, it accepts
requests on port 443 and port 80 and ONLY sends traffic upstream to
port 80 to the apache server listening on localhost.
I use the following config:
https_port 10.14.1.72:443 cert=/etc/squid/self_certs/site.crt
Hello again all,
First of all, thanks to Amos and Andrew for replying to my previous question.
I have setup squid_session with the following in squid.conf. The result is
attached below also. For whatever reason the squid sessions are crashing and I
am not sure why. The goal would be to
I'm a little confused by this scenario and your statement It would be
nice if the crawler identified itself.
Is it spoofing an agent name identical that on your OFFICE machines?
Even the absence of a U-A header is identification in a way.
That was just an example. In its simplest form:
DO
The problem is not refreshing content from the CMS. Our deployment
will be Squid reverse proxying an app server that in turn talks to the
CMS for the content and adds the look and feel to the content. So
squid will be caching the final url. the challenge is to figure out
how to get squid to be
Have you tested to see if any of these concerns are in fact something
that can happen.
It is my understanding that Squid will ask the app server if the content
is new or not and if the app server says that the text is new and the
photo is old, then squid will ask for a new copy of the test
thanks for your answer David.
i'm seeing too much feature been included at squid 3.x, but it's getting as
slower as new features are added.
i think squid 3.2 with 1 worker should be as fast as 2.7, but it's getting
slower e hungry.
Marcos
- Mensagem original
De: da...@lang.hm
Hi there,
Is there any effort now to port 3.1 to windows?
I know there's one for 2.7, and be struggling to get it compile on
vs2010 and win7 sdk.
But it is so complicated and horribly broken by new CRT security
features (which can be fixed by adding some code) and Winsocks
changes. I managed to
I experience the same problem for 3.2.0.7 on FreeBSD 8.0.
When https to a site, the CONNECT request is sent for reqmod, but after
receiving the reqmod reply, the squid is not proceeding to make the connection
to the web server.
Here is the logs with debug option for 93 and 28 on.
2011/04/25
On 4/25/2011 9:26 PM, Yucong Sun (叶雨飞) wrote:
Hi there,
Is there any effort now to port 3.1 to windows?
I know there's one for 2.7, and be struggling to get it compile on
vs2010 and win7 sdk.
But it is so complicated and horribly broken by new CRT security
features (which can be fixed by
I just upgraded from CentOS 5.5 to CentOS 5.6, while running Squid v3.1.12.1 in
both environments, and somehow created a race condition in the process.
Besides updating the 200+ software packages that are the difference between 5.5
and 5.6, I configured and enabled DNSSEC on my nameserver.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Steve Snyder swsny...@snydernet.net wrote:
I just upgraded from CentOS 5.5 to CentOS 5.6, while running Squid v3.1.12.1
in both environments, and somehow created a race condition in the process.
Besides updating the 200+ software packages that are the
On 04/14/2011 09:06 PM, da...@lang.hm wrote:
Ok, I finally got a chance to test 2.7STABLE9
it performs about the same as squid 3.0, possibly a little better.
with my somewhat stripped down config (smaller regex patterns, replacing
CIDR blocks and names that would need to be looked up in
Well, thanks for the pointer, But as far as I can see there, it's a
installer, how did you generate the binary?
what I really hoping for, is to compile and run 3.1 normally on windows.
Well, 2.7 may cut it as well since I need mostly existing features,
but I can't get it compile correctly either.
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, Marcos wrote:
thanks for your answer David.
i'm seeing too much feature been included at squid 3.x, but it's getting as
slower as new features are added.
that's unfortunantly fairly normal.
i think squid 3.2 with 1 worker should be as fast as 2.7, but it's getting
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 04/14/2011 09:06 PM, da...@lang.hm wrote:
Ok, I finally got a chance to test 2.7STABLE9
it performs about the same as squid 3.0, possibly a little better.
with my somewhat stripped down config (smaller regex patterns, replacing
CIDR blocks and
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 04/14/2011 09:06 PM, da...@lang.hm wrote:
In addition, there seems to be some sort of locking betwen the multiple
worker processes in 3.2 when checking the ACLs
There are pretty much no locks in the
On 25/04/11 23:45, Javier wrote:
Hello:
went i navigate to: ftp://novapublishers.com/...
squid3 sent me a: Zero Sized Reply
my acl is:
ftp proto ftp
http_access allow ftp
my squd3 version is: 3.1.6
Please try the 3.1.12 version. There have been two causes of Zero Sized
Reply fixed
On 04/25/2011 05:31 PM, da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 04/14/2011 09:06 PM, da...@lang.hm wrote:
In addition, there seems to be some sort of locking betwen the multiple
worker processes in 3.2 when checking the
On 26/04/11 02:54, Daniel Shelton wrote:
Hello again all,
First of all, thanks to Amos and Andrew for replying to my previous question. I have
setup squid_session with the following in squid.conf. The result is attached below also.
For whatever reason the squid sessions are crashing and I
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 04/25/2011 05:31 PM, da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 04/14/2011 09:06 PM, da...@lang.hm wrote:
In addition, there seems to be some sort of locking betwen the multiple
Hi,
I'm using Squid 3.1.12.1 (Amos ppa-maverick) and i got some weird problem.
Users with Android2 can't get 'ebuddy' to work, but for iPhone users,
it works. (?)
I've made an exception on firewall (for 38.99.73.0/24) to ebuddy
connections skip squid, now it works for both.
Anyone know
On 26/04/11 11:02, Yucong Sun (叶雨飞) wrote:
Well, thanks for the pointer, But as far as I can see there, it's a
installer, how did you generate the binary?
what I really hoping for, is to compile and run 3.1 normally on windows.
Well, 2.7 may cut it as well since I need mostly existing features,
On 26/04/11 12:19, Gerson Barreiros wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Squid 3.1.12.1 (Amos ppa-maverick) and i got some weird problem.
Users with Android2 can't get 'ebuddy' to work, but for iPhone users,
it works. (?)
I've made an exception on firewall (for 38.99.73.0/24) to ebuddy
connections skip
On 26/04/11 01:11, Ali Jawad wrote:
Hi
I have got a reverse proxy that is working just fine, it accepts
requests on port 443 and port 80 and ONLY sends traffic upstream to
port 80 to the apache server listening on localhost.
I use the following config:
https_port 10.14.1.72:443
On 26/04/11 05:27, Jenny Lee wrote:
snip
HALF-BAKED:
acl OFFICE src 1.1.1.1
request_header_access User-Agent allow OFFICE
request_header_access User-Agent deny all
request-header_replace User-Agent BOGUS AGENT
[DIRECT works as expected for OFFICE -- no modifications. However, UA for
OFFICE
Hi Amos,
You can get VS2010 Express for free at here
http://www.microsoft.com/express/Downloads/#2010-Visual-CPP
Win SDK are free as well
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/bb980924 but it's not required
to build.
You get get other VC Express version free as well.
There's some change in
On 04/25/2011 06:14 PM, da...@lang.hm wrote:
if that regains the speed and/or scalability it would point fingers
fairly conclusively at the DNS components.
this is the only think that I can think of that should be shared between
multiple workers processing ACLs
but it is _not_ currently
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 04/25/2011 06:14 PM, da...@lang.hm wrote:
if that regains the speed and/or scalability it would point fingers
fairly conclusively at the DNS components.
this is the only think that I can think of that should be shared between
multiple workers
On 26/04/11 14:57, Yucong Sun (叶雨飞) wrote:
Hi Amos,
You can get VS2010 Express for free at here
http://www.microsoft.com/express/Downloads/#2010-Visual-CPP
Win SDK are free as well
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/bb980924 but it's not required
to build.
You get get other VC Express
39 matches
Mail list logo
