Re: [Standards] XEP-0198 suggestion (Stream management)

2009-03-01 Thread Curtis King
On 28-Feb-09, at 11:49 AM, Justin Karneges wrote: On Saturday 28 February 2009 10:59:57 Curtis King wrote: On 28-Feb-09, at 6:10 AM, Mickael Remond wrote: I still think requiring the full JID is the best approach as it maps with how to locate a session in the server when sending a message

[Standards] Multiple binds in XMPP-CORE

2009-03-01 Thread Dave Cridland
On Sat Feb 28 19:49:51 2009, Justin Karneges wrote: Given that you can bind multiple resources in a single XMPP-Core session, it probably makes more sense to keep the session management before binding. If you resume a session, then all resources are resumed. This also means that the

Re: [Standards] Multiple binds in XMPP-CORE

2009-03-01 Thread Fabio Forno
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net wrote: This sounds like another reason why multiple binds are just overcomplicating the protocol. Additions like this to core cause unforseen issues like this. Who wants this, anyway, and why is it going into core? I was

Re: [Standards] Multiple binds in XMPP-CORE

2009-03-01 Thread Dirk Meyer
Dave Cridland wrote: On Sat Feb 28 19:49:51 2009, Justin Karneges wrote: Given that you can bind multiple resources in a single XMPP-Core session, it probably makes more sense to keep the session management before binding. If you resume a session, then all resources are resumed. This also

Re: [Standards] Multiple binds in XMPP-CORE

2009-03-01 Thread Mickael Remond
Hello , Dirk Meyer wrote: I'm thinking of maybe having a proxy in the home network. All local devices connect to the proxy and the proxy relays everything to the server. In that case the proxy registers all resources from its clients to the server. Maybe it is a stupid idea, maybe not. The

Re: [Standards] Multiple binds in XMPP-CORE

2009-03-01 Thread Fabio Forno
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Dirk Meyer dme...@tzi.de wrote: I'm thinking of maybe having a proxy in the home network. All local devices connect to the proxy and the proxy relays everything to the server. In that case the proxy registers all resources from its clients to the server. Maybe

Re: [Standards] Multiple binds in XMPP-CORE

2009-03-01 Thread Dave Cridland
On Sun Mar 1 09:45:12 2009, Dirk Meyer wrote: I'm thinking of maybe having a proxy in the home network. All local devices connect to the proxy and the proxy relays everything to the server. In that case the proxy registers all resources from its clients to the server. Maybe it is a stupid

Re: [Standards] Multiple binds in XMPP-CORE

2009-03-01 Thread Dirk Meyer
Dave Cridland wrote: On Sun Mar 1 09:45:12 2009, Dirk Meyer wrote: I'm thinking of maybe having a proxy in the home network. All local devices connect to the proxy and the proxy relays everything to the server. In that case the proxy registers all resources from its clients to the server.