On 28-Feb-09, at 11:49 AM, Justin Karneges wrote:
On Saturday 28 February 2009 10:59:57 Curtis King wrote:
On 28-Feb-09, at 6:10 AM, Mickael Remond wrote:
I still think requiring the full JID is the best approach as it maps
with how to locate a session in the server when sending a message
On Sat Feb 28 19:49:51 2009, Justin Karneges wrote:
Given that you can bind multiple resources in a single XMPP-Core
session, it
probably makes more sense to keep the session management before
binding. If
you resume a session, then all resources are resumed. This also
means that
the
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net wrote:
This sounds like another reason why multiple binds are just overcomplicating
the protocol.
Additions like this to core cause unforseen issues like this.
Who wants this, anyway, and why is it going into core?
I was
Dave Cridland wrote:
On Sat Feb 28 19:49:51 2009, Justin Karneges wrote:
Given that you can bind multiple resources in a single XMPP-Core
session, it
probably makes more sense to keep the session management before
binding. If
you resume a session, then all resources are resumed. This also
Hello ,
Dirk Meyer wrote:
I'm thinking of maybe having a proxy in the home network. All local
devices connect to the proxy and the proxy relays everything to the
server. In that case the proxy registers all resources from its clients
to the server. Maybe it is a stupid idea, maybe not.
The
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Dirk Meyer dme...@tzi.de wrote:
I'm thinking of maybe having a proxy in the home network. All local
devices connect to the proxy and the proxy relays everything to the
server. In that case the proxy registers all resources from its clients
to the server. Maybe
On Sun Mar 1 09:45:12 2009, Dirk Meyer wrote:
I'm thinking of maybe having a proxy in the home network. All local
devices connect to the proxy and the proxy relays everything to the
server. In that case the proxy registers all resources from its
clients
to the server. Maybe it is a stupid
Dave Cridland wrote:
On Sun Mar 1 09:45:12 2009, Dirk Meyer wrote:
I'm thinking of maybe having a proxy in the home network. All local
devices connect to the proxy and the proxy relays everything to the
server. In that case the proxy registers all resources from its
clients
to the server.