Re: [squid-users] Squid test-suite / benchmarks

v > > *Subject:* Re: [squid-users] Squid test-suite / benchmarks > >   > > My first port of call would be apachebench with and without your > proxies. A web search for "squid apachebench" might yield some leads to > people who have done this. (I'm sure apachebe

Re: [squid-users] Squid test-suite / benchmarks

Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 11:26 AM To: Stoica Bogdan Alexandru Cc: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org; Alex Rousskov Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid test-suite / benchmarks My first port of call would be apachebench with and without your proxies. A web search for "squid apachebench" mi

Re: [squid-users] Squid test-suite / benchmarks

an trigger cache revalidation, simulate heavy tailed hit distributions > that stress disk caching, exercise the code that handles aborted > transactions, persistent connection races, etc., etc. > > > > Or, even better, is > > there a more comprehensive test suite apart from the

Re: [squid-users] Squid test-suite / benchmarks

better, is > there a more comprehensive test suite apart from the one Squid comes with? Squid does not come with a comprehensive test suite (yet) and the tests distributed with Squid are not performance tests (a.k.a. "benchmarks"). If you are looking for functionality rather than performance testi

Re: [squid-users] Squid test-suite / benchmarks

have good code coverage while doing so. We > > have searched online for alternatives, but found little info. > > > > Are there any good benchmarks used for such purpose? Or, even > > better, is there a more comprehensive test suite apart from the one > >

Re: [squid-users] Squid test-suite / benchmarks

Are there any good benchmarks used for such purpose? Or, even > better, is there a more comprehensive test suite apart from the one > Squid comes with? > > Any suggestions are highly appreciated. > Any chance the details of these research are going to

Re: [squid-users] Squid test-suite / benchmarks

; research project. > > Ideally, we would like to have good code coverage while doing so. We have > searched online for alternatives, but found little info. > > Are there any good benchmarks used for such purpose? Or, even better, is > there a more comprehensive test suite apart fr

[squid-users] Squid test-suite / benchmarks

, is there a more comprehensive test suite apart from the one Squid comes with? Any suggestions are highly appreciated. Thanks a lot! B. ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

Re: [squid-users] Squid3 error: CHILD: hello write test failed logrotate

out other things. >> >> If you are logging with the TCP or UDP log modules then IPv6 might >> matter. For local files its not related. >> >>> >>> /var/log/squid3/*.log { >>> daily >>> compress >>> delaycomp

Re: [squid-users] Squid3 error: CHILD: hello write test failed logrotate

On Wednesday 22 June 2016 at 23:28:56, Roberto Carna wrote: > My squid.conf from Squid3 has this line: > > #Default: > # logfile_rotate 0 > > So the parameter you mentiones it's just setup. You do realise that # at the start of a line means it is a comment and has no effect, right? Antony.

Re: [squid-users] Squid3 error: CHILD: hello write test failed logrotate

daily >> compress >> delaycompress >> rotate 2 >> missingok >> nocreate >> sharedscripts >> postrotate >> test ! -e /var/run/squid3.pid || test ! -x >> /usr/sbi

Re: [squid-users] Squid3 error: CHILD: hello write test failed logrotate

OK, I'll do that. And what about the "nocreate" option in the logrotate file for squid3???Do I have to delete or change for waht option??? Thanks a lot again, this is my last question. 2016-06-22 14:02 GMT-03:00 Amos Jeffries : > On 23/06/2016 4:32 a.m., Roberto Carna

Re: [squid-users] Squid3 error: CHILD: hello write test failed logrotate

On 23/06/2016 4:32 a.m., Roberto Carna wrote: > Amos and Antony, thanks a lot for your help. > > At first, I'll enable IPv6 in my Debian box. > > And for the log problem, I couldn't understand what yoy said > Amos...please can you detail what I have to do in order to avoid log > rotation

Re: [squid-users] Squid3 error: CHILD: hello write test failed logrotate

daily > compress > delaycompress > rotate 2 > missingok > nocreate > sharedscripts > postrotate > test ! -e /var/run/squid3.pid || test ! -x > /usr/sbin/squid3 || /usr/sbin/squid3 -k rotate > endscript

Re: [squid-users] Squid3 error: CHILD: hello write test failed logrotate

r and squid3 daemon runs OK." Do you really need to reboot the server, or is restarting Squid sufficient? > /var/log/squid3/*.log { > daily > compress > delaycompress > rotate 2 > missingok > nocreate > sharedsc

Re: [squid-users] Squid3 error: CHILD: hello write test failed logrotate

On Wednesday 22 June 2016 at 15:49:57, Roberto Carna wrote: > Also I see in cache.log: > > pinger: Initialising ICMP pinger ... > 2016/06/22 09:58:51| pinger: ICMP socket opened. > 2016/06/22 09:58:51| icmp_sock: (97) Address family not supported by > protocol 2016/06/22 09:58:51| pinger:

Re: [squid-users] Squid3 error: CHILD: hello write test failed logrotate

forum.opnsense.org/index.php?topic=879.0) ..can > this be true??? > > /var/log/squid3/*.log { > daily > compress > delaycompress > rotate 2 > missingok > nocreate > sharedscripts > postrotate >

Re: [squid-users] Squid3 error: CHILD: hello write test failed logrotate

{ daily compress delaycompress rotate 2 missingok nocreate sharedscripts postrotate test ! -e /var/run/squid3.pid || test ! -x /usr/sbin/squid3 || /usr/sbin/squid3 -k rotate endscript } Regards, 2016-06-22 10:29

Re: [squid-users] Squid3 error: CHILD: hello write test failed logrotate

On Wednesday 22 June 2016 at 14:53:23, Roberto Carna wrote: > everything was OK until the /var/log/squid3/access.log rotate to > access.log.1. From this moment, the access.log file is not present, and the > squid3 daemon doesn't respond...I'm not sure the cause. Show us your log rotation script.

[squid-users] Squid3 error: CHILD: hello write test failed logrotate

Dear, I've implemented a Squid3 in reverse mode, and when I test it with some web access from my PC, everything was OK. But when I put it in production, there are a lot of web access and everything was OK until the /var/log/squid3/access.log rotate to access.log.1. From this moment, the access.log

Re: [squid-users] Question about my SSL test

gt; Cc : squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org Objet : Re: [squid-users] Question about my SSL test On 2016-02-09 7:38 am, sebastien.boulia...@cpu.ca wrote: > Hi, > > I did a SSL test and I have some questions. > > The SSL test notified me that POODLE (SSLv3), RC4 are enable

Re: [squid-users] Question about my SSL test

? > > Thanks. > > -Message d'origine- > De : dweimer [mailto:dwei...@dweimer.net] > Envoyé : 9 février 2016 08:53 > À : Sebastien Boulianne <sebastien.boulia...@cpu.ca> > Cc : squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org > Objet : Re: [squid-users] Question about my SSL tes

Re: [squid-users] Question about my SSL test

On 2016-02-09 7:38 am, sebastien.boulia...@cpu.ca wrote: Hi, I did a SSL test and I have some questions. The SSL test notified me that POODLE (SSLv3), RC4 are enable or/and vulnerable. Is it a way to block that with Squid ? How can I disable thosed protocols ? Server side or Squid side

Re: [squid-users] Question about my SSL test

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Also: http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Intercept/SslBumpExplicit?#Hardening 09.02.16 19:52, dweimer пишет: > On 2016-02-09 7:38 am, sebastien.boulia...@cpu.ca wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I did a SSL test a

[squid-users] Question about my SSL test

Hi, I did a SSL test and I have some questions. The SSL test notified me that POODLE (SSLv3), RC4 are enable or/and vulnerable. Is it a way to block that with Squid ? How can I disable thosed protocols ? Server side or Squid side ? Thanks for your answer guys. Sébastien

Re: [squid-users] Question about my SSL test

-out dHParam.pem 1024 > > Which file does it uses as input ? > > Thanks. > > -Message d'origine- > De : dweimer [mailto:dwei...@dweimer.net] Envoyé : 9 février 2016 08:53 À : Sebastien Boulianne <sebastien.boulia...@cpu.ca> Cc : squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org O

[squid-users] Question about my SSL test

squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org Objet : Re: [squid-users] Question about my SSL test On 2016-02-09 7:38 am, sebastien.boulia...@cpu.ca wrote: > Hi, > > I did a SSL test and I have some questions. > > The SSL test notified me that POODLE (SSLv3), RC4 are enable or/and > vuln

Re: [squid-users] please help me test ext_ldap_group_acl from command line

Hi, I finally made it work. It does not matter if helper is started under my account or under squid account, it works both ways. Here's full command: ./ext_ldap_group_acl -R \ -b DC=mimar,DC=rs \ -D CN=LDAP Binder,OU=00-System-00,OU=Users,OU=BG,OU=RS,DC=mimar,DC=rs \ -w

[squid-users] please help me test ext_ldap_group_acl from command line

Hi, I am testing ext_ldap_group_acl from command line in squid-3.5.6 on FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p15 amd64, but I can't make it work with Active Directory. My query is as follows: ./ext_ldap_group_acl -d -b DC=mimar,DC=rs \ -f CN=squid_noaccess -d ldapbin...@mimar.rs -W mypass \ -h

Re: [squid-users] please help me test ext_ldap_group_acl from command line

On 29/07/2015 4:01 a.m., Marko Cupać wrote: Hi, I am testing ext_ldap_group_acl from command line in squid-3.5.6 on FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p15 amd64, but I can't make it work with Active Directory. My query is as follows: ./ext_ldap_group_acl -d -b DC=mimar,DC=rs \ -f

Re: [squid-users] please help me test ext_ldap_group_acl from command line

On 29/07/2015 5:56 a.m., Amos Jeffries wrote: On 29/07/2015 4:01 a.m., Marko Cupać wrote: Hi, I am testing ext_ldap_group_acl from command line in squid-3.5.6 on FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p15 amd64, but I can't make it work with Active Directory. My query is as follows: ./ext_ldap_group_acl -d

Re: [squid-users] squidGuard configuration test - echo test

On 08/06/15 08:10, Helmut Hullen wrote: Hallo, Amos, Du meintest am 08.06.15: Under squid 3.4 (and many earlier versions) I use url_rewrite_program /usr/bin/squidGuard How must I change this line for squid 3.5? You should not have to change the SG command line or

Re: [squid-users] squidGuard configuration test - echo test [SOLVED]

On 08/06/15 08:10, Helmut Hullen wrote: Hallo, Amos, Du meintest am 08.06.15: Under squid 3.4 (and many earlier versions) I use url_rewrite_program /usr/bin/squidGuard How must I change this line for squid 3.5? You should not have to change the SG command line or

Re: [squid-users] squidGuard configuration test - echo test

Hallo, Marcus, Du meintest am 08.06.15: you can download ufdbGuard here: https://www.urlfilterdb.com/downloads/software_doc.html and here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/ufdbguard/ ufdbGuard is just like Squid free Open Source Software. The trial license on www.urlfilterdb.com

Re: [squid-users] squidGuard configuration test - echo test

Helmut, you can download ufdbGuard here: https://www.urlfilterdb.com/downloads/software_doc.html and here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/ufdbguard/ ufdbGuard is just like Squid free Open Source Software. The trial license on www.urlfilterdb.com is about the URL database. Best regards,

Re: [squid-users] squidGuard configuration test - echo test

On 8/06/2015 5:20 a.m., Jose Julian Buda wrote: On 2015-06-07 12:15, Helmut Hullen wrote: Hallo, Marcus, Du meintest am 07.06.15: Hi, i have installed squidGuard 1.5 on Debian Jessie and i need an user based filter, made the src/dest/acl setting and then test with : echo http

Re: [squid-users] squidGuard configuration test - echo test

Hallo, Amos, Du meintest am 08.06.15: The URL director interface was changed with Squid 3.4, see also http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/Redirectors The latest version of squidguard is 1.5 beta from 2010 and squidGuard does not support the new interface of Squid. [...] That wiki page

Re: [squid-users] squidGuard configuration test - echo test

Hallo, Amos, Du meintest am 08.06.15: Under squid 3.4 (and many earlier versions) I use url_rewrite_program /usr/bin/squidGuard How must I change this line for squid 3.5? You should not have to change the SG command line or configuration. Ok! Whats needed is a patch from

Re: [squid-users] squidGuard configuration test - echo test

Hallo, Marcus, Du meintest am 07.06.15: The URL director interface was changed with Squid 3.4, see also http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/RedirectorsThe latest version of squidguard is 1.5 beta from 2010 and squidGuard does not support the new interface of Squid. ufdbGuard is also a URL

Re: [squid-users] squidGuard configuration test - echo test

On 8/06/2015 8:38 p.m., Helmut Hullen wrote: Hallo, Amos, Du meintest am 08.06.15: The URL director interface was changed with Squid 3.4, see also http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/Redirectors The latest version of squidguard is 1.5 beta from 2010 and squidGuard does not support the

Re: [squid-users] squidGuard configuration test - echo test

We switched to ufdbGuard recently and were a bit confused on that point as well. But see: https://www.urlfilterdb.com/products/ufdbguard.html ufdbGuard is copyright-protected, but free for use. Also in commercial environments. The pricing page and licensing model you have linked is only for

Re: [squid-users] squidGuard configuration test - echo test

On 2015-06-07 12:15, Helmut Hullen wrote: Hallo, Marcus, Du meintest am 07.06.15: Hi, i have installed squidGuard 1.5 on Debian Jessie and i need an user based filter, made the src/dest/acl setting and then test with : echo http://www.testsite.com 192.168.0.82/ someuserfromauth GET

Re: [squid-users] squidGuard configuration test - echo test

/squidguard_1.5-4_squidguard.README.Debian for another hand, ufdbGuard is not on the debian repository my question is what mean this lines when i run the echo test. . 2015-06-07 00:08:44 [3359] INFO: squidGuard 1.5 started (1433646524.285) 2015-06-07 00:08:44 [3359] INFO: squidGuard ready

Re: [squid-users] squidGuard configuration test - echo test

Hallo, Marcus, Du meintest am 07.06.15: Hi, i have installed squidGuard 1.5 on Debian Jessie and i need an user based filter, made the src/dest/acl setting and then test with : echo http://www.testsite.com 192.168.0.82/ someuserfromauth GET | squidGuard -d The URL director interface

[squid-users] squidGuard configuration test - echo test

Hi, i have installed squidGuard 1.5 on Debian Jessie and i need an user based filter, made the src/dest/acl setting and then test with : echo http://www.testsite.com 192.168.0.82/ someuserfromauth GET | squidGuard -d .. 2015-06-07 00:08:44 [3359] INFO: squidGuard 1.5 started

Re: [squid-users] squidGuard configuration test - echo test

squiddGuard to ufdbGuard. Marcus On 06/07/2015 07:57 AM, Jose Julian Buda wrote: Hi, i have installed squidGuard 1.5 on Debian Jessie and i need an user based filter, made the src/dest/acl setting and then test with : echo http://www.testsite.com 192.168.0.82/ someuserfromauth GET | squidGuard -d

[squid-users] R: Re: [squid-users] to test multiple http access

For axample I'd like simulate from my Windows client, at the same time about 20-30 http requests to different sites to understand the Squid behaviour. With these tools ? Messaggio originale Da: squ...@treenet.co.nz Data: 29-mag-2014 5.16 A: Ogg: Re: [squid-users] to test multiple

[squid-users] to test multiple http access

I'd like to simulate several http access requests before to put into production my new squid server, do you know way to test before to connect server to network ?

Re: [squid-users] to test multiple http access

On 29/05/2014 4:05 a.m., Riccardo Castellani wrote: I'd like to simulate several http access requests before to put into production my new squid server, do you know way to test before to connect server to network ? * Connect your browser to it. * squidclient * ApacheBench * Web Polygraph

[squid-users] Test 1. Please disregard.

This is a test message verifying report of squid-announce issues.

[squid-users] Test 2. Please disregard

This is a test message verifying report of squid-announce issues.

Re: [squid-users] Please help test a streaming problem through squid

On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 05:14:41PM +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: On 8/11/2012 4:33 p.m., Peter Olsson wrote: Hello! We run squid as a caching proxy. No transparency or intercept in any form, and the only way out is through the squid proxy server. Web browsers use either wpad or

Re: [squid-users] Please help test a streaming problem through squid

On 11/8/2012 1:40 PM, Peter Olsson wrote: I'm sorry, I don't know much about streaming, but their requirement for playing the streams is Adobe Flash. And the commercial part which works is played in the same plugin player as the main part which doesn't work. Maybe I'm using the word stream in

Re: [squid-users] Please help test a streaming problem through squid

On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 02:06:46PM +0200, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: On 11/8/2012 1:40 PM, Peter Olsson wrote: I'm sorry, I don't know much about streaming, but their requirement for playing the streams is Adobe Flash. And the commercial part which works is played in the same plugin player

Re: [squid-users] Please help test a streaming problem through squid

On 11/8/2012 2:13 PM, Peter Olsson wrote: But why is the commercial part working in the same plugin? Flash web clips work fine behind proxy for these commercials, and also for complete video clips on other webs. Sorry I cant answer you yet since I dont have data on it. If you are willing to

Re: [squid-users] Please help test a streaming problem through squid

On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 02:44:17PM +0200, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: On 11/8/2012 2:13 PM, Peter Olsson wrote: But why is the commercial part working in the same plugin? Flash web clips work fine behind proxy for these commercials, and also for complete video clips on other webs. Sorry I cant

Re: [squid-users] Please help test a streaming problem through squid

On 11/8/2012 2:53 PM, Peter Olsson wrote: Thanks, I will set this up later. I assume that the outside of the proxy is the most interesting to capture? From the client to the proxy\router. Regards, Eliezer -- Eliezer Croitoru https://www1.ngtech.co.il IT consulting for Nonprofit organizations

[squid-users] Please help test a streaming problem through squid

Hello! We run squid as a caching proxy. No transparency or intercept in any form, and the only way out is through the squid proxy server. Web browsers use either wpad or hardcoded proxy configuration. Streams from www.dn.se/webbtv don't work. The commercial part first in every stream works fine,

Re: [squid-users] Please help test a streaming problem through squid

On 8/11/2012 4:33 p.m., Peter Olsson wrote: Hello! We run squid as a caching proxy. No transparency or intercept in any form, and the only way out is through the squid proxy server. Web browsers use either wpad or hardcoded proxy configuration. Streams from www.dn.se/webbtv don't work. The

Re: [squid-users] Error to test connectivity to internal MS Exchange server

On 23/05/2012 10:08 a.m., Ruiyuan Jiang wrote: Hi, all I am trying to setup MS webmail over rpc Exchange server access through squid (squid 3.1.19, SPARC, Solaris 10) from internet. Here is my pilot squid configuration (squid.conf): https_port 156.146.2.196:443 accel

[squid-users] Error to test connectivity to internal MS Exchange server

Hi, all I am trying to setup MS webmail over rpc Exchange server access through squid (squid 3.1.19, SPARC, Solaris 10) from internet. Here is my pilot squid configuration (squid.conf): https_port 156.146.2.196:443 accel cert=/opt/squid-3.1.19/ssl.crt/webmail_juicycouture_com.crt

[squid-users] Re: Unable to test HTTP PUT-based file upload via Squid Proxy

Thanks, Amos. -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Unable-to-test-HTTP-PUT-based-file-upload-via-Squid-Proxy-tp4634404p4641518.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[squid-users] Re: Unable to test HTTP PUT-based file upload via Squid Proxy

see, there was no output this time. Would appreciate if you or someone could tell me what I'm doing wrong here. Regards, /HS -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Unable-to-test-HTTP-PUT-based-file-upload-via-Squid-Proxy-tp4634404p4642584.html Sent

[squid-users] Unable to test HTTP PUT-based file upload via Squid Proxy

. Posting it here, in case people on StackOverflow are seeing this as a non-programming question and not taking interest.* Regards, /HS [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10568655/unable-to-test-http-put-based-file-upload-via-squid-proxy

Re: [squid-users] Unable to test HTTP PUT-based file upload via Squid Proxy

On 16.05.2012 00:39, Harry Simons wrote: snip **Request:** PUT http://WEB-SERVER/upload/sample.put HTTP/1.1 User-Agent: curl/7.15.5 (i686-redhat-linux-gnu) libcurl/7.15.5 OpenSSL/0.9.8b zlib/1.2.3 libidn/0.6.5 Host: WEB-SERVER Pragma: no-cache Accept: */*

Re: [squid-users] Prefetch patch test

Hallo, anita.sivakumar, Du meintest am 16.02.12: Sorry Amos. But where else do I post this ? I thought I can mail it to this mail id squid-users@squid-cache.org. But if there is some other place, please let me know. [full quote deleted - don't top post, please, don't full quote, please] The

Re: [squid-users] Prefetch patch test

Before we start. Please do not hijack other topics discussions. It ruins the groups archive threading and threaded mailer tools many of us use to track the group mail. Thank you. On 15/02/2012 5:24 p.m., anita.sivakumar wrote: Hi, Has anyone used and tested the squid prefetch patch available

RE: [squid-users] Prefetch patch test

-users@squid-cache.org Subject: Re: [squid-users] Prefetch patch test Before we start. Please do not hijack other topics discussions. It ruins the groups archive threading and threaded mailer tools many of us use to track the group mail. Thank you. On 15/02/2012 5:24 p.m., anita.sivakumar wrote: Hi

[squid-users] Prefetch patch test

Hi, Has anyone used and tested the squid prefetch patch available in the squid website? For me it apparently gave a segmentation fault when I tried to prefetch. It works normally for other requests though. I had integrated squid 3.1.16 with the prefetch patch. My test file: I have a pf1.html

[squid-users] test

sorry

[squid-users] any badly broken webserver to test corner cases?

I was wondering what Squid developers use to test the proxy (or generally, any other software which core usage is interacting with web servers, like a web browser)? Is there any badly broken webserver out there, which could be used to test corner case Squid usage? I mean broken by design

Re: [squid-users] any badly broken webserver to test corner cases?

On 28/06/11 23:32, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: I was wondering what Squid developers use to test the proxy (or generally, any other software which core usage is interacting with web servers, like a web browser)? You had probably as the developers that. They/we hang out on the squid-dev mailing

Re: [squid-users] Can squid test whether a redirect target is up?

On 2011-03-22 17:25, Amos Jeffries wrote: Thepreferred alternative is cache_peer link(s) to the origin server(s) or app(s). Squid 'tests these during each connection setup and can failover between several of them or 'DIRECT' Internet DNS details as needed. Usage is detailed under

Re: [squid-users] Can squid test whether a redirect target is up?

On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:27:16 -0400, David Guertin wrote: On 2011-03-22 17:25, Amos Jeffries wrote: Thepreferred alternative is cache_peer link(s) to the origin server(s) or app(s). Squid 'tests these during each connection setup and can failover between several of them or 'DIRECT' Internet DNS

Re: [squid-users] Can squid test whether a redirect target is up?

choice. Redirectors only pass a URL to Squid to inform the client to try there. It is up to the redirector to test Thanks for the help. I've been sort of been coming to this conclusion as I learn my way around Squid. It looks like your reply was cut off. What would be a better alternate strategy

Re: [squid-users] Can squid test whether a redirect target is up?

be a better choice? Using a redirector for this is not a good choice. Redirectors only pass a URL to Squid to inform the client to try there. It is up to the redirector to test Thanks for the help. I've been sort of been coming to this conclusion as I learn my way around Squid. It looks like your reply

[squid-users] Can squid test whether a redirect target is up?

Hello, One of our remote web sites has a habit of going offline frequently. I am trying to configure squid to act as a proxy for this site so that if the site is down, the browser gets redirected to an alternate page instead of getting a generic server error page. I have configured squid

Re: [squid-users] Can squid test whether a redirect target is up?

this? Is squid the correct tool for this? Would a different redirector that squidGuard be a better choice? Using a redirector for this is not a good choice. Redirectors only pass a URL to Squid to inform the client to try there. It is up to the redirector to test

[squid-users] test post ::please delete::

testing for bounces -j

[squid-users] ANN: stress test tool

Hi all, I've just deployed a few squid boxes. Had an unusual requirement - each box is to handle 1000 connections (not requests) per second. Also had some 173 millions urls taken from access logs. Couldn't find what I needed to test it, so I wrote it. So if you need to squeeze your squid

Re: [squid-users] ANN: stress test tool

On 20/10/10 01:08, Josip Almasi wrote: Hi all, I've just deployed a few squid boxes. Had an unusual requirement - each box is to handle 1000 connections (not requests) per second. Also had some 173 millions urls taken from access logs. Couldn't find what I needed to test it, so I wrote it. So

Re: [squid-users] ANN: stress test tool

Amos Jeffries wrote: On 20/10/10 01:08, Josip Almasi wrote: Hi all, I've just deployed a few squid boxes. Had an unusual requirement - each box is to handle 1000 connections (not requests) per second. Also had some 173 millions urls taken from access logs. Couldn't find what I needed to test

Re: [squid-users] how to simulate big file workload test for squid

for the testing. (Have not done this on a large scale or with web-polygraph myself) Supported directly by web-polygraph if you have a log of the workload you want to test. http://www.web-polygraph.org/docs/userman/access2poly.html If you do not have logs of the workload but a good idea of the content

[squid-users] how to simulate big file workload test for squid

Hi I want to make a workload test for squid, I want to use the tool web-polygraph which has some standard workload models. But in these workload, the content size is too small to me. Dose anyone has a modified workload with big content size or has another method to simulate big file transaction

Re: [squid-users] how to simulate big file workload test for squid

On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:27:12 +0800, du du ergod@gmail.com wrote: Hi I want to make a workload test for squid, I want to use the tool web-polygraph which has some standard workload models. But in these workload, the content size is too small to me. Dose anyone has a modified workload

[squid-users] mailer test

Sorry folks. Just testing the list server is still working. Amos -- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.3

Re: [squid-users] to Amos Jeffries,you said squid performance could be up to 300,000 rps in lab test.

wang.gao...@zte.com.cn wrote: I read this at the end of http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-users/201002/0795.html I want to use squid as a reverse proxy,so I am interested in the squid performance. Can you post a detailed result about this lab test? The test is a test about single

[squid-users] to Amos Jeffries,you said squid performance could be up to 300,000 rps in lab test.

I read this at the end of http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-users/201002/0795.html I want to use squid as a reverse proxy,so I am interested in the squid performance. Can you post a detailed result about this lab test? The test is a test about single machine or Cluster? The record

[squid-users] Extreme Slow Resposne from Squid ( Test environment only 4 users at the moment)

From the multiple instance setup using Squid 3stable25 i have shifted to squid3stable1 packaged with ubuntu 8.04 LTS.However i am unable to understand why its too much slow. Whats wrong please anybody help out.Is it something to do with Operating system? Or initially Squid runs that much slow?

[squid-users] Re: Squid 3.1.0.13 Speed Test - Upload breaks?

jay60103 wrote: I'm using Version 3.1.0.6 and speakeasy.net doesn't work for me either. Download test okay, but when it starts the upload part it fails with Upload test returned an error while trying to read the upload file. FWIW, this speed test works for me using 3.HEAD.BZR

Re: [squid-users] Re: Squid 3.1.0.13 Speed Test - Upload breaks?

Linda Walsh wrote: jay60103 wrote: I'm using Version 3.1.0.6 and speakeasy.net doesn't work for me either. Download test okay, but when it starts the upload part it fails with Upload test returned an error while trying to read the upload file. FWIW, this speed test works for me

Re: [squid-users] Re: Squid 3.1.0.13 Speed Test - Upload breaks?

: I'm using Version 3.1.0.6 and speakeasy.net doesn't work for me either. Download test okay, but when it starts the upload part it fails with Upload test returned an error while trying to read the upload file. FWIW, this speed test works for me using 3.HEAD.BZR (head version

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1.0.13 Speed Test - Upload breaks?

I'm using Version 3.1.0.6 and speakeasy.net doesn't work for me either. Download test okay, but when it starts the upload part it fails with Upload test returned an error while trying to read the upload file. http://bigcartel.com fails also. Possibly related? Adrian Chadd-3 wrote

[squid-users] QA/Test machines sought!

Hi, a few of us dev's have been working on getting a build-test environment up and running. We're still doing fine tuning on it but the basic facility is working. We'd love it if users of squid, both individuals and corporates, would consider contributing a test machine to the buildfarm

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1.0.13 Speed Test - Upload breaks?

: squid-users@squid-cache.org Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1.0.13 Speed Test - Upload breaks? Daniel skrev: Kinkie,       I'm using the default settings, so I don't have any specific max request sizes specified. I guess I'll hold out until someone else running 3.1 can test

RE: [squid-users] Squid 3.1.0.13 Speed Test - Upload breaks?

Lidström [mailto:free...@lidstrom.eu] Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 8:16 PM To: Daniel Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1.0.13 Speed Test - Upload breaks? Daniel skrev: Kinkie, I'm using the default settings, so I don't have any specific max request sizes

RE: [squid-users] Squid 3.1.0.13 Speed Test - Upload breaks?

Kinkie, I'm using the default settings, so I don't have any specific max request sizes specified. I guess I'll hold out until someone else running 3.1 can test this. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Kinkie [mailto:gkin...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 6:44 AM

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1.0.13 Speed Test - Upload breaks?

Daniel skrev: Kinkie, I'm using the default settings, so I don't have any specific max request sizes specified. I guess I'll hold out until someone else running 3.1 can test this. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Kinkie [mailto:gkin...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, August 08

[squid-users] Re: Squid 3.1.0.13 Speed Test - Upload breaks?

On 08.08.2009, Daniel wrote: Would anyone else using Squid mind doing this same bandwidth test and seeing if they have the same issue(s)? It works flawlessly using both 2.7-STABLE6 and 3.0-STABLE18 here.

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1.0.13 Speed Test - Upload breaks?

Maybe the failure could depend on some specific settings, such as max request size? On 8/8/09, Heinz Diehl h...@fancy-poultry.org wrote: On 08.08.2009, Daniel wrote: Would anyone else using Squid mind doing this same bandwidth test and seeing if they have the same issue(s)? It works

  1   2   >