Hi,
Yes, it is even pretty easy to accomplish. We are using a dedicated
Loadbalancer (but you can of course use LVS as loadbalancer) which is
balancing proxy request to 8 squid instances on 4 different real
servers with Kerberos authentication. We are not using any cache
hierarchy, just 4 standalo
Hi All,
any links on how to configure load balancing of squid
See the default squid.conf, :)
If you want to a load balancer for Squid servers then LVS is a good
option. Redhat even have a packaged version.
J
2008/12/23 Ken Peng :
>
>
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> any links on how to configure load balancing of squid
>>
>>
>
> See the default squid.conf, :)
>
hi any details?
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Ken Peng wrote:
>
>
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> any links on how to configure load balancing of squid
>>
>>
>
> See the default squid.conf, :)
>
andre wang wrote:
hi any details?
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Ken Peng wrote:
Hi All,
any links on how to configure load balancing of squid
See the default squid.conf, :)
http://www.suid-cache.org/Doc/config/
Seriously though. 'load balance' means many things. What exactly ar
Amos Jeffries wrote:
andre wang wrote:
hi any details?
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Ken Peng wrote:
Hi All,
any links on how to configure load balancing of squid
See the default squid.conf, :)
http://www.suid-cache.org/Doc/config/
bah. having a typo-day today: that should be
Hi All,
What I mean to say is..
E.G:-
SP 1 = 10.200.2.1
SP 2 = 10.200.2.2
LAN USERS = 10.200.2.x
All lan users should connect to SP1 or SP2 depending upon the load and
if one of the SP is down the other should take the load.
One way of achieving load balance is with DNS
proxy1.example.com I
Hi All,
I was on leave so could not reply.
What I mean to say is..
E.G:-
SP 1 = 10.200.2.1
SP 2 = 10.200.2.2
LAN USERS = 10.200.2.x
All lan users should connect to SP1 or SP2 depending upon the load and
if one of the SP is down the other should take the load.
One way of achieving load balanc
Mario Remy Almeida wrote:
Hi All,
What I mean to say is..
E.G:-
SP 1 = 10.200.2.1
SP 2 = 10.200.2.2
LAN USERS = 10.200.2.x
All lan users should connect to SP1 or SP2 depending upon the load and
if one of the SP is down the other should take the load.
One way of achieving load balance is wit
Hi Remy,
Just a couple of comments.
1) As per your response, if DNS is down squid is not going to be much
happier as it needs that DNS resolution in order to be able to function ;-)
2) WCCP would/could work very nicely for you in a fully transparent
configuration. Cost of wccp capable routers
On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 22:59, Yuri N. Fominov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two instances of squid-2.5-STABLE3 running on same
> dual-processor machine under RH AS 2.1 (2.4.9-e.25). Everything works
> great. I would like to optimize hit ratio and have a following
> questions:
>
> Is it possible to confi
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Dominik Jais wrote:
delay_parameters 1 -1/-1 13000/13000
I'm using the configuration above. My problem is, that eath user gots 13kbps,
but the 13000 mean bytes = 104kbps
Is this a documentation bug?
The above setting will give each user ca 104kbit/s or 12.5KByte/s.
Most clien
what about caching in your setup?
this info will surely help you to design your setup.
I am using one proxy server and two caching proxy servers and
the total number of users in my setup are much more than yours.
I would like to ask you one question here as you have done with
transparent proxy.
Do a search for "round robin dns" "multiple a records" "clustering"
"redundancy" "failover". That should give good coverage on the techniques
Also...visiting www.squid-cache.org and searching for "failover" will help.
Chris Perreault
-Original Message-
From: Gert Brits [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
ah ha!well do a search for Wccp, and do not just
do it, implement it. You can also use LVS thats work
goods as well.
--- Chris Perreault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Do a search for "round robin dns" "multiple a
> records" "clustering"
> "redundancy" "failover". That should give good
> coverag
Check out http://naragw.sharp.co.jp/sps/. I think that this is the most simple and
effective way as long as you don't mind using proxy.pac files and/or WPAD. Your other
option is to use LVS w/ keepalived and ICP.
Regards,
David
>>> Chris Perreault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 7/22/2004 8:02:00 AM >>>
Do
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Jeff Donovan wrote:
> I'm running a transparent cache with squid guard. My problem seems to
> be How do I split my traffic?
This you do in your router in case of transparently intercepting proxies..
If you are not using a TCP interception device capable of tracking
individu
On Aug 2, 2004, at 9:25 AM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Jeff Donovan wrote:
I'm running a transparent cache with squid guard. My problem seems to
be How do I split my traffic?
This you do in your router in case of transparently intercepting
proxies..
If you are not using a TCP inte
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Jeff Donovan wrote:
> would this be a placed on a linux server in front of the two cache's or
> does it run on the same device as squid?
Both possibilities existsm
Regards
Henrik
LVS can be placed on the same server, but it is good
if you a new Linux Box for it, I am not sure but last
time I used it, I need to recompile the kernel. Please
do check with the latest Docs.
And why can not you do the Roundrobin. It is always a
good option. And yeah most convinient, you can use
Mario Remy Almeida wrote:
Hi All,
Want to know if load balancing is possible with squid by maintaining
sessions.
Health check should be TCP Ports
eg:
Server A -> Active port 8080
Server B -> Active port 8080
Client -> Squid -> Server A and/or B
Request 1 comes from 'Client A' Squid forwards t
Hi Amos,
Thanks for that,
so I need to use carp and sourcehash to do load balancing, right?
but where do I specify in squid to monitor the prots?
I mean if port 8080 is down on 'ServerA' how Squid will know that it
should send the request to 'ServerB' on port 8080?
//Remy
On Mon, 2009-06-15 a
Mario Remy Almeida wrote:
Hi Amos,
Thanks for that,
so I need to use carp and sourcehash to do load balancing, right?
only the one you want.
but where do I specify in squid to monitor the prots?
I mean if port 8080 is down on 'ServerA' how Squid will know that it
should send the request t
Thanks Amos for the help
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 00:30 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Mario Remy Almeida wrote:
> > Hi Amos,
> >
> > Thanks for that,
> >
> > so I need to use carp and sourcehash to do load balancing, right?
>
> only the one you want.
>
> >
> > but where do I specify in squid t
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, Carinus Carelse wrote:
I have two external networks connected and I have one proxy server that
is servicing about 500 users. I would like the squid box to do some
load balancing across the two external link so that the http traffic
does not just go through the one link.
Is thi
I've got the same kind of thing going and I have it working with
sibling-mode (not parent). Might want to check your firewall stuff and
make sure that each squid is listening on 3130 for peer requests (forget
what the option is).
My problem is what happens when the real server behind the prox
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Kent, Mr. John (Contractor) wrote:
> The part I don't understand is the redirection: the page says:
> To implement this solution your redirector script must output a URL where the
> hostname part of the URL is a keyword which describes a pool of backend servers,
> such as h
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Gert Brits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : jeudi 22 juillet 2004 13:40
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Org
> Objet : [squid-users] load balancing
>
>
> Hi All
>
> Please could I have either some ideas or solutions to the following:
>
> I work for a BIG company
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Darryn Lowe wrote:
> Therefore, is it possible to have Squid change parent proxies based on
> the content type of the requested URL? How do I do this?
This you can't, as the content type is not known until the reply is seen.
What you can do is to select parent proxy based o
Dusan Djordjevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I plan to install few instances of Squid on one multiprocessor box and
> balance load between them. I plan to use LinuxVirtualServer for it. Do
> someone have that kind of solution ? What load balancing you suggest ?
> Any other recommendation ?
F
Dusan Djordjevic wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I plan to install few instances of Squid on one multiprocessor box and
> balance load between them. I plan to use LinuxVirtualServer for it. Do
> someone have that kind of solution ? What load balancing you suggest ?
> Any other recommendation ?
Do you
Dusan Djordjevic wrote:
>
> Monday 07 July 2003 10:56, Marc Elsen:
> > > I plan to install few instances of Squid on one multiprocessor box
> > > and balance load between them. I plan to use LinuxVirtualServer
> > > for it. Do someone have that kind of solution ? What load
> > > balancing yo
Marc Elsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dusan Djordjevic wrote:
>>
>> Monday 07 July 2003 10:56, Marc Elsen:
>> > > I plan to install few instances of Squid on one multiprocessor box
>> > > and balance load between them. I plan to use LinuxVirtualServer
>> > > for it. Do someone have that kin
e for the universe and
a quick recompile."
- Original Message -
From: "Kinkie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Marc Elsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Dusan Djordjevic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 07,
"Masood Ahmad Shah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hmmm but what do u think if the proxy is transparent ..:)
[...]
The trick is the same. Just do two rules, one with source
-s 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.1
redirecting to the first instance of the transparent proxy, the other with
\! -s 0.0.0.0/0.0.
From: "Kinkie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Masood Ahmad Shah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Marc Elsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dusan Djordjevic"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: [sq
"Masood Ahmad Shah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In my sense if one proxy will down another will not take it's place because
> iptable rules are redirecting packets to both port and port instance is not
> running.. so what type of load balancing .:)
Load balancing _is_ in effect. It's t
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 07, Kinkie wrote:
> It's just done in a different way. BTW, I tried to use linuxvirtualserver
> on the same host, but for some reason it didn't really work.
I use the software called pen for loadbalancing and it works greate for
tcp connections
http://siag.nu/pen/
For ha cluste
On 07.07 00:41, Abbas Salehi wrote:
> I'm using squid as cache server ,
> How i can load balance the http traffic between this 3 cache server with
> round robin algorithm,
do you use 1 or 3 cache servers?
> Supposing that i,ve route http request from cisco router to these cache
> server,any solut
On Friday 18 November 2005 14:31, Stefano Mason wrote:
> I'm thinking to load balancing 2 squid processes with 1 squid. Is this
> idea stupid?
>
> Landscape:
>
> 1 SMP machine with:
> squid1 with cache_dir (a real piece of disk) bind localhost
> squid2 with cache_dir (a real piece of di
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 1:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [squid-users] RE : [squid-users] load balancing
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Gert Brits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : jeudi 22 juillet 2004 13:40
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Org
> Objet
tis 2007-02-13 klockan 17:15 +0530 skrev Selvi:
> Hi All,
>
> I am just checking the Load balancing feature available in squid-icap setup.
Squid-2.x patched with an ICAP patch, or Squid-3 with ICAP enabled?
Regards
Henrik
signature.asc
Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
Hi,
Currently i am using Squid-2.x patched with ICAP.
Thanks,
Selvi
- Original Message -
From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Selvi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 3:57 AM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Load Balancing in ICAP - reg
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Cavanagh, Kevin B wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> Please forgive me if this question has been asked/answered before (I
> searched the FAQs but quickly became too confused by all the various
> postings regarding load balancing, etc).
>
> We currently have six RedHat Linux V8.0 serv
On Jan 22, 2008 5:05 PM, Nick Duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've googled around a bit and see things about using the ntlm_auth -b
> option, but I don't understand how/where?
>
> Problem: I have squid setup to do NTLM aunthetication of the proxy users
> against a local domain controller (samba/w
-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Load-balancing domain controllers with Squid
On Jan 22, 2008 5:05 PM, Nick Duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've googled around a bit and see things about using the ntlm_auth -b
> option, but I don't understand how/where?
>
>
ons 2007-05-09 klockan 08:13 -0500 skrev Sean Walberg:
> Is there any way to balance based on least connections, or something else?
Not today, but probably quite easy to add.
Regards
Henrik
signature.asc
Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
On 5/9/07, Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any way to balance based on least connections, or something else?
Not today, but probably quite easy to add.
How would I go about getting this on a developer's radar screen? I
don't think this is something I could do myself.
On Fri, May 11, 2007, Sean Walberg wrote:
> On 5/9/07, Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Is there any way to balance based on least connections, or something
> >else?
> >
> >Not today, but probably quite easy to add.
>
> How would I go about getting this on a developer's radar s
You can setup a IPVS load balancer in front of your squid pool. I
use it load balance my 10 squid servers. See
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
mike
At 07:10 AM 5/11/2007, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2007, Sean Walberg wrote:
> On 5/9/07, Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Jon DeLee wrote:
*This message was scanned for all current viruses and is certified clean*
Hi All,
I'm using Squid 3.0. STABLE 8 as my main cache, and I have two other
2.7 caches set up, one on each WAN connection. The only reason we
have multiple proxy servers is to load balance; in realit
From: "Siju George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I have a System with two Internet connections.
> Is it possible to configure squid to load balance out going internet
> traffic through those two Internet Connections?
>
This is assuming that you are running Linux :-
Just set up multiple routing and
From: "Ming-Ching Tiew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This is assuming that you are running Linux :-
> Just set up multiple routing and weight assignment.
> You might have to turn off kernel option which
> caches multiple routing.
>
I meant MULTI PATH routing.
-
On Nov 21, 2007 6:29 AM, Ming-Ching Tiew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: "Ming-Ching Tiew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > This is assuming that you are running Linux :-
> > Just set up multiple routing and weight assignment.
> > You might have to turn off kernel option which
> > caches multiple r
From: "Siju George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Is there any option to do it in the "squid.conf" file?
>
> I know there is a "tcp_outgoing_address" option.
>
> just wondering if it is possible to make it use all outgoing IP
> address in a round-robin manner :-)
>
As far as I know, you could do "s
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007, Ming-Ching Tiew wrote:
> As far as I know, you could do "split access" using
> the 'tcp_outgoing_address' method, but you can't
> get squid to use it in round-robin manner.
>
> I might be wrong. :-)
I don't think there is, but making squid do that with a small source patch
Hi George,
Siju George wrote:
Hi,
I have a System with two Internet connections.
Is it possible to configure squid to load balance out going internet
traffic through those two Internet Connections?
To keep things simple, you can just use the "tcp_outgoing_address"
parameter in squid.conf.
On Nov 21, 2007 12:21 PM, Tek Bahadur Limbu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi George,
>
> Siju George wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a System with two Internet connections.
> > Is it possible to configure squid to load balance out going internet
> > traffic through those two Internet Connections?
>
>
On ons, 2007-11-21 at 13:50 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2007, Ming-Ching Tiew wrote:
>
> > As far as I know, you could do "split access" using
> > the 'tcp_outgoing_address' method, but you can't
> > get squid to use it in round-robin manner.
> >
> > I might be wrong. :-)
>
> I
On Nov 22, 2007 2:16 AM, Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On ons, 2007-11-21 at 13:50 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2007, Ming-Ching Tiew wrote:
> >
> > > As far as I know, you could do "split access" using
> > > the 'tcp_outgoing_address' method, but you can't
> > > g
From: "Siju George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > But not something I would recommend. Many sites dislikes clients coming
> > from more than one IP during the same session. The client IP is often
> > embedded in session cookies etc, making the session fail if the IP
> > changes.
> >
>
> Yes Henrik.
>
It sounds like a coding project - are you volunteering? :)
Adrian
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007, Ming-Ching Tiew wrote:
> From: "Siju George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > But not something I would recommend. Many sites dislikes clients coming
> > > from more than one IP during the same session. The c
Hi George,
Siju George wrote:
On Nov 21, 2007 12:21 PM, Tek Bahadur Limbu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi George,
Siju George wrote:
Hi,
I have a System with two Internet connections.
Is it possible to configure squid to load balance out going internet
traffic through those two Internet Connec
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2007, Ming-Ching Tiew wrote:
> > > As far as I know, you could do "split access" using
> > > the 'tcp_outgoing_address' method, but you can't
> > > get squid to use it in round-robin manner.
> > >
> > > I might be wrong. :-)
> On ons, 2007-11-21 at 13:50 +0900, Adrian Chadd w
On Nov 22, 2007 8:33 AM, Ming-Ching Tiew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Siju George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > But not something I would recommend. Many sites dislikes clients coming
> > > from more than one IP during the same session. The client IP is often
> > > embedded in session coo
-Ching Tiew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: squid-users
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 1:27:11 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] load balancing traffic through squid on systems with
2 Internet connections
On Nov 22, 2007 8:33 AM, Ming-Ching Tiew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Siju
> If you use the
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#outgoing
>
> method as I use now then even through the outgoing address will be
> changed for 50% of the packets those same packets will be routed out
> through the default interface only :-(
First of all I don't know anything about Op
On tor, 2007-11-22 at 13:57 +0530, Siju George wrote:
> method as I use now then even through the outgoing address will be
> changed for 50% of the packets those same packets will be routed out
> through the default interface only :-(
There is two related components needed to make multipath routi
On tor, 2007-11-22 at 08:19 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> We have squid servers behind L3 switch (balancer) which uses the
> 'sourcehash' technique for balancing requests because of this reason. Maybe
> such functionality could be integrated into squid. Or into packetfilter :)
That's a g
69 matches
Mail list logo
