Martin Sebor wrote:
Hey everyone,
Marc Betz has been working on the improvements to the stdcxx
documentation outlined in STDCXX-391. Most of them are pretty
straightforward and can, IMO, be implemented without much
debate (although feedback is always appreciated :) but there
is one that I think
std::filebuf::overflow(EOF) writes EOF to file in unbuffered mode
-
Key: STDCXX-522
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-522
Project: C++ Standard Library
Issue Typ
Travis Vitek wrote:
Martin,
I'm not sure if you're aware, but I don't believe that the destructors
for stack objects inside the C functions will be called. I know that
this is the case for MSVC7/8. This isn't an issue for your testcase, but
it may be an issue for the functions invoked by __rw_on
Travis Vitek wrote:
Attached is a patch to enhance the money_put, num_put and time_put facet mt
tests. Threads verify that the values put compare equal to those put in the
primary thread. Also includes change to rw_locale() so that the C
locale can always appear at the front of the locale list.
Sorry, I should clarify that. Destructors for stack objects in C
functions aren't called when an exception is thrown. Testcase...
C:\>(type t.cpp) && (cl /nologo /EHsc t.cpp)
struct Object
{
static int counter;
Object() {
Object::counter += 1;
}
~Object() {
Object:
Martin,
I'm not sure if you're aware, but I don't believe that the destructors
for stack objects inside the C functions will be called. I know that
this is the case for MSVC7/8. This isn't an issue for your testcase, but
it may be an issue for the functions invoked by __rw_once.
I think this is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor closed STDCXX-482.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Nightly tests indicate that the problem has been resolved.
> [Sun C++ 5.9] LIMITS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-482:
Affects Version/s: (was: 4.2)
trunk
Fix Version/s: trunk
4.1.3 d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor closed STDCXX-470.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.2
Nightly build results confirm that the patch fixed it.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-470:
Affects Version/s: (was: 4.2)
4.1.3
I suspect (but haven't actually conf
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor reassigned STDCXX-470:
---
Assignee: Martin Sebor
> [Sun C++/Solaris/AMD64] BUILDMODE=wide has no effect
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-521:
Affects Version/s: (was: 4.2)
trunk
> [gcc/GNU make 3.79.1] linker error
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor closed STDCXX-521.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: trunk
Builds from last night indicate that the the problem ha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12519754
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-504:
-
I looked at one of the HTML files in the attachment and noticed that the n
Martin Sebor wrote:
[...]
I expanded the .zip file containing a mock-up of Marc's proposed
changes and put it up on my home page:
http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx-506/
We're looking for feedback on the changes, positive or negative,
as well as suggestions for additional improvements.
To
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eric Lemings updated STDCXX-260:
Attachment: configure.out
For ease of reference, the attached file contains the help/usage message
Just a couple of high-level comments:
Unless you're posting a preview of your changes please submit
patches with diffs (in a unified diff format) against the latest
files on trunk.
When posting previews, it would make it easier if you could post
them live on your own publicly accessible web site
Hey everyone,
Marc Betz has been working on the improvements to the stdcxx
documentation outlined in STDCXX-391. Most of them are pretty
straightforward and can, IMO, be implemented without much
debate (although feedback is always appreciated :) but there
is one that I think we need input on from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor reassigned STDCXX-504:
---
Assignee: Marc Betz
Assigned to Marc.
Marc: please attach diffs against the original files i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12519744
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-505:
-
I think we might want to retain Rogue Wave people that actually worked on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: faridz
Date: Sun Aug 12 18:47:17 2007
New Revision: 565221
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=565221
Log:
2007-08-13 Farid Zaripov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* char.cpp (rw_widen): Don't write after end of dst.
Why not? I.e., what was wrong with t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor reassigned STDCXX-516:
---
Assignee: Farid Zaripov
Assigning to the maintainer of the Windows infrastructure.
> Rename
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor reassigned STDCXX-260:
---
Assignee: Martin Sebor (was: Farid Zaripov)
Rats! I meant to assign this to myself and STDCX
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12519734
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-516:
-
This makes sense to me, although I think we want to hold off on renaming i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor reassigned STDCXX-260:
---
Assignee: Farid Zaripov
Assigning to Farid, the maintainer of the Windows infrastructure.
>
This isn't the reason for STDCXX-515, is it?
Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: faridz
Date: Thu Aug 9 07:21:44 2007
New Revision: 564213
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=564213
Log:
2007-08-09 Farid Zaripov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
STDCXX-514
* sstream.cc (str)
Thanks for pointing it out! I noticed it too when I tested the change
on Windows but I haven't decided how to deal with it yet. Compilers
often assume that functions with C linkage don't throw exceptions and
generate code that breaks when an exception does end up being thrown.
I think MSVC is one
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: faridz
Date: Wed Jun 6 06:03:48 2007
New Revision: 544831
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=544831
Log:
2007-06-06 Farid Zaripov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* dynatype.cpp (copy): static_cast to const T& instead of T
Why is this an improvement ov
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor reassigned STDCXX-517:
---
Assignee: Farid Zaripov
Assigned to Farid, the Windows infrastructure maintainer.
> No requi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12519720
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-517:
-
Makes sense to me. What do you think about it, Farid?
> No required optio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: faridz
Date: Fri Aug 10 10:48:01 2007
New Revision: 564694
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=564694
Log:
2007-08-10 Farid Zaripov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* exec.cpp (fttoull) [_WIN32]: New function to convert from
FILETIME to ULONGLONG.
Farid Zaripov wrote:
Below is the patch for fix STDCXX-515.
ChangeLog:
* sstream.cc (xsputn): Correct write position after growing the
buffer.
Why do we need to do it in xsputn()? Isn't str() supposed to keep
pptr() at the right offset after growing the buffer?
Martin
Index: sstream.
mark.g.brown wrote:
Hi,
I have been working on a fix for STDCXX-493. The attached patch tries to
improve both the const_pointer and string overloads but makes no attempt
to do anything with the value_type overload. I was successful in making
the const_pointer overload run faster (about 6 times f
Travis Vitek wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
+#define countof(x) (sizeof (x) / sizeof (*x))
Since you seem to like it so much ;-) we might as well move this
macro to some central test suite header (and rename it according
to the naming convention).
I'd love to, provided that we can define the n
34 matches
Mail list logo
