Re: [Standards] Missing point in XEP-0115: Entity Capabilities ?

Hi, no feedback on this? Noone is interested? :-( On the same XEP, I have other interrogations/remarks. Aren't section 6.2 Discovering Capabilities and 7. Determining Support nearly the same? I understand that the separation is mostly to make the difference between the case where there is a

Re: [Standards] XEP-0060: Example 89. Publisher publishes an item with an ItemID

Hi, wasn't the 3 points I raised in my 2 emails about pubsub not consistent enough? I had no answer on any of these... :-/ Moreover the two points in my second email may be discussed, but it looks to me that the first email is obviously a small bug in the XEP because the title and the example

Re: [Standards] Missing point in XEP-0115: Entity Capabilities ?

Aren't section 6.2 Discovering Capabilities and 7. Determining Support nearly the same? 6.2 is about how caps information relates to the actual result of disco info. 7 describes what things you should advertise to announce your support for XEP-115. Every XEP has a section on what namespaces it

Re: [Standards] Missing point in XEP-0115: Entity Capabilities ?

On Wed Dec 10 12:59:32 2008, Jehan wrote: Hi, no feedback on this? Noone is interested? :-( On the same XEP, I have other interrogations/remarks. This message is the only one in my mailbox with this subject - maybe I'm missing your earlier one. Aren't section 6.2 Discovering

Re: [Standards] Missing point in XEP-0115: Entity Capabilities ?

Remko Tronçon;5491 Wrote: 6.2 is about how caps information relates to the actual result of disco info. 7 describes what things you should advertise to announce your support for XEP-115. Every XEP has a section on what namespaces it uses. This one is just an edge case because you can

[Standards] Seeking in file transfers

Hi, as written on the devel list, I'm thinking about adding seek support to file transfers. I'm working on media networks in my PhD thesis and a seekable stream is exactly what I need. First a small scenario why I think it is useful: I have a media server with a video file. This could either be

[Standards] inconsistency between section 7.2 - 10.2 in XEP-0136 ?

Hi, writing about XEP-0136. I't seems to me that there is an inconsistency between section 7.2 http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0136.html#manage-retrieve To request a page of messages from a collection the client sends a retrieve/ element. The 'with' and 'start' attributes specify the

Re: [Standards] option/ vs. value/ in sequence

So, can this schema snippet from http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0004.html#schema xs:element name='field' xs:complexType * xs:sequence* xs:element name='desc' minOccurs='0' type='xs:string'/ xs:element name='required' minOccurs='0' type='empty'/

Re: [Standards] Missing point in XEP-0115: Entity Capabilities ?

Hi, still about to this same XEP, during implementation, I came to a new question. In the service discovery request (the one to associate a list of features to a node), there is the node attribute. This attribute can have only a single value to be consistent: the one you set in the 'c' attribute

Re: [Standards] XEP-0060: Example 89. Publisher publishes an item with an ItemID

Hi Jehan, All of your points (in these Pubsub emails) sounded quite reasonable to me, but I'm just a fringe subscriber... I've been waiting on a number of Pubsub items too, but Peter said that he was collecting the Pubsub errata from me and would reply later, so maybe that's going on with your

Re: [Standards] Missing point in XEP-0115: Entity Capabilities ?

Hi, Hop again about this caps XEP (sorry!). in the list of disco features ( http://xmpp.org/registrar/disco-features.html ), are we supposed to have every proposed namespace? Because I don't find for instance XEP-0168: Resource Application Priority ('urn:xmpp:rap:0' and 'urn:xmpp:raproute:0')