lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 4:36 PM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [RFC] Apache "look and feel" for stdcxx docs
>From: Marc Betz
>Subject: RE: [RFC] Apache "look and feel" for stdcxx docs
>
>No, that's all for now
>From: Marc Betz
>Subject: RE: [RFC] Apache "look and feel" for stdcxx docs
>
>No, that's all for now. I wanted to get these changes reviewed and
>checked in before starting the more substantive text changes.
I don't understand why these changes have to be i
x-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Apache "look and feel" for stdcxx docs
Marc Betz wrote:
> I'd be pleased as punch to expand the zip file if I could figure out
> how to do that. If there is a way on google pages, I haven't found it.
For whatever it's worth,
the Welcome! page. Or is there anything else?
-- Mark
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 9:13 AM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Apache "look and feel" for stdcxx docs
Marc,
Before I resp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 9:13 AM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Apache "look and feel" for stdcxx docs
Marc,
Before I respond to your points below, let me suggest that you might
want to follow Mark's example and expand the .zip
apache.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Apache "look and feel" for stdcxx docs
Marc,
Before I respond to your points below, let me suggest that you might
want to follow Mark's example and expand the .zip file so that people
can easily preview your changes on your page without having to download
On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 9:41 PM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Apache "look and feel" for stdcxx docs
Liviu Nicoara wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
Liviu Nicoara wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
Which list? Is there any project that
t: Re: [RFC] Apache "look and feel" for stdcxx docs
Liviu Nicoara wrote:
> Martin Sebor wrote:
>> Liviu Nicoara wrote:
>>> Martin Sebor wrote:
>> Which list? Is there any project that you liked in particular?
>
> http://directory.apache.org the most.
You m
Liviu Nicoara wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
Liviu Nicoara wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
Which list? Is there any project that you liked in particular?
http://directory.apache.org the most.
You mean the top banner? I like it okay but I like some others better.
If I had to pick one it would probab
Martin Sebor wrote:
Liviu Nicoara wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
Which list? Is there any project that you liked in particular?
http://directory.apache.org the most.
FWIW, I like the Web interface to the Standard C++ Library
documentation for IBM XLC/C++ 9.0, especially the expandable
navigati
Liviu Nicoara wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
Hey everyone,
Marc Betz has been working on the improvements to the stdcxx
documentation outlined in STDCXX-391. Most of them are pretty
straightforward and can, IMO, be implemented without much
debate (although feedback is always appreciated :) but ther
mark.g.brown wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
Hey everyone,
Marc Betz has been working on the improvements to the stdcxx
documentation outlined in STDCXX-391. Most of them are pretty
straightforward and can, IMO, be implemented without much
debate (although feedback is always appreciated :) but there
Martin Sebor wrote:
Hey everyone,
Marc Betz has been working on the improvements to the stdcxx
documentation outlined in STDCXX-391. Most of them are pretty
straightforward and can, IMO, be implemented without much
debate (although feedback is always appreciated :) but there
is one that I think
Martin Sebor wrote:
Hey everyone,
Marc Betz has been working on the improvements to the stdcxx
documentation outlined in STDCXX-391. Most of them are pretty
straightforward and can, IMO, be implemented without much
debate (although feedback is always appreciated :) but there
is one that I think
Martin Sebor wrote:
[...]
I expanded the .zip file containing a mock-up of Marc's proposed
changes and put it up on my home page:
http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx-506/
We're looking for feedback on the changes, positive or negative,
as well as suggestions for additional improvements.
To
Hey everyone,
Marc Betz has been working on the improvements to the stdcxx
documentation outlined in STDCXX-391. Most of them are pretty
straightforward and can, IMO, be implemented without much
debate (although feedback is always appreciated :) but there
is one that I think we need input on from
16 matches
Mail list logo