Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Push

2015-03-03 Thread Mickaël Rémond
Hello, On 3 Mar 2015, christian...@rechenwerk.net wrote: Then the client app hands this information over to its xmpp server using the enable-iq stanza so the xmpp server can publish push notifications when the client app is not reachable. What does it mean ? Suppose I am using MyApp on iPad

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Push

2015-03-03 Thread Mickaël Rémond
Hello, On 2 Mar 2015, edi...@xmpp.org wrote: The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP. Title: Push Abstract: This specification defines a way for an XMPP servers to broadcast information for use in push notifications to mobile and other devices. I have several

Re: [Standards] help! reviews needed in XMPP WG

2015-03-03 Thread Brian Cully
On 2-Mar-2015, at 17:54, Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net wrote: The IETF's XMPP Working Group is finishing up several documents, and reviews from folks here would be very helpful in these late stages! The documents in question are: 1. XMPP Address Format - the fundamental

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Push

2015-03-03 Thread Christian Ulrich
On 03.03.2015 16:16, Mickaël Rémond wrote: Hello, On 3 Mar 2015,christian...@rechenwerk.net wrote: Then the client app hands this information over to its xmpp server using the enable-iq stanza so the xmpp server can publish push notifications when the client app is not reachable. What does

[Standards] XEP-47 In-Band Bytestream: Why not headline messages?

2015-03-03 Thread Florian Schmaus
Is there any particular reason that xep47 does not encourage the use of 'headline' type messages for ibb? They appear to be the ideal choice, as they are not stored offline. Also § 4. should mention xep184 message delivery receipts as alternative to amp. - Florian signature.asc Description:

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Push

2015-03-03 Thread Mickaël Rémond
Hello, On 3 Mar 2015, christian...@rechenwerk.net wrote: On 03.03.2015 16:16, Mickaël Rémond wrote: Hello, On 3 Mar 2015,christian...@rechenwerk.net wrote: Then the client app hands this information over to its xmpp server using the enable-iq stanza so the xmpp server can publish push

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Push

2015-03-03 Thread Lance Stout
On Mar 2, 2015, at 4:11 PM, Christian Ulrich christian...@rechenwerk.net wrote: I started implementing an older version of the XEP [1] as an ejabberd module. It's on github [2]. Currently I'm updating it to the new version. Awesome and ^5! My implementation includes the app server

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Push

2015-03-03 Thread Christian Ulrich
On Di, 2015-03-03 at 11:23 +0100, Mickaël Rémond wrote: - Is app client really an instance of an application running on a specific device ? I thought at first the node what acting as a device registry, but, it seems it does not as a node is defined as: Each PubSub node is a delivery