[jira] Commented: (STDCXX-364) [gcc/Linux] std::tm not declared in

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12483014 ] Mark Brown commented on STDCXX-364: --- I get the same error with gcc 3.4.4 on Cygwin. > [gcc/Linux] std::tm not decl

[jira] Commented: (STDCXX-351) [gcc 3.4.6] error on static const int expression as an array dimension in template code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12483012 ] Mark Brown commented on STDCXX-351: --- The test compiles now so your change must have fixed it. > [gcc 3.4.6] error

Re: [PATCH] Re: new container member functions cbegin() and cend()

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:12:57 -0600 > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: new container member functions cbegin() and > cend() > > Sorry for dropping the ball on reviewing this patch. > > The changes look good t

Re: [VOTE] Re: regression test suite naming convention

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 09:56:30 -0600 > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: regression test suite naming convention > > If we constrain ourselves to the proposed options, my vote is for Option > 2. The reason for t

[jira] Closed: (STDCXX-351) [gcc 3.4.6] error on static const int expression as an array dimension in template code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Martin Sebor closed STDCXX-351. --- Rats, this is a compiler bug, not a bug in the test as I thought. Oh well, it's also fixed in later vers

[jira] Resolved: (STDCXX-351) [gcc 3.4.6] error on static const int expression as an array dimension in template code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Martin Sebor resolved STDCXX-351. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 4.2 I'll set the status of this to Resolved/Fixed. If I d

[jira] Assigned: (STDCXX-351) [gcc 3.4.6] error on static const int expression as an array dimension in template code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Martin Sebor reassigned STDCXX-351: --- Assignee: Martin Sebor > [gcc 3.4.6] error on static const int expression as an array dimensi

Re: [PATCH] Re: new container member functions cbegin() and cend()

Sorry for dropping the ball on reviewing this patch. The changes look good to me. The two things that are missing and that we can't commit the patch without are: 1) tests and 2) a ChangeLog entry. We haven't ported all the container tests to the new driver so you won't be able to simply enhance

Re: svn commit: r515332 - in /incubator/stdcxx/trunk: etc/config/GNUmakefile.tst tests/src/driver.cpp util/output.cpp

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: ablack Date: Tue Mar 6 14:38:21 2007 New Revision: 515332 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=515332 Log: 2007-03-05 Andrew Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * tests/src/driver.cpp (_rw_setopt_output_file): Add logic to treat the magic file name of '-'

[jira] Commented: (STDCXX-361) [icc 9.1.042] hangs compiling conditional initialization in template code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12482906 ] Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-361: - We should still work around the bug in the test. We can't assume that ever

Re: [VOTE] Re: regression test suite naming convention

Farid Zaripov wrote: -Original Message- From: Andrew Black [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 5:57 PM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: regression test suite naming convention If we constrain ourselves to the proposed options, my vote is

RE: [VOTE] Re: regression test suite naming convention

> -Original Message- > From: Andrew Black [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 5:57 PM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: regression test suite naming convention > > If we constrain ourselves to the proposed options, my vote is > for Op

Re: [VOTE] Re: regression test suite naming convention

Liviu Nicoara wrote: FWIW, option 3 makes more sense to me. It could be enhanced though in the light of Martin's reply to Mark: some tests do not cleanly apply to a section. In which case option 3 can be enhanced to place such tests in the regress dir w/o a section number. I would agree with

Re: [VOTE] Re: regression test suite naming convention

FWIW, option 3 makes more sense to me. It could be enhanced though in the light of Martin's reply to Mark: some tests do not cleanly apply to a section. In which case option 3 can be enhanced to place such tests in the regress dir w/o a section number. Liviu Andrew Black wrote: If we constra

RE: [VOTE] Re: regression test suite naming convention

Option 3 sounds better, if option 3 is allowed. Otherwise option 2. Yu (Scott) Zhong -Original Message- From: Andrew Black [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 9:57 AM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: regression test suite naming conventi

Re: [VOTE] Re: regression test suite naming convention

If we constrain ourselves to the proposed options, my vote is for Option 2. The reason for this vote is because it allows us to more easily determine what regression tests need to be run for a particular change. If we don't constrain ourselves to the proposed options, I wish to put forward an

[VOTE] Re: regression test suite naming convention

I'm not hearing any yay's or nay's on the proposed convention so how about a vote to practice our consensus building skills? Everyone is encouraged to vote, including non-committers. Option 1: Put all regression tests in tests/regress/, naming each as follows: tests/regress/stdcxx-.cpp Opt