> The other part this PR tries to address is to specify how clients should
> behave when they receive an error in reply to a reactions payload. I
> think that without clarification, the clients should "revert to the
> previous reaction state", but I proposed to make "empty my reactions for
> this m
> The other part this PR tries to address is to specify how clients should
> behave when they receive an error in reply to a reactions payload. I
> think that without clarification, the clients should "revert to the
> previous reaction state", but I proposed to make "empty my reactions for
> this m
Hi,
I haven't updated the pull request yet, but do you think it would OK to
have an optional, caps-cachable disco extension along the lines of:
urn:xmpp:reactions:0:restrictions
1
💘❤️💜
Besides the allowed emoji list, this would make i
-- Original Message --
From "Mathieu Pasquet"
To "Kevin Smith" ; "XMPP Standards"
Date 06/01/2023 15:44:50
Subject Re: [Standards] XEP-0444 update: restrict reactions
Hi,
On 06.01.2023 11:01, Kevin Smith wrote:
My earlier iteration of the PR did in
Hi,
On 06.01.2023 11:01, Kevin Smith wrote:
My earlier iteration of the PR did include a mechanism to fetch the available
emojis (and rules, eg 1 emoji per reacter per message), but after discussion
with Marvin (author), we decided that it's a bad idea, since, as you said, most
instances are
-- Original Message --
From "Nicolas Cedilnik"
To standards@xmpp.org
Date 06/01/2023 06:12:36
Subject Re: [Standards] XEP-0444 update: restrict reactions
Thanks for the feedback.
I suspect that in most instances, you're happy to accept any reactions, and
fo
Thanks for the feedback.
I suspect that in most instances, you're happy to accept any
reactions, and forcing a poll of available ones before that would be
unhelpful,
My earlier iteration of the PR did include a mechanism to fetch the
available emojis (and rules, eg 1 emoji per reacter per messa
-- Original Message --
From "Nicolas Cedilnik"
To standards@xmpp.org
Date 30/12/2022 13:25:25
Subject [Standards] XEP-0444 update: restrict reactions
Hello all,
About https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1249
My main reason for submitting a patch to this XEP is that most ot
Hello all,
About https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1249
My main reason for submitting a patch to this XEP is that most other
walled garden IM networks are not as permissive when it comes to emoji
reactions: most only allow 1 emoji per message per "reacter", some
restrict the available emojis t
