DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15657] New: - NotSerializableException while trying to write byte data in ServletOutputStream from Action Class

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/resources powered.xml

jmitchell2002/12/24 22:25:04 Modified:doc/resources powered.xml Log: Removing Povoglie, cannot find reference anywhere to Struts, or even Apache. If I'm wrong, please resubmit with correct link. Revision ChangesPath 1.10 +0 -1 jakarta-struts/doc/resources/p

Re: LookupDispatchAction with ImageButtonBean

I think Ted's FindForwardAction (this is in the Scaffold codebase, I assume, and also in his book) is the right answer for dealing with image buttons *and* text buttons together. In fact, this is really the solution that I think beats LookupDispatchAction - although it makes extra mappings and

Re: modifying the mapping input path during validation

Ted Husted wrote: > My first suggestion would be try not to think in terms of request > parameters and try to think in terms of ActionForm properties. > Generally, all the request parameters should be represented as > ActionForm properties. Struts will then take care of automatically > populating t

Re: modifying the mapping input path during validation

Erik Hatcher wrote: > Yes, but only if you tell your action mapping the form bean associated > with it, and from what you showed above, you don't. yep, that was silly eh? i hadn't even considered that the form could be shared across actions like that. i was certain that you guys would have alread

LookupDispatchAction with ImageButtonBean

is there any possible way for LookupDispatchAction and ImageButtonBean to work together? since elements don't send a proper value, but simply coordinates, LDA's standard mechanism for choosing an action method based on a single parameter doesn't work. furthermore, if you're using multiple ImageBu

[OT] Merry Xmas. Kwanza, Navidad, Weihnacht

This is Peter Pilgrim, "live en la casa en London" Merry Christmas, Happy Kwanza, Happy Holidays, or Winter Festival, "Schoene Weihnachten", "Buena Navidad" and Bottom Solstice Interlude to everybody. Keep on moving -- Peter Pilgrim ServerSide Java Specialist My on-line resume and for interview

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan (revised)

On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Ted Husted wrote: > >http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/proposals/release-plan- > 1.1b3.html > > I would remove > > 14042 - Unknown Memory leaks with JBoss 3.x +(Tomcat/Jetty) > > as a "must have" since I don't think we can commit to curing a > problem with an "unknown" ca

Re: Fwd: typo on Struts page

On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Ted Husted wrote: > This is fixed in the current release notes, but I'm not sure if we > should rewrite history and change the archival version. The link referred to in the original message has been fixed already. Don't know who did it or when, but it's not an issue now. ;-

RE: Overloaded Setters in Form

I am trying to use overloaded methods because I am looping through XML to populate forms. I don't always know exactly which elements will be returned, so I have a "map" of the possible elements that can be returned which points to the proper property of the Form. I then use PropertyUtils.setNested

Re: Tying Up Loose Ends

What I've been doing is going to the query page, selecting all severities except enhancement - then selecting struts. I believe this is the method Martin was using, though he could tell you better - as best I can recall, that is the method to use. Ted Husted wrote: Is it not the idea that the

Re: [PROPOSED] html:link should have an "action=" option

James Turner wrote: I find I write a lot of code that uses an intermediate action to link between two web pages (this is good Struts policy in general) However, since the html:link tag has a forward= but no action=, I have to use page= and supply a URI with the ".do" extension at the end, rather

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan (revised)

James Mitchell wrote: Vote: Struts 1.1b3 Release Plan [X] +1 I am in favor of the release, and HAVE HELPED support it [ ] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable tohelp support it [ ] -0 I am not in favor of the relea

Re: Tying Up Loose Ends

Is it not the idea that the computers are suppose to do the counting for us? =:0) =:0) 12/24/2002 2:45:11 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Count the non-enhancement ones :-). -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Tying Up Loose Ends

On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 14:27:11 -0500 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Tying Up Loose Ends > > Yes, but it doesn't return 14 ticke

RE: Overloaded Setters in Form

On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Edgar P. Dollin wrote: > Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 13:47:18 -0500 > From: Edgar P. Dollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Overloaded Setters in

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15196] - Bug on the RequestUtils.computeParameters using a DynaValidatorForm as map of the parameter

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Tying Up Loose Ends

Yes, but it doesn't return 14 tickets when I run it, it returns 45. -T. 12/24/2002 2:07:00 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Ted Husted wrote: > >> Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 09:17:20 -0500 >> From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: Struts De

RE: Overloaded Setters in Form

I switch between booleans and strings for actions and imbed actions into a 'generic' class. Struts currently, doesn't have a problem with this (at least in the current versions). Is there a chance this will stop working? Edgar -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additi

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc status.xml

craigmcc2002/12/24 11:23:14 Modified:doc status.xml Log: Refine the Bugzilla queries for the current bugs (under Struts 1.1) and the bugs marked for later review (under Struts 1.2), and make the text a little more obvious. Revision ChangesPath 1.19 +9 -5

Re: Tying Up Loose Ends

On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 09:17:20 -0500 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Tying Up Loose Ends > > 12/23/2002 5:31:07 PM, "Craig R. Mc

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14800] - Fix initialization bug and add size parameter to form-property

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/test/org/apache/struts/util TestRequestUtils.java

craigmcc2002/12/24 10:49:52 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/config FormPropertyConfig.java src/test/org/apache/struts/action TestDynaActionForm.java TestDynaActionFormClass.java src/test/org/apache/struts/mock MockPrincipal.java

RE: Overloaded Setters in Form

On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Carl Fyffe wrote: > Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 13:12:48 -0500 > From: Carl Fyffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Overloaded Setters in Form > > Edgar does have a point, t

RE: Overloaded Setters in Form

I think the issue is that a particular property has to have a specific type. When you start overloading methods, it becomes ambiguous. It's not even legal Java to overload on return type alone, so I'm not sure what Edgar meant about overloading the getter. It's perfectly fine, though, to have "l

RE: Overloaded Setters in Form

I am not using Introspector. I either use low level introspection (in which you can specifically set your object parameter types) or I let struts do the introspection. Perhaps your issue is just with Introspector? Edgar -Original Message- From: Carl Fyffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sen

RE: Overloaded Setters in Form

Edgar does have a point, the spec doesn't say beans *bad joke* about overloading. I gave it another go after reading (AGAIN) Craig's first post on this topic (12/14/2002) and this time, instead of using a null getter, I provided a getter for the overloaded setter. Still does not work. Introspect

RE: Overloaded Setters in Form

I have had success overloading properties and used the effect liberally. I have found that if you are consistent in your overloading, i.e. for every setter of type x supply a getter of type x as well (at least in the containers I am using) they seem to function. Based on your comments, I have a

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan (revised)

>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/proposals/release-plan- 1.1b3.html I would remove 14042 - Unknown Memory leaks with JBoss 3.x +(Tomcat/Jetty) as a "must have" since I don't think we can commit to curing a problem with an "unknown" cause in a specific container. I would add 13645 - ad

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan (revised)

+1 Cedric Martin Cooper wrote: A number of new features have been added to Struts since the 1.1 Beta 2 release, and many bugs have been fixed. Therefore, I propose that we release the tip of the main trunk in CVS as Beta 3 for a Struts 1.1 release. I have checked in a proposed release plan

Re: Tying Up Loose Ends

12/23/2002 5:31:07 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >14, counting some that are documentation related. Craig, could you please post an active link to the Bugzilla query that produces this list on the Roadmap, so that we are all on the same page. -Ted. -- To unsubscribe

Re: Overloaded Setters in Form

It's contrary to the JavaBean specification to overload the property methods (getters and setters), if that's what you are trying to do. So, it won't work, because it's not suppose to. -Ted. 12/23/2002 10:31:41 PM, Carl Fyffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Seasons greetings friends! > >I sent an

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan (revised)

On 23 Dec 2002, Martin Cooper wrote: > Vote: Struts 1.1b3 Release Plan > [X ] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am > unable tohelp support it( On Vacation) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [PROPOSED] html:link should have an "action=" option

+1 It's already in as ticket #13645 Personally, I think we should add this to the list on the release plan. It should have been int he API to begin with (like using ActionForward for inputs). My latest project uses Velocity templates, and the tools support doing this, so I am =:). I know fin

Re: Struts Tools

If the instructions on amending the build process were available, they might also be submitted to Gump, which builds a ton of JARs every day. http://gump.covalent.net/jars/latest/ The driving force behind Gump is Sam Ruby, who I've copied into this reply. If for some reason the process canno

Re: Fwd: typo on Struts page

This is fixed in the current release notes, but I'm not sure if we should rewrite history and change the archival version. 12/22/2002 9:01:19 PM, Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >FYI - Not acked. > > Pier > >Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Kris Resellmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12871] - ExceptionHandler does not obey controller inputForward rule

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [PROPOSED] html:link should have an "action=" option

Looks like Ted agrees with you: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13645 If you provide a patch, it's more likely to get done. Dave From: "James Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [PROPOSED] htm